Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 148, Issue 4, pp 835–845 | Cite as

Trade Unions and the Whistleblowing Process in the UK: An Opportunity for Strategic Expansion?

  • David Lewis
  • Wim Vandekerckhove
Article

Abstract

Historically, whistleblowing research has predominantly focused on psychological and organisational conditions of raising concerns about alleged wrongdoing. Today, however, policy makers increasingly start to look at institutional frameworks for protecting whistleblowers and responding to their concerns. This article focuses on the latter by exploring the roles that trade unions might adopt in order to improve responsiveness in the whistleblowing process. Research has consistently demonstrated that the two main reasons that deter people from reporting perceived wrongdoing are fear of retaliation and a belief that the wrongdoing is unlikely to be rectified. In this article, we argue that trade unions have an important part to play in dealing with both these inhibiting factors but this requires them to be appropriately engaged in the whistleblowing process and willing to take a more proactive approach to negotiations. We use Vandekerckhove’s 3-tiered whistleblowing model and Kaine’s model of union voice level to structure our speculative analysis of the various ways in which trade unions can interact with whistleblowers and organisations they raise concerns about alleged wrongdoing in, as well as agents at a regulatory level. Our articulation of specific roles trade unions can play in the whistleblowing process uses examples from the UK as to how these trade union roles are currently linked to and embedded in employment law and whistleblowing regulation.

Keywords

Successful whistleblowing Unions Voice Whistleblowing 

References

  1. Addison, J. T., & Belfield, C. R. (2003). Union voice. No: IZA Discussion Paper Series. 862.Google Scholar
  2. Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  3. Brinsfield, C. T. (2014). Employee voice and silence in organizational behaviour. In A. Wilkinson, J. Donaghey, T. Dundon, & R. B. Freeman (Eds.), Handbook of research on employee voice (pp. 114–131). Edward Elgar: Northampton, MA.Google Scholar
  4. Brown, A. J. (Ed.). (2008). Whistleblowing in the Australian public sector: Enhancing the theory and practice of internal witness management in public sector organisations. Canberra: ANU E Press.Google Scholar
  5. Brown, A. J., Lewis, D., Moberly, R., & Vandekerckhove, W. (Eds.). (2014). International handbook on whistleblowing research. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  6. BSI. (2008). PAS 1998:2008 whistleblowing arrangements. Code of practice. London: British Standards Institute.Google Scholar
  7. Budd, J. W. (2014). The future of employee voice. In A. Wilkinson, J. Donaghey, T. Dundon, & R. B. Freeman (Eds.), Handbook of research on employee voice (pp. 477–487). Edward Elgar: Northampton, MA.Google Scholar
  8. Carr, I., & Lewis, D. (2010). Combating corruption through employment law and whistleblower protection. Industrial Law Journal, 39(1), 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. CoE. (2014). Recommendation CM/Rec(2014) 7 of the Committee of Ministers to member States on the protection of whistleblowers, Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 30 April 2014, at the 1198th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
  10. Detert, J. R., & Burris, E. R. (2007). Leadership behaviour and employee voice: Is the door really open? Academy of Management Journal, 50, 869–884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Detert, J. R., & Edmondson, A. C. (2011). Implicit voice theories: taken-for-granted rules of self-censorship at work. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 461–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Freeman, R. B., & Medoff, J. (1984). What do unions do?. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  13. Frege, C., & Kelly, J. (2003). Union revitalisation strategies in comparative perspective. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 9(1), 7–24.Google Scholar
  14. Hirschman, A. (1970). Exit, voice and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Hyman, R. (1991). Trade Unions and the disaggregation of the working class. Management Research News, 14(10), 5–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hyman, R. (2007). How can trade unions act strategically? Transfer, 13(2), 193–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jubb, P. B. (1999). Whistleblowing: A restrictive definition and interpretation. Journal of Business Ethics, 41(3), 217–234.Google Scholar
  18. Kaine, S. (2014). Union voice. In A. Wilkinson, J. Donaghey, T. Dundon, & R. B. Freeman (Eds.), Handbook of research on employee voice (pp. 170–187). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  19. Katz, G., & Lenglet, M. (2010). Whistleblowing in French corporations: Anatomy of a national taboo. Philosophy of Management, 9(1), 103–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lewis, D. (2006). The contents of whistleblowing/confidential reporting procedures in the UK. Some lessons from empirical research. Employee Relations, 28(1), 76–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lewis, D. (2008). Ten years of public interest disclosure legislation in the UK: Are whistleblowers adequately protected? Journal of Business Ethics, 82, 497–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lewis, D. (2013). Resolving whistleblowing disputes in the public interest: is tribunal adjudication the best that can be offered? Industrial Law Journal, 42(1), 35–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lewis, D. (2015). Is a public interest test for workplace whistleblowing in society’s interest? International Journal of Law and Management, 57(2), 141–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lewis, D., D’Angelo, A., & Clark, L. (2015). Surveys of NHS staff, trusts and stakeholders. London: Middlesex University.Google Scholar
  25. Mesmer-Magnus, J. R., & Viswesvaran, C. (2005). Whistleblowing in organizations: An examination of correlates of whistleblowing intentions, actions, and retaliation. Journal of Business Ethics, 62(3), 277–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Miceli, M. P., Near, J. P., & Dworkin, T. M. (2008). Whistle-blowing in organizations. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Morrison, E. W. (2011). Employee voice behaviour: Integration and directions for future research. Academy of Management Annals, 5, 373–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Near, J. P., & Miceli, M. P. (1985). Organizational dissidence: The case of whistle-blowing. Journal of Business Ethics, 4(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Near, J. P., & Miceli, M. P. (1995). Effective-whistle blowing. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 679–708.Google Scholar
  30. Near, J. P., & Miceli, M. P. (1996). Whistle-blowing: Myth and reality. Journal of Management, 22(3), 507–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Organ, D. (1988). A restatement of the satisfaction–performance hypothesis. Journal of Management, 14(4), 547–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. PCaW. (2013a). Whistleblowing code of practice. London: Public Concern at Work.Google Scholar
  33. PCaW. (2013b). Whistleblowing: The inside story. London: Public Concern at Work.Google Scholar
  34. PCaW. (2013c). Whistleblowing commission report. London: Public Concern at Work.Google Scholar
  35. Phillips, A., & Lewis, D. (2013). Whistleblowing to regulators: Are prescribed persons fit for purpose. London: Middlesex University.Google Scholar
  36. Pohler, D. M., & Luchak, A. A. (2014). The missing employee in employee voice research. In A. Wilkinson, J. Donaghey, T. Dundon, & R. B. Freeman (Eds.), Handbook of research on employee voice (pp. 188–207). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  37. Skivenes, M., & Trygstad, S. C. (2010). When whistle-blowing works: The Norwegian case. Human Relations, 63(7), 1071–1097.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Skivenes, M., & Trygstad, S. C. (2014). Wrongdoing- definition and contextual factors. In A. J. Brown, D. Lewis, R. Moberly, & W. Vandekerckhove (Eds.), International handbook on whistleblowing research (pp. 95–114). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  39. Skivenes, M., & Trygstad, S. C. (2015). Explaining whistle blowing processes in the Norwegian labour market: Between individual power resources and institutional arrangements. Economic and Industrial Democracy. doi: 10.1177/0143831X14559783.Google Scholar
  40. Tsahuridu, E. E., & Vandekerckhove, W. (2008). Whistleblowing and moral autonomy in organisations. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(1), 107–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. van Es, R., & Smit, G. (2013). Whistleblowing and media logic: A case study. Business Ethics: A European Review, 12(2), 144–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Vandekerckhove, W. (2006). Whistleblowing and organizational social responsibility. A global assessment. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  43. Vandekerckhove, W. (2010). European whistleblower protection: tiers or tears? In D. Lewis (Ed.), A global approach to public interest disclosure (pp. 15–35). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  44. Vandekerckhove, W., Brown, A. J., & Tsahuridu, E. E. (2014). Managerial responsiveness to whistleblowing: Expanding the research horizon. In A. J. Brown, D. Lewis, R. Moberly, & W. Vandekerckhove (Eds.), The international whistleblowing research handbook (pp. 298–329). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  45. Vandekerckhove, W., & James, C. (2013). Blowing the whistle to the union: How successful is it? E-Journal of International and Comparative Labour Studies, 2(3), 66–93.Google Scholar
  46. Vandekerckhove, W., & Lewis, D. (2012). The content of whistleblowing procedures: A critical review of recent official guidelines. Journal of Business Ethics, 108(2), 253–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Vandekerckhove, W., & Rumyantseva, N. (2014). Freedom to speak up qualitative research. London: University of Greenwich.Google Scholar
  48. Vandekerckhove, W., & Tsahuridu, E. E. (2010). Risky rescues and whistleblowing. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(3), 365–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Middlesex UniversityLondonUK
  2. 2.Faculty of BusinessUniversity of GreenwichLondonUK

Personalised recommendations