Cancer Causes & Control

, 22:1529 | Cite as

Paternal occupational exposure to pesticides and risk of neuroblastoma among children: a meta-analysis

  • Amy Moore
  • Daniel A. Enquobahrie
Original paper



Epidemiological data relating paternal pesticide exposure in occupational settings with higher risk of neuroblastoma are inconsistent. Since most studies included a small number of cases, lack of power is a potential reason for observed inconsistencies. We conducted a meta-analysis of published studies that investigated the association of paternal occupational pesticide exposure with childhood neuroblastoma.


We identified published studies up to October 2009 on paternal pesticide exposure and neuroblastoma using online databases and extracted relative risk estimates for the association. Summary relative risk estimates were calculated using the fixed effects inverse variance weighting method. To account for heterogeneity, we used Shore-corrected confidence intervals and the random effects method. Subgroup analyses were conducted according to study design, location, and exposure ascertainment method.


The meta-analysis included seven case–control and two cohort studies with a combined total of 1,426 cases. Overall, between-study heterogeneity was low (p = 0.46), and the fixed effects, random effects, and Shore-adjusted confidence intervals were similar. The summary risk ratio was 1.07 (95% CI 0.79–1.46, two-sided p value = 0.65). Results of the subgroup meta-analyses were robustly null.


Findings from current published studies do not support an association between paternal occupational pesticide exposure and childhood neuroblastoma.


Neuroblastoma Pesticides Occupational exposure Meta-analysis 



The authors would like to thank Gloria Won for her assistance with searching Embase, Dr. Craig Steinmaus for providing Excel spreadsheets with which to perform analysis and for his editing of the draft of this paper, and Dr. William Jagust, Dr. Allan Smith, and Dr. Anneclaire De Roos for their editing of the draft of this paper. Amy Moore was supported by the Reproductive, Perinatal, and Pediatric Epidemiology Training Grant (T32 HD052462 from NICHD).

Supplementary material

10552_2011_9829_MOESM1_ESM.docx (22 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 21 kb)


  1. 1.
    Brodeur GM, Castleberry RP (1997) Neuroblastoma. In: Pizzo PA, Poplack DG (eds) Principles and practice of pediatric oncology. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, pp 761–797Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jaffe N (1976) Neuroblastoma: review of the literature and an examination of factors contributing to its enigmatic character. Cancer Treat Rev 3(2):61–82PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Maris JM, Hogarty MD, Bagatell R, Cohn SL (2007) Neuroblastoma. Lancet 369(9579):2106–2120PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zage PE, Kletzel M, Murray K et al (2008) Outcomes of the POG 9340/9341/9342 trials for children with high-risk neuroblastoma: a report from the Children’s Oncology Group. Pediatr Blood Cancer 51(6):747–753PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pearson AD, Pinkerton CR, Lewis IJ et al (2008) High-dose rapid and standard induction chemotherapy for patients aged over 1 year with stage 4 neuroblastoma: a randomized trial. Lancet Oncol 9(3):247–256PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Barrette S, Bernstein ML, Leclerc JM et al (2006) Treatment complications in children diagnosed with neuroblastoma during a screening program. J Clin Oncol 24(10):1542–1545PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yamamoto K, Ohta S, Ito E et al (2002) Marginal decrease in mortality and marked increase in incidence as a result of neuroblastoma screening at 6 months of age: cohort study in seven prefectures in Japan. J Clin Oncol 20(5):1209–1214PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schilling FH, Spix C, Berthold F et al (2002) Neuroblastoma screening at one year of age. N Engl J Med 346(14):1047–1053PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schilling FH, Spix C, Berthold F et al (2003) Children may not benefit from neuroblastoma screening at 1 year of age. Updated results of the population based controlled trial in Germany. Cancer Lett 197(1–2):19–28PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Occupational Exposures in Insecticide Application, and Some Pesticides (1991) IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans. 53:535Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Blair A, Freman LB (2009) Epidemiologic studies in agricultural populations: observations and future directions. J Agromed 14(2):125–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zahm SH, Ward MH (1998) Pesticides and childhood cancer. Environ Health Perspect 106(Suppl 3):893–908PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Infante-Rivard C, Weichenthal S (2007) Pesticides and childhood cancer: an update of Zahm and Ward’s 1998 review. J Toxicol Environ Health 10(1–2):81–99Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Infante PF, Newton WA (1975) Prenatal chlordane exposure and neuroblastoma. N Engl J Med 293(6):308PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Infante PF, Epstein SS, Newton WA (1978) Blood dyscrasias and childhood tumors and exposure to chlordane and heptachlor. Scand J Work Environ Health 4(2):137–150PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Carozza SE, Li B, Elgethun K, Whitworth R (2008) Risk of childhood cancers associated with residence in agriculturally intense areas in the United States. Environ Health Perspect 116(4):559–565PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Carozza SE, Li B, Wang Q, Horel S, Cooper S (2009) Agricultural pesticides and risk of childhood cancers. Int J Hyg Environ Health 212(2):186–195PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Daniels JL, Olshan AF, Teschke K et al (2001) Residential pesticide exposure and neuroblastoma. Epidemiology 12(1):20–27PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Daniels JL, Olshan AF, Teschke K, Hertz-Picciotto I, Savitz DA, Blatt J (2001) Comparison of assessment methods for pesticide exposure in a case-control interview study. Am J Epidemiol 153(12):1227–1232PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Michaelis J, Haaf HG, Zöllner J, Kaatsch P, Krummenauer F, Berthold F (1996) Case control study of neuroblastoma in West Germany after the chernobyl accident. Klin Padiatr 208(4):172–178PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Olsen JH, Brown P, Schulgen G, Jensen OM (1991) Parental employment at time of conception and risk of cancer in offspring. Eur J Cancer 27(8):958–965PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bunin GR, Ward E, Kramer S, Rhee CA, Meadows AT (1990) Neuroblastoma and parental occupation. Am J Epidemiol 5:776–780Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Flower KB, Hoppin JA, Lynch CF, Blair A, Knott C, Shore DL, Sandler DP (2004) Cancer risk and parental pesticide application in children of Agricultural Health Study participants. Environ Health Perspect 112(5):631–635PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kerr MA, Nasca PC, Mundt KA, Michalek AM, Baptiste MS, Mahoney MC (2000) Parental occupational exposures and risk of neuroblastoma: A case-control study (United States). Cancer Causes Control 11(7):635–643PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kristensen P, Andersen A, Irgens LM, Bye AS, Sundheim L (1996) Cancer in offspring of parents engaged in agricultural activities in Norway: Incidence and risk factors in the farm environment. Int J Cancer 65(1):39–50PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Olshan AF, DeRoos AJ, Teschke K, Neglia JP, Stram DO, Pollock BH, Castleberry RP (1999) Neuroblastoma and parental occupation. Cancer Causes Control 10(6):539–549PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pearce MS, Hammal DM, Dorak MT, McNally RJ, Parker L (2006) Paternal occupational exposure to pesticides or herbicides as risk factors for cancer in children and young adults: a case-control study from the North of England. Arch Environ Occup Health 61(3):138–144PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Schüz J, Kaletsch U, Meinert R, Kaatsch P, Spix C, Michaelis J (2001) Risk factors for neuroblastoma at different stages of disease. Results from a population-based case-control study in Germany. J Clin Epidemiol 54(7):702–709PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Spitz MR, Johnson CC (1985) Neuroblastoma and paternal occupation. A case-control analysis. Am J Epidemiol 121(6):924–929PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wilkins JR, Hundley VD (1990) Paternal occupational exposure to electromagnetic fields and neuroblastoma in offspring. Am J Epidemiol 131(6):995–1008PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Greenland S (1987) Quantitative methods in the review of epidemiologic literature. Epidemiol Rev 9:1–30PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Petitti D (1994) Statistical methods in meta-analysis. In: Meta-analysis, decision analysis, and cost effective analysis: methods for quantitative synthesis in medicine. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 94–118Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Higgins JP, Thompson SG (2002) Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med 21(11):1539–1558PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    DerSimonian R, Laird N (1986) Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 7(3):177–188PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Poole C, Greenland S (1999) Random effects meta-analysis are not always conservative. Am J Epidemiol 150(5):469–475PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Shore RE, Gardner MJ, Pannett B (1993) Ethylene oxide: an assessment of the epidemiological evidence on carcinogenicity. Br J Ind Med 50(11):971–997PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Begg CB, Mazumdar M (1994) Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics 50(4):1088–1101PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C (1997) Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 315(7109):629–634PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    StataCorp (2009) Stata statistical software: release 11. StataCorp LP, College StationGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    MacCarthy A, Bunch KJ, Fear NT, King JC, Vincent TJ, Murphy MF (2010) Paternal occupation and neuroblastoma: a case-control study based on cancer registry data for Great Britain 1962–1999. Br J Cancer 102(3):615–619PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Teschke K, Smith JC, Olshan AF (2000) Evidence of recall bias in volunteered vs. prompted responses about occupational exposures. Am J Ind Med 38(4):385–388PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Schuz J, Spector LG, Ross JA (2003) Bias in studies of parental self-reported occupational exposure and childhood cancer. Am J Epidemiol 158(7):710–716PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Curwin BD, Hein MJ, Sanderson WT et al (2007) Urinary pesticide concentrations among children, mothers and fathers living in farm and non-farm households in Iowa. Ann Occup Hyg 51(1):53–65PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EpidemiologyUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA
  2. 2.Center for Perinatal Studies, Swedish Medical CenterSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations