Advertisement

Sense-Making Resource Efficiency Through “Sustainability” Reports

  • Matthew Egan
Original Paper

Abstract

This paper explores the nature and antecedents of a unique “sustainability” reporting initiative developed within a large Australian family-run manufacturing company. In so doing, the paper responds to calls for empirical insight into how accounting can inform organisational objectives relating to sustainability. Despite known flaws in the data, the company’s weekly sustainability reports had become a critical support to on-going sense-making, driven by deliberate strategies focused on resource efficiency, and understanding the business. While the contributions of these initiatives to broader global sustainability concerns were limited, the case provides insight into a well-intentioned and passionate journey towards the unknown of sustainability. The case explains how management distinguished related activities from core economic objectives. What is important here is that the CEO availed space for management to explore the moral dimensions of corporate activity. There was opportunity to now enhance that space, by encouraging engagement with a broader range of stakeholders, and a broader range of sustainability impacts.

Keywords

Sustainability Sustainability accounting Sustainability reporting Sense-making 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author wishes to acknowledge comments provided on earlier iterations of this paper from delegates attending Monforma in Melbourne in February 2015, a Jill McKinnon seminar at Macquarie University in Sydney in 2015, a seminar at Royal Holloway, University of London, in 2015, and at the 14th Australasian Centre on Social and Environmental Accounting Research Conference (A-CSEAR), in Sydney in December 2015.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

The author has no financial relationship, and otherwise no known potential conflict of interest, with the case study organisation explored in this study. In this study, semi-structured interviews have been undertaken with adult human participants, all of whom provided informed consent to be interviewed. All procedures performed in this study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. The author has full control of all primary data which are available to the journal to review if requested.

Conflict of interest

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Bibliography

  1. Abrahamsson, G., Englund, H., & Gerdin, J. (2016). On the (re)construction of numbers and operational reality. A study of face-to-face interactions. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 13(2), 159–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams, C., & Frost, G. (2008). Integrating sustainability reporting into management practices. Accounting Forum, 32(4), 288–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adams, C., & Larrinaga-Gonzalez, C. (2007). Engaging with organisations in pursuit of improved sustainability accounting and performance. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 20(3), 333–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ahrens, T., & Chapman, C. S. (2006). Doing qualitative field research in management accounting: Positioning data to contribute to theory. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 31(8), 819–841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Albelda, E. (2011). The role of management accounting practices as facilitators of the environmental management. Evidence from EMAS organisations. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 2(1), 76–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ancona, D. (2012). Sensemaking. Framing and acting in the unknown. In S. Snook, N. Nohria & R. Khurana (Eds.), The handbook for teaching leadership. Knowing, doing and being (pp. 3–19). SAGE Publications Inc, Harvard University USA.Google Scholar
  7. Arjalies, D. L., & Mundy, J. (2013). The use of management control systems to manage CSR strategy: A levers of control perspective. Management Accounting Research, 24(4), 284–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bakan, J. (2005). The corporation. The pathological pursuit of profit and power. London: Constable & Robinson.Google Scholar
  9. Baker, M., & Schaltegger, S. (2014). Pragmatism and new directions in social and environmental accountability research. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 28(2), 263–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bebbington, J. (2007). Changing organizational attitudes and culture through sustainability accounting. In J. Unerman, J. Bebbington, & B. O’Dwyer (Eds.), Sustainability accounting and accountability (pp. 226–242). Milton Park: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bebbington, J. (2014). Accounting for sustainable development performance. Oxford: CIMA.Google Scholar
  12. Bebbington, J., Brown, J., & Frame, B. (2007). Accounting technologies and sustainability assessment models. Ecological Economics, 61(2–3), 224–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bebbington, J., & Fraser, M. (2014). Organizational change and sustainability accounting. In J. Bebbington, J. Unerman, & B. O’Dwyer (Eds.), Sustainability accounting and accountability (2nd ed., pp. 141–153). Milton Park: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Bebbington, J., & Larrinaga, C. (2014). Accounting and sustainable development: An exploration. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 39(6), 395–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bebbington, J., Unerman, J., & O’Dwyer, B. (2014). Introduction to sustainability accounting and accountability. In J. Bebbington, J. Unerman, & B. O’Dwyer (Eds.), Sustainability accounting and accountability (2nd ed., pp. 3–14). Milton Park: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Bennett, M., & James, P. (1998). The green bottom line. In M. Bennett, & P. James (Eds.), The green bottom line. Environmental accounting for management. Current practices and future trends (pp. 30–60). Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing.Google Scholar
  17. Business Review Weekly (BRW). (2013) Top 1,000 companies. Accessed on 16 May 2014. Available from: http://www.brw.com.au/lists/top-1000-companies/2013/;jsessionid=72D58D3F29585D525AAA71423961524E.
  18. Catasus, B., Martensson, M., & Skoog, M. (2009). The communication of human accounts: Examining models of sensegiving. Journal of Human Resource Costing & Accounting, 13(2), 163–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Contrafatto, M., & Burns, J. (2013). Social and environmental accounting, organisational change and management accounting: A processual view. Management Accounting Research, 24(4), 349–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design. Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Inc.Google Scholar
  21. Dillard, J. (2014). Legitimating the social accounting project: An ethic of accountability. In J. Bebbington, J. Unerman, & B. O’Dwyer (Eds.), Sustainability accounting and accountability (2nd ed., pp. 233–248). Milton Park: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Duncan, O. and Thomson, I. (1998). Waste accounting and cleaner technology: A complex evaluation. In Asian Pacific interdisciplinary research in accounting. Osaka, Japan.Google Scholar
  23. Durden, C. (2008). Towards a socially responsible management control system. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 21(5), 671–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Faure, B., Brummans, B. H. J. M., Giroux, H., & Taylor, J. R. (2010). “The calculation of business, or the business of calculation? Accounting as organizing through everyday communication. Human Relations, 63(8), 1249–1273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Figge, F., & Hahn, T. (2013). Value drivers of corporate eco-efficiency: Management accounting information for the efficient use of environmental resources. Management Accounting Research, 24, 387–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fraser, M. (2012). “Fleshing Out” an engagement with a social accounting technology. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 25(3), 508–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fries, J., McCulloch, K., & Webster, W. (2010). The Prince’s accounting for sustainability project: Creating 21st-century decision-making and reporting systems to respond to 21st-century challenges and opportunities. In A. G. Hopwood, J. Unerman, & J. Fries (Eds.), Accounting for sustainability. Practical insights (pp. 29–45). London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  28. Gasparatos, A., El-Haram, M., & Horner, M. (2009). The argument against a reductionist approach for measuring sustainable development performance and the need for methodological pluralism. Accounting Forum, 33(3), 245–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gioia, D. A., & Chittipeddi, K. (1991). Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation. Strategic Management Journal, 12(6), 433–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Giuliani, M. (2016). Sensemaking, sensegiving and sensebreaking: The case of intellectual capital. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 17(2), 218–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gladwin, T. N., Krause, T. S., & Kennelly, J. J. (1995). Beyond eco-efficiency: Towards socially sustainable business. Sustainable Development, 3, 35–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gond, J. P., Grubnic, S., Hertzig, C., & Moon, J. (2012). Configuring management control systems: Theorizing the integration of strategy and sustainability. Management Accounting Research, 23, 205–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gray, R. (2010). Is accounting for sustainability actually accounting for sustainability… and how would we know? An exploration of narratives of organisations and the planet. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(1), 47–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gray, R., & Bebbington, J. (2001). Accounting for the environment (4th ed.). London: SAGE Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
  35. Gray, R., Walters, D., Bebbington, J., & Thompson, I. (1995). The greening of enterprise: An exploration of the (non) role of environmental accounting and environmental accountants in organisational change. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 6(3), 211–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hopwood, A. G., Unerman, J., & Fries, J. (2010). Introduction to the accounting for sustainability case studies. In A. G. Hopwood, J. Unerman, & J. Fries (Eds.), Accounting for sustainability. Practical insights (pp. 1–28). London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  37. Jasinski, D., Meredith, J., & Kirwan, K. (2015). A comprehensive review of full cost accounting methods and their applicability to the automotive industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 105(Part A), 1123–1139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kraus, K., & Stromsten, T. (2012). Going public: The role of accounting and shareholder value in making sense of an IPO. Management Accounting Research, 23(3), 186–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Laine, M. (2005). Meanings of the term ‘Sustainable Development’ in Finnish corporate disclosures. Accounting Forum, 29(4), 395–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Larrinaga-Gonzalez, C., & Bebbington, J. (2001). Accounting change or institutional appropriation? A case study of the implementation of environmental accounting. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 12(3), 269–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Larrinaga-Gonzalez, C., Carrasco-Fenech, F., Caro-Gonzalez, F. J., Correa-Ruiz, C., & Paez-Sandubete, J. M. (2001). The role of environmental accounting in organisational change. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 14(2), 213–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Luft, J. (2009). Nonfinancial information and accounting: A reconsideration of benefits and challenges. Accounting Horizons, 23(3), 307–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Maas, K., Schaltegger, S., & Crutzen, N. (2016). Integrating corporate sustainability assessment, management accounting, control, and reporting. Journal of Cleaner Production, 137, 237–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Maitlis, S., & Christianson, M. (2014). Sensemaking in organizations: Taking stock and moving forward. The Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 57–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Miller, P., & O’Leary, T. (1993). Accounting expertise and the politics of the product: Economic citizenship and modes of corporate governance. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 18(2/3), 187–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Milne, M. J. (1996). On sustainability; the environment and management accounting. Management Accounting Research, 7, 135–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Milne, M. J., Kearins, K., & Walton, S. (2006). Creating adventures in Wonderland: The journey metaphor and environmental sustainability. Organization, 13(6), 801–839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Mintzberg, H. (1978). Patterns in strategy formation. Management Science, 24(9), 934–948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Monteiro, S. M., & Aibar-Guzman, B. (2010). Organisational and accounting change within the context of the environmental agenda. Journal of Accounting and Organisational Change, 6(4), 404–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Schaltegger, S. (2011). Sustainability as a driver for corporate economic success. Consequences for the development of sustainability management control. Society and Economy, 33(1), 15–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Schaltegger, S., & Burritt, R. (2000). Contemporary environmental accounting: Issues, concepts and practice. Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
  52. Schaltegger, S., & Burritt, R. (2010). Sustainability accounting for companies: Catchphrase or decision support for business leaders? Journal of World Business, 45, 375–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Schaltegger, S., Burritt, R., Zvezdov, D., Horisch, J., & Tingey-Holyoak, J. (2015). Management roles and sustainability information. Exploring corporate practice. Australian Accounting Review, 75(5), 328–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Shearer, T. (2002). Ethics and accountability: From the for-itself to the for-the-other. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 27(6), 541–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Smith, R., & Lambell, J. (1997). Accounting for the environment: The role of strategic management accounting. Management Accounting: Magazine for Chartered Management Accountants, 75(2), 34–35.Google Scholar
  56. Spence, L. J., & Rinaldi, L. (2010). Sainsbury’s: Embedding sustainability within the supermarket supply chain. In A. G. Hopwood, J. Unerman, & J. Fries (Eds.), Accounting for sustainability. Practical insights (pp. 47–71). London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  57. Thomson, I. (2014). Mapping the terrain of sustainability and accounting for sustainability. In J. Bebbington, J. Unerman, & B. O’Dwyer (Eds.), Sustainability accounting and accountability (2nd ed., pp. 15–30). Milton Park: Routledge.Google Scholar
  58. Thomson, I., & Bebbington, J. (2005). Social and environmental reporting in the UK: A pedagogic evaluation. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 16, 507–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Thomson, I., & Georgakopoulos, G. (2010). Building from the bottom, inspired from the top: Accounting for sustainability and the environment agency. In A. G. Hopwood, J. Unerman, & J. Fries (Eds.), Accounting for sustainability Practical insights (pp. 129–147). London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  60. Tillmann, K., & Goddard, A. (2008). Strategic management accounting and sense-making in a multinational company. Management Accounting Research, 19(2), 80–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. van der Cramer, J., Heijden, A., & Jonker, J. (2006). Corporate social responsibility: Making sense through thinking and acting. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15(4), 380–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Voronov, M. (2008). Toward a practice perspective on strategic organizational learning. The Learning Organization, 15(2), 195–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. WCED (United Nations World Commission on Environment and Development). (1987). Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development. Our common future. Accessed: 18 March 2012. Available from: http://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/publications/publications.htm.
  64. Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.Google Scholar
  65. Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Obstfeld, D. (2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, 16(4), 409–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Young, J. J. (2006). Making up users. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 31, 581–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Discipline of AccountingThe University of SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations