Cancer Causes & Control

, Volume 16, Supplement 1, pp 79–88 | Cite as

In Conclusion: The Promise of Comprehensive Cancer Control

  • Susan True
  • Tom Kean
  • Patricia A. Nolan
  • E. Sue Haviland
  • Karin Hohman


The Promise of Comprehensive Cancer Control

Operationally, comprehensive cancer control (CCC) brings together diverse experts and interested partners to review together the cancer experience of their community, to identify key areas in need of improvement, to develop collaborative approaches to address individual and system changes and strategies to meet the needs of the population, and to combine resources – fiscal, relational, and intellectual – to maximize positive outcomes. Specific positive outcomes related to CCC are as follows:

Comprehensive cancer plans;

A cadre of collaborating partners;

Support for the continuum of cancer-related functions and needs;

New opportunities to learn and build skills;

Coordinated appeals for federal, state, and private resources;

Combined strategies to address major system changes that individual programs could not hope to address on their own; and

Greater impact than single programs or partners could accomplish alone.

A number of factors can at times impede success:


Resources; and


Continuing the extraordinary progress of the past 5 years will fundamentally alter the trajectory of cancer and the burden of this disease in the United States. The readers are challenged to add their voices, skills, resources, perspectives, connections, and passion to this remarkable effort.


cancer control successes comprehensive cancer control 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    American Cancer Society2004Cancer Facts and FiguresAmerican Cancer SocietyAtlanta, GAGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    American Cancer Society2005Cancer Facts and FiguresAmerican Cancer SocietyAtlanta, GAGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Curry, SJByers, THewitt, M eds. 2003Fulfilling the Potential Of Cancer Prevention And Early DetectionThe National Academies PressWashington, D.CGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Unequal Treatment: Confronting Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Healthcare2003Committee on Understanding and Eliminating Racial and Ethnic Disparities in HealthCare, Board on Health Sciences Policy, Institute of MedicineThe National Academies PressWashington, DCGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hewitt, MSimone, JV eds. 1999Ensuring Quality Cancer CareThe National Academies PressWashington, DCGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lenfant, C 2003Clinical research to clinical practice – lost in translation?NEJM249868874Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ross, LE, Coates, RJ, Breen, N, Uhler, RJ, Potosky, AL, Blackman, D 2004Prostate specific antigen test use reported in the 2000 National Health Interview SurveyPrevent Med3873244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Guide to Clinical Preventive Services. Available online at: Scholar
  9. 9.
    Saraiya, M,  et al. 2001Self-reported Papanicolaou smears and hysterectomies among women in the United StatesObstet Gynecol98269278CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    The State of Health Care Quality 2004, industry trends and analysis (2004) Washington, DC: National Committee for Quality Assurance.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Marbella, AM,  et al. 2003Wisconsin physicians advising smokers to quit: results from the Current Population Survey, 1998–1999 and Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2000WMJ1024145Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Grimshaw, ,  et al. 2001Changing provider behavior: an overview of systematic reviews of interventionsMed Care39II-2II45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ellis P et al. (2003) Diffusion and dissemination of evidence-based cancer control interventions. Rockville, MD: Evidence Report/Technology Assessment Number 79. AHRQ Publication No. 03-E033.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    U.S. Task Force on Community Preventive Services (2005) Guide to Community Preventive Services. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Available online at: Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hodge JD, Kraft CC, Mathews CW, Sjoberg, SA (1962) Results of the First United States Manned Orbital Space Flight, February 20, 1962. Operational Requirements and Plans. Washington, DC: National Aeronautic and Space Administration, US Government Printing Office 0–634401.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Unpublished information from the Division of Cancer Prevention and Control at CDC related to the funding of states, tribes and territories for the June 30, 2005-June 29, 2006 budget year.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    For more information, see the C-Change website. As www.C-Change, it is under construction (as of June 28, 2005), but is accessible by entering Scholar
  18. 18.
    Eden, JSimone, J eds. 2005Assessing the Quality of Cancer Care: An Approach to Measurement in GeorgiaNational Academies PressWashington, DCGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    About One Voice Against Cancer and Facts About Federal Funding. Retrieved June 28, 2005 from Scholar
  20. 20.
    French, C, True, S, McIntyre, R, Sciulli, M, Maloy, KA 2004State Implementation of the Breast and Cervical Cancer Prevention and Treatment Act of 2000: A Collaborative Effort Among Government AgenciesPublic Health Reports119-3279285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    50 Fortune 500 companies join forces to give four million uninsured working Americans access to affordable health insurance. Published Monday, May 10, 2004. Retrieved from on April 6, 2005.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    O’Malley, C, Hu, K, West, D 2002Race and Ethnicity Identifier Assessment ProjectNorth American Association of Central Cancer Registries, Springfield, IL255Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Greenlee, R 2004Evaluation of Methods to Estimate & Compare Race/Ethnicity Specific Cancer Incidence Rates Using Combined Central Cancer Registry DataNorth American Association of Central Cancer RegistriesSpringfield, ILGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Espey D, Paisano R, Cobb N (2004)Regional Patterns and Trends in Cancer Mortality among American Indians and Alaska Natives 1990–2001.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Becker, TM, Bettles, J, Lapidus, J, Campo, J, Johnson, CJ, Shipley, D, Robertson, LD 2002Improving cancer incidence estimates for American Indians and Alaska Natives in the Pacific NorthwestAm J Public Health. Sep9214691471Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Maine Responds to Cancer: A Summary of the Work by the Maine Consortium for Comprehensive Cancer Control. January 2001, pp. 65–72.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    West Virginia Cancer Resources: A Patient’s Guide is available at Guide.pdf.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Personal communication; Heather Becker, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    From the CRAN informational brochure: Colorectal Cancer Awareness Network: Promoting Colorectal Cancer Awareness among all Michigan Men and Women through Public Education. September, 2003. Quoted with permission from Dawn Brannick, RN.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (1999) Best Practices for Comprehensive Tobacco Control Plans. Available at Scholar
  31. 31.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (2003) A Public Health Action Plan to Prevent Heart Disease and Stroke. Available at Scholar
  32. 32.
    Retrieved from on April 6, 2005.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Susan True
    • 1
  • Tom Kean
    • 2
  • Patricia A. Nolan
    • 3
  • E. Sue Haviland
    • 4
  • Karin Hohman
    • 5
  1. 1.Division of Cancer Prevention and ControlCenters for Disease Control and PreventionAtlantaUSA
  2. 2.Strategic Health ConceptsDenverUSA
  3. 3.Brown UniversityProvidenceUSA
  4. 4.Cancer Prevention and Control SectionMichigan Department of Community HealthLansingUSA
  5. 5.Strategic Health ConceptsDenverUSA

Personalised recommendations