Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 135, Issue 3, pp 587–603 | Cite as

Organic Products in Mexico and South Korea on Twitter

  • Xanat Vargas Meza
  • Han Woo Park


Although there is a growing body of research on social media, only few studies have considered organic products. Therefore, this study mapped the diffusion path of the social media resources for organic products in Mexico and South Korea through Twitter and compared the contents of tweets about organic products in terms of their semantic and hyperlink networks using webometric methods. The results indicate that for organic products, Koreans sent tweets much more frequently than Mexicans. Mexican tweets focused on basic food products in street markets, whereas Korean tweets highlighted promotions and firms, revealing the corporatist structure of its economy. In both cases, the findings support Twitter as a useful tool for Word-of-Mouth Communication on the online environment, among product consumers, and between consumers and enterprises.


Organic products Social media Twitter Marketing Webometrics South Korea Mexico 


  1. Allen, G. J., & Albala, K. (Eds.). (2007). The business of food: Encyclopedia of the food and drink industries. New York: ABC-CLIO.Google Scholar
  2. Bernal, J. L. (2014). Mexico y Corea, actores globales, Excelsior. Retrieved May 07, 2014, from
  3. BFA. (2010). Australian organic market report 2010. Brisbane: Biological Farmers of Australia.Google Scholar
  4. Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C. (2002). Ucinet for windows: Software for social network analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.Google Scholar
  5. Bulearca, M., & Bulearca, S. (2010). Twitter: A viable marketing tool for SMEs? Global Business and Management Research: An International Journal, 2(4), 296–309.Google Scholar
  6. Callahan, E. (2006). Cultural similarities and differences in the design of university web sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11, 239–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cho, S. E., Choi, M. G., & Park, H. W. (2012). Government-civic group conflicts and communication strategies: A text analysis of TV debates on Korea’s Import of U.S. Beef. Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia, 11(1), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cho, S. E., Jung, K., & Park, H. W. (2013). Social media use during Japan’s 2011 earthquake: How Twitter transforms the locus of crisis communication. Media International Australia, Incorporating Culture & Policy, 149, 28–40.Google Scholar
  9. Cho, S. E. & Park, H. W. (2012). Comparative analysis of Twitter use between South Koreans and Russians: An exploratory study. Journal of the Korean Data Analysis Society, 14, 4(A), 1827–1838.Google Scholar
  10. Cho, S. E., & Park, H. W. (2013). A qualitative analysis of cross-cultural new media research: SNS use in Asia and the West. Quality & Quantity, 47(4), 2319–2330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chung, C. J., & Park, H. W. (2010). Textual analysis of a political message: The inaugural addresses of two Korean Presidents. Social Science Information, 49(2), 215–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Corbin, J., & Anselm, S. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  13. Cosentino, C. (2010). Social media: Managing a newly empowered consumer. The 21st annual American Express Restaurant Trade Program, Aspen, CO. Retrieved October 30, 2013 from
  14. Danowski, J. A., & Park, H. W. (2014). Arab spring effects on meanings for Islamist web terms and on web hyperlink networks among Muslim-Majority nations: A naturalistic field experiment. Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia, 13(2), 15–39.Google Scholar
  15. Dessai, S. (2001). The climate regime from The Hague to Marrakech: Saving or sinking the Kyoto Protocol? Tyndall Centre Working Paper 12. Retrieved May 5, 2010 from
  16. Edwards, J. (2013). REPORT: Twitter Ad Revenue To Hit $1 Billion in 2014, Business Insider, Mar 27 2013. Retrieved June 04, 2014 from
  17. Ess, C & Sudweeks, F. (2005). Culture and computer-mediated communication: Toward new understandings. Journal of computer-mediated communication, 11(1): article 9. Retrieved 30 Oct 2012, from
  18. FAO & WHO. (2012). Guidelines for the production, processing, labeling, and marketing of organically produced foods. Retrieved 30 Sep 2013,
  19. Fruchterman, T. M. J., & Reingold, E. M. (1991). Graph drawing by force-directed placement. Software: Practice and Experience, 21(11). doi: 10.1002/spe.4380211102.
  20. Gevorgyan, G., & Manucharova, N. (2009). Does Culturally adapted online communication work?A study of American and Chinese internet users’ attitudes and preferences toward culturally customized web design elements. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 14(2), 393–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gómez, T. L. & Gómez, C. M. A. (2004). La agricultura orgánica en México y en el mundo, CONABIO. Biodiversitas, 55, 13–15. Retrieved September 30, 2013 from
  22. Gruzd, A., Wellman, B., & Takhteyev, Y. (2011). Imagining Twitter as an imagined community. American behavioral Scientist, 55(10), 1294–1318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Haddow, D. (2008). Hipster: The dead end of western civilization, Adbusters magazine. Retrieved September 30, 2013 from
  24. Hansen, D., Shneiderman, B., & Smith, M. A. (2011). Analyzing social media networks through Nodexl—Insights from a connected world. New York: Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar
  25. Harel, D., & Koren, Y. (2001). A Fast multi-scale method for drawing large graphs. Graph Drawing Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 1984, 183–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hofstede, G. (1984). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values (2nd ed.). New York: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  27. Hofstede, G. (2014). The Hofstede Centre. Retrieved April 27, 2014 from
  28. Holt, R. (2013). Twitter in numbers, The Telegraph. Retrieved March 21, 2013 from
  29. Hsu, C. L., Park, S. J., & Park, H. W. (2013). Political discourse among key Twitter users: The case of Sejong city in South Korea. Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia, 12(1), 65–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Inkeles, A., & Levinson, D. J. (1969). National character: The study of modal personality and sociocultural systems—The handbook of social psychology. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction publishers.Google Scholar
  31. International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements. (2014). Capacity building. Retrieved May 16 2014, from
  32. Internet Society. (2005). Uniform Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax. Retrieved November 18, 2013, from
  33. Jansen, B. J., Zhang, M., Sobel, K., & Chowdury, A. (2009). Twitter power: Tweets as electronic word of mouth. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(11), 2169–2188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kim, M., Heo, Y. C., Choi, S. C., & Park, H. W. (2013). Comparative trends in global communication networks of #K-pop tweets. Quality & Quantity, 48, 2687–2702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kim, D., & Nam, Y. (2012). Corporate relations with environmental organizations represented by hyperlinks on the Fortune global 500 companies’ websites. Journal of Business Ethics, 105(4), 475–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kim, Y., Sohn, D., & Choi, S. M. (2011). Cultural Difference in motivations for using social network sites: A comparative study of American and Korean College students. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(1), 365–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kluckholn, C., & Strodtbeck, F. (1961). Variations in value orientations. Evanston: Row, Peterson.Google Scholar
  38. Lee, K., Oh, W. Y., & Kim, N. (2013). Social Media for socially responsible firms: Analysis of fortune 500’s Twitter profiles and their CSR/CSIR ratings. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(4), 791–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Leydesdorff, L 2013, TI.exe for Co-Word Analysis. Retrieved November 21, 2013, from
  40. Liverman, D. M. (2008). Conventions of climate change: Constructions of danger and the dispossession of the atmosphere. Journal of Historical Geography, 35(2), 279–296. doi: 10.1016/j.jhg.2008.08.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Marcus, A. & Gould, E. W. (2000). Cultural dimensions and global web user-interface design: What? So what? Now what?. Retrieved September 30, 2013,
  42. Marcus, A., & Krishnamurthi, N. (2009). Cross-Cultural analysis of social networking services in Japan, Korea, and the USA. Internationalization, Design and Global Development Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 5623, 59–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mc Namara, D. L. (2002). Corporatism and Korean capitalism. London: Routledge Press.Google Scholar
  44. Moon, J. (2007). The Contribution of corporate social responsibility to sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 15, 296–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Morio, H., & Buchholz, C. (2009). How anonymous are you online? Examining online social behaviors from a cross-cultural perspective. AI & SOCIETY, 23(2), 297–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Müller, B. (2010). Copenhagen 2009: Failure or final wake-up call for our leaders? EV 49. Retrieved November 21, 2013, from
  47. Murdock, G. (1949). Social structure. New York: The Macmillan Company.Google Scholar
  48. Murdock, G. & White, D. (1969). Standard cross-cultural sample. Ethnology, 9, 329–369. Retrieved September 30, 2013, from
  49. NHN Corporation. (2011). NHN Annual report 2011. Retrieved September 30, 2013, from
  50. Pantelidis, I. (2010). Electronic meal experience: A content analysis of online restaurant comments. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 51(4), 483–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Park, M. K. (1987). Interest representation in South Korea: The limits of corporatist control. Asian Survey, 27(8), 903–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Park, H. W. (2012). Examining academic Internet use using a combined method. Quality & Quantity, 46(1), 251–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Park, H. W., & Leydesdorff, L. (2004). Understanding KrKwic: A computer program for the analysis of Korean text. Journal of the Korean Data Analysis Society, 6(5), 1377–1387.Google Scholar
  54. Park, S. J., Lim, Y. S., Sams, S., Sang, M. N., & Park, H. W. (2011). Networked politics on Cyworld: The text and sentiment of Korean political profiles. Social Science Computer Review, 29(3), 288–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Paull, J. (2011). Organics olympiad 2011: Global indices of leadership in organic agriculture. Journal of Social and Development Sciences, 1(4), 144–150.Google Scholar
  56. Pearson, D., Henryks, J., & Jones, H. (2010). Organic food: What we know (and do not know) about consumers. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, 26(2), 171–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Pivato, S., Misani, N., & Tencati, A. (2008). The impact of corporate social responsibility on consumer trust: The case of organic food. Business Ethics: A European Review, 17(1), 3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Poblete, B., Garcia, R., Mendoza, M., & Jaimes, A. (2011). Do all birds tweet the same? Characterizing Twitter around the world, Proceedings of the 20th ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management (pp. 1025–1030). New York.Google Scholar
  59. Red Mexicana de Tianguis y Mercados Orgánicos 2013, Tianguis y mercados. Retrieved November 19, 2013, from
  60. Riva, PV 1880, México a través de los siglos, Ballesca, Espasa y Compa Editores.Google Scholar
  61. Rummel, R. (1972). Dimensions of Nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  62. Secretaria de Relaciones Exteriores (SRE). (2014). Cuarto informe de labores. Retrieved April 27, 2014, from
  63. Shanahan, C. J., Hooker, N. H. & Sporleder, T. L. (20080. The diffusion of organic food products: Toward a theory of adoption. Agribusiness, 24(3). Retrieved November 21, 2013, from 10.1002/agr.20164/pdf.
  64. Sowa, J. (1987). Semantic networks. In S. C. Shapiro (Ed.), Encyclopedia of artificial intelligence. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  65. Statcounter. (2013). Statcounter. Globalstats. Retrieved November 19, 2013, from
  66. Stelzner, M. A. (2013). Social media marketing industry report. Retrieved September 30, 2013, from
  67. Stringhini, G., Kruegel, C. & Vigna, G. (2010). Detecting Spammers on Social Networks. ACSAC 10 Proceedings of the 26th Annual Computer Security Applications Conference (pp. 1–90. Retrieved March 10, 2014, from
  68. Sung, Y. J., & Tinkham, S. F. (2005). Brand personality structures in the United States and Korea: Common and culture-specific factors. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 15(4), 334–350.Google Scholar
  69. Thelwall, M. (2009). Introduction to webometrics. New York: Morgan & Claypool.Google Scholar
  70. Toldos, M. (2012). Dimensions of brand personality in Mexico. Global Journal of Business Research, 6(5), 35–48.Google Scholar
  71. United Nations. (2012). The Future We Want: Outcome document adopted at Rio+20. Retrieved 27 April, 2014, from
  72. United Nations Global Compact. (2014). Food and Agriculture Business Principles. Retrieved May 16, 2014, from
  73. United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2013). Database of Environmental Information for Products and Services. Retrieved November 19, 2013, from
  74. Van Dijk, J. (2012). The network society. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  75. Van Gorp, B., & Van der Goot, M. J. (2012). Sustainable food and agriculture: Stakeholder’s frames. Communication, Culture & Critique, 5, 127–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Visser, W. (2010). The AGE of responsibility: CSR 2.0 and the new DNA of business. Journal of Business Systems, Governance and Ethics, 5(3), 7–22.Google Scholar
  77. Von Feigenblatt, O. F. (2013). Harmony through holistic engagement: An emic model of greater East Asian regionalism. Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia, 12(2), 61–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. We are social 2014, Global digital statistics 2014. We are social’s snapshot of key digital indicators. Retrieved April 27, 2014, from
  79. Willer, H., & Lernoud, J. (2014) The world of organic agriculture. Statistics & emerging trends 2014, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  80. Willer, H., Lernoud, J. & Home, R. (2013). The World of Organic Agriculture 2013: Summary, International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements (IFOAM), Frick, Switzerland, Research Institute of Organic Agriculture (FiBL).Google Scholar
  81. Würtz, E. (2006). Intercultural communication on web sites: A cross-cultural analysis of websites from high-context cultures and low-context cultures. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(1), 274–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Zepeda, L., Chang, H., & Leviten-Reid, C. (2006). Organic food demand: A focus group study involving Caucasian and African-American shoppers. Agriculture and Human Values, 23, 385–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Media & CommunicationYeungnam UniversityGyeongsanSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations