Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 139, Issue 2, pp 391–409 | Cite as

Detecting Fraud: The Role of the Anonymous Reporting Channel

  • Elka Johansson
  • Peter Carey
Article

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to examine whether anonymous reporting channels (ARCs) are effective in detecting fraud against companies. Fraud, which comprises predominantly asset misappropriation, represents a key operational risk and a major cost to organisations (ACFE, http://www.acfe.com/uploadedFiles/ACFE_Website/Content/rttn/2012-report-to-nations.pdf, 2012; KPMG, http://www.kpmg.com/AU/en/IssuesAndInsights/ArticlesPublications/Fraud-Survey/Documents/fraud-bribery-corruption-survey-2012v2.pdf, 2012). The fraud triangle (incentives, opportunities and attitudes) provides a framework for developing our understanding of how ARCs can increase detection of fraud. Using publicly listed company survey data collected by KPMG in Australia—where ARCs are not mandated—we find a positive association between ARCs and reported fraud. These results indicate that ARCs are effective in detecting fraud. Additional analysis reveals that small firms derive the greatest benefit from adopting ARCs. We also find that independent boards do not directly influence the detection of fraud, but companies with independent boards detect more fraud because they implement ARCs.

Keywords

Anonymous reporting channel Whistleblowing Fraud Asset misappropriation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the late Professor Colin Ferguson for the provision of the KPMG Fraud Survey data.

References

  1. Arnold, D. F., & Ponemon, L. (1991). Internal auditors’ perceptions of whistle-blowing and influence of moral reasoning: An experiment. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 10(2), 1–15.Google Scholar
  2. Association of Certified Fraud Examiners. (2006). Report to the nations on occupational fraud and abuse. Association of Certified Fraud Examiners. http://www.acfe.com/uploadedFiles/ACFE_Website/Content/documents/2006-rttn.pdf.
  3. Association of Certified Fraud Examiners. (2008). Report to the nations on occupational fraud and abuse. Association of Certified Fraud Examiners. http://www.acfe.com/uploadedFiles/ACFE_Website/Content/documents/2008-rttn.pdf.
  4. Association of Certified Fraud Examiners. (2010). Report to the nations on occupational fraud and abuse. Association of Certified Fraud Examiners. http://www.acfe.com/uploadedFiles/ACFE_Website/Content/documents/rttn-2010.pdf.
  5. Association of Certified Fraud Examiners. (2012). Report to the nations on occupational fraud and abuse. Association of Certified Fraud Examiners. http://www.acfe.com/uploadedFiles/ACFE_Website/Content/rttn/2012-report-to-nations.pdf.
  6. Association of Certified Fraud Examiners. (2014). Report to the nations on occupational fraud and abuse. Association of Certified Fraud Examiners. http://www.acfe.com/rttn/docs/2014-report-to-nations.pdf.
  7. ASX Corporate Governance Council. (2007). Corporate governance principles and recommendations with 2010 amendments (2nd ed.). ASX Corporate Governance Council. http://asx.ice4.interactiveinvestor.com.au/ASX0701/Corporate%20Governance%20Principles/EN/body.aspx?z=1&p=-1&v=1&uid=.
  8. ASX Corporate Governance Council. (2014). Corporate governance principles and recommendations (3rd ed.). ASX Corporate Governance Council. http://www.asx.com.au/documents/asx-compliance/cgc-principles-and-recommendations-3rd-edn.pdf.
  9. Ayers, S., & Kaplan, S. E. (2005). Wrongdoing by consultants: An examination of employees’ reporting intentions. Journal of Business Ethics, 57, 121–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Barnett, T. (1992). A preliminary investigation of the relationship between selected organizational characteristics and external whistleblowing by employees. Journal of Business Ethics, 11, 949–959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Beasley, M. S., & Salterio, S. E. (2001). The relationship between board characteristics and voluntary improvements in audit committee characteristics. Contemporary Accounting Research, 18, 539–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bierstaker, J. L., Brody, R. G., & Pacini, C. (2006). Accountants’ perceptions regarding fraud detection and prevention methods. Managerial Auditing Journal, 21, 520–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cassematis, P. G., & Wortley, R. (2013). Prediction of whistleblowing or non-reporting observation: The role of personal and situational factors. Journal of Business Ethics, 117, 615–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chapple, L., Ferguson, C., & Kang, D. (2009). Corporate governance and misappropriation. Journal of Forensic and Investigative Accounting, 1(2), 1–26.Google Scholar
  16. Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modelling. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern methods for business research (pp. 295–336). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  17. Chin, W. W., & Newsted, P. R. (1999). Structural equation modelling analysis with small samples using partial least squares. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Statistical strategies for small sample research (pp. 307–342). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  18. Chiu, R. K. (2003). Ethical judgment and whistleblowing intention: Examining the moderating role of locus of control. Journal of Business Ethics, 43, 65–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Coram, P., Ferguson, C., & Moroney, R. (2008). Internal audit, alternative internal audit structures and the level of misappropriation of assets fraud. Accounting and Finance, 48, 543–559.Google Scholar
  20. Corporations Act 2001 (Commonwealth of Australia). Part 9.4AAA.Google Scholar
  21. Cressey, D. R. (1973). Other people’s money: A study in the social psychology of embezzlement. Montclair: Patterson-Smith.Google Scholar
  22. Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Curtis, M. B., & Taylor, E. Z. (2009). Whistleblowing in public accounting: Influence of identity disclosure, situational context, and personal characteristics. Accounting and the Public Interest, 9, 191–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dozier, J. B., & Miceli, M. P. (1985). Potential predictors of whistle-blowing: A prosocial behavior perspective. Academy of Management Review, 10, 823–836.Google Scholar
  25. Dyck, A., Morse, A., & Zingales, L. (2010). Who blows the whistle on corporate fraud? The Journal of Finance, 65, 2213–2253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gao, J., Greenberg, R., & Wong-On-Wing, B. (2015). Whistleblowing intentions of lower-level employees: The effect of reporting channel, bystanders, and wrongdoing. Journal of Business Ethics, 126, 85–99.Google Scholar
  27. Goodwin-Stewart, J., & Kent, P. (2006). The use of internal audit by Australian companies. Managerial Auditing Journal, 21, 81–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Graham, J. W. (1986). Principled organizational dissent: A theoretical essay. In I. I. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 8, pp. 1–52). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  29. Hooks, K. L., Kaplan, S. E., & Schultz, J. J., Jr. (1994). Enhancing communication to assist in fraud prevention and detection. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 13(2), 86–117.Google Scholar
  30. Kaplan, S., Pany, K., Samuels, J., & Zhang, J. (2009a). An examination of the association between gender and reporting intentions for fraudulent financial reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 87, 15–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kaplan, S. E., Pany, K., Samuels, J. A., & Zhang, J. (2009b). An examination of the effects of procedural safeguards on intentions to anonymously report fraud. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 28(2), 273–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kaplan, S. E., Pope, K. R., & Samuels, J. A. (2010). The effect of social confrontation on individuals’ intentions to internally report fraud. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 22(2), 51–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kaplan, S. E., & Schultz, J. J. (2007). Intentions to report questionable acts: An examination of the influence of anonymous reporting channel, internal audit quality and setting. Journal of Business Ethics, 71, 109–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kaplan, S. E., & Whitecotton, S. M. (2001). An examination of auditors’ reporting intentions when another auditor is offered client employment. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 20(1), 45–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kaptein, M. (2011). From inaction to external whistleblowing: The influence of the ethical culture of organizations on employees’ responses to observed wrongdoing. Journal of Business Ethics, 98, 513–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Keenan, J. P. (1990). Upper-level managers and whistleblowing: Determinants of perceptions of company encouragement and information about where to blow the whistle. Journal of Business and Psychology, 5, 223–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Keenan, J. P. (1995). Whistleblowing and the first-level manager: Determinants of feeling obliged to blow the whistle. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 10, 571–584.Google Scholar
  38. Keenan, J. P. (2000). Blowing the whistle on less serious forms of fraud: A study of executive and managers. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 12, 199–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. King, G. (1999). The implications of an organisation’s structure on whistleblowing. Journal of Business Ethics, 20, 315–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. KPMG. (2012). A survey of fraud, bribery and corruption in Australia and New Zealand. KPMG. http://www.kpmg.com/AU/en/IssuesAndInsights/ArticlesPublications/Fraud-Survey/Documents/fraud-bribery-corruption-survey-2012v2.pdf.
  41. Krishnan, J. (2005). Audit committee quality and internal control: An empirical analysis. The Accounting Review, 80, 649–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kuntz, J. R. C., Kuntz, J. R., Elenkov, D., & Nabirukhina, A. (2013). Characterizing ethical cases: A cross-cultural investigation of individual differences, organisational climate, and leadership on ethical decision-making. Journal of Business Ethics, 113, 317–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lee, G., & Fargher, N. (2013). Companies’ use of whistle-blowing to detect fraud: An examination of corporate whistle-blowing. Journal of Business Ethics, 114, 283–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lowe, D. J., Pope, K. R., & Samuels, J. A. (2014). An examination of financial sub-certification and timing of fraud discovery on employee whistleblowing reporting intentions. Journal of Business Ethics (online). Google Scholar
  45. MacGregor, J., & Stuebs, M. (2014). The silent Samaritan syndrome: Why the whistle remains unblown. Journal of Business Ethics, 120, 149–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mesmer-Magnus, J. R., & Viswesvaran, C. (2005). Whistleblowing in organizations: An examination of correlates of whistleblowing intentions, actions, and retaliation. Journal of Business Ethics, 62, 277–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Miceli, M. P., & Near, J. P. (1984). The relationships among beliefs, organizational position and whistle-blowing status: A discriminant analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 27, 687–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Miceli, M. P., & Near, J. P. (1985). Characteristics of organizational climate and perceived wrongdoing associated with whistle-blowing decisions. Personnel Psychology, 38, 525–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Miceli, M. P., & Near, J. P. (1988). Individual and situational correlates of whistle-blowing. Personnel Psychology, 41, 267–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Miceli, M. P., & Near, J. P. (2002). What makes whistle-blowers effective? Three field studies. Human Relations, 55, 455–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mustafa, S. T., & Meier, H. H. (2006). Audit committees and misappropriation of assets: Publicly held companies in the United States. Canadian Accounting Perspectives, 5, 307–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Mustafa, S. T., & Youssef, N. B. (2010). Audit committee financial expertise and misappropriation of assets. Managerial Auditing Journal, 25, 208–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Nayir, D. Z., & Herzig, C. (2012). Value orientations as determinants of preference for external and anonymous whistleblowing. Journal of Business Ethics, 107, 197–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Near, J. P., & Miceli, M. P. (1985). Organizational dissidence: The case of whistle-blowing. Journal of Business Ethics, 4, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Near, J. P., Rehg, M. T., Van Scotter, J. R., & Miceli, M. P. (2004). Does type of wrongdoing affect the whistle-blowing process? Business Ethics Quarterly, 14, 219–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Nunnally, J. C. (1967). Psychometric theory (1st ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  57. Oppenheim, A. N. (1996). Questionnaire design and attitude measurement (2nd ed.). London: Continuum Books.Google Scholar
  58. Patel, C. (2003). Some cross-cultural evidence on whistle-blowing as an internal control mechanism. Journal of International Accounting Research, 2(1), 69–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Ponemon, L. A. (1994). Whistle-blowing as an internal control mechanism: Individual and organizational considerations. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 13(2), 118–130.Google Scholar
  60. Rae, K., & Subramaniam, N. (2008). Quality of internal control procedures: Antecedents and mediating effect on organisational justice and employee fraud. Managerial Auditing Journal, 23, 104–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Robinson, S. N., Robertson, J. C., & Curtis, M. B. (2012). The effects of contextual and wrongdoing attributes on organizational employees’ whistleblowing intentions following fraud. Journal of Business Ethics, 106, 213–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Rothwell, G. R., & Baldwin, J. N. (2007). Ethical climate theory, whistle-blowing, and the code of silence in police agencies in the state of Georgia. Journal of Business Ethics, 70, 341–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sarbanes-Oxley Act. (2002). PL 107-204, 116 Stat 745.Google Scholar
  64. Schmidt, M. (2005). “Whistle blowing” regulation and accounting standards enforcement in Germany and Europe—An economic perspective. International Review of Law and Economics, 25, 143–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Schultz, J. J., Johnson, D. A., Morris, D., & Dyrnes, S. (1993). An investigation of the reporting of questionable acts in an international setting. Journal of Accounting Research, 31(Studies on International Accounting), 75–103.Google Scholar
  66. Seifert, D. L., Sweeney, J. T., Joireman, J., & Thornton, J. M. (2010). The influence of organizational justice on accountant whistleblowing. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35, 707–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Sharma, V. D. (2004). Board of director characteristics, institutional ownership and fraud: Evidence from Australia. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 23(2), 105–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Sims, R. L., & Keenan, J. P. (1998). Predictors of external whistleblowing: Organizational and intrapersonal variables. Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 411–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In S. Leinhardt (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 290–312). Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.Google Scholar
  70. Somers, M. J. (2001). Ethical codes of conduct and organizational context: A study of the relationship between codes of conduct, employee behavior and organizational values. Journal of Business Ethics, 30, 185–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Standards Australia. (2008). AS 8001-2008 Fraud and Corruption Control. Standards Australia. http://www.saiglobal.com/PDFTemp/Previews/OSH/AS/AS8000/8000/8001-2008.pdf.
  72. Taylor, E. Z., & Curtis, M. B. (2010). An examination of the layers of workplace influences in ethical judgments: Whistleblowing likelihood and perseverance in public accounting. Journal of Business Ethics, 93, 21–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Vandekerckhove, W., & Tsahuridu, E. E. (2010). Risky rescues and the duty to blow the whistle. Journal of Business Ethics, 97, 365–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Victor, B., Treviño, L. K., & Shapiro, D. L. (1993). Peer reporting of unethical behaviour: The influence of justice evaluations and social context factors. Journal of Business Ethics, 12, 253–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Zhang, J., Chiu, R., & Wei, L. (2009). On whistleblowing judgment and intention: The roles of positive mood and organizational ethical culture. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 24, 627–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Zhang, J., Pany, K., & Reckers, P. (2013). Under which conditions are whistleblowing “Best-Practices” best? A Journal of Practice & Theory, 32(3), 171–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Zhang, Y., Zhou, J., & Zhou, N. (2007). Audit committee quality, auditor independence and internal control weaknesses. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 26, 300–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of AccountingDeakin UniversityBurwoodAustralia

Personalised recommendations