Area disadvantage, individual socio-economic position, and premature cancer mortality in Australia 1998 to 2000: a multilevel analysis
- 333 Downloads
To examine associations between area and individual socio-economic characteristics and premature cancer mortality using multilevel analysis.
We modeled cancer mortality among 25–64-year-old men and women (n = 16,340) between 1998 and 2000 in Australia. Socio-economic characteristics of Statistical Local Areas (n = 1,317) were measured using an Index of Relative Socio-economic Disadvantage (quintiles), and individual socio-economic position was measured by occupation (professionals, white and blue collar).
After adjustment for within-area variation in age and occupation, the probability of premature cancer mortality was highest in the most disadvantaged areas for all-cancer mortality for men (RR 1.48 95% CI 1.35–1.63) and women (RR 1.30 95% CI 1.18–1.43) and for lung cancer mortality for men (1.91 95% CI 1.63–2.25) and women (1.51 95% CI 1.04–2.18).
Men in blue collar occupations had a higher rate of cancer mortality (RR 1.57 95% CI 1.50–1.65) and lung cancer mortality (RR 2.31 95 % CI 2.09–2.56), whereas men in white collar occupations had a lower all-cancer mortality rate (RR 0.78 95% CI 0.72–0.85). Compared with professionals, women in white collar occupations had an all-cancer mortality rate that was lower (RR 0.85 95% CI 0.80–0.90). When deaths from breast cancer were excluded, women in blue collar occupations had a significantly higher all-cancer mortality rate than professionals (RR 1.12 95% CI 1.02–1.22).
Area disadvantage and individual socio-economic position were independently associated with premature cancer mortality, suggesting that interventions to reduce inequalities should focus on places and people.
KeywordsCancer Mortality Socio-economic factors Socio-economic status Australia
R. Bentley is supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council Capacity Building Grant in Population. Health Research (Australian Health Inequalities: A program addressing social and economic determinants of health). S. V. Subramanian is supported by the National Institutes of Health Career Development Award (NHLBI 1 K25 HL081275). Gavin Turrell is supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council Senior Research Fellowship (No. 390109).
- 10.Vinnakota S, Lam NSN (2006) Socio-economic inequality of cancer mortality in the United States: a spatial data mining approach. Int J Health Geogr 15 Feb 2006(5): 9Google Scholar
- 11.U.S. Cancer Statistics Working Group (2005) United States cancer statistics: 2002 incidence and mortality. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centres for Disease Control and Prevention, National Cancer Institute, AtlantaGoogle Scholar
- 13.Singh GK, A. MB, Hankey BF, Edwards BK (2003) Area socioeconomic variations in U.S. cancer incidence, mortality, stage, treatment and survival, 1975–1999. NIH publication no. 04-5417. National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MDGoogle Scholar
- 14.Australian Institute of Health and Welfare and Australasian Association of Cancer Registries (2007) Cancer in Australia: an overview, 2006. Cancer series no. 37. AIHW, CanberraGoogle Scholar
- 15.Draper G, Turrell G, Oldenburg B (2004) Health inequalities in Australia: mortality. Health Inequalities Monitoring Series No. 1 AIHW cat. no. PHE 55. Queensland University of Technology and the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, CanberraGoogle Scholar
- 21.Harvard Center for Cancer Prevention (1996) Harvard Reports on Cancer Prevention: human causes of cancer. Cancer Causes Control 7(Supplement 1):533–535Google Scholar
- 22.Australian Institute of Health, Welfare (2004) Cancer in Australia 2001. Cancer series number 28. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, CanberraGoogle Scholar
- 24.Australian Institute of Health, Welfare & National Breast Cancer Centre (2006) Breast cancer in Australia: an overview, 2006. Cancer series no. 34. AIHW, CanberraGoogle Scholar
- 25.Australian Bureau of Statistics (1996) Statistical geography: volume 1 Australian Standard Geographical Classification (ASGC). Australian Government Publishing Service, CanberraGoogle Scholar
- 26.Magliano D, Liew D, Pater H, Kirby A, Hunt D, Simes J, Sundararajan V, Tonkin A (2003) Accuracy of the Australian National Death Index: comparison with adjudicated fatal outcomes among Australian participants in the Long-term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischaemic Disease (LIPID) study. Aust N Z J Public Health 27(6):649–53PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.Australian Bureau of Statistics (1997) Australian Standard Classification of Occupations, 2nd edn. Australian Government Publishing Service, CanberraGoogle Scholar
- 28.Australian Bureau of Statistics (1998) Socioeconomic index for areas. Australian Government Publishing Service, CanberraGoogle Scholar
- 31.Goldstein H (2003) Multilevel statistical models. Arnold, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 32.Rasbash J, Browne W, Goldstein H (2000) A user’s guide to MLwiN version 2.1. Institute of Education, The University of London, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 36.The World Health Organisation. (2002) The world health report: reducing risks, promoting healthy life. WHO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
- 42.Australian Institute of Health, Welfare (2006) Australia’s health 2006. AIHW cat. no. AUS 73. AIHW, CanberraGoogle Scholar
- 44.Turrell G, Kavanagh A, Draper G, Subramanian SV (2007) Do places affect the probability of death in Australia? A multilevel study of area-level disadvantage, individual-level socioeconomic position and all-cause mortality, 1998–2000. J Epidemiol Community Health 61(1):13–19PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 50.Harper S, Lynch J (2005) Methods for measuring cancer disparities: using data relevant to Health People 2010 cancer-related objectives. NCI cancer surveillance monograph series. National Cancer Institute, US Department of Health and Human Services, National Institute of Health, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar