Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 138, Issue 3, pp 477–492 | Cite as

Fraud in Sustainability Departments? An Exploratory Study

  • Maria Steinmeier
Article

Abstract

While sustainability is largely associated with do-gooders, this article discusses whether and how fraud might also be an issue in sustainability departments. More specifically, transferring the concept of the fraud triangle to sustainability departments I discuss possible pressures/incentives, opportunities, and rationalizations/attitudes for sustainability managers to commit fraud. Based on interviews with sustainability and forensic practitioners, my findings suggest that sustainability managers face mounting pressure and have opportunities to manipulate due to an immature control environment. Whether a presumably morality-driven attitude may prevent them from committing and easily rationalizing fraud remains controversial. Even though cases of fraud happening in sustainability departments are still widely unknown, the interview analysis reveals that sustainability fraud is likely to occur at least to some extent—and presumably remains undetected. The study brings to light the importance of a clear commitment from executives to sustainability to prevent sustainability fraud and demonstrates adverse developments driven by external stakeholders, specifically the bonus relevancy of sustainability index scores. In particular, the study shows a lack of awareness for potential fraud in sustainability departments.

Keywords

Sustainability Sustainability manager Fraud Fraud triangle 

References

  1. Abbott, L. J., Parker, S., & Peters, G. F. (2004). Audit committee characteristics and restatements. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 23(1), 69–88.Google Scholar
  2. Albrecht, W. S., Albrecht, C. C., & Albrecht, C. O. (2004). Fraud and corporate executives: Agency, stewardship and broken trust. Journal of Forensic Accounting, 5, 109–130.Google Scholar
  3. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). (2002). Consideration of fraud in a financial statement audit. Statement on auditing standards No. 99.Google Scholar
  4. Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE). (2012). Report to the nations on occupational fraud and abuse.Google Scholar
  5. Babiak, K., & Trendafilova, S. (2011). CSR and environmental responsibility: motives and pressures to adopt green management practices. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 18, 11–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barnett, M. L. (2007). Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 794–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beu, D., & Buckley, M. (2001). The hypothesized relationship between accountability and ethical behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 34, 57–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bondy, K. (2008). The paradox of power in CSR: A case study on implementation. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(2), 307–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Buchholz, A. K. (2012). SAS 99: Deconstructing the fraud triangle and some classroom suggestions. Journal of Leadership, Accountability and Ethics, 9(2), 109–118.Google Scholar
  10. Coffey, B. S., & Wang, J. (1998). Board diversity and managerial control as predicators of corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 1595–1603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cohen, J., Ding, Y., Lesage, C., & Stolowy, H. (2010). Corporate fraud and managers’ behavior: Evidence from the press. Journal of Business Ethics, 95, 271–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). (2013). Internal control-integrated framework. New York: AICPA.Google Scholar
  13. Cox, P., Brammer, S., & Millington, A. (2004). An empirical examination of institutional investor preferences for corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 52(1), 27–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cressey, D. R. (1950). The criminal violation of financial trust. American Sociological Review, 15(6), 738–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Davidson, R., Dey, A., & Smith, A. (2013). Executives’ “off-the-job” behavior, corporate culture, and financial reporting risk. Journal of Financial Economics. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304405X13001992.
  16. Dechow, P. M., Sloan, R. G., & Sweeney, A. P. (1996). Causes and consequences of earnings manipulation: An analysis of firms subject to enforcement actions by the SEC. Contemporary Accounting Research, 13, 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Delmas, M. A., & Burbano, V. C. (2011). The drivers of greenwashing. California Management Review, 54(1), 64–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dhaliwal, D. S., Li, O. Z., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. G. (2011). Voluntary nonfinancial disclosure and the cost of equity capital: the initiation of corporate social responsibility reporting. The Accounting Review, 86(1), 59–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ditlev-Simonsen, C. D., & Midttun, A. (2011). What motivates managers to pursue corporate responsibility? A survey among key stakeholders. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 18, 25–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Donald, K. F., & Goldsby, M. G. (2004). Corporate entrepreneurs or rogue middle managers? A framework for ethical corporate entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Ethics, 55(1), 13–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dorminey, J. W., Fleming, A. S., Kranacher, M., & Riley, R. A. (2012). The evolution of fraud theory. Issues in Accounting Education, 27(2), 555–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Edmondson, A. C., & McManus, S. E. (2007). Methodological fit in management field research. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1155–1179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Efendi, J., Srivastava, A., & Swanson, E. P. (2007). Why do corporate managers misstate financial statements? Journal of Financial Economics, 85(3), 667–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Esterberg, K. G. (2002). Qualitative methods in social research. London: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  25. Feng, M., Ge, W., Luo, S., & Shevlin, T. (2011). Why do CFOs become involved in material accounting manipulations? Journal of Accounting and Economics, 51, 21–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gephart, R. P. (2004). Qualitative research and the Academy of Management Journal. Academy of Management Journal, 47(4), 454–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. GreenBiz. (2011). GreenBiz salary survey. Available at: http://www.greenbiz.com/sites/default/files/GreenBiz-Salary-Survey-2011.pdf.
  28. Haniffa, R. M., & Cooke, T. E. (2005). The impact of culture and governance on corporate social reporting. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 24, 391–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hobson, J., Mayew, W., & Venkatachalam, M. (2012). Analyzing speech to detect financial misreporting. Journal of Accounting Research, 50(2), 349–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hogan, C. E., Rezaee, Z., Riley, R. A., & Velury, U. K. (2008). Financial statement fraud: insights from the academic literature. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 27 (2), 231-252.Google Scholar
  31. International Federation of Accountants (IFAC). (2009). International Standard on Auditing 240. The auditor’s responsibilities relating to fraud in and audit of financial statements.Google Scholar
  32. Irvine, H., & Gaffikin, M. (2006). Getting in, getting on, and getting out: Reflections on a qualitative research project. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 19(1), 115–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Isenberg, M. (1997). Mapping out environmental careers: the young professional’s perspective. Environmental Quality Management, 7(1), 115–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. KPMG .(2011). KPMG international corporate responsibility reporting survey 2011. Available at: http://www.kpmg.com/Global/en/IssuesAndInsights/ArticlesPublications/corporate-responsibility/Pages/ 2011-survey.aspx.
  35. McNulty, E., & Davis, R. (2010). Should the C-suite have a ‘‘Green’’ suite?. Watertown: Harvard Business School.Google Scholar
  36. Michelon, G., & Parbonetti, A. (2012). The effect of corporate governance on sustainability disclosure. Journal of Management and Governance, 16, 477–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Molz, R. (1995). The theory of pluralism in corporate governance: A conceptual framework and empirical test. Journal of Business Ethics, 14(10), 789–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Morales, J., Gendron, Y., & Guénin-Paracini, H. (2014). The construction of the risky individual and vigilant organization: A genealogy of the fraud triangle. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 39, 170–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Murphy, P. R., & Dacin, M. T. (2011). Psychological pathways to fraud: understanding and preventing fraud in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 101, 601–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. O’Dwyer, B. (2011). The case of sustainability assurance. Constructing a new assurance service. Contemporary Accounting Review, 28(4), 1230–1266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Perez-Batres, L. A., Doh, J. P., Miller, V. V., & Pisani, M. J. (2012). Stakeholder pressures as determinants of CSR strategic choice: Why do firms choose symbolic versus substantive self-regulatory codes of conduct? Journal of Business Ethics, 110(2), 157–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Prakash, A. (2001). Why do firms adopt ‘beyond-compliance’ environmental policies? Business Strategy and the Environment, 10(5), 286–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). (2007). Observations on auditors’ implementation of PCAOB standards relating to auditors’ responsibilities with respect to fraud. New York: PCAOB.Google Scholar
  44. Sánchez, J. L. F., Sotorrío, L. L., & Díez, E. B. (2011). The relationship between corporate governance and corporate social behavior: a structural equation model analysis. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 18, 91–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Soltani, B. (2013). The anatomy of corporate fraud: a comparative analysis of high profile American and European corporate scandals. Journal of Business Ethics, 125(2), 1–24.Google Scholar
  46. Strand, R. (2013). The chief officer of corporate social responsibility: a study of its presence in top management teams. Journal of Business Ethics, 112, 721–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sutherland, E. H. (1940). White-collar criminality. American Sociological Review, 5(1), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sutherland, E. H. (1944). Is “white-collar crime” crime? American Sociological Review, 10(2), 132–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Trompeter, G. M., Carpenter, T. D., Desai, N., Jones, K. L., & Riley, R. A. (2013). A synthesis of fraud-related research. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 32, 287–321.Google Scholar
  50. United Nations Global Compact (UNGC) (2013). The UN Global Compact-Accenture CEO Study on Sustainability 2013.Google Scholar
  51. Van Marrewijk, M. (2003). Concepts and definitions of CSR and corporate sustainability: between agency and communion. Journal of Business Ethics, 44(2/3), 95–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Visser, W., & Crane, A. (2010). Corporate sustainability and the individual: understanding what drives sustainability professionals as change agents. Working Paper.Google Scholar
  53. Wagner-Tsukamoto, S. (2009). Consumer ethics in Japan: An economic reconstruction of moral agency of Japanese firms—qualitative insights from grocery/retail markets. Journal of Business Ethic 84, 29–44.Google Scholar
  54. Wolfe, D. T., & Hermanson, D. R. (2004). The fraud diamond: considering the four elements of fraud. The CPA Journal, 74, 38–42.Google Scholar
  55. Zahra, S. A., Priem, R. L., & Raseheed, A. A. (2005). The antecedents and consequences of top management fraud. Journal of Management, 31(6), 803–828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Zona, F., Minoja, M., & Coda, V. (2013). Antecedents of corporate scandals: CEOs’ personal traits, stakeholders’ cohesion, managerial fraud, and imbalanced corporate strategy. Journal of Business Ethics, 113, 265–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ruhr University BochumBochumGermany

Personalised recommendations