Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 137, Issue 4, pp 649–662 | Cite as

Corporate Social Responsibility, Ethical Leadership, and Trust Propensity: A Multi-Experience Model of Perceived Ethical Climate

  • S. Duane Hansen
  • Benjamin B. Dunford
  • Bradley J. Alge
  • Christine L. Jackson
Article

Abstract

Existing research on the formation of employee ethical climate perceptions focuses mainly on organization characteristics as antecedents, and although other constructs have been considered, these constructs have typically been studied in isolation. Thus, our understanding of the context in which ethical climate perceptions develop is incomplete. To address this limitation, we build upon the work of Rupp (Organ Psychol Rev 1:72–94, 2011) to develop and test a multi-experience model of ethical climate which links aspects of the corporate social responsibility (CSR), ethics, justice, and trust literatures and helps to explain how employees’ ethical climate perceptions form. We argue that in forming ethical climate perceptions, employees consider the actions or characteristics of a complex web of actors. Specifically, we propose that employees look (1) outward at how communities are impacted by their organization’s actions (e.g., CSR), (2) upward to make inferences about the ethicality of leaders in their organizations (e.g., ethical leadership), and (3) inward at their own propensity to trust others as they form their perceptions. Using a multiple-wave field study (N = 201) conducted at a privately held US corporation, we find substantial evidence in support of our model.

Keywords

Corporate social responsibility (CSR) Ethical leadership Ethical climate Trust propensity Trust Justice Fairness 

References

  1. Aguinis, H. (2010). Organizational responsibility: Doing good and doing well. In S. Zedeck (Ed.), APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 855–879)., Maintaining, expanding, and contracting the organization Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  2. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  3. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior’. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Albinger, H. S., & Freeman, S. J. (2000). Corporate social performance and attractiveness as an employer to different job seeking populations. Journal of Business Ethics, 28, 243–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Alge, B. J., Ballinger, G. A., & Green, S. G. (2004). Remote control: Predictors of electronic monitoring intensity and secrecy. Personnel Psychology, 57(2), 377–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Arnaud, A., & Schminke, M. (2012). The ethical climate and context of organizations: A comprehensive model. Organization Science, 23(6), 1767–1780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Balmer, M. T., Fukukawa, K., & Gray, E. R. (2007). The nature and management of ethical corporate identity: A commentary on corporate identity, corporate social responsibility and ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 76, 7–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The Moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bigley, G. A., & Pearce, J. L. (1998). Straining for shared meaning in organization science: Problems of trust and distrust. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 405–421.Google Scholar
  10. Boeckmann, R. J., & Tyler, T. R. (1997). Commonsense justice and inclusion within the moral community: When to people receive procedural protections from others? Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 3, 362–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brower, H. H., & Shrader, Y. (2000). Moral reasoning and ethical climate: Not for profit versus for profit boards of directors. Journal of Business Ethics, 26, 147–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brown, M. E., Trevino, L. K., & Harrison, D. A. (2005). Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97, 117–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Collier, J., & Esteban, R. (2007). Corporate social responsibility and employee commitment. Business Ethics: A European Review, 16(1), 19–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 386–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Colquitt, J. A., Scott, B. A., Judge, T. A., & Shaw, J. C. (2006). Justice and personality: Using integrative theories to derive moderators of justice effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 100(1), 110–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Colquitt, J. A., Scott, J. A., & LePine, B. A. (2007). Trust, trustworthiness, and trust propensity: A meta-analytic test of their unique relationships with risk taking and job performance. Journal of Applied Pscyhology, 92(4), 909–927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cropanzano, R., Rupp, D. E., Mohler, C. J., & Schminke, M. (2001). Three roads to organizational justice. In G. R. Ferris (Ed.), Research in personnel and human resources management (Vol. 20, pp. 1–123). Philadelphia: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
  18. Dawson, L. M. (1992). Will feminization change the ethics of the sales profession? Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 12, 21–31.Google Scholar
  19. De Cremer, D., & Van Hiel, A. (2006). Effects of another person’s fair treatment on one’s own emotions and behaviors: The moderating role of how much the other cares for you. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 100, 231–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dirks, K. T., & Ferrin, D. L. (2002). Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 611–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dunford, B. B., Jackson, C. L., Boss, A. D., Tay, L., & Boss, R. W. (2015). Be fair, your employees are watching: A relational response model of external third party justice. Personnel Psychology, 68(2), 319–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ellen, P. S., Webb, D. J., & Mohr, L. A. (2006). Building corporate associations: Consumer attributions for corporate socially responsible programs. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(2), 147–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ferris, G. R., Arthur, M. M., & Berkson, H. M. (1998). Toward a social context theory of the human resource management-organization effectiveness relationship. Human Resource Management Review, 8(3), 235–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  26. Folger, R., Cropanzano, R., & Goldman, B. (2005). What is the relationship between justice and morality?’. In J. Greenberg & J. A. Colquitt (Eds.), Handbook of organizational justice (pp. 215–245). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  27. Forte, A. (2004). Business ethics: A study of the moral reasoning of selected business managers and the influence of the organizational ethical climate. Journal of Business Ethics, 51(2), 167–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gephart, J. K., Harrison, D. A., & Treviño, L. K. (2008). The who, when, and where of unethical choices: Meta-analytic answers to fundamental ethics questions. Academy of Management Annual Proceedings, 18, 1–6.Google Scholar
  29. Glavas, A., & Godwin, L. (2013). Is the perception of goodness good enough? Exploring the relationship between perceived CSR and employee organizational identification. Journal of Business Ethics, 114, 15–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Groza, M. D., Pronschinske, M. R., & Walker, M. (2011). Perceived organizational motives and consumer responses to proactive and reactive CSR. Journal of Business Ethics, 102, 639–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hansen, S. D., Alge, B. J., Brown, M. E., Jackson, C. J., & Dunford, B. B. (2013). Ethical leadership: Assessing the value of a multifoci social exchange perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 115, 435–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hansen, S. D., Dunford, B. B., Boss, A. D., Boss, R. W., & Angermeier, I. (2011). Corporate social responsibility and the benefits of employee trust: A cross-disciplinary perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(1), 29–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Harman, H. (1967). Modern factor analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  34. Herndon, N. C, Jr, Ferrell, O. C., Le Clari, D. Y., & Ferrel, L. K. (1999). Relationship of individual moral values and perceived ethical climate to satisfaction, commitment and turnover in a sales organization. Research in Marketing, 15, 25–48.Google Scholar
  35. Johnson, P. O., & Neyman, J. (1936). Tests of certain linear hypotheses and their applications to some educational problems. Statistical Research Memoirs, 1, 57–93.Google Scholar
  36. Kim, Y., & Kim, S. (2010). The influence of cultural values on perceptions of CSR: Application of Hofstede’s dimensions to Korean public relations practitioners. Journal of Business Ethics, 91(4), 485–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kish-Gephart, J. J., Harrison, D. A., & Treviño, L. (2010). Bad apples, bad cases, and bad barrels: Meta-analytic evidence about sources of unethical decisions at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1), 1–31. doi: 10.1037/a0017103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  39. Lavelle, J. J., Rupp, D. E., & Brockner, J. (2007). Taking a multifoci approach to the study of justice, social exchange, and citizenship behavior: The target similarity model? Journal of Management, 33, 841–866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lind, E. A. (2001). Fairness heuristic theory: Justice judgments as pivotal cognitions in organizational relations. In J. Greenberg & R. Cropanzano (Eds.), Advances in organizational justice (pp. 56–88). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Lind, E. A., & Van den Bos, K. (2002). When fairness works: Toward a general theory of uncertainty management. In B. M. Staw & R. M. Kramer (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 24, pp. 181–223). Boston, MA: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  42. Lord, R., & Maher, K. (1993). Leadership and information processing. Routledge: New York, NY.Google Scholar
  43. Luntley, M. (2003). Ethics in the face of uncertainty: Judgment not rules. Business Ethics: A European Review, 12(4), 325–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Luthar, H. K., DiBattista, R. A., & Gautschi, T. (1997). Perception of what the ethical climate is and what it should be: The role of gender, academic status, and ethical education. Journal of Business Ethics, 16(2), 205–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Martin, K. D., & Cullen, J. B. (2006). Continuities and extensions of ethical climate theory: A meta analytic review. Journal of Business Ethics, 69, 175–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mason, E. S., & Mudrack, P. E. (1997). Are individuals who agree that CSR is a ‘fundamentally subversive doctrine’ inherently unethical? Applied Psychology: An International Review, 46(2), 135–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mayer, D. M. (in press). A review of the literature on ethical climate and culture. In B. Schneider and K. M. Barbera (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of organizational climate and culture. Oxford: University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Mayer, R. C., & Davis, J. H. (1999). The effect of performance appraisal system on trust for management: A field quasiexperiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 123–136.Google Scholar
  49. Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20, 709–734.Google Scholar
  50. Mayer, D. M., Kuenzi, M., & Greenbaum, R. L. (2009). Making ethical climate a mainstream management topic: A review, critique and prescription for the empirical research on ethical climate. In D. De Cremer (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on ethical behavior and decision making (pp. 181–213). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  51. Mayer, D. M., Kuenzi, M., & Greenbaum, R. L. (2010). Examining the link between ethical leadership and employee misconduct: The mediating role of ethical climate. Journal of Business Ethics, 95, 7–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Mayer, D. M., Nurmohamed, S., Treviño, L. K., Shapiro, D. L., & Schminke, M. (2013). Encouraging employees to report unethical conduct internally: It takes a village. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 121(1), 89–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Mesmer-Magnus, J. R., & Viswesvaran, C. (2005). Whistleblowing in organizations: An examination of correlates of whistleblowing intentions, actions, and retaliation. Journal of Business Ethics, 62, 277–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Neubaum, D. O., Mitchell, M. S., & Schminke, M. (2004). Firm newness, and ethical climate. Journal of Business Ethics, 52(4), 335–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Ostroff, C., Kinicki, A. J., & Muhammad, R. S. (2013). Organizational culture and climate. In I. B. Weiner (Ed.), Handbook of psychology (2nd ed., pp. 643–676). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  57. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. (2007). addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42(1), 185–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Ramasamy, B., Yeung, M., & Au, A. (2010). Consumer support for corporate social responsibility (CSR): The role of religion and values. Journal of Business Ethics, 91, 61–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Riordan, C. M., Gatewood, R. D., & Bill, J. B. (1997). Corporate image: Employee reactions and implications for managing corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 16(4), 401–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Rupp, D. E. (2011). An employee centered model of organizational justice and social responsibility. Organizational Psychology Review, 1(1), 72–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Rupp, D. E., Ganapathi, J., Aguilera, R. V., & Williams, C. A. (2006). Employee reactions to corporate social responsibility: An organizational justice framework. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 537–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Schneider, B. (1975). Organizational climate: An essay. Personnel Psychology, 28, 447–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Schneider, B., Ehrhart, M. G., & Macey, W. A. (2011). Perspectives on organizational climate and culture. In S. Zedeck (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 373–414). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  66. Shinn, Y. (2012). CEO ethical leadership, ethical climate, climate strength and collective organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 108, 299–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Skarlicki, D. P., & Kulik, C. (2005). Third party reactions to employee (mis)treatment: A justice perspective. In B. Staw & R. Kramer (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 26, pp. 183–230). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  68. Treviño, L. K., Butterfield, K. D., & McCabe, D. L. (1998). The ethical context in organizations: Influences on employee attitudes and behaviors. Business Ethics Quarterly, 8(3), 447–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Trevino, L. K., Hartman, L. P., & Brown, M. (2000). Moral person and moral manager: How executives develop a reputation for ethical leadership. California Management Review, 42(4), 128–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Victor, B., & Cullen, J. (1988). The organizational bases of ethical work climates. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33, 101–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Weaver, G. R., Trevino, L. K., & Cochran, P. L. (1999). Corporate ethics programs as control systems: Influences of executive commitment and environmental factors. Academy of Management Journal, 42(1), 41–57.Google Scholar
  72. Wimbush, J. C., Shepard, J. M., & Markham, S. E. (1997). An empirical examination of the relationship between ethical climate and ethical climate perceptions from multiple levels of analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 16, 1705–1716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Duane Hansen
    • 1
  • Benjamin B. Dunford
    • 2
  • Bradley J. Alge
    • 2
  • Christine L. Jackson
    • 2
  1. 1.John B. Goddard School of Business & EconomicsWeber State UniversityOgdenUSA
  2. 2.Krannert Graduate School of ManagementPurdue UniversityWest LafayetteUSA

Personalised recommendations