Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 132, Issue 4, pp 795–811 | Cite as

Managerial Morality and Philanthropic Decision-Making: A Test of an Agency Model

  • Cheng-Li Huang
  • Ju-Lan Tsai
Article
  • 587 Downloads

Abstract

While previous authors have broadly examined the motivations and outcomes of the philanthropic activities of organizations, the present study extends Miska et al.’s (J Bus Ethics 1–12, 2013) rationalistic approach to examine the degree to which managerial philanthropic decision-making behaviour is dominated by morality. This study also tackles the question of whether this relationship is moderated by the strength of the geographical proximity and amount of the donation within an agency framework. To probe the radical agency problem and the effect of intervention, an alternative heuristic scenario is also developed to provide evidence that managers under the same moral level show significant differences in donation intention under a variety of agency conditions. The results indicate a significant difference between the existence and non-existence of agency problems in charitable decision-making by managers high in idealism and relativism; however, at the same time, philanthropic behaviour is intertwined with various dilemma-related contexts. These findings bridge the gap in the literature on ethics and corporate social responsibility, and challenge current thinking on corporate governance mechanisms in this area by offering researchers and practitioners an integrated model that responds to a strong sceptical bias or a high premium placed on morality.

Keywords

Moral philosophy Corporate charitable decision Contextual factors Agency problem 

Abbreviations

CSR

Corporate social responsibility

EPQ

Ethics position questionnaire

HRM

Human resource management

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support by National Science Council (NSC 100-2410-H-032-035). In addition, we also appreciate the two blind reviewers’ constructive suggestions for improving the quality of this study.

References

  1. Al-Khatib, J., Rawwas, M. A., & Vitell, S. (2004). Organizational ethics in developing countries: A comparative analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 55(4), 307–320.Google Scholar
  2. Amato, L., & Amato, C. (2007). The effects of firm size and industry on corporate giving. Journal of Business Ethics, 72(3), 229–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, B. (2006). Multivariate data analysis. Lightning Source Incorporated.Google Scholar
  4. Andreoni, J., Brown, E., & Rischall, I. (2003). Charitable giving by married couples: Who decides and why does it matter? The Journal of Human Resources, 38(1), 111–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aßländer, M. (2011). Corporate social responsibility as subsidiary co-responsibility: A macroeconomic perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 99(1), 115–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Attas, D. (2004). A moral stakeholder theory of the firm. Zeitschrift fuer Wirtschafts- und Unternehmensethik, 5(3), 312–318.Google Scholar
  7. Barnett, T., Bass, K., & Brown, G. (1994). Ethical ideology and ethical judgment regarding ethical issues in business. Journal of Business Ethics, 13(6), 469–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bellizzi, J., & Bristol, T. (2005). Supervising the unethical selling behavior of top sales performers: Assessing the impact of social desirability bias. Journal of Business Ethics, 57(4), 377–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Booth, P., & Schulz, A. K. D. (2004). The impact of an ethical environment on managers’ project evaluation judgments under agency problem conditions. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29(5–6), 473–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brammer, S., & Millington, A. (2003). The evolution of corporate charitable contributions in the UK between 1989 and 1999: Industry structure and stakeholder influences. Business Ethics: A European Review, 12(3), 216–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brammer, S., & Millington, A. (2008). Does it pay to be different? An analysis of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 29(12), 1325–1343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brammer, S., Millington, A., & Pavelin, S. (2006). Is philanthropy strategic? An analysis of the management of charitable giving in large UK companies. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15(3), 234–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Buchholtz, A. K., Amason, A. C., & Rutherford, M. A. (1999). Beyond resources: The mediating effect of top management discretion and values on corporate philanthropy. Business and Society, 38(2), 167–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Campbell, D., Moore, G., & Metzger, M. (2002). Corporate philanthropy in the U.K. 1985–2000 some empirical findings. Journal of Business Ethics, 39(1–2), 29–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Campbell, D., & Slack, R. (2007). The strategic use of corporate philanthropy: Building societies and demutualisation defences. Business Ethics: A European Review, 16(4), 326–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cherry, J. (2006). The impact of normative influence and locus of control on ethical judgments and intentions: A cross-cultural comparison. Journal of Business Ethics, 68(2), 113–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chiu, S.-C., & Sharfman, M. (2011). Legitimacy, visibility, and the antecedents of corporate social performance: An investigation of the instrumental perspective. Journal of Management, 37(6), 1558–1585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chung, J., & Monroe, G. (2003). Exploring social desirability bias. Journal of Business Ethics, 44(4), 291–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cochran, W. G., & Cox, G. M. (1992). Experimental designs (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  20. Cohen, J. R., Pant, L. W., & Sharp, D. J. (2001). An examination of differences in ethical decision-making between Canadian business students and accounting professionals. Journal of Business Ethics, 30(4), 319–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cordeiro, J. J., & Sarkis, J. (2008). Does explicit contracting effectively link CEO compensation to environmental performance? Business Strategy and the Environment, 17(5), 304–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cranenburgh, K., & Arenas, D. (2013). Strategic and moral dilemmas of corporate philanthropy in developing countries: Heineken in Sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Business Ethics, 122, 523–536.Google Scholar
  23. Crossan, M., Mazutis, D., & Seijts, G. (2013). In search of virtue: The role of virtues, values and character strengths in ethical decision making. Journal of Business Ethics, 113(4), 567–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Davis, M., Andersen, M., & Curtis, M. (2001). Measuring ethical ideology in business ethics: A critical analysis of the ethics position questionnaire. Journal of Business Ethics, 32(1), 35–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. The Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91.Google Scholar
  26. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. The Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57–74.Google Scholar
  27. Elango, B., Paul, K., Kundu, S., & Paudel, S. (2010). Organizational ethics, individual ethics, and ethical intentions in international decision-making. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(4), 543–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Etheredge, J. (1999). The perceived role of ethics and social responsibility: An alternative scale structure. Journal of Business Ethics, 18(1), 51–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Falkenberg, A. (2004). When in Rome… Moral maturity and ethics for international economic organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 54(1), 17–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ferrell, O. C., Fraedrich, J., & Ferrell, L. (2012). Business ethics: Ethical decision making and cases (9th ed.). Mason, OH: South Western Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
  32. Forsyth, D. R. (1980). A taxonomy of ethical ideologies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(1), 175–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Forsyth, D. (1992). Judging the morality of business practices: The influence of personal moral philosophies. Journal of Business Ethics, 11(5–6), 461–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Forsyth, D. R., & Nye, J. L. (1990). Personal moral philosophies and moral choice. Journal of Research in Personality, 24(4), 398–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Frederiksen, C. (2010). The relation between policies concerning corporate social responsibility (CSR) and philosophical moral theories-an empirical investigation. Journal of Business Ethics, 93(3), 357–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine, pp. 122–126.Google Scholar
  37. Galaskiewicz, J., & Burt, R. S. (1991). Interorganization contagion in corporate philanthropy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(1), 88–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Gallego-Alvarez, I., Prado-Lorenzo, J. M., & García-Sánchez, I. M. (2011). Corporate social responsibility and innovation: A resource-based theory. Management Decision, 49(10), 1709–1727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Gan, A. (2006). The impact of public scrutiny on corporate philanthropy. Journal of Business Ethics, 69(3), 217–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Garriga, E., & Melé, D. (2004). Corporate social responsibility theories: mapping the territory. Journal of Business Ethics, 53(1–2), 51–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ghosh, S., & Harjoto, M. A. (2011). Insiders’ personal stock donations from the lens of stakeholder, stewardship and agency theories. Business Ethics: A European Review, 20(4), 342–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Godfrey, P. C. (2005). The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth: A risk management perspective. The Academy of Management Review, 30(4), 777–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hair, J. F., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis. New York: Prentice Hall Higher Education.Google Scholar
  44. Haley, U. C. V. (1991). Corporate contributions as managerial masques: Reframing corporate contributions as strategies to influence society. Journal of Management Studies, 28(5), 485–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Harrell, A., & Harrison, P. (1994). An incentive to shirk, privately held information, and managers’ project evaluation decisions. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 19(7), 569–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Harrison, P. D., & Harrell, A. (1993). Impact of “adverse selection” on managers’ project evaluation decisions. The Academy of Management Journal, 36(3), 635–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Heeler, R. M., & Ray, M. L. (1972). Measure validation in marketing. Journal of Marketing Research, 9(4), 361–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Hemingway, C., & Maclagan, P. (2004). Managers’ personal values as drivers of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 50(1), 33–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Hosmer, L. R. (2008). The ethics of management (6th ed.). Irwin: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  50. Huang, C. L., & Chang, B. G. (2010). The effects of managers’ moral philosophy on project decision under agency problem conditions. Journal of Business Ethics, 94(4), 595–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Hunt, S. D., & Vitell, S. (1986). A general theory of marketing ethics. Journal of Macromarketing, 6(1), 5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Jamali, D., & Mirshak, R. (2007). Corporate social responsibility (CSR): Theory and practice in a developing country context. Journal of Business Ethics, 72(3), 243–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Jones, T. M. (1991). Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue-contingent model. The Academy of Management Review, 16(2), 366–395.Google Scholar
  55. Jones, M. T., & Haigh, M. (2007). The transnational corporation and new corporate citizenship theory. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 27, 51–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Kanodia, C., Bushman, R., & Dickhaut, J. (1989). Escalation errors and the sunk cost effect: An explanation based on reputation and information asymmetries. Journal of Accounting Research, 27(1), 59–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Kant, I. (2008). Kant: Groundwork of the metaphysic of morals. Radford: Wilder Publications.Google Scholar
  58. Kish-Gephart, J. J., Harrison, D. A., & Treviño, L. K. (2010). Bad apples, bad cases, and bad barrels: Meta-analytic evidence about sources of unethical decisions at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1), 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Klettner, A., Clarke, T., & Boersma, M. (2013). The governance of corporate sustainability: Empirical insights into the development, leadership and implementation of responsible business strategy. Journal of Business Ethics, 122(1), 1–21.Google Scholar
  60. Kung, F. H., & Huang, C. L. (2013). Auditors’ moral philosophies and ethical beliefs. Management Decision, 15(3), 479–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Lev, B., Petrovits, C., & Radhakrishnan, S. (2010). Is doing good good for you? How corporate charitable contributions enhance revenue growth. Strategic Management Journal, 31(2), 182–200.Google Scholar
  62. Logsdon, J. M., & Wood, D. J. (2002). Business citizenship: From domestic to global level of analysis. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(2), 155–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 268–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Martin, K., & Cullen, J. (2006). Continuities and extensions of ethical climate theory: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Business Ethics, 69(2), 175–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2000). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: correlation or misspecification? Strategic Management Journal, 21(5), 603–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Miska, C., Hilbe, C., & Mayer, S. (2013). Reconciling different views on responsible leadership: A rationality-based approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 1–12.Google Scholar
  67. Navarro, P. (1988). Why do corporations give to charity? The Journal of Business, 61(1), 65–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Nunnally, J. C. (2010). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  69. Park, H. (2005). The role of idealism and relativism as dispositional characteristics in the socially responsible decision-making process. Journal of Business Ethics, 56(1), 81–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Piper, G., & Schnepf, S. (2008). Gender differences in charitable giving in Great Britain. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 19(2), 103–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2002). Competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy. Harvard Business Review, 80, 56–68.Google Scholar
  72. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). Strategy and society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84, 56–68.Google Scholar
  73. Quazi, A. M. (2003). Identifying the determinants of corporate managers’ perceived social obligations. Management Decision, 41(9), 822–831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Ramasamy, B., & Yeung, M. H. (2013). Ethical ideologies among senior managers in China. Asian Journal of Business Ethics, 2(2), 129–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Rest, J. R. (1986). Moral development: Advances in research and theory. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  76. Ricks, J. M., & Williams, J. A. (2005). Strategic corporate philanthropy: Addressing frontline talent needs through an educational giving program. Journal of Business Ethics, 60(2), 147–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Ross, S. A. (1973). The economic theory of agency: The principal’s problem. The American Economic Review, 63(2), 134–139.Google Scholar
  78. Rutledge, R. W., & Karim, K. E. (1999). The influence of self-interest and ethical considerations on managers’ evaluation judgments. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 24(2), 173–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Saiia, D. H., Carroll, A. B., & Buchholtz, A. K. (2003). Philanthropy as strategy: When corporate charity “begins at home”. Business and Society, 42(2), 169–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Schouten, E. M. J., & Remmé, J. (2006). Making sense of corporate social responsibility in international business: Experiences from Shell. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15(4), 365–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Schwartz, M. S., & Carroll, A. B. (2003). Corporate social responsibility: A three-domain approach. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13(4), 503–530.Google Scholar
  82. Sidani, Y. M., Ghanem, A. J., & Rawwas, M. Y. A. (2014). When idealists evade taxes: The influence of personal moral philosophy on attitudes to tax evasion—a Lebanese study. Business Ethics: A European Review, 23(2), 183–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Singhapakdi, A., Vitell, S., Rallapalli, K., & Kraft, K. (1996). The perceived role of ethics and social responsibility: A scale development. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(11), 1131–1140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Smith, N. C., & Ward, H. (2007). Corporate social responsibility at a crossroads? Business Strategy Review, 18(1), 16–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Spence, C., & Thomson, I. (2009). Resonance tropes in corporate philanthropy discourse. Business Ethics: A European Review, 18(4), 372–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Steenhaut, S., & Kenhove, P. (2006). An empirical investigation of the relationships among a consumer’s personal values, ethical ideology and ethical beliefs. Journal of Business Ethics, 64(2), 137–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Swanson, D. L. (1995). Addressing a theoretical problem by reorienting the corporate social performance model. The Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 43–64.Google Scholar
  88. Tian, Q. (2008). Perception of business bribery in China: The impact of moral philosophy. Journal of Business Ethics, 80(3), 437–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Trevino, L. K., & Nelson, K. A. (2010). Managing business ethics: Straight talk about how to do it right (5th ed.). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  90. Valentine, S., & Rittenburg, T. (2004). Spanish and American business professionals’ ethical evaluations in global situations. Journal of Business Ethics, 51(1), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Van Staveren, I. (2007). Beyond utilitarianism and deontology: Ethics in economics. Review of Political Economy, 19(1), 21–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Wang, J., & Coffey, B. (1992). Board composition and corporate philanthropy. Journal of Business Ethics, 11(10), 771–778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Wang, H., & Qian, C. (2011). Corporate philanthropy and corporate financial performance: The roles of stakeholder response and political access. Academy of Management Journal, 54(6), 1159–1181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Williams, R. (2003). Women on corporate boards of directors and their influence on corporate philanthropy. Journal of Business Ethics, 42(1), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Woodbine, G. F., & Taylor, D. (2006). Moral choice in an agency framework: The search for a set of motivational typologies. Journal of Business Ethics, 63(3), 261–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of AccountingTamkang UniversityNew TaipeiTaiwan, ROC
  2. 2.Accounting Section, Graduate Institute of Management SciencesTamkang UniversityNew TaipeiTaiwan, ROC

Personalised recommendations