Corporate Governance and Sustainability Performance: Analysis of Triple Bottom Line Performance



The study empirically investigates the relationship between corporate governance and the triple bottom line sustainability performance through the lens of agency theory and stakeholder theory. We claim, in fact, that no single theory fully accounts for all the hypothesised relationships. We measure sustainability performance through manual content analysis on sustainability reports of the US-based companies. The study extends the existing literature by investigating the impact of selected corporate governance mechanisms on each dimension of sustainability performance, as defined by the GRI framework. Our approach allows to identify which governance mechanisms foster triple bottom line performance, also revealing that some mechanisms fit only specific dimension(s) of sustainability. The fact-based findings provide support for a new beginning in the theorising process in which the theories must try not only to provide rationale for the impact of corporate governance on sustainability, but also to explain which dimension of sustainability might be more affected. The most important implication for practitioners is the support for sustainability practices, which may be gained through implementation of particular corporate governance mechanisms. The findings contribute also to the improvement of the ongoing standard setting process, in particular as it concerns the in-depth revision of the economic dimension of sustainability carried out under the new GRI framework.


Corporate Governance Board independence Sustainability performance Agency theory Stakeholder theory 


  1. Adawi, M., & Rwegasira, K. (2011). Corporate boards and voluntary implementation of best disclosure practices in emerging markets: Evidence from the UAE listed companies in the Middle East. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 8(3), 272–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahmed, K., Hossain, M., & Adams, M. B. (2006). The effects of board composition and board size on the informativeness of annual accounting earnings. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 14(5), 418–431. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8683.2006.00515.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Akhtaruddin, M., Hossain, M. A., Hossain, M., & Yao, L. (2009). Corporate governance and voluntary disclosure in corporate annual reports of Malaysian listed firms. Journal of Applied Management Accounting Research, 7(1), 1–19.Google Scholar
  4. Allegrini, M., & Greco, G. (2013). Corporate boards, audit committees and voluntary disclosure: evidence from Italian Listed Companies. Journal of Management and Governance, 17(1), 187–216. doi: 10.1007/s10997-011-9168-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Al-Shammari, B., & Al-Sultan, W. (2010). Corporate governance and voluntary disclosure in Kuwait. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 7(3), 262–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Amran, A., Lee, S. P., & Devi, S. S. (2014). The influence of governance structure and strategic corporate social responsibility toward sustainability reporting quality. Business Strategy and the Environment, 23(4), 217–235. doi: 10.1002/bse.1767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Aras, G., & Crowther, D. (2008). Governance and sustainability. Management Decision, 46(3), 433–448. doi: 10.1108/00251740810863870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Arena, C., Bozzolan, S., & Michelon, G. (2014). Environmental reporting: Transparency to stakeholders or stakeholder manipulation? An analysis of disclosure tone and the role of the board of directors. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management,. doi: 10.1002/csr.1350.Google Scholar
  9. Arussi, A. S. A., Selamat, M. H., & Hanefah, M. M. (2009). Determinants of financial and environmental disclosures through the internet by Malaysian companies. Asian Review of Accounting, 17(1), 59–76. doi: 10.1108/13217340910956513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Babío Arcay, M. R., & Muiño Vázquez, M. F. (2005). Corporate characteristics, governance rules and the extent of voluntary disclosure in Spain. Advances in Accounting, 21, 299–331. doi: 10.1016/S0882-6110(05)21013-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Barako, D., & Brown, A. (2008). Corporate social reporting and board representation: evidence from the Kenyan banking sector. Journal of Management and Governance, 12(4), 309–324. doi: 10.1007/s10997-008-9053-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Barako, D. G., Hancock, P., & Izan, H. Y. (2006). Factors influencing voluntary corporate disclosure by Kenyan Companies. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 14(2), 107–125. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8683.2006.00491.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brammer, S., & Pavelin, S. (2006). Voluntary environmental disclosures by large UK Companies. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 33(7–8), 1168–1188. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5957.2006.00598.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Buniamin, S., Alrazi, B., Johari, N. H., & Rahman, N. R. A. (2011). Corporate governance practices and environmental reporting of companies in Malaysia: Finding possibilities of double thumbs up. Journal Pengurusan, 32(2011), 55–71.Google Scholar
  15. Campbell, K., & Mínguez-Vera, A. (2008). Gender diversity in the boardroom and firm financial performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(3), 435–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chen, H., & Wang, X. (2011). Corporate social responsibility and corporate financial performance in China: An empirical research from Chinese firms. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 11(4), 361–370. doi: 10.1108/14720701111159217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cheng, E. C. M., & Courtenay, S. M. (2006). Board composition, regulatory regime and voluntary disclosure. The International Journal of Accounting, 41(3), 262–289. doi: 10.1016/j.intacc.2006.07.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Coles, J. L., Daniel, N. D., & Naveen, L. (2008). Boards: Does one size fit all? Journal of Financial Economics, 87(2), 329–356. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2006.08.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cormier, D., Ledoux, M. J., & Magnan, M. (2011). The informational contribution of social and environmental disclosures for investors. Management Decision, 49(8), 1276–1304. doi: 10.1108/00251741111163124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cox, P., Brammer, S., & Millington, A. (2004). An empirical examination of institutional investor preferences for corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 52(1), 27–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Daily, C. M., & Dalton, D. R. (2003). Women in the boardroom: a business imperative. Journal of Business Strategy, 24(5), 8–10. doi: 10.1108/jbs.2003.28824eaf.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. De Andres, P., Azofra, V., & Lopez, F. (2005). Corporate Boards in OECD Countries: size, composition, functioning and effectiveness. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 13(2), 197–210. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8683.2005.00418.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Deegan, C. (2000). Financial accounting theory. Sydney: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  24. Dey, A. (2008). Corporate governance and agency conflicts. Journal of Accounting Research, 46(5), 1143–1181. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-679X.2008.00301.x.Google Scholar
  25. Dhaliwal, D. S., Li, O. Z., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. G. (2011). Voluntary nonfinancial disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The initiation of corporate social responsibility reporting. The Accounting Review, 86(1), 59–100. doi: 10.2308/accr.00000005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91. doi: 10.5465/amr.1995.9503271992.Google Scholar
  27. Dunn, P., & Sainty, B. (2009). The relationship among board of director characteristics, corporate social performance and corporate financial performance. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 5(4), 407–423. doi: 10.1108/17439130910987558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks. The triple bottom line of 21st century (The triple bottom line of 21st century). Capstone: Oxford.Google Scholar
  29. Eng, L. L., & Mak, Y. T. (2003). Corporate governance and voluntary disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 22(4), 325–345. doi: 10.1016/S0278-4254(03)00037-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Erhardt, N. L., Werbel, J. D., & Shrader, C. B. (2003). Board of director diversity and firm financial performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 11(2), 102–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301–325. doi: 10.2307/725104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Fernandez-Feijoo, B., Romero, S., & Ruiz, S. (2012). Does board gender composition affect corporate social responsibility reporting? International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(1), 31–38.Google Scholar
  33. Fodio, M. I., & Oba, V. C. (2012). Boards’ gender mix and extent of environmental responsibility information disclosure in Nigeria: An empirical study. European Journal of Business and Management, 4(14), 163–169.Google Scholar
  34. Fonseca, A., McAllister, M. L., & Fitzpatrick, P. (2014). Sustainability reporting among mining corporations: a constructive critique of the GRI approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 84, 70–83. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.11.050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  36. Frias-Aceituno, J. V., Rodriguez-Ariza, L., & Garcia-Sanchez, I. M. (2013). The Role of the Board in the Dissemination of Integrated Corporate Social Reporting. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 20(4), 219–233. doi: 10.1002/csr.1294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Galbreath, J. (2011). Are there gender-related influences on corporate sustainability? A study of women on boards of directors. Journal of Management & Organization, 17(1), 17–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Garcia-Sanchez, I.-M., Cuadrado-Ballesteros, B., & Sepulveda, C. (2014). Does media pressure moderate CSR disclosures by external directors? Management Decision, 52(6), 1014–1045. doi: 10.1108/MD-09-2013-0446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Giannarakis, G. (2014a). Corporate governance and financial characteristic effects on the extent of corporate social responsibility disclosure. Social Responsibility Journal, 10(4), 569–590. doi: 10.1108/SRJ-02-2013-0008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Giannarakis, G. (2014b). The determinants influencing the extent of CSR disclosure. International Journal of Law and Management, 56(5), 393–416. doi: 10.1108/IJLMA-05-2013-0021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Giannarakis, G., Konteos, G., & Sariannidis, N. (2014). Financial, governance and environmental determinants of corporate social responsible disclosure. Management Decision, 52(10), 1928–1951. doi: 10.1108/MD-05-2014-0296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Graves, S. B., & Waddock, S. A. (1994). Institutional owners and corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal, 37(4), 1034–1046. doi: 10.2307/256611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Greene, W. H. (2008). Econometric analysis (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  44. GRI (2006). Sustainability reporting guidelines. (Vol. G3). Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  45. Guest, P. M. (2009). The impact of board size on firm performance: Evidence from the UK. The European Journal of Finance, 15(4), 385–404. doi: 10.1080/13518470802466121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Gul, F. A., & Leung, S. (2004). Board leadership, outside directors’ expertise and voluntary corporate disclosures. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 23(5), 351–379. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2004.07.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hahn, R., & Lülfs, R. (2014). Legitimizing negative aspects in GRI-oriented sustainability reporting: A qualitative analysis of corporate disclosure strategies. Journal of Business Ethics, 123(3), 401–420. doi: 10.1007/s10551-013-1801-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Halme, M., & Huse, M. (1997). The influence of corporate governance, industry and country factors on environmental reporting. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 13(2), 137–157. doi: 10.1016/S0956-5221(97)00002-X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Haniffa, R. M., & Cooke, T. E. (2002). Culture, corporate governance and disclosure in Malaysian corporations. Abacus, 38(3), 317–349. doi: 10.1111/1467-6281.00112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Haniffa, R. M., & Cooke, T. E. (2005). The impact of culture and governance on corporate social reporting. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 24(5), 391–430. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2005.06.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Hausman, J. A. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica, 46(6), 1251–1271. doi: 10.2307/1913827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Hill, C. W. L., & Jones, T. M. (1992). Stakeholder-agency theory. Journal of Management Studies, 29(2), 131–154. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.1992.tb00657.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Hillman, A. J., & Keim, G. D. (2001). Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: What’s the bottom line? Strategic Management Journal, 22(2), 125–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Ho, P. L., & Taylor, G. (2013). Corporate governance and different types of voluntary disclosure. Pacific Accounting Review, 25(1), 4–29. doi: 10.1108/01140581311318940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Hossain, M., & Reaz, M. (2007). The determinants and characteristics of voluntary disclosure by Indian banking companies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 14(5), 274–288. doi: 10.1002/csr.154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Htay, S. N. N., Rashid, H. M. A., Adnan, M. A., & Meera, A. K. M. (2012). Impact of corporate governance on social and environmental information disclosure of Malaysian listed banks: Panel data analysis. Asian Journal of Finance & Accounting, 4(1), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Huafang, X., & Jianguo, Y. (2007). Ownership structure, board composition and corporate voluntary disclosure. Managerial Auditing Journal, 22(6), 604–619. doi: 10.1108/02686900710759406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Ibrahim, N. A., & Angelidis, J. P. (2011). Effect of board members’ gender on corporate social responsiveness orientation. Journal of Applied Business Research (JABR), 10(1), 35–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Ienciu, I.-A., Popa, I. E., & Ienciu, N. M. (2012). Environmental reporting and good practice of corporate governance: Petroleum industry case study. Procedia Economics and Finance, 3, 961–967. doi: 10.1016/S2212-5671(12)00258-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Janggu, T., Darus, F., Zain, M. M., & Sawani, Y. (2014). Does good corporate governance lead to better sustainability reporting? An analysis using structural equation modeling. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 145, 138–145. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.06.020.Google Scholar
  61. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. doi: 10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1979). Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure. In K. Brunner (Ed.), Economics Social Institutions (Vol. 1, pp. 163–231, Rochester Studies in Economics and Policy Issues): SpringerGoogle Scholar
  63. Jizi, M., Salama, A., Dixon, R., & Stratling, R. (2014). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility disclosure: Evidence from the US Banking Sector. Journal of Business Ethics, 125(4), 601–615. doi: 10.1007/s10551-013-1929-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Jo, H., & Harjoto, M. (2011). Corporate governance and firm value: The impact of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 103(3), 351–383. doi: 10.1007/s10551-011-0869-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Jo, H., & Harjoto, M. (2014). Analyst coverage, corporate social responsibility, and firm risk. Business Ethics: A European Review, 23(3), 272–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. John, K., & Senbet, L. W. (1998). Corporate governance and board effectiveness. Journal of Banking & Finance, 22(4), 371–403. doi: 10.1016/S0378-4266(98)00005-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Johnson, R. A., & Greening, D. W. (1999). The effects of corporate governance and institutional ownership types on corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 564–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Jones, S., Frost, G., Loftus, J., & van der Laan, S. (2007). An empirical examination of the market returns and financial performance of entities engaged in sustainability reporting. Australian Accounting Review, 17(1), 78–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Karamanou, I., & Vafeas, N. (2005). The association between corporate boards, audit committees, and management earnings forecasts: An empirical analysis. Journal of Accounting Research, 43(3), 453–486. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-679X.2005.00177.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Kolk, A. (2008). Sustainability, accountability and corporate governance: exploring multinationals’ reporting practices. Business Strategy and the Environment, 17(1), 1–15. doi: 10.1002/bse.511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  72. Laksmana, I. (2008). Corporate board governance and voluntary disclosure of executive compensation practices*. Contemporary Accounting Research, 25(4), 1147–1182. doi: 10.1506/car.25.4.8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Li, J., Pike, R., & Haniffa, R. (2008). Intellectual capital disclosure and corporate governance structure in UK firms. Accounting and Business Research, 38(2), 137–159. doi: 10.1080/00014788.2008.9663326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Liao, L., Luo, L., & Tang, Q. (2014). Gender diversity, board independence, environmental committee and greenhouse gas disclosure. The British Accounting Review,. doi: 10.1016/ Scholar
  75. Lim, S., Matolcsy, Z., & Chow, D. (2007). The association between board composition and different types of voluntary disclosure. European Accounting Review, 16(3), 555–583. doi: 10.1080/09638180701507155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Linck, J. S., Netter, J. M., & Yang, T. (2008). The determinants of board structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 87(2), 308–328. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2007.03.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Lipton, M., & Lorsch, J. W. (1992). A modest proposal for improved corporate governance. The Business Lawyer, 48(1), 59–77. doi: 10.2307/40687360.Google Scholar
  78. Lozano, R. (2008). Envisioning sustainability three-dimensionally. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(17), 1838–1846. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.02.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Lozano, R., & Huisingh, D. (2011). Inter-linking issues and dimensions in sustainability reporting. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19(2–3), 99–107. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.01.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Mallin, C., Michelon, G., & Raggi, D. (2013). Monitoring intensity and stakeholders’ orientation: How does governance affect social and environmental disclosure? Journal of Business Ethics, 114(1), 29–43. doi: 10.1007/s10551-012-1324-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Mani, M., & Wheeler, D. (1998). In search of pollution havens? Dirty industry in the world economy, 1960 to 1995. The Journal of Environment & Development, 7(3), 215–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 268–305. doi: 10.2307/3556659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. McKendall, M., Sánchez, C., & Sicilian, P. (1999). Corporate governance and corporate illegality: The effects of board structure on environmental violations. The International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 7(3), 201–223. doi: 10.1108/eb028900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Michelon, G., & Parbonetti, A. (2012). The effect of corporate governance on sustainability disclosure. Journal of Management and Governance, 16(3), 477–509. doi: 10.1007/s10997-010-9160-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Mohd Ghazali, N. A., & Weetman, P. (2006). Perpetuating traditional influences: Voluntary disclosure in Malaysia following the economic crisis. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 15(2), 226–248. doi: 10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2006.08.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Morhardt, J. E., Baird, S., & Freeman, K. (2002). Scoring corporate environmental and sustainability reports using GRI 2000, ISO 14031 and other criteria. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 9(4), 215–233. doi: 10.1002/csr.26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Ntim, C. G., & Soobaroyen, T. (2013). Corporate Governance and Performance in Socially Responsible Corporations: New Empirical Insights from a Neo-Institutional Framework. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 21(5), 468–494. doi: 10.1111/corg.12026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. O’Dwyer, B. (2002). Managerial perceptions of corporate social disclosure. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(3), 406–436. doi: 10.1108/09513570210435898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Orij, R. (2010). Corporate social disclosures in the context of national cultures and stakeholder theory. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 23(7), 868–889. doi: 10.1108/09513571011080162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Patten, D. M., & Crampton, W. (2004). Legitimacy and the internet: An examination of corporate web page environmental disclosures. In Advances in Environmental Accounting & Management, 2, 31–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Plumlee, M., Brown, D., Hayes, R. M., & Marshall, R. S. (2015). Voluntary environmental disclosure quality and firm value: Further evidence. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 34(4), 336–361. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2015.04.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Porter, M. (1991). America\’s green strategy. Scientific American, 264(4), 168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Post, C., Rahman, N., & McQuillen, C. (2014). From board composition to corporate environmental performance through sustainability-themed alliances. Journal of Business Ethics,. doi: 10.1007/s10551-014-2231-7.Google Scholar
  94. Post, C., Rahman, N., & Rubow, E. (2011). Green governance: boards of directors’ composition and environmental corporate social responsibility. Business and Society, 50(1), 189–223. doi: 10.1177/0007650310394642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Prado-Lorenzo, J.-M., & Garcia-Sanchez, I.-M. (2010). The role of the board of directors in disseminating relevant information on greenhouse gases. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(3), 391–424. doi: 10.1007/s10551-010-0515-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Rao, K. K., Tilt, C. A., & Lester, L. H. (2012). Corporate governance and environmental reporting: an Australian study. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 12(2), 143–163. doi: 10.1108/14720701211214052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Rechner, P. L., & Dalton, D. R. (1991). CEO duality and organizational performance: A longitudinal analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 12(2), 155–160. doi: 10.1002/smj.4250120206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Ricart, J. E., Rodríguez, M. Á., & Sánchez, P. (2005). Sustainability in the boardroom. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 5(3), 24–41. doi: 10.1108/14720700510604670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Rodrigue, M., Magnan, M., & Cho, C. H. (2013). Is environmental governance substantive or symbolic? An empirical investigation. Journal of Business Ethics, 114(1), 107–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Rupley, K. H., Brown, D., & Marshall, R. S. (2012). Governance, media and the quality of environmental disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 31(6), 610–640. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2012.09.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Saha, A. K., & Akter, S. (2013). Corporate governance and voluntary disclosure practices of financial non-financial sector companies in Bangladesh. Journal of Applied Management Accounting Research, 11(2), 45–61.Google Scholar
  102. Said, R., Zainuddin, Y. H., & Haron, H. (2009). The relationship between corporate social responsibility disclosure and corporate governance characteristics in Malaysian public listed companies. Social Responsibility Journal, 5(2), 212–226. doi: 10.1108/17471110910964496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Sharif, M., & Rashid, K. (2014). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting: an empirical evidence from commercial banks (CB) of Pakistan. Quality & Quantity, 48(5), 2501–2521. doi: 10.1007/s11135-013-9903-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Spitzeck, H. (2009). The development of governance structures for corporate responsibility. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 9(4), 495–505. doi: 10.1108/14720700910985034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Vafeas, N. (1999). Board meeting frequency and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 53(1), 113–142. doi: 10.1016/S0304-405X(99)00018-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Vigneau, L., Humphreys, M., & Moon, J. (2014). How do firms comply with international sustainability standards? Processes and consequences of adopting the global reporting initiative. Journal of Business Ethics,. doi: 10.1007/s10551-014-2278-5.Google Scholar
  107. Villiers, C. D., Naiker, V., & Staden, C. (2009). Good corporate governance makes for good environmental performance. New Zealand: Dipersentasikan pada AFAANZ Conferense.Google Scholar
  108. Walls, J. L., Berrone, P., & Phan, P. H. (2012). Corporate governance and environmental performance: Is there really a link? Strategic Management Journal, 33(8), 885–913. doi: 10.1002/smj.1952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Wang, J., & Coffey, B. (1992). Board composition and corporate philanthropy. Journal of Business Ethics, 11(10), 771–778. doi: 10.1007/BF00872309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Webb, D. J., Mohr, L. A., & Harris, K. E. (2008). A re-examination of socially responsible consumption and its measurement. Journal of Business Research, 61(2), 91–98. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.05.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Williams, R. (2003). Women on corporate boards of directors and their influence on corporate philanthropy. Journal of Business Ethics, 42(1), 1–10. doi: 10.1023/A:1021626024014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Xu, X. (1999). Do stringent environmental regulations reduce the international competitiveness of environmentally sensitive goods? A Global Perspective. World Development, 27(7), 1215–1226. doi: 10.1016/S0305-750X(99)00055-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ManagementCa’ Foscari University of VeniceVeneziaItaly
  2. 2.Department of Business Studies, Leiden Law SchoolLeiden UniversityLeidenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations