Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 151, Issue 1, pp 37–54 | Cite as

Goffman’s Return to Las Vegas: Studying Corruption as Social Interaction

  • Dennis Schoeneborn
  • Fabian Homberg
Article

Abstract

In this paper, we argue that corruption research can benefit from studying corrupt transactions as a particular form of social interaction. We showcase the usefulness of a theoretical focus on social interaction by investigating online user reports on the website Frontdesktip.com. Through this focus, we can observe users sharing experiences and tips on the best ways of bribing hotel clerks in Las Vegas for attaining room upgrades and other complimentary extras. We employ a logistic regression analysis to examine what factors influence the “successful” performance of this bribery practice. Our study makes a twofold contribution to existing research on corruption. First, on the theoretical level, we show that the typified and scripted character of social interactions can help explain the occurrence of corrupt transactions. Second, on a methodological level, our study showcases online self-reports as a useful data source to study corrupt transactions in an unobtrusive way.

Keywords

Business ethics Bribery Codes of conduct Corruption Online media Social interactions 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Michael Etter, Patrick Haack, Merrill Jones Barradale, Hans Krause Hansen, Katja Rost, Andreas G. Scherer, Arne Robert Weiss, Glen Whelan, and Peter Winkler for their fruitful comments and suggestions regarding earlier versions. We owe special gratitude to Roland Stettler for his generous and invaluable assistance with data collection and analysis in the initial stages of this research project. Furthermore, we are grateful for the helpful research support provided by Joyce Costello and Jordan Vincent. Portions of this research were funded by the Research Council of Norway (project “Fair Labor in the Digitized Economy” at BI Business School, Oslo), the Danish Council for Strategic Research (project “Responsible Business in the Blogosphere” at Copenhagen Busines School) as well as the “Governing Responsible Business” (GRB) Research Environment at Copenhagen Business School.

References

  1. Anand, V., Ashforth, B. E., & Joshi, M. (2004). Business as usual: The acceptance and perpetuation of corruption in organizations. Academy of Management Executive, 18(2), 39–53.Google Scholar
  2. Argandoña, A. (2003). Private-to-private corruption. Journal of Business Ethics, 47(3), 253–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Argandoña, A. (2005). Corruption and companies: The use of facilitating payments. Journal of Business Ethics, 60(3), 251–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Armantier, O., & Boly, A. (2011). A controlled field experiment on corruption. European Economic Review, 55(8), 1072–1082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ashforth, B. E., & Anand, V. (2003). The normalization of corruption in organizations. In R. M. Kramer & B. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 1–52). Greenwich, CT: JAI.Google Scholar
  6. Ashforth, B. E., Gioia, D. A., Robinson, S. L., & Trevino, L. K. (2008). Introduction to a special topic forum: Re-viewing organizational corruption. Academy of Management Review, 33(3), 670–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Azar, O. H. (2007). Why pay extra? Tipping and the importance of social norms and feelings in economic theory. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 36(2), 250–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barley, S. R., & Tolbert, P. S. (1997). Institutionalization and structuration: Studying the links between action and institution. Organization Studies, 18(1), 93–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Becker, T. E., Atinc, G., Breaugh, J. A., Carlson, K. D., Edwards, J. R., & Spector, P. E. (2016). Statistical control in correlational studies: 10 essential recommendations for organizational researchers. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37(2), 157–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bernardi, R. A., Delorey, E. L., LaCross, C. C., & Waite, R. A. (2003). Evidence of social desirability response bias in ethics research: An international study. Journal of Applied Business Research, 19(3), 42–52.Google Scholar
  11. Bernerth, J. B., & Aguinis, H. (2016). A critical review and best-practice recommendations for control variable usage. Personnel Psychology, 69(1), 229–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bertrand, M., Djankov, S., Hanna, R., & Mullainathan, S. (2007). Obtaining a driver’s license in India: An experimental approach to studying corruption. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(4), 1639–1676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Blundo, G. (2007). Hidden acts, open talks. How anthropology can “observe” and describe corruption. In M. Nuijten & G. Anders (Eds.), Corruption and the secret of law. A legal anthropological perspective (pp. 27–53). Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  14. Blundo, G., & de Sardan, J. P. O. (2006). Everyday corruption and the state: Citizens and public officials in Africa. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  15. Bondy, K., Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). Multinational corporation codes of conduct: Governance tools for corporate social responsibility? Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16(4), 294–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Breit, E. (2010). On the (re)construction of corruption in the media: A critical discursive approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 92(4), 619–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2013). Local area unemployment statistics (Series ID: LAUMT32298203). Retrieved from http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LAUMT32298203?data_tool=Xgtable.
  18. Butterfield, K. D., Treviño, L. K., & Weaver, G. R. (2000). Moral awareness in business organizations: Influences of issue-related and social context factors. Human Relations, 53(7), 981–1018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Clair, J. A., Beatty, J. E., & MacLean, T. L. (2005). Out of sight but not out of mind: Managing invisible social identities in the workplace. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 78–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Clark, B. T., & Allen, D. W. (2004). Political economy and the adoption of everyday environmental policies in the American states: An exploratory analysis. The Social Science Journal, 41(4), 525–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cleek, M. A., & Leonard, S. L. (1998). Can corporate codes of ethics influence behavior? Journal of Business Ethics, 17(6), 619–630.Google Scholar
  22. Cole, S., & Ahn, T. (2011). Evidence from the firm: A new approach to understanding corruption. In S. Rose-Ackerman & T. Søreide (Eds.), The international handbook on the economics of corruption (pp. 408–427). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  23. Cressey, D. R. (1953). Other people’s money; a study of the social psychology of embezzlement. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  24. Crowley, P. J. (2012). The rise of transparency and the decline of secrecy in the age of global and social media. Penn State International Law Review, 1(2), 241–390.Google Scholar
  25. Davis, J. H., & Ruhe, J. A. (2003). Perceptions of country corruption: Antecedents and outcomes. Journal of Business Ethics, 43(4), 275–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Della Porta, D., & Vannucci, A. (2012). The hidden order of corruption: An institutional approach. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  27. Den Nieuwenboer, N. A., & Kaptein, M. (2008). Spiraling down into corruption: A dynamic analysis of the social identity processes that cause corruption in organizations to grow. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(2), 133–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Dorminey, J., Fleming, A. S., Kranacher, M. J., & Riley, R. A, Jr. (2012). The evolution of fraud theory. Issues in Accounting Education, 27(2), 555–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fine, G. A., & Manning, P. (2003). Erving Goffman. In G. Ritzer (Ed.), The Blackwell companion to major contemporary social theorists (pp. 34–62). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  30. Getz, K. A., & Volkema, R. J. (2001). Culture, perceived corruption, and economics: A model of predictors and outcomes. Business and Society, 40(1), 7–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Goffman, E. (1955). On face-work: An analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. Psychiatry, 18, 213–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  33. Goffman, E. (1969). Where the action is: Three essays. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  34. Gomez, P. Y., & Jones, B. C. (2000). Conventions: An interpretation of deep structure in organizations. Organization Science, 11(6), 696–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Halter, M. V., De Arruda, M. C. C., & Halter, R. B. (2009). Transparency to reduce corruption? Journal of Business Ethics, 84(3), 373–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (2007). Ethnography: Principles in practice. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Heath, J. (2006). Business ethics without stakeholders. Business Ethics Quarterly, 16(4), 533–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hollinger, R. D., Slora, K. B., & Terris, W. (1992). Deviance in the fast-food restaurant: Correlates of employee theft, altruism, and counterproductivity. Deviant Behavior, 13(2), 155–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. HVS. (2012). HVS Las Vegas casino and hotel market outlook 2012. Retrieved from http://www.hvs.com/Content/3226.pdf.
  40. Jagd, S. (2007). Economics of convention and new economic sociology: Mutual inspiration and dialogue. Current Sociology, 55(1), 75–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. James, H. S. (2002). When is a bribe a bribe: Teaching a workable definition of bribery. Teaching Business Ethics, 6(2), 199–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Jancsics, D. (2013). Petty corruption in Central and Eastern Europe: the client’s perspective. Crime, Law and Social Change, 60(3), 319–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Jancsics, D. (2014). Interdisciplinary perspectives on corruption. Sociology Compass, 8(4), 358–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Jex, S. M., & Gudanowski, D. M. (1992). Efficacy beliefs and work stress: An exploratory study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13(5), 509–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ketokivi, M., & Mantere, S. (2010). Two strategies for inductive reasoning in organizational research. Academy of Management Review, 35(2), 315–333.Google Scholar
  46. Konchar, S. (2014). The 2012 Libor scandal: An analysis of the lack of institutional oversight and incentives to deter manipulation of the world’s most important number. Transnational Law & Contemporary Problems, 23, 173–197.Google Scholar
  47. Kulik, B. W., O’Fallon, M. J., & Salimath, M. S. (2008). Do competitive environments lead to the rise and spread of unethical behavior? Parallels from Enron. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(4), 703–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lambsdorff, J. G. (2006). Measuring corruption: The validity and precision of subjective indicators. In C. J. Sampford, A. Shacklock, C. Connors, & F. Galtung (Eds.), Measuring corruption (pp. 81–100). Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  49. Lambsdorff, J. G., & Frank, B. (2011). Corrupt reciprocity: Experimental evidence on a men’s game. International Review of Law and Economics, 31(2), 116–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lindstedt, C., & Naurin, D. (2010). Transparency is not enough: Making transparency effective in reducing corruption. International Political Science Review, 31(3), 301–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Luhmann, N. (1992). What is communication? Communication Theory, 2(3), 251–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Martinez, A., & Williams, C. C. (2014). Explaining cross-national variations in tax morality in the European Union: an exploratory analysis. Studies of Transition States and Societies, 6(1), 5–18.Google Scholar
  53. Mocan, N. (2008). What determines corruption? International evidence from microdata. Economic Inquiry, 46(4), 493–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Morales, J., Gendron, Y., & Guénin-Paracini, H. (2014). The construction of the risky individual and vigilant organization: A genealogy of the fraud triangle. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 39(3), 170–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Olken, B., & Barron, P. (2009). The simple economics of extortion: Evidence from trucking in Aceh. Journal of Political Economy, 117(3), 417–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Petrillose, M. J., & Brewer, K. P. (2012). An exploration of customer retention factors in Las Vegas casino resort properties. UNLV Gaming Research & Review Journal, 5(2), 1–14.Google Scholar
  57. Rabl, T. (2011). The impact of situational influences on corruption in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 100(1), 85–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Rabl, T. (2012). Do contextual factors matter? An investigation of ethical judgments of corrupt acts. Journal of Business Economics, 82(6), 5–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Seidl, D. (2005). Organization and interaction. In D. Seidl & K. H. Becker (Eds.), Niklas Luhmann and organization studies (pp. 145–170). Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press.Google Scholar
  60. Sequeira, S. (2012). Advances in measuring corruption in the field. In D. Serra & L. Wantchekon (Eds.), New advances in experimental research on corruption (pp. 145–175). Bingley: Emerald.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Simmons, J. R. (1999). Altruistic corruption: The Downsian bureaucrats revisited. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 21(3), 265–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Svensson, J. (2003). Who must pay bribes and how much? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(1), 207–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Toffler, B. L. (2003). Final accounting: Ambition, greed, and the fall of Arthur Andersen. New York: Broadway Books.Google Scholar
  64. Torfason, M. T., Flynn, F. J., & Kupor, D. (2013). Here is a tip: Prosocial gratuities are linked to corruption. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4(3), 348–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Torsello, D., & Venard, B. (2016). The anthropology of corruption. Journal of Management Inquiry, 25(1), 34–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Udoidem, I. (1987). Tips in business transaction: A moral issue. Journal of Business Ethics, 6(8), 613–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Vásquez, C., Schoeneborn, D., & Sergi, V. (2016). Summoning the spirits: Organizational texts and the (dis)ordering properties of communication. Human Relations, 69(3), 629–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Venard, B. (2009). Organizational isomorphism and corruption: An empirical research in Russia. Journal of Business Ethics, 89(1), 59–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Venard, B., & Hanafi, M. (2008). Organizational isomorphism and corruption in financial institutions: Empirical research in emerging countries. Journal of Business Ethics, 81(2), 481–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Warburton, J. (2001). Corruption as a social process: From dyads to networks. In P. Larmour & N. Wolanin (Eds.), Corruption and anti-corruption (pp. 221–237). Canberra: Asia-Pacific.Google Scholar
  71. Weber, J., & Wasieleski, D. (2001). Investigating influences on managers’ moral reasoning: The impact of context and personal and organizational factors. Business and Society, 40(1), 79–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Copenhagen Business SchoolFrederiksbergDenmark
  2. 2.Southampton Business SchoolSouthamptonUK

Personalised recommendations