Fraud in Sustainability Departments? An Exploratory Study
- 638 Downloads
While sustainability is largely associated with do-gooders, this article discusses whether and how fraud might also be an issue in sustainability departments. More specifically, transferring the concept of the fraud triangle to sustainability departments I discuss possible pressures/incentives, opportunities, and rationalizations/attitudes for sustainability managers to commit fraud. Based on interviews with sustainability and forensic practitioners, my findings suggest that sustainability managers face mounting pressure and have opportunities to manipulate due to an immature control environment. Whether a presumably morality-driven attitude may prevent them from committing and easily rationalizing fraud remains controversial. Even though cases of fraud happening in sustainability departments are still widely unknown, the interview analysis reveals that sustainability fraud is likely to occur at least to some extent—and presumably remains undetected. The study brings to light the importance of a clear commitment from executives to sustainability to prevent sustainability fraud and demonstrates adverse developments driven by external stakeholders, specifically the bonus relevancy of sustainability index scores. In particular, the study shows a lack of awareness for potential fraud in sustainability departments.
KeywordsSustainability Sustainability manager Fraud Fraud triangle
- Abbott, L. J., Parker, S., & Peters, G. F. (2004). Audit committee characteristics and restatements. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 23(1), 69–88.Google Scholar
- Albrecht, W. S., Albrecht, C. C., & Albrecht, C. O. (2004). Fraud and corporate executives: Agency, stewardship and broken trust. Journal of Forensic Accounting, 5, 109–130.Google Scholar
- American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). (2002). Consideration of fraud in a financial statement audit. Statement on auditing standards No. 99.Google Scholar
- Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE). (2012). Report to the nations on occupational fraud and abuse.Google Scholar
- Buchholz, A. K. (2012). SAS 99: Deconstructing the fraud triangle and some classroom suggestions. Journal of Leadership, Accountability and Ethics, 9(2), 109–118.Google Scholar
- Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). (2013). Internal control-integrated framework. New York: AICPA.Google Scholar
- Davidson, R., Dey, A., & Smith, A. (2013). Executives’ “off-the-job” behavior, corporate culture, and financial reporting risk. Journal of Financial Economics. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304405X13001992.
- Esterberg, K. G. (2002). Qualitative methods in social research. London: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- GreenBiz. (2011). GreenBiz salary survey. Available at: http://www.greenbiz.com/sites/default/files/GreenBiz-Salary-Survey-2011.pdf.
- Hogan, C. E., Rezaee, Z., Riley, R. A., & Velury, U. K. (2008). Financial statement fraud: insights from the academic literature. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 27 (2), 231-252.Google Scholar
- International Federation of Accountants (IFAC). (2009). International Standard on Auditing 240. The auditor’s responsibilities relating to fraud in and audit of financial statements.Google Scholar
- KPMG .(2011). KPMG international corporate responsibility reporting survey 2011. Available at: http://www.kpmg.com/Global/en/IssuesAndInsights/ArticlesPublications/corporate-responsibility/Pages/ 2011-survey.aspx.
- KPMG .(2013). The KPMG survey of corporate responsibility reporting 2013. Available at: http://www.kpmg.com/Global/en/IssuesAndInsights/ArticlesPublications/corporate-responsibility/Documents/corporate-responsibility-reporting-survey-2013-v2.pdf.
- McNulty, E., & Davis, R. (2010). Should the C-suite have a ‘‘Green’’ suite?. Watertown: Harvard Business School.Google Scholar
- Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). (2007). Observations on auditors’ implementation of PCAOB standards relating to auditors’ responsibilities with respect to fraud. New York: PCAOB.Google Scholar
- Soltani, B. (2013). The anatomy of corporate fraud: a comparative analysis of high profile American and European corporate scandals. Journal of Business Ethics, 125(2), 1–24.Google Scholar
- Trompeter, G. M., Carpenter, T. D., Desai, N., Jones, K. L., & Riley, R. A. (2013). A synthesis of fraud-related research. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 32, 287–321.Google Scholar
- United Nations Global Compact (UNGC) (2013). The UN Global Compact-Accenture CEO Study on Sustainability 2013.Google Scholar
- Visser, W., & Crane, A. (2010). Corporate sustainability and the individual: understanding what drives sustainability professionals as change agents. Working Paper.Google Scholar
- Wagner-Tsukamoto, S. (2009). Consumer ethics in Japan: An economic reconstruction of moral agency of Japanese firms—qualitative insights from grocery/retail markets. Journal of Business Ethic 84, 29–44.Google Scholar
- Wolfe, D. T., & Hermanson, D. R. (2004). The fraud diamond: considering the four elements of fraud. The CPA Journal, 74, 38–42.Google Scholar