Corporate Social Irresponsibility and Executive Succession: An Empirical Examination
- 682 Downloads
This study contributes to the corporate social responsibility, stakeholder theory, and executive succession literature by examining the effect of corporate social irresponsibility (CSiR) on strategic leadership turnover. We theorize that firms’ CSiR increases the likelihood of executive turnover. We also investigate the nature of succession (non-voluntary or voluntary succession) and successor origin (internal candidate or external candidate) following CSiR. We further examine how the CSiR–CEO succession relationship is moderated by firm visibility to stakeholders and industry dynamism. Our results, based on a dataset of 248 U.S. public firms between 2001 and 2008, provide evidence that firms’ CSiR affects what is conventionally seen as primarily a market-driven decision on executive turnover, especially when firms operate in a more dynamic industry. Research contributions and implications are discussed.
KeywordsCorporate social responsibility Executive turnover Chief executive officer Succession Firm visibility Dynamism Dismissal Successor origin
- Agle, B. R., Mitchell, R. K., & Sonnenfeld, J. A. (1999). Who matters to CEOs? An investigation of stakeholder attributes and salience, corporate performance, and CEO values. The Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 507–525.Google Scholar
- Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
- Alpert, L. (2010). BP’s spectacularly gaffe-prone chief exec Tony Hayward is finally getting his walking papers for his woeful mishandling of the colossal Gulf of Mexico oil spill http://www.nydailynews.com/news/money/bp-finally-give-CEO-tony-hayward-boot-due-botched-response-gulf-oil-spill-article-1.465359. Accessed 06 Jan 2015.
- Bloomberg Businessweek (2008). Ousted CEOs. http://images.businessweek.com/ss/09/03/0331_ousted_CEOs/5.htm. Accessed 06 Jan 2015.
- Bromiley, P. (1991). Testing a causal model of corporate risk taking and performance. The Academy of Management Journal, 34(1), 37–59.Google Scholar
- Carey, D. C., Ogden, D., & Roland, J. A. (2000). CEO succession. Oxford: Oxford University Press US.Google Scholar
- Dalton, D. R., & Kesner, I. F. (1985). Organizational performance as an antecedent of inside/outside chief executive succession: An empirical assessment. Academy of Management Journal, 28(4), 749–762.Google Scholar
- Donaldson, T. (1999). Making stakeholder theory whole. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 237–241.Google Scholar
- Finkelstein, S., & Hambrick, D. C. (1996). Strategic leadership: Top executives and their effect on organizations. St. Paul, MN: West.Google Scholar
- Fombrun, C. J. (1996). Reputation: Realizing value from the corporate image. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
- Gill, A. (2008). Corporate governance as social responsibility: A research agenda. Berkeley Journal of International Law, 26, 452.Google Scholar
- Golub, G. H., & Van Loan, C. F. (1996). Matrix computations (pp. 374–426). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
- Kant, I. (1964). Groundwork of the metaphysic of morals. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
- Kolk, A., & Pinkse, J. (2010). The integration of corporate governance in corporate social responsibility disclosures. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 17(1), 15–26.Google Scholar
- Lan, L. L., & Heracleous, L. (2010). Rethinking agency theory: The view from law. Academy of Management Review, 35(2), 294–314.Google Scholar
- Lev, B., Petrovits, C., & Radhakrishnan, S. (2010). Is doing good good for you? How corporate charitable contributions enhance revenue growth. Strategic Management Journal, 31(2), 182–200.Google Scholar
- McGuire, J. B., Sundgren, A., & Schneeweis, T. (1988). Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 31(4), 854–872.Google Scholar
- Morrison, J. (2014). Business and society: Defining the ‘social licence’. http://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/2014/sep/29/social-licence-operate-shell-bp-business-leaders. Accessed 30 Sep 2015.
- Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource-dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
- Ruf, B., Muralidhar, K., & Paul, K (1993). Eight dimensions of corporate social performance: Determination of relative importance using the analytic hierarchy process. In Academy of Management proceedings.Google Scholar
- Russo, M. V., & Fouts, P. A. (1997). A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. The Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 534–559.Google Scholar
- Shen, W., & Cannella, A. A. (2002). Power dynamics within top management and their impacts on CEO dismissal followed by inside succession. The Academy of Management Journal, 45(6), 1195–1206.Google Scholar
- Westphal, J. D. (1999). Collaboration in the boardroom: Behavioral and performance consequences of CEO-board social ties. Academy of Management Journal, 42(1), 7–24.Google Scholar
- Zald, M. N. (Ed.). (1970). Political economy: A framework for comparative analysis. (Power in organizations). Nashville, Tenn. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.Google Scholar
- Zhang, Y., & Rajagopalan, N. (2003). Explaining new CEO origin: Firm versus industry antecedents. Academy of Management Journal, 46(3), 327–338.Google Scholar