Female Institutional Directors on Boards and Firm Value

  • María Consuelo Pucheta-Martínez
  • Inmaculada Bel-Oms
  • Gustau Olcina-Sempere


The aim of this research is to examine what impact female institutional directors on boards have on corporate performance. Previous research shows that institutional female directors cannot be considered as a homogeneous group since they represent investors who may or may not maintain business relations with the companies on whose corporate boards they sit. Thus, it is not only the effect of female institutional directors as a whole on firm value that has been analysed, but also the impact of pressure-resistant female directors, who represent institutional investors (investment, pension and mutual funds) that only invest in the company, and do not maintain a business relation with the firm. We hypothesize that there is a non-linear association, specifically quadratic, between institutional and pressure-resistant female directors on boards and corporate performance. Our results report that female institutional directors on boards enhance corporate performance, but when they reach a certain threshold on boards (11.72 %), firm value decreases. In line with female institutional directors, pressure-resistant female directors on boards also increase firm value, but only up to a certain figure (12.71 % on boards), above which they have a negative impact on firm performance. These findings are consistent with an inverted U-shaped relationship between female institutional directors and pressure-resistant female directors and firm performance.


Corporate governance Female institutional directors Pressure-resistant female directors Board of directors Firm value 


  1. Abdelsalam, O., El-Masry, A., & Elsegini, S. (2008). Board composition, ownership structure and dividend policies in an emerging market: Further evidence from CASE 50. Managerial Finance, 34(12), 953–964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Act 3/2007, of 22 March, for Effective Equality between Women and Men.Google Scholar
  3. Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact of governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(2), 291–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aggarwal, R., Erel, I., Ferreira, M., & Matos, P. (2011). Does governance travel around the world? Evidence from institutional investors. Journal of Financial Economics, 100(1), 154–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ahl, H. (2006). Why research on women entrepreneurs needs new directions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(5), 595–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Al Farooque, O. A., Van Zijl, T., Dunstan, K., & Karim, A. W. (2007). Ownership structure and corporate performance: Evidence from Bangladesh. Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics, 14(2), 127–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Aldama Report. (2003). Informe de la comisión especial para el fomento de la transparencia y la seguridad en los mercados financieros y en las sociedades cotizadas. Madrid: Ministerio de Economía y Hacienda.Google Scholar
  8. Ali, M., Ng, Y. L., & Kulik, C. (2014). Board age and gender diversity: A test of competing linear and curvilinear predictions. Journal of Business Ethics, 125(3), 497–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Allen, J. W. (2001). Private information and spin-off performance. The Journal of Business, 74(2), 281–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Almazán, A., Hartzell, J. C., & Starks, L. T. (2005). Active institutional shareholders and costs of monitoring: Evidence from executive compensation. Financial Management, 34(4), 5–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Anderson, R. C., Mansi, S. A., & Reeb, D. M. (2003). Founding family ownership and the agency cost of debt. Journal of Financial Economics, 68(2), 263–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Archambeaut, D., & DeZoort, F. T. (2001). Auditor opinion shopping and the Audit Committee: An analysis of suspicious auditor switches. International Journal of Auditing, 5(1), 33–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Arellano, M. (2003). Panel data econometrics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Atkinson, S. M., Baird, S. B., & Frye, M. B. (2003). Do female mutual fund managers manage differently? Journal of Financial Research, 26(1), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Attig, N., El Ghoul, S., & Guedhami, O. (2009). Do multiple large shareholders play a corporate governance role? Evidence from East Asia. Journal of Financial Research, 32(4), 395–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Barber, B. M., & Odean, T. (2001). Boys will be boys: Gender, overconfidence, and common stock investment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(1), 261–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Baum, F. C. (2006). An introduction to modern econometrics using Stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press.Google Scholar
  18. Beiner, S., Drobetz, W., Schmid, M. M., & Zimmermann, H. (2006). An integrated framework of corporate governance and firm valuation. European Financial Management, 12(2), 249–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bennett, J. A., Sias, R. W., & Starks, L. T. (2003). Greener pastures and the impact of dynamic institutional preferences. Review of Financial Studies, 16(4), 1203–1238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Bhattacharya, P. S., & Graham, M. (2007). Institutional ownership and firm value: Evidence from Finland? Working Paper, School of Accounting, Economics and Finance, Faculty of Business and Law, Deaking University, Melbourne.Google Scholar
  21. Bilimoria, D. (2000). Building the business case for women corporate directors. Women on Corporate Boards of Directors, 14, 25–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Booth, J. R., & Deli, D. N. (1999). On executives of financial institutions as outside directors. Journal of Corporate Finance, 5(3), 227–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Boubakri, N., & Ghouma, H. (2010). Control/ownership structure, creditor rights protection, and the cost of debt financing: International evidence. Journal of Banking & Finance, 34(10), 2481–2499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Brewer, M. B. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17(5), 475–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Brickley, J. A., Lease, R. C., & Smith, C. W. (1988). Ownership structure and voting on antitakeover amendments. Journal of Financial Economics, 20, 267–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Burgess, Z., & Tharenou, P. (2002). Women board directors: Characteristics of the few. Journal of Business Ethics, 37(1), 39–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Burke, R. J. (1997). Women on corporate boards of directors: And needed resource. Journal of Business Ethics, 16(9), 909–915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Burriel, P., Labrador, M., & Brusca, I. (2012). Factores explicativos de la rentabilidad: Género y Responsabilidad Social Empresarial. Paper presented at XV Congreso de la Asociación Española de Profesores Universitarios de Contabilidad, Cádiz.Google Scholar
  29. Byrnes, J., Miller, D., & Schafer, W. (1999). Gender differences in risk taking: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125(3), 367–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Campbell, K., & Mínguez-Vera, A. M. (2008). Gender diversity in the boardroom and firm financial performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(3), 435–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Campbell, K., & Mínguez-Vera, A. M. (2010). Female board appointments and firm valuation: Short and long-term effects. Journal of Management and Governance, 14(1), 37–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Carcello, J. V., & Neal, T. L. (2000). Audit committee composition and auditor reporting. The Accounting Review, 75(4), 453–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Carleton, W. T., Nelson, J. A., & Weisbach, M. S. (1998). The influence of institutions on corporate governance through private negotiations: Evidence from TIAAF-CREF”. Journal of Finance, 53(4), 1335–1362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Carter, D. A., D’Souza, F., Simkins, B. J., & Simpson, W. G. (2010). The gender and ethnic diversity of US boards and board committees and firm financial performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 18(5), 396–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Carter, D., Simkins, B., & Simpson, W. (2003). Corporate governance, board diversity, and firm value. The Financial Review, 38(1), 33–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Chen, C. R., Guo, W., & Mande, V. (2003). Managerial ownership and firm valuation: Evidence from Japanese firms. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 11(3), 267–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Chen, J., Blenman, L., & Chen, D. H. (2008). Does institutional ownership create values? The New Zealand case. Quarterly Journal of Finance and Accounting, 32, 109–124.Google Scholar
  38. Chen, Z., Cheung, Y. L., Stouraitis, A., & Wong, A. W. (2005). Ownership concentration, firm value, and dividend policy in Hong Kong. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 13(4), 431–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Chirinko, R. S., van Ees, H., Garretsen, H., & Sterken, E. (1999). Firm value, financial institutions and corporate governance in the Netherlands. CESifo Working Paper.Google Scholar
  40. Christopher, J. (2010). Corporate governance—A multi-theoretical approach to recognizing the wider influencing forces impacting on organizations. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 21(8), 683–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Chung, R., Firth, M., & Kim, J. B. (2002). Institutional monitoring and opportunistic earnings management. Journal of Corporate Finance, 8(1), 29–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Coles, J. W., McWilliams, V. B., & Sen, N. (2001). An examination of the relationship of governance mechanisms to performance. Journal of Management, 27(1), 23–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Cornett, M. M., Marcus, A. J., Saunders, A., & Tehranian, H. (2007). The impact of institutional ownership on corporate operating performance. Journal of Banking & Finance, 31(6), 1771–1794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. De Miguel, A., Pindado, J., & De la Torre, C. (2004). Ownership structure and firm value: New evidence from Spain. Strategic Management Journal, 25(12), 1199–1207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. De Villiers, C., Naiker, V., & van Staden, C. J. (2011). The effect of board characteristics on firm environmental performance. Journal of Management, 37(6), 1636–1663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Del Guercio, D., & Hawkins, J. (1999). The motivation and impact of pension fund activism. Journal of Financial Economics, 52(3), 293–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Demsetz, H., & Villalonga, B. (2001). Ownership structure and corporate performance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 7(3), 209–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Dong, H. (2014). Essays on mutual fund strategies and investor characteristics. UNIVERSIDAD CARLOS III DE MADRID. Tesis Doctoral. Doctorado en Economía de la Empresa y Métodos Cuantitativos. Departamento de Economía de la Empresa. Mayo.Google Scholar
  49. Dong, M., & Ozkan, A. (2008). Institutional investors and director pay: An empirical study of UK companies. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 18(1), 16–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Drago, C., Millo, F., Ricciuti, R., & Satella, P. (201)1. The role of women in the Italian Network of Boards of Directors, 2003–2010. Working Paper Series Department of Economics, University of Verona, [ISSN: 2036-2919 (paper), 2036-4679 (online)].Google Scholar
  51. Eisenberg, T., Sundgren, S., & Wells, M. T. (1998). Larger board size and decreasing firm value in small firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 48(1), 35–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Elyasiani, E., & Jia, J. (2010). Distribution of institutional ownership and corporate firm value. Journal of Banking & Finance, 34(3), 606–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Erhardt, N., Werbel, J., & Shrader, C. (2003). Board of director diversity and firm financial performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 11(2), 102–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Faccio, M., & Lang, L. H. (2002). The ultimate ownership of Western European corporations. Journal of Financial Economics, 65(3), 365–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Farinha, J. (2003). Dividend policy, corporate governance and the managerial entrenchment hypothesis: An empirical analysis. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 30(9–10), 1173–1209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Ferreira, M. A., & Matos, P. (2008). The colors of investors’ money: The role of institutional investors around the world. Journal of Financial Economics, 88(3), 499–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Fondas, N., & Sassalos, S. (2000). A different voice in the boardroom: How the presence of women directors affects board influence over management. Global Focus, 12(2), 13–22.Google Scholar
  58. Francoeur, C., Labelle, R., & Sinclair-Desgnané, B. (2008). Gender diversity in corporate governance and top management. Journal of Business Ethics, 81(1), 83–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Frink, D. D., Robinson, R. K., Reithel, B., Arthur, M. M., Ammeter, A. P., Ferris, G. R., et al. (2003). Gender demography and organization performance a two-study investigation with convergence. Group and Organization Management, 28(1), 127–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Garba, T., & Abubakar, B. A. (2014). Corporate board diversity and financial performance of insurance companies in Nigeria: An application of panel data approach. Asian Economic and Financial Review, 4(2), 257–277.Google Scholar
  61. García-Meca, E., López-Iturriaga, F., & Tejerina, F. (2015). Institutional investors on board. Does their behaviour influence corporate finance? Journal of Business Ethics, 2, 1–18.Google Scholar
  62. García-Osma, B., & Gill de Albornoz-Noguer, B. (2007). The effect of the board composition and its monitoring committees on earnings management: Evidence from Spain. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(6), 1413–1428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Gillan, S. L., & Starks, L. T. (2003). Corporate governance, corporate ownership, and the role of institutional investors, a global perspective. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 13(2), 4–22.Google Scholar
  64. Giner, B., & Pardo, F. (2015). How ethical are managers’ goodwill impairment decisions in Spanish-listed firms? Journal of Business Ethics, 132(1), 21–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Grant Thornton. (2013). Women in senior management: Setting the stage for growth. Available at:
  66. Gómez-Ansón, S. (2005). Diversidad de género en los consejos de administración de las sociedades cotizadas y cajas de ahorros españolas. Papeles de la Fundación de Estudios Financieros, paper 12.Google Scholar
  67. Gulzar, M. A., & Wang, Z. (2011). Corporate Governance characteristics and earnings management: Empirical evidence from Chinese listed firms. International Journal of Accounting and Financial Reporting., 1(1), 134–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Haan, C. T. (2002). Statistical methods in hydrology (2nd ed.). Ames, IA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  69. Haddaji, W. (2009). Corporate Governance and corporate control: Evidence from trading. Doctoral dissertation, Duke University.Google Scholar
  70. Han, K. C., Lee, S. H., & Suk, D. Y. (1999). Institutional shareholders and dividends. Journal of Financial and Strategic Decisions, 12(1), 53–62.Google Scholar
  71. Heidrick & Struggles. (2011). Challenging board performance. European report on corporate governance: Chicago, IL: Heidrick & Struggles.Google Scholar
  72. Heidrick & Struggles. (2014). Towards dynamics governance 2014. European corporate governance report. Chicago, IL: Heidrick & Struggles.Google Scholar
  73. Hermalin, B. E., & Weisbach, M. S. (1998). Endogenously chosen boards of directors and their monitoring of the CEO. American Economic Review, 88, 96–118.Google Scholar
  74. Hidalgo, R., García, E., & Demetrio, S. (2012). Impacta la estructura del Gobierno Corporativo en la rentabilidad empresarial? Paper presented at al XV Congreso de la Asociación Española de Profesores Universitarios de Contabilidad, Cádiz.Google Scholar
  75. Hillman, A. J., & Dalziel, T. (2003). Boards of directors and firm value: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 383–396.Google Scholar
  76. Hillman, A. J., Withers, M. C., & Collins, B. J. (2009). Resource dependence theory: A review. Journal of Management, 35(6), 1404–1427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Hovakimian, A., & Li, G. (2010). Shareholder investment horizons and payout policy. Available at SSRN 1571757.Google Scholar
  78. Hu, Y., & Izumida, S. (2008). Ownership concentration and corporate performance: A causal analysis with Japanese panel data. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16(4), 342–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Huse, M., Nielsen, S., & Hagen, I. M. (2009). Women and employee-elected board members, and their contributions to board control tasks. Journal of Business Ethics, 89(4), 581–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Huse, M., & Solberg, A. G. (2006). Gender-related boardroom dynamics: How Scandinavian women make and can make contributions on corporate boards. Women in Management Review, 21(2), 113–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Huson, M. R. (1997). Does governance matter? Evidence from CalPERS interventions. Unpublished working paper, University of Alberta, Edmonton.Google Scholar
  82. Ibrahim, H., & Samad, F. A. (2014). Corporate governance mechanisms and performance of public-listed family-ownership in Malaysia. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 3(1), 105–115.Google Scholar
  83. Jacobson, R., & Aaker, D. (1993). Myopic management behaviour with efficient, but imperfect, financial markets: A comparison of information asymmetries in the US and Japan. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 16(49), 383–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Jara-Bertín, M., López-Iturriaga, F., & López-de-Foronda, O. (2012). Does the influence of institutional investors depend on the institutional framework? An international analysis. Applied Economics, 44(3), 265–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Jensen, M. C. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. The American Economic Review, 76(2), 323–329.Google Scholar
  86. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Jianakoplos, N., & Bernasek, A. (1998). Are women more risk averse? Economic Inquiry, 36(4), 620–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Jiao, Y., & Ye, P. (2013). Public pension fund ownership and firm performance. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 40(3), 571–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Jo, H., & Harjoto, M. A. (2011). Corporate governance and firm value: The impact of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 103(3), 351–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Johnsen, G. J., & McMahon, R. G. (2005). Owner-manager gender, financial performance and business growth amongst SMEs from Australia’s business longitudinal survey. International Small Business Journal, 23(2), 115–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Johnson, J. L., Daily, C. M., & Ellstrand, A. E. (1996). Boards of directors: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 22(3), 409–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Johnson, R. A., & Greening, D. W. (1999). The effects of corporate governance and institutional ownership types on corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 564–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Karpoff, J. M. (1999). The impact of shareholder activism on target companies: A survey of empirical findings. Unpublished working paper, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.Google Scholar
  94. Khazanchi, D. (1995). Unethical behavior in information systems: The gender factor. Journal of Business Ethics, 14(9), 741–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Kirchmaier, T., & Grant, J. (2005). Corporate ownership structure and performance in Europe. European Management Review, 2(3), 231–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Klock, M. S., Mansi, S. A., & Maxwell, W. F. (2005). Does corporate governance matter to bondholders? Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 40(4), 693–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Knouse, S. B., & Dansby, M. R. (1999). Percentage of work-group diversity and work-group effectiveness. The Journal of Psychology, 133, 486–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Knyazeva, A., Knyazeva, D., & Raheja, C. G. (2013). The benefits of focus versus heterogeneity: Dissimilar directors and coordination within corporate boards. Unpublished working paper.Google Scholar
  99. Kochhar, R., & David, P. (1996). Institutional investors and firm innovation: A test of competing hypotheses. Strategic Management Journal, 17(1), 73–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Kravitz, D. A. (2003). More women in the workplace: Is there a payoff in firm performance? Academy of Management Executive, 17(3), 148–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Kumar, J. (2004). Does corporate governance influence firm value? Evidence from Indian firms. Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance and Business Ventures, 9(2), 61–92.Google Scholar
  102. Kumar, N., & Singh, J. P. (2012). Outside directors, corporate governance and firm value: Empirical evidence from India. Asian Journal of Finance & Accounting, 4(2), 39–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. La Porta, R., López de Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (1999). Corporate ownership around the world. Journal of Finance, 54(2), 471–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Lee, J. W., & Zhang, Z. (2011). Ownership structure, corporate governance and firm value: Evidence from Chinese listed companies. In Corporate governance and firm value: Evidence from Chinese listed companies finance and corporate governance conference. December 16, 2010.Google Scholar
  105. Levine, R. (1999). Law, finance, and economic growth. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 8(1), 8–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Levine, R., Loayza, N., & Beck, T. (2000). Financial intermediation and growth: Causality and causes. Journal of Monetary Economics, 46(1), 31–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Lin, F. (2010). A panel threshold model of institutional ownership and firm value in Taiwan. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 42, 54–62.Google Scholar
  108. Liu, Y., Wei, Z., & Xie, F. (2013). Do women directors improve firm value in China? Journal of Corporate Finance, 46, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. López-Iturriaga, F. J., García-Meca, E., & Tejerina Gaite, F. (2015). Institutional directors and board compensation: Spanish evidence. Business Research Quarterly, 18, 161–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Loukil, N., & Yousfi, O. (2013). Does gender diversity on board lead to risk-taking? Empirical evidence from Tunisia. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 33, 66–81.Google Scholar
  111. Lückerath-Rovers, M. (2013). Women on boards and firm value. Journal of Management and Governance, 17(2), 491–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Mak, Y. T., & Kusnadi, Y. (2005). Size really matters: Further evidence on the negative relationship between board size and firm value. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 13(3), 301–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Manzaneque, M., Merino, E., & Priego, A.M. (2016). The role of institutional shareholders as owners and directors and the financial distress likelihood. Evidence from a concentrated ownership context. European Management Journal, Forthcoming.Google Scholar
  114. Martín-Ugedo, J. F., & Mínguez-Vera, A. (2014). Firm value and women on the board: Evidence from Spanish small and medium-sized enterprises. Feminist Economics, 20(3), 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Masulis, R. W., & Mobbs, S. (2011). Are all inside directors the same? Evidence from the external directorship market. Journal of Finance, 66(3), 823–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Mateos de Cabo, R. M., Gimeno, R., & Escot, L. (2010). Discriminación en consejos de administración: Análisis e implicaciones económicas. Revista de Economía Aplicada, 18(53), 131–162.Google Scholar
  117. Maznevski, M. L. (1994). Understanding our differences: Performance in decision-making groups with diverse members. Human Relations, 47(5), 531–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. McConnell, J. J., & Servaes, H. (1990). Additional evidence on equity ownership and corporate value. Journal of Financial Economics, 27, 595–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Morck, R., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1988). Management ownership and market valuation: An empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 20, 293–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Muller-Kahle, M. I. (2012). The impact of dominant ownership: The case of Anglo-American firms. Journal of Management & Governance, 16, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Navissi, F., & Naiker, V. (2006). Institutional ownership and corporate value. Managerial Finance, 32(3), 247–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Nekhili, M., & Gatfaoui, H. (2013). Are demographic attributes and firm characteristics drivers of gender diversity? Investigating women’s positions on French boards of directors. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(2), 227–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Neter, J., Wasserman, W., & Kumer, M. (1985). Applied linear statistical models. Homewood, IL: Irwin Press.Google Scholar
  124. Nielsen, S., & Huse, M. (2010). The contribution of women on boards of directors: Going beyond the surface. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 18(2), 136–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Olivencia Report. (1998). El Buen Gobierno de las Sociedades. Madrid: Ministerio de Economía y Hacienda.Google Scholar
  126. Pathan, S., & Faff, R. (2013). Does board structure in banks really affect their performance? Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(5), 1573–1589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Pelled, L. H. (1996). Demographic diversity, conflict, and work group outcomes: An intervention process theory. Organization Science, 7, 615–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Peng, M. W. (2004). Outside directors and firm value during institutional transitions. Strategic Management Journal, 25(5), 453–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Peng, M. W., Zhang, S., & Li, X. (2007). CEO duality and firm value during China’s institutional transitions. Management and Organization Review, 3(2), 205–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Pound, J. (1988). Proxy contest and the efficiency of shareholder oversight. Journal of Financial Economics, 20, 237–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Pucheta-Martínez, M. C., & García-Meca, E. (2014). Institutional investors on boards and audit committees and their effects on financial reporting quality. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 22(4), 347–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Qi, B., & Tian, G. (2012). The impact of Audit Committees’ personal characteristics on earnings management: Evidence from China. Journal of Applied Business Research, 28(6), 1331–1343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Rajgopal, S., & Venkatachalam, M. (1998). The role of institutional investors in corporate governance: An empirical investigation. Working paper, University of Washington/Stanford University.Google Scholar
  134. Rashid, A. (2012). Corporate governance, ownership structure and firm value: Evidence from an emerging economy. Corporate Ownership and Control, 9(4), 441–455.Google Scholar
  135. Rashid, A. (2013). CEO duality and agency cost: Evidence from Bangladesh. Journal of Management and Governance, 17, 989–1008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. Rashid, A., De Zoysa, A., Lodh, S., & Rudkin, K. (2010). Board composition and firm performance: Evidence from Bangladesh. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 4(1), 76–95.Google Scholar
  137. Robinson, G., & Dechant, K. (1997). Building a business case for diversity. Academy of Management Executive, 11(3), 21–30.Google Scholar
  138. Rogelberg, S. G., & Rumery, S. M. (1996). Gender diversity, team decision quality, time on task, and interpersonal cohesion. Small Group Research, 27(1), 79–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. Ruegger, D., & King, E. W. (1992). A study of the effect of age and gender upon student business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 11(3), 179–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. Ruiz-Mallorquí, M. V., & Santana-Martín, D. J. (2011). Dominant institutional owners and firm value. Journal of Banking & Finance, 35(1), 118–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. Sacramento, M., Moreira, A. C., & Vieira, E. F. S. (2013). Blockholders presence, identity and institutional context. Are they relevant for firm value? International Journal Business Governance and Ethics, 8(1), 18–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. Sahu, A. K. (2014). Do financial institutions affect firm value? An empirical analysis in Indian market. SSRN Electronic Journal, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2413074.Google Scholar
  143. Sahut, J. M., & Othmani-Gharbi, H. (2010). Institutional investors’ typology and firm value: The case of French firms. International Journal of Business, 15(1), 33–50.Google Scholar
  144. Saunders, A., Cornett, M. M., Marcus, A. J., & Tehranian, H. (2003). The impact of institutional ownership on corporate operating performance. NYU Stern Finance Working Paper No. 03-033.Google Scholar
  145. Schwartz-Ziv, M. (2011). Are all welcome a-board: What do women directors bring to the table. Working Paper, Hebrew University.Google Scholar
  146. Sheikh, N. A., Wang, Z., & Khan, S. (2013). The impact of internal attributes of corporate governance on firm value: Evidence from Pakistan. International Journal of Commerce and Management, 23(1), 38–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  147. Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1986). Large shareholders and corporate control. Journal of Political Economy, 94(3), 458–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  148. Short, H., Zhang, H., & Keasey, K. (2002). The link between dividend policy and institutional ownership. Journal of Corporate Finance, 8(2), 105–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  149. Simons, T., & Pelled, L. H. (1999). Understanding executive diversity: More than meets the eye. Human Resource Planning, 22, 49–51.Google Scholar
  150. Singh, V. (2007). Ethnic diversity on top corporate boards: A resource dependency perspective. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18(12), 2128–2146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  151. Tajfel, H. (1978). Social categorization, social identity and social comparison. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 61–76). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  152. Talpsepp, T. (2013). Does gender and age affect investor performance and the disposition effect? Research in Economics and Business: Central and Eastern Europe, 2(1), 76–93.Google Scholar
  153. Terjesen, S., Sealy, R., & Singh, V. (2009). Women directors on corporate boards: A review and research agenda. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(3), 320–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  154. Tian, J. J., & Lau, C. M. (2001). Board composition, leadership structure and performance in Chinese shareholding companies. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 18(2), 245–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  155. Unified Code of Corporate Governance (CUBG). (2015). Informe del grupo especial de trabajo sobre buen gobierno de las sociedades cotizadas. Madrid: Comité Conthe.Google Scholar
  156. Valsan, R. (2015). Gender diversity in the boards of directors: A corporate governance perspective. Working paper, European Union Centre of Excellence, University of Alberta.Google Scholar
  157. Van Essen, M., Van Oosterhout, J., & Heugens, P. P. (2013). Competition and cooperation in corporate governance: The effects of labour institutions on blockholder effectiveness in 23 European countries. Organization Science, 24(2), 530–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  158. Van Nuys, K. (1993). Corporate governance through the proxy process: Evidence from the 1989 Honeywell proxy solicitation. Journal of Financial Economics, 34, 101–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  159. Van Pelt, T. (2013). The effect of board characteristics on dividend policy. Tilburg: Tilburg University.Google Scholar
  160. Villalonga, B., & Amit, R. (2006). How do family ownership, control and management affect firm value? Journal of Financial Economics, 80(2), 385–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  161. Vo, D. H., & Nguyen, T. M. (2014). The impact of corporate governance on firm value: Empirical study in Vietnam. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 6(6), 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  162. Wahba, H., & Elsayed, K. (2014). The effect of institutional investor type on the relationship between CEO duality and financial performance. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, 9(3), 221–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  163. Wang, M. (2014). Which types of institutional investors constrain abnormal accruals? Corporate Governance: An International Review, 22(1), 43–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  164. Wei, Z., Xie, F., & Zhang, S. (2005). Ownership structure and firm value in China’s privatized firms: 1991–2001. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 40(01), 87–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  165. Welch, S., & Wang, Y. (2013). Is manager gender important in the performance of mutual funds? Accounting and Finance Faculty Publications, 6, 1–31. Available:
  166. Wellalage, N., Fauzi, F., & Wang, G. (2012). Corporate governance and cash dividend policy: Evidence from Chinese IPOs. Working Paper.Google Scholar
  167. Yeh, Y. (2005). Do controlling shareholders enhance corporate value? Corporate Governance: An International Review, 13(2), 313–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  168. Yermack, D. (1996). Higher valuation of companies with a small board of directors. Journal of Financial Economics, 40(2), 185–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  169. Yuan, R., Xiao, J. Z., & Zou, H. (2008). Mutual funds’ ownership and firm value: Evidence from China. Journal of Banking & Finance, 32(8), 1552–1565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  170. Zou, H. (2010). Hedging affecting firm value via financing and investment: Evidence from property insurance use. Financial Management, 39(3), 965–996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • María Consuelo Pucheta-Martínez
    • 1
  • Inmaculada Bel-Oms
    • 2
  • Gustau Olcina-Sempere
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Finance and AccountingUniversity Jaume ICastellónSpain
  2. 2.Department of Business Administration and MarketingUniversity Jaume ICastellónSpain
  3. 3.Department of EducationUniversity Jaume ICastellónSpain

Personalised recommendations