Maternal exposure to medical radiation and Wilms tumor in the offspring: a report from the Children’s Oncology Group
- 85 Downloads
This study examined the association between pre-conception and in utero maternal medical radiation exposure and Wilms tumor, using data from a large population-based case–control study.
Cases were identified from the National Wilms Tumor Study Group. Controls were identified by random digit dialing and frequency matched to child’s age and geographic area of residence in the United States and Canada. Interview data from 512 cases and 509 controls were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for Wilms tumor and exposure to: (1) maternal X-ray alone and; (2) all medical radiation types (X-ray, CT, RT, Nuclear scans, Fluoroscopy) combined, for the period from two years before conception until child birth were estimated after adjustment for age, geographic area, maternal education, and household income.
We found no consistent association between the risk of Wilms tumor and either maternal X-ray exposure (OR 0.9, 95% CI 0.7–1.3) or all medical radiation types combined (OR 0.9, 95% CI 0.7–1.2). No meaningful associations were seen for analysis of gonadal or non-gonadal radiation exposure.
Our study did not find any consistent pattern of association between Wilms tumor and maternal radiation exposure during pre-pregnancy or pregnancy period. In view of the negative findings from the largest case control study of this question to date, the reduced doses of biological radiation during pregnancy, and the requirements for an improved study design, we believe that future studies of this exposure may not be a priority for research on Wilms tumor.
KeywordsWilms Tumor Children’s Oncology Group Radiation Maternal
This study was supported in part by a grant from the National Cancer Institute (R01CA75385) and National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (P30ES10126). We wish to thank Joanna Smith for her data management support. We are deeply thankful for the families, investigators, and institutions across the country, who have participated in research to prevent and treat childhood cancer.
- 1.Ries LAG, Krapcho M, Mariotto A, Miller BA, Feuer EJ, Clegg L, Horner MJ, Howlader N, Eisner MP, Reichman M, Edwards BK (eds) (2004) SEER cancer statistics review 1975–2004. National Cancer Institute, BethesdaGoogle Scholar
- 7.Olshan AF, Breslow NE, Falletta JM, Grufferman S, Pendergrass T, Robison LL et al (1993) Risk factors for Wilms tumor. Report from the National Wilms Tumor Study. Cancer 72(3):938–944 doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19930801)72:3<938::AID-CNCR2820720345>3.0.CO;2-C PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Hicks N, Zack M, Caldwell GG, Fernbach DJ, Falletta JM (1984) Childhood cancer and occupational radiation exposure in parents. Cancer 53(8):1637–1643 doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19840415)53:8<1637::AID-CNCR2820530802>3.0.CO;2-Y PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Draper GJ, Little MP, Sorahan T, Kinlen LJ, Bunch KJ, Conquest AJ et al (1997) Cancer in the offspring of radiation workers: a record linkage study. BMJ Clinical Res (Clin Res Ed.) 315(7117):1181–1188Google Scholar
- 26.Ross JA, Severson RK, Pollock BH, Robison LL (1996) Childhood cancer in the United States. A geographical analysis of cases from the Pediatric Cooperative Clinical Trials groups. Cancer 77(1):201–207 doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960101)77:1<201::AID-CNCR32>3.0.CO;2-7 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.The SAS System for Windows Version 9.1.3 (2006). SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NCGoogle Scholar
- 28.Gilman EA, Kneale GW, Knox EG, Stewart AM (1988) Pregnancy X-rays and childhood cancers: effects of exposure age and radiation dose. J Radiol Prot 8:3–8Google Scholar
- 31.Schuz J, Kaletsch U, Kaatsch P, Meinert R, Michaelis J (2001) Risk factors for pediatric tumors of the central nervous system: results from a German population-based case–control study. Med Pediatr Oncol 36(2):274–282 doi: 10.1002/1096-911X(20010201)36:2<274::AID-MPO1065>3.0.CO;2-D PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar