Corporate Governance as a Key Driver of Corporate Sustainability in France: The Role of Board Members and Investor Relations
This paper examines the relationships between corporate governance and corporate sustainability by focusing on two main components of companies’ governance structure: boards of directors (BoDs) and investor relations officers (IROs). We propose an original empirical strategy based on the 120 biggest French capitalizations for the year 2013, allowing us to measure boards of directors’ independence and expertise, as well as investor relations officers’ convictions and communication on corporate sustainability. Our results show that corporate governance has an ambiguous impact on corporate sustainability because of opposing forces: internal, external and intermediate forces. On the one hand, the higher the proportion of inside directors, the higher the company’s environmental and governance performance, while the higher the proportion of general experts in the board room, the lower the company’s governance performance. On the other hand, investor relations officers’ beliefs that corporate sustainability is primarily driven by investors’ ethical values appear negatively related to companies’ governance performance. In sum, corporate sustainability appears positively related to internal forces (inside directors) and negatively related to external forces (general expert directors and investor activist engagement). The results of this study demonstrate the need to carry out efforts to train BoDs (specifically inside directors) and IROs to respond to corporate sustainability and to take more of a leadership role in this area.
KeywordsInvestor relations officers (IROs) Board of directors (BoDs) Environmental Social and governance (ESG) criteria Socially responsible investment (SRI) Corporate sustainability and corporate social responsibility (CSR) France
JEL ClassificationM14 G30
We thank Vigeo and Ethics & Boards for granting us access to their data and the French Investor Relations Professional Association (CLIFF) for helping us in gathering the data on Investors Relations practices in the top French listed companies. Patricia Crifo acknowledges the support of the chair for Sustainable Finance and Responsible Investment (chair FDIR—Toulouse IDEI & Ecole Polytechnique) and Research program Investissements d’Avenir (ANR-11-IDEX-0003/Labex Ecodec/ANR-11-LABX-0047). Elena Escrig Olmedo acknowledges the support of Group SoGReS-MF (Sustainability of Organizations and Social Responsibility Management–Financial Markets) and the financial support provided by Grant E-2013-10 funded by Universitat Jaume I. Nicolas Mottis acknowledges the support of the chair for Energy and prosperity, finance and evaluation of energy transition.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This study does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
- Boubaker, S., & Nguyn, D. K. (Eds.). (2012). Board directors and corporate social responsibility. Berlin: Springer. ISBN: 978-1-349-35109-1.Google Scholar
- Bourque, L., & Fielder, E. P. (2002). The survey kit: How to conduct self-administered and mail surveys (2nd ed.). New York: Sage.Google Scholar
- Cadbury, A. (1992). Report of the committee on the financial aspects of corporate governance (Vol. 1). Gee.Google Scholar
- Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497–505.Google Scholar
- Dass, N., Kini, O., Nanda, V., Onal, B., & Wang, J. (2014b). Board expertise: Do directors from related industries help bridge the information gap? Review of Financial Studies, 25, 533–1592.Google Scholar
- Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D., & Donaldson, L. (1997). Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy Management Review, 22(1), 20–47.Google Scholar
- Dienes, D., & Velte, P. (2016). The impact of supervisory board composition on CSR reporting. Evidence from the German Two-Tier System, Sustainability, 8, 63.Google Scholar
- European Commission -EC- (2011). A renewed EU strategy 2011-14 for Corporate Social Responsibility. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2011:0681:FIN:EN:PDF. Accessed 9 April 2018.
- EUROSIF (2016). European SRI study. Available at: https://www.eurosif.org/sri-study-2016/[accessed March 3, 2017.
- Ferreira, D. (2010). Board diversity. In R. Anderson & H. K. Baker (Eds.), Corporate governance: A synthesis of theory, research, and practice (pp. 225–242). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Marshfield, MA: Pitman Publishing Inc.Google Scholar
- Hermalin, B., & Weisbach, M. (2003). Boards of directors as an endogenously determined institution: A survey of the economic literature. Economic Policy Review, 9, 17–26.Google Scholar
- Hillman, A., & Dalziel, T. (2003). Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. Academy of Management Review, 28, 383–396.Google Scholar
- KPMG. (2005). KPMG International Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting. Amstelveen: KPMG.Google Scholar
- KPMG. (2013). KPMG international survey of corporate responsibility reporting. Amstelveen: KPMG.Google Scholar
- Marston, C. (2004). A survey of European investor relations. Edinburgh: The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland. ISBN: 1-904574-08-4.Google Scholar
- Peng, Y. S., Dashdeleg, A. U., & Chih, H. L. (2014). National culture and firm’s CSR engagement: A cross-nation study. Journal of Marketing and Management, 5(1), 38–49.Google Scholar
- Post, J., Preston, L., & Sachs, S. (2002a). Redefining the corporation, stakeholder management and organizational wealth. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Sakuma-Keck, K., & Hensmans, M. (2013). A motivation puzzle: Can investors change corporate behavior by conforming to ESG pressures? Institutional Investors’ Power to Change Corporate Behavior: International Perspectives (Critical Studies on Corporate Responsibility, Governance and Sustainability) Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 5, 367–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Tirole, J. (2006). The theory of corporate finance. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- US-SIF (2015). SRI Basics. Available at: http://www.ussif.org/sribasics. Accessed May 18, 2015.
- Walsh, J., & Seward, J. (1990). On the efficiency of internal and external corporate control mechanisms. Academy of Management Review, 15(3), 421–458.Google Scholar