Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 134, Issue 2, pp 171–197 | Cite as

Firm Internationalization and Corporate Social Responsibility

  • Najah Attig
  • Narjess Boubakri
  • Sadok El Ghoul
  • Omrane Guedhami
Article

Abstract

Using a large sample of 3,040 U.S. firms and 16,606 firm-year observations over the 1991–2010 period, we find strong evidence that firm internationalization is positively related to the firm’s corporate social responsibility (CSR) rating. This finding persists when we use alternative estimation methods, samples, and proxies for internationalization and when we address endogeneity concerns. We also provide evidence that the positive relation between internationalization and CSR rating holds for a large sample of firms from 44 countries. Finally, we offer novel evidence that firms with extensive foreign subsidiaries in countries with well-functioning political and legal institutions have better CSR ratings. Our findings shed light on the role of internationalization in influencing multinational firms’ CSR activities in the U.S. and around the world.

Keywords

Corporate international diversification Corporate social performance Institutional environments 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Sabri Boubaker, Ruiyuan Chen, Walid Saffar, Helen Wang, and especially Gary Monroe (Section Editor) and two anonymous referees for constructive comments. We appreciate the generous financial support from Canada’s Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council.

References

  1. Amato, L. H., & Amato, C. H. (2012). Retail philanthropy: Firm size, industry, and business cycle. Journal of Business Ethics, 107, 435–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Attig, N. (2011). Intangible assets, organizational capital and corporate social responsibility: Evidence from U.S. manufacturing firms. Working paper, Saint Mary’s University.Google Scholar
  3. Attig, N., Cleary, S., El Ghoul, S., & Guedhami, O. (2013a). Institutional investment horizons and the cost of equity capital. Financial Management, 42, 441–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Attig, N., Cleary, S., El Ghoul, S., & Guedhami, O. (2014). Corporate legitimacy and investment–cash flow sensitivity. Journal of Business Ethics, 121, 297–314.Google Scholar
  5. Attig, N., El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., & Suh, J. (2013). Corporate social responsibility and credit ratings. Journal of Business Ethics, 117, 679–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barnea, A., & Rubin, A. (2010). Corporate social responsibility as a conflict between shareholders. Journal of Business Ethics, 97, 71–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Black, D. E., Dikolli, S. S., & Dyreng, S. D. (2014). CEO pay-for-complexity and the risk of managerial diversion from multinational diversification. Contemporary Accounting Research, 31, 103–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Block, J., & Wagner, M. (2013). The effect of family ownership on different dimensions of corporate social responsibility: Evidence from large US firms. Business Strategy and the Environment (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  9. Brammer, S. J., Pavelin, S., & Porter, L. A. (2006). Corporate social performance and geographical diversification. Journal of Business Research, 59, 1025–1034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brammer, S. J., Pavelin, S., & Porter, L. A. (2009). Corporate charitable giving, multinational companies and countries of concern. Journal of Management Studies, 46, 575–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carroll, A. B. (1991). Corporate social performance measurement: A commentary on methods for evaluating an elusive construct. Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, 12, 385–401.Google Scholar
  12. Chatterji, A. K., Levine, D. I., & Toffel, M. W. (2009). How well do social ratings actually measure corporate social responsibility? Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 18, 125–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Christmann, P., & Taylor, G. (2001). Globalization and the environment: Determinants of firm self-regulation in China. Journal of International Business Studies, 32, 439–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Collins, C., & Smith, K. (2006). Knowledge exchange and combination: The role of human resource practices in the performance of high-technology firms. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 544–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dam, L., & Scholtens, L. J. R. (2007). Cultural values and international differences in business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 75, 273–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dam, L., & Scholtens, B. (2008). Environmental regulation and MNEs location: Does CSR matter? Ecological Economics, 67, 55–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Detomasi, D. (2007). The multinational corporation and global governance: Modelling global public policy networks. Journal of Business Ethics, 71, 321–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dyreng, S., Hanlon, M., & Maydew, E. (2012). Where do firms manage earnings? Review of Accounting Studies, 17, 649–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dyreng, S., & Lindsey, B. (2009). Using financial accounting data to examine the effect of foreign operations located in tax havens and other countries on U.S. multinational firms’ tax rates. Journal of Accounting Research, 47, 1283–1316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., Kwok, C. C., & Mishra, D. (2011). Does corporate social responsibility affect the cost of capital? Journal of Banking & Finance, 35, 2388–2406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1997). Industry costs of equity. Journal of Financial Economics, 43, 153–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fatemi, A. M. (1984). Shareholder benefits from corporate international diversification. Journal of Finance, 39, 1325–1344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Feldman, S. J., Soyka, P. A., & Ameer, P. (1997). Does improving a firm’s environmental management system and environmental performance result in a higher stock price? Journal of Investing, 6, 87–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine, 32, 122–126.Google Scholar
  25. Gaba, V., Pan, Y., & Ungson, G. R. (2002). Timing of entry in international market: An empirical study of U.S. Fortune 500 firms in China. Journal of International Business Studies, 33, 39–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Galema, R., Plantinga, A., & Scholtens, B. (2008). The stocks at stake: Return and risk in socially responsible investment. Journal of Banking & Finance, 32, 2646–2654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Geringer, J. M., Beamish, P. W., & DaCosta, R. C. (1989). Diversification strategy and internationalization: Implication for MNE performance. Strategic Management Journal, 10, 109–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Godfrey, P. C. (2005). The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder value: A risk management perspective. Academy of Management Review, 30, 777–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Goss, A., & Roberts, G. S. (2011). The impact of corporate social responsibility on the cost of bank loans. Journal of Banking & Finance, 35, 1794–1810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gow, I. D., Ormazabal, G., & Taylor, D. J. (2010). Correcting for cross-sectional and time-series dependence in accounting research. Accounting Review, 85, 483–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Griffin, J. J., & Mahon, J. F. (1997). The corporate social performance and corporate financial performance debate. Business and Society, 36, 5–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hart, S. L. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20, 986–1014.Google Scholar
  33. Hillman, A. J., & Keim, J. D. (2001). Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: What’s the bottom line? Strategic Management Journal, 22, 125–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hitt, M. A., Hoskisson, R. E., & Kim, H. (1997). International diversification: Effects on innovation and firm performance in product-diversified firms. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 767–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., & Hoskisson, R. E. (2007). Strategic management: Competitiveness and globalization (7th ed.). Mason, OH: South-Western.Google Scholar
  36. Hong, H., & Kacperczyk, M. (2009). The price of sin: The effects of social norms on markets. Journal of Financial Economics, 93, 15–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2012). What drives corporate social performance? The role of nation-level institutions. Journal of International Business Studies, 43, 834–864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Janney, J. J., & Gove, S. (2011). Reputation and corporate social responsibility aberrations, trends, and hypocrisy: Reactions to firm choices in the stock option backdating scandal. Journal of Management Studies, 48, 1562–1585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J.-E. (1977). The internationalization process of the firm: A model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments. Journal of International Business Studies, 8, 23–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Jones, T. M. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management Review, 20, 404–437.Google Scholar
  41. Kacperczyk, A. (2009). With greater power comes greater responsibility? Takeover protection and corporate attention to stakeholders. Strategic Management Journal, 30, 261–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kang, J. (2013). The relationship between corporate diversification and corporate social performance. Strategic Management Journal, 34, 94–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kim, Y., Li, H., & Li, S. (2014). Corporate social responsibility and stock price crash risk. Journal of Banking & Finance, 43, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kim, Y., Park, M. S., & Wier, B. (2012). Is earnings quality associated with corporate social responsibility? Accounting Review, 87, 761–796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kirca, H. A., Hult, G. T. M., Deligonul, S., Perry, M. Z., & Cavusgil, S. T. (2012). A multilevel examination of the drivers of firm multinationality: A meta-analysis. Journal of Management, 38, 502–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kogut, B. (1985). Designing global strategies: Profiting from operational flexibility. Sloan Management Review, 21, 27–38.Google Scholar
  47. KPMG. (2013). KPMG international: The KPMG survey of corporate responsibility reporting 2013. http://www.kpmg.com/Global/en/IssuesAndInsights/ArticlesPublications/corporate-responsibility/Documents/corporate-responsibility-reporting-survey-2013-exec-summary.pdf. Accessed 26 March 2014.
  48. Krüger, P. (2014). Corporate goodness and shareholder wealth. Journal of Financial Economics. (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  49. La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1998). Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy, 106, 1113–1155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Li, S., Qiu, J., & Wan, C. (2011). Corporate globalization and bank lending. Journal of International Business Studies, 42, 1016–1042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 28, 117–127.Google Scholar
  52. Murtha, P. T., & Lenway, S. A. (1994). Country capabilities and the strategic state: How national political institutions affect multinational Corporations’ strategies. Strategic Management Journal, 15, 113–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Nachum, L., & Zaheer, A. (2005). The persistence of distance? The impact of technology on MNE motivations for foreign investment. Strategic Management Journal, 26, 747–767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Orlitzky, M., Siegel, D. S., & Waldman, D. A. (2011). Strategic corporate social responsibility and environmental sustainability. Business and Society, 50, 6–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Petersen, M. A. (2009). Estimating standard errors in finance panel data sets: Comparing approaches. Review of Financial Studies, 22, 435–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Porter, M. E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. New York: Free Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Rosenbaum, P., & Rubin, D. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70, 41–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Sanders, G. W. M., & Carpenter, M. A. (1998). Internationalization and firm governance: The roles of CEO compensation, top team composition, and board structure. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 158–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Scholtens, B., & Sievänen, R. (2013). Drivers of socially responsible investing: A case study of four Nordic countries. Journal of Business Ethics, 115, 605–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Servaes, H., & Tamayo, A. (2013). The impact of corporate social responsibility on firm value: The role of customer awareness. Management Science, 59, 1045–1061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sievänen, R., Rita, H., & Scholten, B. (2013). The drivers of responsible investment: The case of European pension funds. Journal of Business Ethics, 117, 137–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Simerly, R. L. (1997). Corporate social performance and multinationality: An empirical examination. International Journal of Management, 14, 699–703.Google Scholar
  63. Simerly, R. L. & Li, M. (2000). Corporate social performance and multinationality, A longitudinal study. Working paper: http://www.westga.edu/~bquest/2000/corporate.html.
  64. Strike, M. V., Gao, J., & Bansal, P. (2006). Being good while being bad: Social responsibility and the international diversification of US firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 37, 254–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Sullivan, D. (1994). Measuring the degree of internationalization of a firm. Journal of International Business Studies, 25, 325–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Waddock, S. (2003). Myths and realities of social investing. Organization and Environment, 16, 369–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Waddock, S. A., & Graves, S. B. (1997). The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 303–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Whitener, E. (2001). Do “high commitment” human resource practices affect employee commitment? A cross-level analysis using hierarchical linear modeling. Journal of Management, 27, 515–535.Google Scholar
  69. Zaheer, S. (1995). Overcoming the liability of foreignness. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 341–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Zahra, S. A., & Garvis, D. M. (2000). International corporate entrepreneurship and firm performance: The moderating effect of international environment hostility. Journal of Business Venturing, 15, 469–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Zahra, S. A., Ireland, R. D., & Hitt, M. A. (2000). International expansion by new venture firms: International diversity, mode of market entry, technological learning, and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 925–950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Najah Attig
    • 1
  • Narjess Boubakri
    • 2
  • Sadok El Ghoul
    • 3
  • Omrane Guedhami
    • 4
  1. 1.Saint Mary’s UniversityHalifaxCanada
  2. 2.American University of SharjahSharjahUnited Arab Emirates
  3. 3.University of AlbertaEdmontonCanada
  4. 4.University of South CarolinaColumbiaUSA

Personalised recommendations