Power and Diffusion of Sustainability in Supply Networks: Findings from Four In-Depth Case Studies
This paper investigates how coercive and non-coercive power impacts on the successful diffusion of sustainability within supply networks. The paper reports on four in-depth case studies of the development of sustainability initiatives, each case based on data collection from focal companies and suppliers. The four case studies are based on 38 semi-structured interviews in total and supported by secondary data. The case studies indicate that both coercive and non-coercive power impact suppliers’ engagement in sustainability initiatives and its wider diffusion in supply networks. However, where the use of coercive power facilitates diffusion to immediate suppliers, the use of non-coercive (reward and expert) power leads to sustainability diffusion beyond the dyadic level into wider supply networks. The study provides rich insights into understanding sustainability diffusion in supply networks and the perceptions of multiple supply network actors on the role of different types of power on the diffusion process. We elaborate existing theory and formulate propositions to guide future research into the role and coexistence of different types of power in diffusing sustainability in supply networks.
KeywordsDiffusion Power Supply network Sustainability
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
- Dahl, R. A. (1961). Who governs? Democracy and power in an American city. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- Dwyer, F. R. (1980). Channel-member satisfaction: Laboratory insights. Journal of Retailing, 56, 45–65.Google Scholar
- Eisenhardt, K. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.Google Scholar
- Ford, D., Gadde, L.-E., Håkansson, H., & Snehota, I. (2003). Managing business relationships. London: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Freeman, R. (1984). Strategic management—A stakeholder approach. London: Pitman.Google Scholar
- French, J. R. P., Jr., & Raven, B. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies of social power (pp. 150–167). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, Institute for Social Research.Google Scholar
- Gadde, L.-E., & Håkansson, H. (2001). Supply network strategies. London: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Håkansson, H. (1982). International marketing and purchasing of industrial goods: An interaction approach. London: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Håkansson, H., & Snehota, I. (1995). Developing relationships in business networks. London: International Thomson Business Press.Google Scholar
- Maloni, M., & Benton, W. C. (2000). Power influences in the supply chain. Journal of Business Logistics, 21(1), 49–73.Google Scholar
- Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
- Wilkinson, I. F. (1979). Power and satisfaction in channels of distribution. Journal of Retailing, 55, 79–94.Google Scholar
- Wycherley, I. (1999). Greening supply chains: The case of the body shop international. Business Strategy and the Ethics, 8, 120–127.Google Scholar