Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 134, Issue 2, pp 249–261 | Cite as

A Discovery of Early Labor Organizations and the Women who Advocated Work–Life Balance: An Ethical Perspective

  • Simone T. A. Phipps
  • Leon C. Prieto
Article

Abstract

“Work–life balance” (WLB) is a relatively modern expression. However, there is no novelty in the core concept, as resistance to excessive incompatibility between work roles and personal roles has a history that predates contemporary struggles for a decline in unnecessary work–life conflict. The authors of this manuscript aim to convey a portion of this history by instilling, from an ethics perspective, an awareness of the efforts of early labor organizations, including labor unions, and a social organization that addressed labor issues. They will also communicate the resolve of key individuals, especially women, including labor leaders and activists, who contributed to labor reform and served as early proponents for WLB. In addition, implications and suggestions for practice and future inquiry will be provided.

Keywords

Work–life balance International Ladies’ Garment Workers’ Union (ILGWU) Women’s Trade Union League Russell Sage Foundation Pauline Newman Margaret Dreier Robins Mary Abby Van Kleeck 

References

  1. Alchon, G. (1992). Mary van Kleeck and scientific management. In D. Nelson (Ed.), A mental revolution: Scientific management since Taylor (pp. 102–129). Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Alesina, A., Glaeser, E., & Sacerdote, B. (2005). Work and leisure in the United States and Europe: Why so different? NBER/Macroeconomics Annual (MIT Press), 20(1), 1–64.Google Scholar
  3. Auster, E. R., Wylie, K. K., & Valente, M. S. (2005). Strategic organizational change: Building change capabilities in your organization. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Avery, C., & Zabel, D. (2001). The flexible workplace: A sourcebook of information and research. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  5. Baker, T. L., Hunt, T. G., & Andrews, M. C. (2006). Promoting ethical behavior and organizational citizenship behaviors: The influence of corporate ethical values. Journal of Business Research, 59(7), 849–857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Balser, D. (1987). Sisterhood and solidarity: Feminism and labor in modern times. Boston: South End Press.Google Scholar
  7. Barnett, R. C., & Hyde, J. S. (2001). Women, men, work, and family: An expansionist theory. American Psychologist, 56(10), 781–796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barnum, G. (1905). Weekly Bulletin of the Clothing Trades. Google Scholar
  9. Baron, A. (1981). Protective labor legislation and the cult of domesticity. Journal of Family Issues, 2(1), 25–38.Google Scholar
  10. Beauregard, T., & Henry, L. C. (2009). Making the link between work–life balance practices and organizational performance. Human Resource Management Review., 19(1), 9–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bernard-Powers, J. (2012). The “Girl Question” in Education: Vocational Education for Young Women in the Progressive Era. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Bird, J. (2006). Work–life balance: Doing it right and avoiding the pitfalls. Employment Relations Today, 33(3), 21–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Biscardi, D., & Schill, T. (1985). Correlations of narcissistic traits with defensive style, Machiavellianism, and empathy. Psychological Reports, 57(2), 354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brenner, S. N. (1992). Ethics programs and their dimensions. Journal of Business Ethics, 11(5–6), 391–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Brunell, A. B., Davis, M. S., Schley, D. R., Eng, A. L., van Dulmen, M. H. M., Wester, K. L., et al. (2013). A new measure of interpersonal exploitativeness. Frontiers in Psychology, 4(299), 1–9.Google Scholar
  16. Carroll, A. B., & Buchholtz, A. K. (2012). Business and Society: Ethics, Sustainability and Stakeholder Management. Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
  17. Chafe, W. H. (1991). The Paradox of Change: American Women in the 20th Century. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Cornell University ILR School. (2013). History of the ILGWU. The Kheel Center ILGWU Collection. Retrieved from http://www.ilr.cornell.edu/ILGWU/history/.
  19. Crampton, S. M., & Mishra, J. M. (2005). Job sharing: A viable work alternative for the new millennium. Journal of Applied Management and Entrepreneurship, 10(2), 13–34.Google Scholar
  20. De Cieri, H., Holmes, B., Abbott, J., & Pettit, T. (2005). Achievements and challenges for work/life balance strategies in Australian organizations. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16(1), 90–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Deloitte and Touche USA LLP. (2007). Leadership counts: Deloitte and Touche USA 2007 ethics and workplace survey results. Retrieved from https://www.deloitte.com/assets/Dcom-UnitedStates/Local%20Assets/Documents/us_2007_ethics_workplace_survey_011009.pdf.
  22. Demson, M. (2011). Let a great assembly be: Percy Shelley’s “The Mask of Anarchy” and the organization of labor in New York City, 1910-30. European Romantic Review, 22(5), 641–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91.Google Scholar
  24. Duxbury, L., & Higgins, C. (2003). Work–life conflict in Canada in the new millennium: A status report. Healthy Communities Division, Health Canada. Retrieved from http://publications.gc.ca/collections/Collection/H72-21-186-2003E.pdf.
  25. Dye, N. S. (1975). Creating a feminist alliance: Sisterhood and class conflict in the New York Women’s Trade Union League, 1903–1914. Feminist Studies, 2(2/3), 24–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Earle, H. A. (2003). Building a workplace of choice: Using the work environment to attract and retain top talent. Journal of Facilities Management, 2(3), 244–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Emmons, R. A. (1987). Narcissism: Theory and measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(1), 11–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (2012). Pregnancy discrimination charges EEOC & FEPAs Combined: FY 1997FY 2011. Retrieved from http://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/statistics/enforcement/pregnancy.cfm.
  29. Equal Opportunities Commission. (2005). Greater expectations: Summary final report: EOC’s investigation into pregnancy discrimination. UK: Equal Opportunities Commission. Retrieved from http://www.equalityhumanrights.com/uploaded_files/eoc_pregnancygfi_summary_report.pdf
  30. Ezra, M., & Deckman, M. (1996). Balancing work and family responsibilities: Flextime and childcare in the federal government. Public Administration Review, 56(2), 174–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Felstead, A., Jewson, N., Phizacklea, A., & Walters, S. (2002). Opportunities to work at home in the context of work–life balance. Human Resource Management Journal, 12(1), 54–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Fisk, G. M. (2010). “I want it all and I want it now!” An examination of the etiology, expression, and escalation of excessive employee entitlement. Human Resource Management Review, 20(2), 102–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Florida, R., & Goodnight, J. (2005). Managing for creativity. Harvard Business Review, 83(7/8), 124–131.Google Scholar
  34. Forsyth, D. R. (1980). A taxonomy of ethical ideologies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(1), 175–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Friedman, S. D., & Greenhaus, J. H. (2000). Allies or enemies? What happens when business professionals confront life choices. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Frone, M. R. (2003). Work–family balance. In J. C. Quick & L. E. Tetrick (Eds.), Handbook of Occupational Health Psychology (pp. 143–162). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Greenhaus, J. H., Collins, K. M., & Shaw, J. D. (2003). The relation between work–family balance and quality of life. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63(3), 510–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Greenhaus, J. H., & Powell, G. N. (2006). When work and family are allies: A theory of work–family enrichment. Academy of Management Review, 31(1), 72–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Haas, L. (1999). Families and work. In M. Sussman, S. K. Steinmetz, & G. W. Peterson (Eds.), Handbook of Marriage and the Family (pp. 571–612). New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hammack, D. C., & Wheeler, S. (1994). Social Science in the Making: Essays on the Russell Sage Foundation, 1907–1972. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  42. Handy, S. L., & Mokhtarian, P. L. (1996). The future of telecommuting. Futures, 28(3), 227–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hartwell, T. D., Steele, P., French, M. T., Potter, F. J., Rodman, N. F., & Zarkin, G. A. (1996). Aiding troubled employees: The prevalence, cost and characteristics of employee assistance programs in the United States. American Journal of Public Health, 86(6), 804–808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hermanson, J. (1993). Organizing for justice: ILGWU returns to social unionism to organize immigrant workers. Labor Research Review, 1(20), 53–61.Google Scholar
  45. Hill, E. J., Hawkins, A. J., Ferris, M., & Weitzman, M. (2001). Finding an extra day a week: The positive influence of perceived job flexibility on work and family life balance. Family Relations, 50(1), 49–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Hobson, C. J., Delunas, L., & Kesic, D. (2001). Compelling evidence of the need for corporate work life balance initiatives: Results from a national survey of stressful life events. Journal of Employment Counseling, 38(1), 38–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hochman, J. (1941). Labor Information. Bulletin., 8(5), 1–5.Google Scholar
  48. Hoffman, B. (2003). Health care reform and social movements in the United States. American Journal of Public Health, 93(1), 75–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Howes, E. P. (1922). Accepting the universe. Atlantic Monthly, 129, 444–453.Google Scholar
  50. Hughes, J., & Bozionelos, N. (2007). Work–life balance as a source of job dissatisfaction and withdrawal attitudes: An exploratory study on the views of male workers. Personnel Review, 36(1), 145–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. International Ladies’ Garment Workers’ Union. (1916). The Ladies’ Garment Worker 7(1), 1–28.Google Scholar
  52. Jacobs, D. C. (1987). The UAW and the Committee for National Health Insurance: The contours of social unionism. Advances in Industrial and Labor Relations, 4, 119–140.Google Scholar
  53. Jacoby, R. M. (1975). The Women’s Trade Union League and American feminism. Feminist Studies, 3(1/2), 126–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Katz, D. (2011). All Together Different: Yiddish Socialists, Garment Workers, and the Labor roots of multiculturalism. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Kaufman, G., Lyonette, C., & Crompton, R. (2010). Post-birth employment leave among fathers in Britain and the United States. Fathering: A Journal of Theory, Research, and Practice About Men As Fathers, 8(3), 321–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Kelly, E., & Dobbin, F. (1999). Civil rights law at work: Sex discrimination and the rise of maternity leave policies. American Journal of Sociology, 105(2), 455–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Kessler-Harris, A. (1976). Organizing the unorganizable: Three Jewish women and their union. Labor History, 17(1), 5–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Kirkby, D. (1987). The wage-earning woman and the state: The National Women’s Trade Union League and protective labor legislation, 1903–1923. Labor History, 28(1), 54–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Kirkby, D. (1991). Alice Henry: The Power of Pen and Voice: The Life of an Australian-American Labor Reformer. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Knight, M. A., & Comer-HaGans, D. (2012). Domestic partner benefits. Public Personnel Management, 41(3), 493–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Kok, P., van der Wiele, T., McKenna, R., & Brown, A. (2001). A corporate social responsibility audit within a quality management framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 31(4), 285–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Koonmee, K., Singhapakdi, A., Virakul, B., & Lee, D. J. (2010). Ethics institutionalization, quality of work life, and employee job-related outcomes: A survey of human resource managers in Thailand. Journal of Business Research, 63(1), 20–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Levitan, S. A., & Gallo, F. (1990). Work and family: The impact of legislation. Monthly Labor Review, 113(3), 34–40.Google Scholar
  64. Lewis, S., Gambles, R., & Rapoport, R. (2007). The constraints of a ‘work–life balance’ approach: An international perspective. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18(3), 360–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Lockwood, N. R. (2003). Work/life balance: Challenges and solutions. SHRM Research Quarterly Report No. 2. Alexandria, VA: Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM). Retrieved from http://www.shrm.org/research/surveyfindings/articles/documents/0302wl.pdf.
  66. Lund, D. B. (2003). Organizational culture and job satisfaction. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 18(3), 219–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Mandell, N. (2000). The triumph of personnel management: Contesting corporate motherhood and the corporate welfare system. Essays in Economic and Business History, 18, 135–147.Google Scholar
  68. Marchand, R. (1998). Creating the corporate soul: The rise of public relations and corporate imagery in American big business. Los Angeles, CA: The University of California Press.Google Scholar
  69. Marchese, M. C., Bassham, G., & Ryan, J. (2002). Work–family conflict: A virtue ethics analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 40(2), 145–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. McDowell, L. (2004). Work, workfare, work/life balance and an ethic of care. Progress in Human Geography, 28(2), 145–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Miller, S. (1997). The role of a juggler. In S. Parasuraman & J. H. Greenhaus (Eds.), Integrating Work and Family: Challenges and Choices for a Changing World (pp. 48–56). Westport, CT: Quorum.Google Scholar
  72. Moseley, E. (1990). Labor holdings at the Schlesinger Library. Radcliffe College. Labor History, 31(1–2), 16–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Nyland, C., & Rix, M. (2000). Mary van Kleeck, Lillian Gilbreth and the women’s bureau study of gendered labor law. Journal of Management History, 6(7), 306–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. O’Neil, D. A., Hopkins, M. M., & Bilimoria, A. (2008). Women’s careers at the start of the 21st century: Patterns and paradoxes. Journal of Business Ethics, 80(4), 727–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2013). Work–life balance. Retrieved from http://www.oecdbetterlifeindex.org/topics/work-life-balance/.
  76. Orleck, A. (1995). Common sense and a little fire: Women and working class politics in the United States, 1900–1965. Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  77. Orleck, A. (2004). Pauline Newman: Immigration, Jewish radicalism, and gender. In E. Arnesen (Ed.), The Human Tradition in American Labor History (pp. 107–127). Wilmington, DE: Scholarly Resources.Google Scholar
  78. Ortiz, A. (1990). Puerto Ricans in the garment industry of New York City, 1920–1960. In R. Asher & C. Stephenson (Eds.), Labor Divided: Race and Ethnicity in United States Labor Struggles, 1835–1960 (pp. 105–125). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  79. Pacyga, D. A. (2011). Chicago: A biography (p. 84). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  80. Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. (2002). The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36(6), 556–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Payne, E. A. (1988). Reform, labor, and feminism: Margaret Dreier Robins and the Women’s Trade Union League. Chicago, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  82. Prieto, L. (2012). Women issues to Wonder Woman: Contributions made by the students of Hugo Munsterberg. Journal of Management History, 18(2), 166–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Rapoport, R., & Rapoport, R. (1965). Work and family in contemporary society. American Sociological Review, 30(3), 381–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Raskin, R., & Terry, H. (1988). A principal-components analysis of the narcissistic personality inventory and further evidence of its construct validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(5), 890–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Reiter, N. (2007). Work life balance: What do you mean? The ethical ideology underpinning appropriate application. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 43(2), 273–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Rodgers, F. S., & Rodgers, C. (1989). Business and the facts of family life. Harvard Business Review, 67(6), 121–129.Google Scholar
  87. Root, L. S., & Dickinson, K. K. (2010). Joint labor-management programs in the auto industry and the shaping of human services. In P. A. Kurzman & R. P. Maden (Eds.), Union contributions to labor, welfare policy and practice (pp. 47–62). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  88. Russell Sage Foundation. (n.d.). History of the Russell Sage Foundation. Retrieved from http://www.russellsage.org/about/history.
  89. Russell Sage Foundation (n.d.). About the Foundation. Retrieved from http://www.russellsage.org/about.
  90. Scarborough, E., & Furumoto, L. (1987). Untold lives: The first generation of American women psychologists. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  91. Scharlach, A. F., Sansom, S. L., & Stanger, J. (1995). The Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993. How fully is business complying? California Management Review, 37(2), 66–79.Google Scholar
  92. Schilling, M. A. (2000). Decades ahead of her time: Advancing stakeholder theory through the ideas of Mary Parker Follett. Journal of Management History, 6(5), 224–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Shepard, R. F., & Levi, V. G. (1982). Live and be well: A celebration of Yiddish culture in America from the first immigrants to the Second World War. New York: Ballantine Books/Hilltown Press.Google Scholar
  94. Sicherman, B., Green, C. H., Kantrov, I., & Walker, H. (1980). Notable American Women: The Modern Period. MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  95. Slocum, R. B., & Armentrout, D. S. (2000). An Episcopal Dictionary of the Church: A User-Friendly Reference for Episcopalians. New York: Church Publishing, Incorporated.Google Scholar
  96. Smith, R. (2010). GPS technology increases efficiency, reduces stress for Texas producers. Western Farm Press, 32(24), 6.Google Scholar
  97. Snider, J., Hill, R. P., & Martin, D. (2003). Corporate social responsibility in the 21st century: A view from the world’s most successful firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 48(2), 175–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Tausig, M., & Fenwick, R. (2001). Unbinding time: Alternate work schedules and work–life balance. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 22(2), 101–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Thomas, L. T., & Ganster, D. C. (1995). Impact of family-supportive work variables on work–family conflict and strain: A control perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80(1), 6–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Tone, A. (1997). The business of benevolence: Industrial paternalism in Progressive America. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  101. Tyler, G. (1995). Look for the union label: A history of the International Ladies’ Garment Workers’ Union. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  102. Van Kleeck, M. (1916). Industrial investigations of the Russell Sage Foundation: With bibliography of publications of the foundation concerning industry. New York: Committee on Women’s Work.Google Scholar
  103. Voydanoff, P. (2001). Incorporating community into work and family research: A review of basic relationships. Human Relations, 54(12), 1609–1637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Waldinger, R. D. (1985). Another look at the International Ladies’ Garment Workers’ Union: Women, industry structure and collective action. In R. Milkman (Ed.), Women, Work and Protest: Century of United States Women’s Labor History (pp. 86–109). New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  105. Watson, P. J., Grisham, S. O., Trotter, M. V., & Biderman, M. D. (1984). Narcissism and empathy: Validity evidence for the Narcissistic Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48(3), 301–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. White, M., Hill, S., McGovern, P., Mills, C., & Smeaton, D. (2003). High performance management practices, working hours and work–life balance. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 41(2), 175–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Wilkie, D. (2014). U.S. ranks low on work/life balance. Retrieved from http://www.shrm.org/hrdisciplines/employeerelations/articles/pages/us-low-work-life-balance.aspx.
  108. Wilkinson, J. P. (1995). The impacts of industrial paternalism: A study of the National Cash Register Company. Middle States Geographer, 28, 86–94.Google Scholar
  109. Wolfson, T. (1950). Role of the ILGWU in stabilizing the women’s garment industry. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 4(1), 33–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Woloch, N. (1994). Women and the American Experience (p. 243). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  111. Wren, D. A. (2005). The history of management thought (p. 186). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Middle Georgia State CollegeMaconUSA
  2. 2.Clayton State UniversityMorrowUSA

Personalised recommendations