Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 136, Issue 4, pp 675–685 | Cite as

The Social License to Operate

  • Geert Demuijnck
  • Björn Fasterling
Article

Abstract

This article proposes a way to zoom in on the concept of the social license to operate (SLO) from the broader normative perspective of contractarianism. An SLO can be defined as a contractarian basis for the legitimacy of a company’s specific activity or project. “SLO”, as a fashionable expression, has its origins in business practice. From a normative viewpoint, the concept is closely related to social contract theory, and, as such, it has a political dimension. After outlining the contractarian normative background to the SLO, we will show how academic concepts such as legitimacy and stakeholder management have a tendency to provide the intellectual underpinning for the business case for securing an SLO. While business case perspectives on the SLO may well be in line with the use of the term in business practice, we will highlight certain difficulties and ambiguities related to the instrumental use of the expression. In the final section, we briefly introduce the articles of this Special Issue to the reader and explain how they relate to the topic.

Keywords

Social license to operate Social contract theory Legitimacy Pragmatic legitimacy 

References

  1. Aldrich, H. E., & Fiol, M. C. (1994). Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. Academy of Management Review, 19, 645–670.Google Scholar
  2. Ashforth, B. E., & Gibbs, B. W. (1990). The double-edge of organizational legitimation. Organization Science, 1, 177–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baba, S., & Raufflet, E. (2014). Managing relational legacies: Lessons from British Columbia, Canada. Administrative Sciences, 4, 15–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Banerjee, S. B. (2010). Governing the global corporation: A critical perspective. Business Ethics Quarterly, 20(2), 265–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Basu, K., & Palazzo, G. (2008). Corporate social responsibility: A process model of sensemaking. Academy of Management Review, 33(1), 122–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Black, L. (2013). The social license to operate: Your management framework for complex times. Oxford: Do Sustainability [Sedition Publishing, Ltd.].Google Scholar
  7. Boutilier, R. G., Black, L., & Thomson, I. (2012). From metaphor to management tool: How the social license to operate can stabilise the socio-political environment for business. In International mine management 2012 proceedings (pp. 227–237). Melbourne: Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy.Google Scholar
  8. Bowen, F., Newenham-Kahindi, A., & Herremans, I. (2010). When suits meet roots: The antecedents and consequences of community engagement strategy. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(2), 297–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Buhmann, K. (2016). Public regulators and CSR: The ‘Social Licence to Operate’ in recent united nations instruments on business and human rights and the juridification of CSR. Journal of Business Ethics. doi: 10.1007/s10551-015-2869-9.Google Scholar
  10. Castello, I., & Lozano, J. M. (2011). Searching for new forms of legitimacy through corporate responsibility rhetoric. Journal of Business Ethics, 100, 11–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Claasen, C., & Roloff, J. (2012). The link between responsibility and legitimacy: The case of De Beers in Namibia. Journal of Business Ethics, 107, 379–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Coumans, C. (2011). Occupying spaces created by conflict: Anthropologists, development NGOs, responsible investment, and mining: with CA comment by Stuart Kirsch. Current Anthropology, S3, S29–S43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cui, J., Jo, H., & Velasquez, M. (2016). Community religion, employees, and the social license to operate. Journal of Business Ethics. doi: 10.1007/s10551-015-2865-0.Google Scholar
  14. Davis, R., & Franks, D. (2014). Costs of company–community conflict in the extractive sector. In Corporate social responsibility initiative report no. 66. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Kennedy School.Google Scholar
  15. Deegan, C., & Shelly, M. (2014). Corporate social responsibilities: Alternative perspectives about the need to legislate. Journal of Business Ethics, 121, 499–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Donaldson, T., & Dunfee, T. (1999). Ties that bind: A social contract approach to business ethics. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  17. Dowling, J., & Pfeffer, J. (1975). Organizational legitimacy: Social values and organizational behaviour. Pacific Sociological Review, 18, 122–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dworkin, R. (1977). Taking rights seriously. Cambridge (Ma.): Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management. A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.Google Scholar
  20. Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wickes, A. C., Parmar, B. L., & de Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder theory. The state of the art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gauthier, D. (1986). Morals by agreement. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  22. Gond, J. P., Palazzo, G., & Basu, K. (2009). Reconsidering instrumental corporate social responsibility through the Mafia Metaphor. Business Ethics Quarterly, 19, 57–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Graafland, J. J. (2002). Profits and principles: Four perspectives. Journal of Business Ethics, 35(4), 293–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gunningham, N., Kagan, R. A., & Thornton, D. (2004). Social license and environmental protection: Why businesses go beyond compliance. Law & Social Inquiry, 29(2), 307–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hampton, J. (1993). Contractarianism. In R. Goodin & P. Pettit (Eds.), A companion to contemporary political philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  26. Hennchen, E. (2015). Royal dutch shell in Nigeria: Where do responsibilities end? Journal of Business Ethics, 129(1), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hume, D. (1758). Essays. Moral, political and literary. Indianapolis: LibertyClassics. (1985).Google Scholar
  28. Idemudia, U. (2009). Oil extraction and poverty reduction in the Niger Delta: A critical examination of partnership initiatives. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(Supplement 1), 91–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. International Finance Corporation. (2010). Strategic community investment: A good practice handbook for companies doing business in emerging markets. Retrieved July 25, 2015, from http://www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/Topics_Ext_Content/IFC_External_Corporate_Site/IFC+Sustainability/Learning+and+Adapting/Knowledge+Products/Publications/
  30. Jones, T. M. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 404–437.Google Scholar
  31. Kagan, R. A., Gunningham, N., & Thornton, D. (2003). Explaining corporate environmental performance: How does regulation matter? Law & Society Review, 37(1), 51–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kant, I. (1788). Kritik der praktischen Vernunft. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp. (1996).Google Scholar
  33. Kant, I. (1793). Über den Gemeinspruch: Das mag in der Theorie richtig sein, taugt aber nicht für die Praxis. In I. Kant, Kleinere Schriften zur Geschichtphilosophie, Ethik und Politik [ed.by K. Vorländer]. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.Google Scholar
  34. Koivurova, T., Masloboev, V., Hossain, K., Nygaard, V., Petrétei, A., & Vinogradova, S. (2015). Legal protection of sami traditional livelihoods from the adverse impacts of mining: A comparison of the level of protection enjoyed by sami in their four home states. Arctic Review on Law and Politics, 6(1). Retrieved July 25, 2015, from http://arcticreview.no/index.php/arctic/article/view/76
  35. Luetge, C., Armbrüster, T., & Müller, J. (2016). Order ethics: Bridging the gap between contractarianism and business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics. doi: 10.1007/s10551-015-2977-6.Google Scholar
  36. Lynch-Wood, G., & Williamson, D. (2007). The social licence as a form of regulation for small and medium enterprises. Journal of Law and Society, 34(3), 321–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Melé, D., & Armengou, J. (2016). Moral legitimacy in controversial projects and Its relationship with social license to operate: A case study. Journal of Business Ethics. doi: 10.1007/s10551-015-2866-z.Google Scholar
  38. Matejek, S., & Gössling, T. (2014). Beyond legitimacy: A case study in BP’s ‘‘Green Lashing’’. Journal of Business Ethics, 120, 571–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Meyer, J., & Scott, R. (1983). Centralization and the legitimacy problems of local government. In J. Meyer & R. Scott (Eds.), Organizational environment: Rituals and rationality (pp. 199–216). Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  41. Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886.Google Scholar
  42. Moffat, K., & Zhang, A. (2014). The paths to social licence to operate: An integrative model explaining community acceptance of mining. Resources Policy, 39, 61–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Morrison, John. (2014). The social license to operate. How to keep your organization legitimate. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
  44. Murillo, D., & Vallentin, S. (2016). The business school’s right to operate: Responsibilization and resistance. Journal of Business Ethics. doi: 10.1007/s10551-015-2872-1.Google Scholar
  45. Néron P.-Y. (2016). Rethinking the ethics of corporate political activities in a post-citizens united era: Political equality, corporate citizenship, and market failures. Journal of Business Ethics. doi: 10.1007/s10551-015-2867-y.Google Scholar
  46. Nielsen, A. E. (2013). License to operate. In S. O. Idowu, N. Capaldi, L. Zu & A. Das Gupta (Eds.), Encyclopedia of corporate social responsibility (pp. 1585–1591). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  47. O’Donohue, W., & Nelson, L. (2009). The role of ethical values in an expanded psychological contract. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(2), 251–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Palazzo, G., & Scherer, A. (2006). Corporate legitimacy as deliberation: A communicative framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 66(1), 71–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Phillips, R., Freeman, R. E., & Wicks, A. C. (2003). What stakeholder theory is not. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13(4), 479–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Pike, R. (2012). The relevance of social licence to operate for mining companies. In Schroders social license to operate research paper. http://www.schroders.com/staticfiles/schroders/sites/Americas/US%20Institutional%202011/pdfs/Social-Licence-to-Operate.pdf. Accessed 25 July 2015
  51. Prno, J., & Slocombe, D. S. (2012). Exploring the origins of ‘social license to operate’ in the mining sector: Perspectives from governance and sustainability theories. Resource Policy, 37, 346–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ruggie, J. (2013). Just business. Multinational corporations and human rights. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  53. Russell, C., Russell, D., & Honea, H. (2016). Corporate social responsibility failures: How do consumers respond to corporate violations of implied social contracts? Journal of Business Ethics. doi: 10.1007/s10551-015-2868-x.Google Scholar
  54. Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20, 571–610.Google Scholar
  55. Thomson, I., & Boutilier, R. G. (2011). Social license to operate. In P. Darling (Ed.), SME mining engineering handbook (pp. 1779–1796). Littleton, CO: Society for Mining, Metallurgy and Exploration.Google Scholar
  56. Voegtlin, C., Patzer, M., & Scherer, A. G. (2012). Responsible leadership in global business: A new approach to leadership an its multi-level outcomes. Journal of Business Ethics, 105, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Waxenberger, B., & Spence, L. (2003). Reinterpretation of a metaphor: From stakes to claims. Strategic Change, 12(5), 239–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wilburn, K. M., & Wilburn, R. (2011). Achieving social license to operate using stakeholder theory. Journal of International Business Ethics, 4(2), 3–16.Google Scholar
  59. Wood, D. J. (1991). Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of Management Review, 16(4), 691–718.Google Scholar
  60. Yates, B., & Horvath, C. (2013). Social license to operate: How to get it, and how to keep it. In Summit working paper. Pacific Energy Summit.Google Scholar
  61. Zandvliet, L., & Anderson, M. B. (2009). Getting it right: Making corporate–community relations work greenleaf publishing limited. UK: Sheffield.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.EDHEC Business SchoolLilleFrance
  2. 2.LegalEDHEC Research CenterEDHEC Business SchoolLilleFrance

Personalised recommendations