Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 138, Issue 2, pp 231–246 | Cite as

Do they Know it’s CSR at all? An Exploration of Socially Responsible Music Consumption

  • Todd Green
  • Gary Sinclair
  • Julie Tinson
Article

Abstract

The increasing visibility and elevated status of musicians has become prominent in contemporary society as a consequence of technological advances and the development of both mass and specialized targeted audiences. Consequently, the actions of musicians are under greater levels of scrutiny and fans demand more from musicians than ‘just’ music. If the industry demands corporate social responsibility practices in a similar vein to how corporations promote themselves; a further question then remains regarding how the increasing prominence of such activities by musicians influences music consumers and fans of individual bands and artists. The current research provides a foundation upon which to better understand the role that social responsibility plays for consumers of music. Consequently, the research has practical implications for promoting socially responsible consumption practices. The various public spaces (concerts, festivals, retail outlets, social events, and social media) that music consumption encompasses represent great opportunities in which ethical consumption practices can be promoted. We identify a number of factors (level of expectations, authenticity and escapism) that ultimately determine when socially responsible engagement in the music industry is supported, ignored, or even becomes the focus of consumer backlash.

Keywords

Consumer behavior Hedonic consumption Music Qualitative Socially responsible consumption behavior 

References

  1. Auger, P., Devinney, T. M., Louviere, J. J., & Burke, P. F. (2008). Do social product features have value to consumers? International Journal of Research in Marketing, 25, 183–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barnett, M. L. (2007). Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 794–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barone, M. J., Norman, A. T., & Miyazaki, A. D. (2007). Consumer responses to retailer use of cause related marketing: Is more fit better? Journal of Retailing, 83(4), 437–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baym, N. K. (2012). Fans or friends? Seeing social media audiences as musicians do. Journal of Audience and Reception Studies, 9(2), 286–316.Google Scholar
  5. Becker Olsen, K. L., Cudmore, B. A., & Hill, R. P. (2006). The impact of perceived corporate social responsibility on consumer behavior. Journal of Business Research, 59(1), 46–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berens, G., van Riel, C. B. M., & van Rekom, J. (2007). The CSR quality trade off: When can corporate social responsibility and corporate ability compensate each other? Journal of Business Ethics, 74, 233–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brunk, K. H. (2010). Reputation building: beyond our control? Inferences in consumers’ ethical perception formation. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 9, 275–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carrigan, M., & Attalla, A. (2001). The myth of the ethical consumer—Do ethics matter in purchase behaviour? Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18(7), 560–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chang, C. (2008). To donate or not to donate? Product characteristics and framing effects of cause related marketing on consumer purchase behavior. Psychology & Marketing, 25(12), 1089–1110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chowdhury, T. G., & Khare, A. (2011). Matching a cause with self-schema: The moderating effect on brand preferences. Psychology & Marketing, 28(8), 825–842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cotte, J., & Trudel, R. (2009). Socially conscious consumerism: A systematic review of the body of knowledge. London: Network for business Sustainability.Google Scholar
  12. Creyer, E. H., & Ross, W. T, Jr. (1997). The influence of firm behavior on purchase intention: Do consumers really care about business Ethics? Journal of Consumer Marketing, 14(6), 421–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. De Pelsmacker, P., Driesen, L., & Rayp, G. (2005). Do consumers care about ethics? Willingness to pay for fair-trade coffee. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 39(2), 363–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. DeNora, T. (2000). Music in everyday life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Donoghue, S. (2000). Projective techniques in consumer research. Journal of Family Ecology and Consumer Sciences, 28, 47–52.Google Scholar
  16. Du, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2010). Maximizing business returns to corporate social responsibility: The role of CSR communication. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 8–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Elias, N., & Dunning, E. (2008). The quest for excitement. Dublin: University College Dublin Press.Google Scholar
  18. Folkes, V. S., & Kamins, M. A. (1999). Effects of information about firms’ ethical and unethical actions on consumers’ attitudes. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 8(3), 243–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Hawthorne: Aldine Publishing.Google Scholar
  20. Goulding, C., & Saren, M. (2009). Performing identity: An analysis of gender expressions as the Whitby Goth Festival. Consumption Markets & Culture., 12(1), 27–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Green, T., & Peloza, J. (2014). How do consumers infer corporate social responsibility? The role of organisation size. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 13(4), 282–293.Google Scholar
  22. Griskevicius, V., Van den Bergh, B., & Tybur, J. M. (2010). Going green to be seen: status, reputation and conspicuous consumption. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(3), 392–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Guest, G., Bruce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18, 59–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Haanaes, K., Balagopal, B., Kong, M. T., Velken, I., Arthur, D., Hopkins, M. S., & Kruschwitz, N. (2011). New sustainability study: The ‘embracers’ seize advantage. MIT Sloan Management Review, 52(3), 23–35.Google Scholar
  25. Hall, S., & Jefferson, T. (1976). Resistance through rituals: Youth subcultures in post-war Britain. Birmingham: Hutchison.Google Scholar
  26. Hillary, R. (2000). The eco-management and audit scheme, ISO 14001 and the smaller firm. In Ruth Hillary (Ed.), Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises and the Environment (pp. 128–147). Sheffield: Greenleaf.Google Scholar
  27. Hoeffler, S., & Keller, K. L. (2002). Building brand equity through corporate societal marketing. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 21(2), 78–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Holbrook, M. B., & Hirschman, E. C. (1982). The experiential aspects of consumption: Consumer fantasies, feelings, and fun. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(2), 132–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Holbrook, M. B., & Schindler, R. M. (1989). Some exploratory findings on the development of musical tastes. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(1), 119–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kubacki, K., & Croft, R. (2004). Mass marketing, music and morality. Journal of Marketing Management, 20(5–6), 577–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Laing, J., & Frost, W. (2010). How green was my festival: Exploring challenges and opportunities associated with staging green events. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 29, 261–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Laroche, M., Bergeron, J., & Barbaro-Forleo, G. (2001). Targeting consumers who are willing to pay more for environmentally friendly products. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18(6), 503–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Larsen, G., Lawson, R., & Todd, S. (2010). The symbolic consumption of music. Journal of Marketing Management, 26(7–8), 671–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lysonski, S., & Durvasula, S. (2008). Digital piracy of MP3 s: Consumer and ethical predispositions. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 25(3), 167–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Magudda, P. (2011). When materiality “bites back”: Digital music consumption practices in the age of dematerialization. Journal of Consumer Research, 11(1), 15–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Miller, W. L., & Crabtree, B. F. (1992). Primary care research: a multi-method typology and qualitative roadmap. In B. F. Crabtree & W. L. Miller (Eds.), Doing Qualitative Research (pp. 3–28). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  37. Mohr, L. A., & Webb, D. J. (2005). The effects of corporate social responsibility and price on consumer responses. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 35(1), 45–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mohr, L. A., Webb, D. J., & Harris, K. E. (2001). Do customers expect companies to be socially responsible? The impact of corporate social responsibility on buying behavior. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 35(1), 45–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. NPD Group (2013). Music Consumer Profile—2013. Retrieved August 20, 2014 from: http://riaa.com/media/179F6A9B-42EB-F309-8382-5AB1E00D7C29.pdf.
  40. Oberseder, M., Schlegelmilch, B. B., & Gruber, V. (2011). Why don’t consumers care about CSR? A qualitative study exploring the role of CSR in consumption decisions. Journal of Business Ethics, 104, 449–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Peattie, K., & Crane, A. (2005). Green marketing: Myth, legend, farce or prophesy? Qualitative Marketing Research: An International Journal, 8(4), 357–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Peloza, J., & Falkenberg, L. (2009). The role of collaboration in achieving corporate social responsibility objectives. California Management Review, 51(3), 95–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Peloza, J., & Shang, J. (2011). How can corporate social responsibility activities create value for stakeholders? Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(1), 117–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Peloza, J., White, K., & Shang, J. (2013). Green and guilt-free: The role of self-accountability in influencing preferences for products with ethical attributes. Journal of Marketing, 77(1), 104–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pomering, A., & Dolnicar, S. (2009). Assessing the Prerequisite of Successful CSR Implementation: Are Consumers Aware of CSR Initiatives? Journal of Business Ethics, 85, 285–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Robinson, L. (2012). Putting the charity back into charity singles: Charity singles in Britain 1984–1995. Contemporary British History, 26(3), 405–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rolling Stone (n.d.) The 15 most eco-friendly rockers. Retrieved September 30th, 2014 from: http://www.rollingstone.com/music/pictures/the-15-most-eco-friendly-rockers-20101216.
  48. Shankar, A. (2000). Lost in music? Subjective personal introspection and popular music consumption. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 3(1), 27–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sheth, H., & Babiak, K. (2010). Beyond the game: Perceptions and practices of corporate social responsibility in the professional sport industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 91(3), 433–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Siddique, H. (2014). Lily Allen: Band Aid is smug and I’d rather donate actual money. Retrieved November 30, 2014 from: http://www.theguardian.com/music/2014/nov/23/lily-allen-criticise-band-aid-smug-ebola.
  51. Sinclair, G., & Dolan, P. (forthcoming). Heavy metal figurations: Music consumption, subcultural control and civilizing processes. Marketing Theory. Available online at: http://mtq.sagepub.com/content/early/2015/01/29/1470593115569015.refs.
  52. Smith, N. C. (2003). Corporate social responsibility: whether or how. California Management Review, 45(4), 52–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Spiggle, S. (1994). Analysis and interpretation of qualitative data in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(3), 491–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Strahilevitz, M., & Myers, J. G. (1998). Donations to charity as purchase incentives: How well they work may depend on what you are trying to sell. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(4), 434–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  56. The Daily Beast (2014). The 25 most charitable celebrities. Retrieved October 28, 2014 from: http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/12/16/the-25-most-charitable-celebrities-of-2013.html.
  57. Thornton, S. (1995). Club cultures: Music, media and subcultural capital. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  58. Torelli, C., Monga, A. B., & Kaikati, A. M. (2012). Doing poorly by doing good: corporate social responsibility and brand concepts. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(5), 948–963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Valor, C. (2008). Can consumers buy responsibly? Analysis and solutions for market failures. Journal of Consumer Policy, 31(3), 315–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wang, X., & McClung, S. (2011). Towards a detailed understanding of illegal digital downloading intentions: An extended theory of planned behavior approach. New Media and Society, 13(4), 663–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. White, K., & Peloza, J. (2009). Self-Benefit versus other-benefit marketing appeals: their effectiveness in generating charitable support. Journal of Marketing, 73(4), 109–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Withnall, S. (2014). Band Aid 30: Emeli Sande says lyrics for Do They Know It’s Christmas need to be rewritten and admits her own edits were rejected. Retrieved November 30, 2014 from: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/band-aid-30-emeli-sande-says-lyrics-for-do-they-know-its-christmas-need-to-be-rewritten-and-admits-her-own-edits-were-rejected-9878221.html.
  63. Youn, S., & Kim, H. (2008). Antecedents of consumer attitudes toward cause-related marketing. Journal of Advertising Research, 48(1), 123–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Goodman School of BusinessBrock UniversitySt. CatherinesCanada
  2. 2.Stirling Management SchoolUniversity of StirlingStirlingUK

Personalised recommendations