Employee Treatment and Contracting with Bank Lenders: An Instrumental Approach for Stakeholder Management
- 264 Downloads
Adopting an instrumental approach for stakeholder management, we focus on two primary stakeholder groups (employees and creditors) to investigate the relationship between employee treatment and loan contracts with banks. We find strong evidence that fair employee treatment reduces loan price and limits the use of financial covenants. In addition, we document that relationship bank lenders price both the levels and changes in the quality of employee treatment, whereas first-time bank lenders only care about the levels of fair employee treatment. Taking a contingency perspective, we find that industry competition and firm asset intangibility moderate the relationship between good human resource management and bank loan costs. The cost reduction effect of fair employee treatment is stronger for firms operating in a more competitive industry and having higher levels of intangible assets.
KeywordsEmployee treatment Stakeholder management Instrumental approach Cost of bank loans Loan covenants
This research is supprted by the Research Bureau at People's Bank of China, the Major Program of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant 13&ZD016, and the Key Program of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant 12AZD095).
Compliance with Ethical Standards
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Barney, J. B. (1995). Looking inside for competitive advantage. Academy of Management Executive, 9(4), 49–61.Google Scholar
- Clarkson, M. B. E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92–117.Google Scholar
- Cronqvist, H., Low, A., & Nilsson, M. (2007). Does corporate culture mater for investment and financial policies? Working paper.Google Scholar
- Dichev, I., & Skinner, D. (2002). Large-sample evidence on the debt covenant hypothesis. Journal of Accounting Research, 19, 45–79.Google Scholar
- Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91.Google Scholar
- Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., & Wicks, A. C. (2007). Managing for stakeholders: Survival, reputation, and success. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- Harrison, J. S., & St. John, C. H. (1998). Strategic management of organizations and stakeholders: Concepts and cases. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western Publishing.Google Scholar
- Hirshleifer, J. (1961). Risk, the discount rate, and investment decisions. American Economic Review, 61(1), 112–120.Google Scholar
- Jamali, D. (2008). A stakeholder approach to corporate social responsibility: A fresh perspective into theory and pratice. Journal of Business Ethics, 82, 213–231.Google Scholar
- Jones, T. M. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 404–437.Google Scholar
- Lepak, D. P., & Snell, S. A. (1999). The human resource architecture: Toward a theory of human capital allocation and development. Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 31–48.Google Scholar
- Leuven, E., Sianesi, B. (2014). PSMATCH2: Stata module to perform full Mahalanobis and propensity score matching, common support graphing, and covariate imbalance testing. http://ideas.repec.org/c/boc/bocode/s432001.html.
- Li, K., & Prabhala, N. R. (2007). Self-selection models in corporate finance. In B. E. Eckbo (Ed.), Handbook of corporate finance: Empirical corporate finance (1st ed.) (Vol. 1, pp. 37–83). North Holland, Amsterdam, Netherlands.Google Scholar
- McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117–127.Google Scholar
- Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886.Google Scholar
- Modigliani, F., & Miller, M. H. (1958). The cost of capital, corporate finance and the theory of investment. American Economic Review, 48(3), 261–297.Google Scholar
- Post, J., Preston, I., & Sachs, S. (2002). Redefining the corporation: Stakeholder management and organizational wealth. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Preffer, J. (1998). The human equation: Building profits by putting people first. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
- Spence, M. A. (1974). Market signaling: Information transfer in hiring and related screening processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Strahan, P. E. (1999). Borrower risk and the price and nonprice terms of banks loans. Staff Reports 90: Federal Reserve Bank of New York.Google Scholar
- Taylor, A., & Sansone, A. (2006). The handbook of loan syndications and trading. McGraw-Hill Education: City, ST.Google Scholar
- Whitener, E. M. (2001). Do ‘high commitment’ human resource practice affect employee commitment? A cross-level analysis using hierarchical linear modeling. Journal of Management, 27, 515–535.Google Scholar