Advertisement

Cancer Causes & Control

, Volume 22, Issue 4, pp 631–647 | Cite as

The California Neighborhoods Data System: a new resource for examining the impact of neighborhood characteristics on cancer incidence and outcomes in populations

  • Scarlett Lin Gomez
  • Sally L. Glaser
  • Laura A. McClure
  • Sarah J. Shema
  • Melissa Kealey
  • Theresa H. M. Keegan
  • William A. Satariano
Original paper

Abstract

Research on neighborhoods and health has been growing. However, studies have not investigated the association of specific neighborhood measures, including socioeconomic and built environments, with cancer incidence or outcomes. We developed the California Neighborhoods Data System (CNDS), an integrated system of small area-level measures of socioeconomic and built environments for California, which can be readily linked to individual-level geocoded records. The CNDS includes measures such as socioeconomic status, population density, racial residential segregation, ethnic enclaves, distance to hospitals, walkable destinations, and street connectivity. Linking the CNDS to geocoded cancer patient information from the California Cancer Registry, we demonstrate the variability of CNDS measures by neighborhood socioeconomic status and predominant race/ethnicity for the 7,049 California census tracts, as well as by patient race/ethnicity. The CNDS represents an efficient and cost-effective resource for cancer epidemiology and control. It expands our ability to understand the role of neighborhoods with regard to cancer incidence and outcomes. Used in conjunction with cancer registry data, these additional contextual measures enable the type of transdisciplinary, “cells-to-society” research that is now being recognized as necessary for addressing population disparities in cancer incidence and outcomes.

Keywords

Neighborhood Socioeconomic environment Built environment Immigration Contextual factors GIS 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Ms. Jane Pham, Ms. June Kristine Winters, Mr. Andrew Hertz, and Dr. Myles Cockburn for their help with aspects of the work related to this manuscript. This study was supported by a grant from the National Cancer Institute (R03 CA117324), and by a Rapid Response Surveillance Study from the SEER program under a modification to contract N01-PC-35136 awarded to the Cancer Prevention Institute of California. The collection of cancer incidence data used in this study was supported by the California Department of Health Services as part of the statewide cancer reporting program mandated by California Health and Safety Code Section 103885; the National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program under contract N01-PC-35136 awarded to the Cancer Prevention Institute of California, contract N01-PC-35139 awarded to the University of Southern California, and contract N02-PC-15105 awarded to the Public Health Institute; and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Program of Cancer Registries, under agreement #U55/CCR921930-02 awarded to the Public Health Institute. The ideas and opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and endorsement by the State of California, Department of Health Services, the National Cancer Institute, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention or their contractors and subcontractors is not intended nor should be inferred.

References

  1. 1.
    Kaplan GA (2009) Hourglass Nation. In: School of Public Health (ed) Findings magazine. University of Michigan, FallGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jackson RJ (2003) The impact of the built environment on health: an emerging field. Am J Public Health 93(9):1382–1384PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Diez Roux AV (2003) The examination of neighborhood effects on health: conceptual and methodological issues related to the presence of multiple levels of organization. In: Kawachi I, Berkman LF (eds) Neighborhoods and Health. New York, Oxford University Press, pp 45–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Barnett E, Caspar M (2001) A definition of “social environment”. Am J Public Health 91(3):465PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Srinivasan S, O’Fallon LR, Dearry A (2003) Creating healthy communities, healthy homes, healthy people: initiating a research agenda on the built environment and public health. Am J Public Health 93(9):1446–1450PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wikipedia. Built environment. In 2010Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Krieger N, Chen JT, Waterman PD, Soobader MJ, Subramanian SV, Carson R (2003) Choosing area based socioeconomic measures to monitor social inequalities in low birth weight and childhood lead poisoning: the public health disparities geocoding project (US). J Epidemiol Community Health 57(3):186–199PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Berkman LF, Macintyre S (1997) The measurement of social class in health studies: old measures and new formulations. In: Kogevinas M, Pearce N, Susser M, Boffetta P (eds) Social inequalities and cancer. International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, pp 51–64Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Geronimus AT, Bound J (1998) Use of census-based aggregate variables to proxy for socioeconomic group: evidence from national samples. Am J Epidemiol 148(5):475–486PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Krieger N (1992) Overcoming the absence of socioeconomic data in medical records: validation and application of a census-based methodology. Am J Public Health 82(5):703–710PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Krieger N (2001) Socioeconomic data in cancer registries. Am J Public Health 91(1):156–157PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gehlert S, Rebbeck T, Lurie N, Warnecke RB, Paskett E, Goodwin J (2007) Cells to society: overcoming health disparities. In: Institute NC (ed) WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Warnecke RB, Oh A, Breen N, Gehlert S, Paskett E, Tucker KL, Lurie N, Rebbeck T, Goodwin J, Flack J, Srinivasan S, Kerner J, Heurtin-Roberts S, Abeles R, Tyson FL, Patmios G, Hiatt RA (2008) Approaching health disparities from a population perspective: the National Institutes of Health Centers for Population Health and Health Disparities. Am J Public Health 98(9):1608–1615PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Krieger N, Fee E (1994) Social class: the missing link in US health data. Int J Health Serv 24(1):25–44PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Haan M, Kaplan GA, Camacho T (1987) Poverty and health. Prospective evidence from the Alameda County study. Am J Epidemiol 125(6):989–998PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Subramanian SV, Chen JT, Rehkopf DH, Waterman PD, Krieger N (2006) Comparing individual- and area-based socioeconomic measures for the surveillance of health disparities: a multilevel analysis of Massachusetts births, 1989–1991. Am J Epidemiol 164(9):823–834PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Winkleby M, Cubbin C, Ahn D (2006) Effect of cross-level interaction between individual and neighborhood socioeconomic status on adult mortality rates. Am J Public Health 96(12):2145–2153PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Winkleby MA, Cubbin C (2003) Influence of individual and neighbourhood socioeconomic status on mortality among black, Mexican-American, and white women and men in the United States. J Epidemiol Community Health 57(6):444–452PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yen IH, Kaplan GA (1999) Neighborhood social environment and risk of death: multilevel evidence from the Alameda County Study. Am J Epidemiol 149(10):898–907PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Diez Roux AV (2001) Investigating neighborhood and area effects on health. Am J Public Health 91(11):1783–1789PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Diez Roux AV (2004) The study of group-level factors in epidemiology: rethinking variables, study designs, and analytical approaches. Epidemiol Rev 26:104–111PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Diez Roux AV (2004) Estimating neighborhood health effects: the challenges of causal inference in a complex world. Soc Sci Med 58(10):1953–1960PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Boardman JD (2004) Stress and physical health: the role of neighborhoods as mediating and moderating mechanisms. Soc Sci Med 58:2473–2483PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Feldman PJ, Steptoe A (2004) How neighborhoods and physical functioning are related: the roles of neighborhood socioeconomic status, perceived neighborhood strain, and individual health risk factors. Ann Behav Med 27(2):91–99PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Foster S, Giles-Corti B (2008) The built environment, neighborhood crime and constrained physical activity: an exploration of inconsistent findings. Prev Med 47(3):241–251PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Leyden KM (2003) Social capital and the built environment: the importance of walkable neighborhoods. Am J Public Health 93(9):1546–1551PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Subramanian SV (2004) The relevance of multilevel statistical methods for identifying causal neighborhood effects. Soc Sci Med 58(10):1961–1967PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sampson RJ (2003) Neighborhood-level context and health: lessons from sociology. In: KawachiI BLe (ed) Neighborhoods and health. New York, Oxford University Press, pp 132–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kawachi I, Berkman LF (2003) Neighborhoods and health. Oxford University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lurie N, Dubowitz T (2007) Health disparities and access to health. JAMA 297(10):1118–1121PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Williams DR, Collins C (2001) Racial residential segregation: a fundamental cause of racial disparities in health. Public Health Rep 116:404–416PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Glaser SL, Clarke CA, Gomez SL, O’Malley CD, Purdie DM, West DW (2005) Cancer surveillance research: a vital subdiscipline of cancer epidemiology. Cancer Causes Control 16:1009–1019PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Howe HL, Edwards BK, Young JL, Shen T, West DW, Hutton M, Correa CN (2003) A vision for cancer incidence surveillance in the United States. Cancer Causes Control 14(7):663–672PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Potosky AL, Riley GF, Lubitz JD, Mentnech RM, Kessler LG (1993) Potential for cancer related health services research using a linked Medicare-tumor registry database. Med Care 31(8):732–748PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Warren JL, Klabunde CN, Schrag D, Bach PB, Riley GF (2002) Overview of the SEER-Medicare data: content, research applications, and generalizability to the United States elderly population. Med Care 40(8 Suppl):IV-3-18Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Clegg LX, Reichman ME, Hankey BF, Miller BA, Lin YD, Johnson NJ, Schwartz SM, Bernstein L, Chen VW, Goodman MT, Gomez SL, Graff JJ, Lynch CF, Lin CC, Edwards BK (2007) Quality of race, Hispanic ethnicity, and immigrant status in population-based cancer registry data: implications for health disparity studies. Cancer Causes Control 18:177–187PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Clegg LX, Reichman ME, Miller BA, Hankey BF, Singh GK, Lin YD, Goodman MT, Lynch CF, Schwartz SM, Chen VW, Bernstein L, Gomez SL, Graff JJ, Lin CC, Johnson NJ, Edwards BK (2009) Impact of socioeconomic status on cancer incidence and stage at diagnosis: selected findings from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results: National Longitudinal mortality study. Cancer Causes Control 20(4):417–435PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Chan JK, Gomez SL, O’Malley CD, Perkins CI, Clarke CA (2006) Validity of cancer registry medicaid status against enrollment files: implications for population-based studies of cancer outcomes. Med Care 44(10):952–955PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Reynolds P, Urayama KY, Von Behren J, Feusner J (2004) Birth characteristics and hepatoblastoma risk in young children. Cancer 100(5):1070–1076PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Von Behren J, Reynolds P (2003) Birth characteristics and brain cancers in young children. Int J Epidemiol 32(2):248–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Reynolds P, Von Behren J, Gunier RB, Goldberg DE, Harnly M, Hertz A (2005) Agricultural pesticide use and childhood cancer in California. Epidemiology 16(1):93–100PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Reynolds P, Von Behren J, Gunier RB, Goldberg DE, Hertz A (2004) Residential exposure to traffic in California and childhood cancer. Epidemiology 15(1):6–12PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Von Behren J, Reynolds P, Gunier RB, Rull RP, Hertz A, Urayama KY, Kronish D, Buffler PA (2008) Residential traffic density and childhood leukemia risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 17(9):2298–2301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Ward MH, Colt JS, Metayer C, Gunier RB, Lubin J, Crouse V, Nishioka MG, Reynolds P, Buffler PA (2009) Residential exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls and organochlorine pesticides and risk of childhood leukemia. Environ Health Perspect 117(6):1007–1013PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Burns PB, Swanson GM (1991) The occupational cancer incidence surveillance study (OCISS): risk of lung cancer by usual occupation and industry in the Detroit metropolitan area. Am J Ind Med 19(5):655–671PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Swanson GM, Schwartz AG, Brown KL (1985) Population-based occupational cancer incidence surveillance. Utilization of the telephone interview. J Occup Med 27(6):439–444PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Clarke CA, Miller T, Chang ET, Yin D, Cockburn M, Gomez SL (2010) Racial and social class gradients in life expectancy in contemporary California. Soc Sci Med 70(9):1373–1380PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Krieger N, Chen JT, Waterman PD, Rehkopf DH, Yin R, Coull BA (2006) Race/ethnicity and changing US socioeconomic gradients in breast cancer incidence: California and Massachusetts, 1978–2002 (United States). Cancer Causes Control 17(2):217–226PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Krieger N, Chen JT, Waterman PD, Soobader MJ, Subramanian SV, Carson R (2002) Geocoding and monitoring of US socioeconomic inequalities in mortality and cancer incidence: does the choice of area-based measure and geographic level matter?: the Public Health Disparities Geocoding Project. Am J Epidemiol 156(5):471–482PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Liu L, Cozen W, Bernstein L, Ross RK, Deapen D (2001) Changing relationship between socioeconomic status and prostate cancer incidence. J Natl Cancer Inst 93(9):705–709PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Krieger N, Williams DR, Moss NE (1997) Measuring social class in US public health research: concepts, methodologies, and guidelines. Annu Rev Public Health 18:341–378PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Krieger N, Zierler S, Hogan JW, Waterman PD, Chen J, Lemieux K, Gjelsvik A (2003) Geocoding and measurement of neighborhood socioeconomic position. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Krieger N, Chen JT, Waterman PD, Rehkopf DH, Subramanian SV (2003) Race/ethnicity, gender, and monitoring socioeconomic gradients in health: a comparison of area-based socioeconomic measures–the public health disparities geocoding project. Am J Public Health 93(10):1655–1671PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Yost K, Perkins C, Cohen R, Morris C, Wright W (2001) Socioeconomic status and breast cancer incidence in California for different race/ethnic groups. Cancer Causes Control 12(8):703–711PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Chang ET, Shema SJ, Wakelee HA, Clarke CA, Gomez SL (2009) Uncovering disparities in survival after non-small-cell lung cancer among Asian/Pacific Islander ethnic populations in California. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 18(8):2248–2255PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Gomez SL, Clarke CA, Shema SJ, Chang ET, Keegan TH, Glaser SL (2010) Disparities in breast cancer survival among Asian women by ethnicity and immigrant status: a population-based study. Am J Public Health 100(5):861–869PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Gomez SL, Glaser SL (2005) Quality of cancer registry birthplace data for Hispanics living in the United States. Cancer Causes Control 16(6):713–723PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Gomez SL, Glaser SL (2006) Misclassification of race/ethnicity in a population-based cancer registry. Cancer Causes Control 17:771–781PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Gomez SL, Glaser SL, Kelsey JL, Lee MM (2004) Bias in completeness of birthplace data for Asian groups in a population-based cancer registry (United States). Cancer Causes Control 15(3):243–253PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Rhoads KF, Ackerson LK, Jha AK, Dudley RA (2008) Quality of colon cancer outcomes in hospitals with a high percentage of Medicaid patients. J Am Coll Surg 207(2):197–204PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Horner MJ, Ries LAG, Krapcho M, Neyman N, Aminou R, Howlader N, Altekruse SF, Feuer EJ, Huang L, Mariotto A, Miller BA, Lewis DR, Eisner MP, Stinchcomb DG, Edwards BK (2009) SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2006, http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2006/, based on November 2008 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER web site. In: Institute NC (ed) Bethesda
  62. 62.
    Great Circle Distance Calculations (2007) In: Data Analysis Tools: The North American Association of Central Cancer Registries (NAACCR)Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Takaki R (1989) Strangers from a different shore: a History of Asian Americans. Penguin Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Chung TL-N (2010) Asian American Health: discrepancies, convergence, and enclave-specific trends. In: Abesamis-Mendoza N, Ho-Asjoe H, Bateman WB (eds) Handbook of Asian American Health: taking notice and taking action. Greenwood Publishing Group, Santa BarbaraGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Robert SA, Strombom I, Trentham-Dietz A, Hampton JM, McElroy JA, Newcomb PA, Remington PL (2004) Socioeconomic risk factors for breast cancer: distinguishing individual- and community-level effects. Epidemiology 15(4):442–450PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Sanderson M, Coker AL, Perez A, Du XL, Peltz G, Fadden MK (2006) A multilevel analysis of socioeconomic status and prostate cancer risk. Ann Epidemiol 16(12):901–907PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Webster TF, Hoffman K, Weinberg J, Vieira V, Aschengrau A (2008) Community- and individual-level socioeconomic status and breast cancer risk: multilevel modeling on Cape Cod, Massachusetts. Environ Health Perspect 116(8):1125–1129PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Datta GD, Colditz GA, Kawachi I, Subramanian SV, Palmer JR, Rosenberg L (2006) Individual-, neighborhood-, and state-level socioeconomic predictors of cervical carcinoma screening among US black women: a multilevel analysis. Cancer 106(3):664–669PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Robert SA (1999) Socioeconomic position and health: the independent contribution of community socioeconomic context. Annu Rev Sociol 25:489–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Warner ET, Gomez SL (2010) Impact of neighborhood racial composition and metropolitan residential segregation on disparities in breast cancer stage at diagnosis and survival between black and white women in California. J Commun HealthGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Pickett KE, Pearl M (2001) Multilevel analyses of neighbourhood socioeconomic context and health outcomes: a critical review. J Epidemiol Community Health 55(2):111–122PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Subramanian SV, Chen JT, Rehkopf DH, Waterman PD, Krieger N (2005) Racial disparities in context: a multilevel analysis of neighborhood variations in poverty and excess mortality among black populations in Massachusetts. Am J Public Health 95(2):260–265PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Yen IH, Syme SL (1999) The social environment and health: a discussion of the epidemiologic literature. Annu Rev Public Health 20:287–308PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    MacIntyre S, MacIver S, Sooman A (1993) Area, class, and health: should we be focusing on places or people? J Soc Polic 22:213–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Gee GC, Payne-Sturges DC (2004) Environmental health disparities: a framework integrating psychosocial and environmental concepts. Environ Health Perspect 112(17):1645–1653PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Oakes JM (2004) The (mis)estimation of neighborhood effects: causal inference for a practicable social epidemiology. Soc Sci Med 58(10):1929–1952PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Keegan THM, Hurley S, Goldberg D, Nelson DO, Reynolds P, Bernstein L, Horn-Ross PL, Gomez SL. The association between neighborhood characteristics and body size and physical activity in the California teachers study cohort. Am J Public Health (in press)Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Smith G, Gidlow C, Davey R, Foster C (2010) What is my walking neighbourhood? A pilot study of English adults’ definitions of their local walking neighbourhoods. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 7:34PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Hubbard AE, Ahern J, Fleischer NL, Van der Laan M, Lippman SA, Jewell N, Bruckner T, Satariano WA (2010) To GEE or not to GEE: comparing population average and mixed models for estimating the associations between neighborhood risk factors and health. Epidemiology 21(4):467–474PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    RAND. RAND California Community Statistics, http://ca.rand.org/stats/community/community.html. Accessed 30 Sep 09
  81. 81.
    State of California Department of Justice. http://ag.ca.gov/crime.php. Accessed 29 Sep 2009
  82. 82.
    Census 2000 Summary File 3—California. In: US Census Bureau, 2002Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Krieger N, Chen JT, Waterman PD, Rehkopf DH, Subramanian SV (2005) Painting a truer picture of US socioeconomic and racial/ethnic health inequalities: the Public Health Disparities Geocoding Project. Am J Public Health 95(2):312–323PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Lee C, Moudon AV (2006) The 3Ds + R: Quantifying land use and urban form correlates of walking. Transp Res Part D 11:204–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Rural-Urban Commuting Area Codes (2000) In: United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Available at: http://www.ers.usda.gov/Data/RuralUrbanCommutingAreaCodes/
  86. 86.
    Data Core Library Collection: Segregation Indices Data Series (2000) In: Rand’s Center for Population Health and Health Disparities (CPHHD)Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Acevedo-Garcia D, Lochner KA, Osypuk TL, Subramanian SV (2003) Future directions in residential segregation and health research: a multilevel approach. Am J Public Health 93(2):215–221PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Gee GC, Ro A, Shariff-Marco S, Chae D (2009) Racial discrimination and health among Asian Americans: evidence, assessment, and directions for future research. Epidemiol Rev 31:130–151PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Data Core Library Collection (2000) Street Connectivity Data Series. In: Rand’s Center for Population Health and Health Disparities (CPHHD)Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Pendola R, Gen S (2007) BMI, auto use, and the urban environment in San Francisco. Health Place 13(2):551–556PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    The Annual Utilization Report of Hospitals (2001) In: Office of Statewide Health Planning and DevelopmentGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    ReferenceUSA-Business Data (2004) In: University of Texas at Austin. Available at: http://www.lib.utexas.edu/indexes/titles.html?id=305
  93. 93.
    ArcGIS Business Analyst Online In: Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI). Available at: http://www.esri.com/data/esri_data/business.html, 2004 and 2006
  94. 94.
    Hoehner CM, Schootman M (2010) Concordance of commercial data sources for neighborhood-effects studies. J Urban Health 87(4):713–725PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Lee C, Vernez Moudon A (2006) Correlates of walking for transportation or recreation purposes. J Phys Act Health 3(Suppl 1):S77–S98Google Scholar
  96. 96.
    Moudon AV, Lee C, Cheadle AD, Garvin C, Rd DB, Schmid TL, Weathers RD (2007) Attributes of environments supporting walking. Am J Health Promot 21(5):448–459PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Scarlett Lin Gomez
    • 1
    • 2
  • Sally L. Glaser
    • 1
    • 2
  • Laura A. McClure
    • 1
  • Sarah J. Shema
    • 1
  • Melissa Kealey
    • 3
  • Theresa H. M. Keegan
    • 1
    • 2
  • William A. Satariano
    • 3
  1. 1.Cancer Prevention Institute of CaliforniaFremontUSA
  2. 2.Department of Health Research and PolicySchool of Medicine, Stanford UniversityStanfordUSA
  3. 3.Division of Community Health and Human Development and Division of Epidemiology, School of Public HealthUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations