Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The ‘Biophilic Organization’: An Integrative Metaphor for Corporate Sustainability

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper proposes a new organizational metaphor, the ‘Biophilic Organization’, which aims to counter the bio-cultural disconnection of many organizations despite their espoused commitment to sustainability. This conceptual research draws on multiple disciplines such as evolutionary psychology and architecture to not only develop a diverse bio-cultural connection but to show how this connection tackles sustainability, in a holistic and systemic sense. Moreover, the paper takes an integrative view of sustainability, which effectively means that it embraces the different emergent tensions. Three specific tensions are explored: efficiency versus resilience, organizational versus personal agendas and isomorphism versus institutional change. In order to illustrate how the Biophilic Organization could potentially provide a synthesis strategy for such tensions, healthcare examples are drawn from the emerging fields of Biophilic Design in Singapore and Generative Design in the U.S.A. Finally, an example is provided which highlights how a Taoist cultural context has impacted on a business leader in China, to illustrative the significance of a transcendent belief system to such a bio-cultural narrative.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander, A. (2006). A Daoist renaissance. Resurgence (January/February), 17–19.

  • Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital. (2012). Submission to The Caritas Project Generative Space Award Enabling Health: Everybody. Chicago, IL: Everywhere.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlow, C. (1997). Green space, green time: The way of science. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Barry, D., & Elmes, M. (1997). Strategy retold: Toward a narrative view of strategic discourse. Academy of Management Review, 22, 429–451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beatley, T. (2011). Biophilic Cities: Integrating nature into urban design and planning. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Beatley, T. (2012). Singapore: City in a garden. Biophilic Cities. Accessed July 23, 2014, from www.biophiliccities.org/blog-singapore/.

  • Beatley, T. (2014). Hospital in a garden. University of Virginia. Accessed October 10, 2014, from www.uvadesignhealth.org/docs/blog/hospital-in-a-garden-by-timothy-beatley.

  • Beech, N., Burns, H., de Caestecker, L., MacIntosh, R., & MacLean, D. (2004). Paradox as invitation to act in problematic change situations. Human Relations, 57(10), 1313–1332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergs, J. A. (2002). Effect of healthy workplaces: Office work, well-being, and productivity. Amersfoort: Green Solar Architecture.

    Google Scholar 

  • Best, S., & Kellner, D. (1997). The postmodern turn. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birdwhistell, J. D. (2001). Ecological questions for Daoist thought: Contemporary issues and ancient texts. In N. J. Girardot, J. Miller, & L. Xiaogan (Eds.), Daoism and ecology: Ways within a cosmic landscape. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkin, F., Cashman, A., Koh, S. C. L., & Liu, Z. (2010). New sustainable business models in China. Business Strategy and the Environment, 18, 64–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callinicos, A. (1995). Theories and narratives. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carolan, M. S. (2006). The values and vulnerabilities of metaphors within the environmental sciences. Society and Natural Resources, 19, 921–930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, S., Walker, B., Anderies, J. M., & Abel, N. (2001). From metaphor to measurement: Resilience of what to what? Ecosystems, 4(8), 765–781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, M. (2002). Transcending paradox: The Chinese ‘Middle Way’ perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19(2–3), 179–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, A. (2008, July 14). The nature of design. Pacific Standard Magazine. Accessed July 10, 2013, from www.psmag.com/navigation/nature-and-technology/the-nature-of-design-4430.

  • Cornelissen, J. P., & Kafouros, M. I. (2008). The emergent organization: Primary and complex metaphors in theorizing about organizations. Organization Studies, 29(7), 957–978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cramer, J. (2005). Company learning about corporate social responsibility. Business Strategy and the Environment, 14, 255–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Certeau, M. (1984). The practice of everyday life. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dey, P., & Steyaert, C. (2007). The troubadours of knowledge: Passion and invention in management education. Organization, 3, 437–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durlabhji, S. (2004). The Tao of organization behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 52(4), 401–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyllick, T., & Hockerts, K. (2002). Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 11, 130–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenwick, T. (2007). Developing organizational practices of ecological sustainability: A learning perspective. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 28(7), 632–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • François, C. (2006). Transdisciplinary unified theory. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 23, 617–624.

  • Gao, J., & Bansal, P. (2013). Instrumental and integrative logics in business sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 112(2), 241–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gherardi, S. (1999). Learning as problem-driven or learning in the face of mystery? Organization Studies, 20(1), 101–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, T., & Figge, F. (2011). Beyond the bounded instrumentality in current corporate sustainability research: Toward an inclusive notion of profitability. Journal of Business Ethics, 104(3), 325–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, T., Pinkse, J., Preuss, L., & Figge, F. (2014). Tensions in corporate sustainability: Towards an integrative framework. Journal of Business Ethics. doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2047-5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heerwagen, J., & Bloom, M. F. (2011). The Resilient Workplace. Accessed September 13, 2013, from www.contractdesign.com.

  • Hill, J. (1998). The illegal architect. London: Black Dog.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillier, B. (1996). Space is the machine: A configurational theory of architecture. Cambridge York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyman, D., & Sage, W. (2005). Through the Tax Code: Status or conduct? Accessed August 13, 2014, from www.content.healthaffairs.org/cgi/content/full/hlthaff.25.w312/DC1.

  • Ip, P. K. (2008). The challenge of developing a business ethics in China. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(1), 211–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, I. (2010). The rise of the Tao. The New York Times. Accessed May 10, 2010, from www.nytimes.com/2010/11/07/magazine/07religion-t.html?_r=3&partner=rss&=&%2359;pagewanted=all&%2359;emc=rss&pagewanted=all&.

  • Jones, D. R. (2012). Looking through the ‘Greenwashing glass cage’ of the green league table towards the sustainability challenge for UK universities. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 25(4), 630–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, P. H., Jr, Friedman, B., Gill, B., Hagman, J., Severson, R. L., Freier, N. G., et al. (2008). A plasma display window? The shifting baseline problem in a technologically-mediated natural world. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28, 192–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kardash, T. (1998). Daoism – the Wu‐Wei Principle. Accessed April 10, 2013, from www.jadedragon.com.

  • Kellert, S. R. (1997). Kinship to mastery: Biophilia in human evolution and development. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellert, S. (2004). Beyond LEED: From low environmental impact to restorative environmental design. Keynote address. In Greening Rooftops for SUSTAINABLE Communities conference. Sponsored by Green Roofs for Healthy Cities, Toronto, CA and City of Portland, Portland.

  • Kellert, S. (2012). Birthright: People and nature in the modern world. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellert, S., Heerwagen, J. H., & Mador, M. L. (2008). Biophilic design. New Jersey: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellert, S. R., & Wilson, E. O. (1993). The biophilia hypothesis. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koolhaas, R. (1995). S, M, L, XL. New York: Monacelli Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korhonen, J., & Seager, T. P. (2008). Beyond eco-efficiency: A resilience perspective. Business Strategy and Environment, 17, 411–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kornberger, M., & Clegg, S. (2004). Bringing space back in: Organizing the generative building. Organization Studies, 25(7), 1095–1114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraemer, K. (2006). World scriptures: An introduction to comparative religions. Marwah: Paulist Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lau, D. C., & Ames, R. T. (1998). Yuan Dao: Tracing Dao to its source. New York: Ballantine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leach, M. (1998). Culture and sustainability. In L. Emmerji & P. Streeton (Eds.), World Culture Report. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. Oxford: Blackwell.

  • Lin, L.-H., Ho, Y.-L., & Lin, W.-H. E. (2013). Confucian and Taoist work values: An Exploratory study of the Chinese transformational leadership behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 113(1), 91–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lips-Wiersma, M., & Morris, L. (2009). Discriminating between ‘meaningful work’ and the ‘management of meaning’. Journal of Business Ethics, 88, 491–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lozano, R., & Huisingh, D. (2011). Inter-linking issues and aspects in sustainability reporting. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19, 99–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lozano, R., Lukman, R., Lozano, F. J., Huisingh, D., & Zilahy, G. (2010). Jumping Sustainability Meme. SD transfer from society to universities. Paper presented at the Environmental Management for Sustainable Universities, Delft.

  • Mass, J. (2011). Take a hike! How attention restorative theory shows that nature sharpens the mind. Ode for Intelligent Optimists, September, 2011.

  • Macnaughten, P., & Urry, J. (1998). Contested natures. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, C. C., & Barnes, M. (1995). Gardens in healthcare facilities: Uses, therapeutic benefits, and design recommendation. University of California Berkeley: The Center for Health Design.

  • Mathews, F. (2011). Towards a deeper philosophy of biomimicry. Organization and Environment, 20(10), 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGregor, S. L. T. (2004). The nature of transdisciplinary research and practice. Kappa Omicron Nu Human Sciences Working Paper Series. East Lansing, MI: Kappa Omicron Nu.

  • Midttun, A. (2007). Corporate responsibility from a resource and knowledge perspective: Towards a dynamic reinterpretation of C(S)R: Are corporate responsibility and innovation compatible or contradictory? Corporate Governance, 4(2), 401–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. (2003). Daoism: A short introduction. Oxford: Oneworld.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monteiro, M., & Keating, E. (2009). Managing misunderstandings: The role of language in interdisciplinary scientific collaboration. Sci. Commun., 31, 6–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, P. (2013). Biophilic urbanism: A case study on Singapore. Australian Planner, 51(1), 47–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nietzsche, F. (1968). The will to power. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nparks. (2012). Skyrise Greenery Incentive Scheme. National Parks Board, Government of Singapore. Accessed January 7, 2015, from www.skyrisegreenery.com/index.php/home/incentive_scheme/about/.

  • Nunez, M. C. (2012). Sustainability and spirituality: A transdisciplinary perspective. In B. Nicolescu (Ed.), Transdisicplinarity and sustainability (pp. 102–110). Lubbock, TX: Atlas Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paper, J. (2001). “Daoism” and “Deep Ecology”: Fantasy and potentiality. In N. J. Girardot, J. Miller, & L. Xiaogan (Eds.), Daoism and ecology: Ways within a cosmic landscape. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penker, M. (2008). Governing Austrian landscapes: Shifts along the private–public divide. In T. Sikor (Ed.), Public and private in natural resource governance: A false dichotomy? (pp. 89–106). London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, J. M. (2003). The Dao of Star Wars. Atlanta: Brumby Holdings Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahschulte, T. (2010). Virtues for leading change. The Journal of Virtues & Leadership, 1(1), 15–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudofsky, B. (1964). Architecture without architects: A short introduction to non pedigreed architecture. London: Academy Editions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruga, W. (2013). Two projects named generative space award Recipients. Medical Construction and Design. Accessed December 6, 2014, from www.mcdmag.com.

  • Ruiz, F. (2012, July 26). Biophilia becomes a design standard. EcoHome Magazine. Accessed August 4, 2014, from www.ecobuildingpulse.com/green-building/biophilia-becomes-a-design-standard.aspx.

  • SBEnrc. (2012). Can biophilic urbanism deliver strong economic and social benefits in cities? An economic and policy investigation into the increased use of natural elements in urban design. Sustainable Built Environment National Research Centre (SBEnrc), Curtin University and Queensland University of Technology.

  • Schutz, J. (1999). Organising diversity. In J. Kohn, J. M. Gowdy, F. Hinterberger, & J. van der Straaten (Eds.), Sustainability in question: The search for a conceptual framework (pp. 101–123). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrivastava, P., & Ivanaj, S. (2012). Transdisciplinary art, technology, and management for sustainable enterprise. In B. Nicolescu (Ed.), Transdisicplinarity and sustainability (pp. 112–128). Lubbock, TX: Atlas Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrivastava, P., & Persson, S. (2014). A theory of strategy—learning from China from walking to sailing. Management, 17(1), 38–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singapore Design Council. (2011). President’s Design Award 2011. Singapore: Khoo Teck Puat Hospital. Accessed August 10, 2014, from www.designsingapore.org/PDA_PUBLIC/content.aspx?sid=4.

  • Singer, P. (1995). How are we to live?. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, W. K., & Lewis, M. W. (2011). Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 381–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sng, P. L. (2011). In what way can green building contribute to human wellness in the Singapore context? Singapore: National University of Singapore.

  • Starkey, K., & Crane, A. (2003). Toward green narrative: Management and the evolutionary epic. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 220–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steyaert, C. (2006). Cities as heterotopias and third spaces: The example of ImagiNation, the Swiss Expo 02. In Space, organizations and management theory (pp. 248-265). Copenhagen: Liber & Copenhagen Business School Press.

  • Sundaramurthy, C., & Lewis, M. (2003). Control and collaboration: Paradoxes of governance. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 397–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. S., & Hansen, H. (2005). Finding form: looking at the field of organizational aesthetics. Journal of Management Studies, 42(6), 1211–1232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terrapin Bright Green, LLC. (2012). The economics of Biophilia: Why designing with nature in mind makes financial sense. Washington, DC: Terrapin Bright Green.

  • Thayer, J. F., Verkuil, B., Brosschot, J. F., Kampschroer, K., West, A., Sterling, C., et al. (2010). Effects of the physical work environment on physiological measures of stress. European Journal of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation, 17, 431–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Economist. (2013, August). China and the environment: The East is grey.

  • Toropov, B., & Hansen, C. (2002). The Complete Idiot’s guide to Daoism. Indianapolis: Alpha Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, R. S. (1993). Biophilia, biophobia, and natural landscapes. In S. R. Kellert & E. O. Wilson (Eds.), The Biophilia hypothesis (pp. 73–137). Washington DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venturi, R. (1966). Complexity and contradiction in architecture. London: Architectural Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waistel, J. (2012). The way of environmental preservation and restoration. In Buddhist virtues in social and economic development conference.

  • Wang, L., & Juslin, H. (2009). The impact of Chinese culture on corporate social responsibility: The harmony approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 88, 433–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren, S. (2002). Creating creativity: The organizational manipulation of aesthetics in a web design department. The Pink Machine Papers, 9(2), Stockholm.

  • Wheatley, M. (1999). Leadership and the new science. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. O. (1978). On human nature. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. O. (1984). Biophilia: The human bond with other species. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winnicott, D. W. (1971). Playing and reality. London: Tavistock Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yen, T. S. (2012). The practice of integrated design: The case study of Khoo Teck Puat Hospital, Singapore. Masters Dissertation, Nottingham University.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Aberdeen Business School, Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, Scotland, UK

    David R. Jones

Authors
  1. David R. Jones
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David R. Jones.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jones, D.R. The ‘Biophilic Organization’: An Integrative Metaphor for Corporate Sustainability. J Bus Ethics 138, 401–416 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2640-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2640-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation