Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 132, Issue 2, pp 477–491 | Cite as

Teaching Ethics to Undergraduate Business Students in Australia: Comparison of Integrated and Stand-alone Approaches

  • Elizabeth Prior Jonson
  • Linda Mary McGuire
  • Deirdre O’Neill
Article

Abstract

There are questions about how ethics is best taught to undergraduate business students. There has been a proliferation in the number of stand-alone ethics courses for undergraduate students but research on the effectiveness of integrated versus stand-alone mode of delivery is inconclusive. Christensen et al. (J Bus Ethics 73(4):347–368, 2007), in a comprehensive review of ethics, corporate social responsibility and sustainability education, investigated how ethics education has changed over the last 20 years, including the issue of integration of these topics into the core course offerings. We use Brenner and Molander’s (Harv Bus Rev 55(1):57–71, 1977) situational ethics survey instrument to examine the effect of the mode of delivery of business ethics education on undergraduate student responses. We found a significant difference on mode of delivery. Studies have also found interesting results in respect of the effect of cultural differences and gender on the effectiveness of business ethics instruction. While not the primary focus of this study, we also looked at the influence of gender and culture on students’ responses. Our results indicate significant differences in respect of mode of delivery and culture. In contrast to other studies, we found that gender was not significant. We did test for any interactive effects of gender, culture and mode of delivery. However, no significant differences were found.

Keywords

Teaching Ethics Undergraduates Mode of delivery Culture Gender Nationality 

Notes

Ethics Disclosure

This study was approved by the Monash University Human Research Ethics Committee reference Number: LR 2013000078 The impact of ethics and corporate social responsibility education.

References

  1. Abratt, A., Nel, D., & Higgs, N. (1992). An examination of the ethical beliefs of managers using selected scenarios in a cross-cultural environment. Journal of Business Ethics, 11, 29–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alas, R. (2006). Ethics in countries with different cultural dimensions. Journal of Business Ethics, 69(3), 237–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Armstrong, R. W. (1996). The relationship between culture and perception of ethical problems in international marketing. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(11), 1199–1208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baughn, C., Bodie, N. L., Buchanan, M. A., & Bixby, M. B. (2010). Bribery in international business transactions. Journal of Business Ethics, 92(1), 15–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baumhart, R. (1961). Problems in review: How ethical are businessmen? Harvard Business Review, 39, 6–9.Google Scholar
  6. Beekun, R. I., Hamdy, R., Westerman, J. W., & HassabElnaby, H. R. (2008). An exploration of ethical decision-making processes in the United States and Egypt. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(3), 587–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beekun, R. I., Stedham, Y., & Yamamura, J. H. (2003). Business ethics in Brazil and the US: A comparative investigation. Journal of Business Ethics, 42(3), 267–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bernardi, R. A., Witek, M. B., & Melton, M. R. (2009). A four-country study of the associations between bribery and unethical actions. Journal of Business Ethics, 84(3), 389–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Biddle, B. J. (1986). Recent development in role theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 12, 67–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Borkowski, S. C., & Ugras, Y. J. (1998). Business students and ethics: A meta-analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(11), 1117–1127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bowie, N. (2008). A Kantian approach to business ethics, Chapter 1. In R. Frederick (Ed.), A companion to business ethics. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  12. Brenner, S. N., & Molander, E. A. (1977). Is the ethics of business changing? Harvard Business Review, 55(1), 57–71.Google Scholar
  13. Christensen, L. J., Peirce, E., Hartman, L. P., Hoffman, W. M., & Carrier, J. (2007). Ethics, CSR, and sustainability education in the financial times top 50 global business schools: Baseline data and future research directions. Journal of Business Ethics, 73(4), 347–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Clark, G. L., & Prior Jonson, E. P. (Eds.). (1994). Management ethics: Theory, cases and practice. Sydney: Harper Educational.Google Scholar
  15. Cohen, J. R., Pant, L. W., & Sharp, D. J. (1996). A methodological note on cross-cultural accounting ethics research. The International Journal of Accounting, 31(1), 55–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Davis, N. (2013). Contemporary deontology, Chapter 17. In P. Singer (Ed.), A companion to ethics. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  17. De Bock, T., Vermeir, I., & Van Kenhove, P. (2013). “What’s the harm in being unethical? These strangers are rich anyway!” Exploring underlying factors of double standards. Journal of Business Ethics, 112(2), 225–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Eagly, A. H., & Koenig, A. M. (2006). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: Implication for prosocial behavior. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  19. Eagly, A. H., Wood, W., & Diekman, A. B. (2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. The developmental social psychology of gender (pp. 123–174). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  20. Emerson, T. L., & Conroy, S. J. (2004). Have ethical attitudes changed? An intertemporal comparison of the ethical perceptions of college students in 1985 and 2001. Journal of Business Ethics, 50(2), 167–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Evans, J. M., Treviño, L. K., & Weaver, G. R. (2006). Who’s in the ethics driver’s seat? Factors influencing ethics in the MBA curriculum. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 5(3), 278–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ford, R. C., & Richardson, W. D. (1994). Ethical decision making: A review of the empirical literature. Journal of Business Ethics, 13(3), 205–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Franke, G. R., Crown, D. F., & Spake, D. F. (1997). Gender differences in ethical perceptions of business practices: A social role theory perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(6), 920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Frederick, R. (Ed.). (2008). A companion to business ethics. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  25. Fried, C. (1978). Right and wrong. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gautschi, F. H., & Jones, M. (1998). Enhancing the ability of business students to recognize ethical issues: An empirical assessment of the effectiveness of a course in business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 205–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Glenn, J. R., Jr, & Van Loo, M. F. (1993). Business students’ and practitioners’ ethical decisions over time. Journal of Business Ethics, 12(11), 835–847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gundersen, D. E., Capozzoli, E. A., & Rajamma, R. K. (2008). Learned ethical behavior: An academic perspective. Journal of Education for Business, 83(6), 315–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hanson, K. (1987, September). What good are ethics courses? Across the Board, 24(2), 10.Google Scholar
  30. Hardin, R. (1971). Collective action as an agreeable n-prisoners’ dilemma. Behavioral Science, 16(5), 472–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Harman, G. (1975). Moral relativism defended. The Philosophical Review, 84(1), 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hofstede, G. (1983). The cultural relativity of organizational practices and theories. Journal of International Business Studies, 14(2), 75–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hunt, S. D., & Vitell, S. (1986). A general theory of marketing ethics. Journal of macromarketing, 6(1), 5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Izraele, D. (1988). Ethical beliefs and behaviour of managers—A cross-cultural perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 7, 263–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jewe, R. D. (2008). Do business ethics courses work? The effectiveness of business ethics education: An empirical study. Journal of Global Business Issues, 1.Google Scholar
  36. Kohlberg, L., Levine, C., & Hewer, A. (1983). Moral stages: A current formulation and a response to critics. Contributions to Human Development, 10, 174.Google Scholar
  37. Kohlberg, L., & Turiel, E. (1973). Moralization, the cognitive development approach. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
  38. Lee, K. H. (1981). Ethical beliefs in marketing management: A cross-cultural study. European Journal of Marketing, 15(1), 58–67.Google Scholar
  39. Loe, T. W., Ferrell, L., & Mansfield, P. (2000). A review of empirical studies assessing ethical decision making in business. Journal of Business Ethics, 25(3), 185–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Marta, J. K. M., Attia, A., Singhapakdi, A., & Atteya, N. (2003). A comparison of ethical perceptions and moral philosophies of American and Egyptian business students. Teaching Business Ethics, 7(1), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mazar, N., & Aggarwal, P. (2011). Greasing the palm can collectivism promote bribery? Psychological Science, 22(7), 843–848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. McDonald, G. M., & Donleavy, G. D. (1995). Objections to the teaching of business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 14(10), 839–853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. McNichols, C. W., & Zimmerer, T. W. (1985). Situational ethics: An empirical study of differentiators of student attitudes. Journal of Business Ethics, 4(3), 175–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mill, J. S. ((1863) 2007). Utilitarianism, liberty & representative government. Rockville, MD: Wildside Press LLC.Google Scholar
  45. Mudrack, P. E., & Mason, E. S. (2013). Dilemmas, conspiracies, and Sophie’s choice: Vignette themes and ethical judgments. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(3), 639–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Noah, T. (1987, May 25). Do business school ethics courses alter executive behaviour? Newsweek, 109(1), 36.Google Scholar
  47. Pearce, J. (2013). Using social identify theory to predict managers emphasises. Journal of Business Ethics, 112(4), 497–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Perri, D. F., Callanan, G. A., Rotenberry, P. F., & Oehlers, P. F. (2009). Education and training in ethical decision making: Comparing context and orientation. Education + Training, 51(1), 70–83.Google Scholar
  49. Piper, T. R., Gentile, M. C., & Parks, S. D. (1993). Can Ethics Be Taught? Perspectives, challenges and approaches. Boston: Harvard Business Scholl Press.Google Scholar
  50. Rachels, J., & Rachels, S. (1986). The elements of moral philosophy. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  51. Reidenbach, R. E., & Robin, D. P. (1990). Toward the development of a multidimensional scale for improving evaluations of business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 9(8), 639–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rest, J. R., Narvaez, D., Thoma, S. J., & Bebeau, M. J. (2000). A neo-Kohlbergian approach to morality research. Journal of Moral Education, 29(4), 381–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Rest, J. R., & Narvez, D. (Eds.). (1994). Moral development in the professions: Psychology and applied ethics. Hillsdale, NJ: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  54. Ritter, B. A. (2006). Can business ethics be trained? A study of the ethical decision-making process in business students. Journal of Business Ethics, 68(2), 153–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Rossouw, G. J. (2002). Three approaches to teaching business ethics. Teaching Business Ethics, 6(4), 411–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rubin, R. S., & Dierdorff, E. C. (2011). On the road to Abilene: Time to manage agreement about MBA curricular relevance. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 10(1), 148–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Runge, C. F. (1984). Institutions and the free rider: The assurance problem in collective action. The Journal of Politics, 46(01), 154–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Rutherford, M. A., Parks, L., Cavazos, D. E., & White, C. D. (2012). Business ethics as a required course: Investigating the factors impacting the decision to require ethics in the undergraduate business core curriculum. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11(2), 174–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sanyal, R. (2005). Determinants of bribery in international business: The cultural and economic factors. Journal of Business Ethics, 59(1–2), 139–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sanyal, R., & Guvenli, T. (2009). The propensity to bribe in international business: The relevance of cultural variables. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, 16(3), 287–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sen, A. K. (1967). Isolation, assurance and the social rate of discount. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 81, 112–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Sims, R. R. (2002). Business ethics teaching for effective learning. Teaching Business Ethics, 6(4), 393–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Singer, P. (1993). Practical ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Singer, P. (2011). Practical ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Singhapakdi, A., Vitell, S. J., & Kraft, K. L. (1996). Moral intensity and ethical decision-making of marketing professionals. Journal of Business Research, 36(3), 245–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Snoeyenbos, M., & Humber, J. (2008). Utilitarianism and business ethics, Chapter 2. In R. Frederick (Ed.), A companion to business ethics. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  67. Solberg, J., Strong, K. C., & McGuire, C., Jr. (1995). Living (not learning) ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 14(1), 71–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Swanson, D. L. (2008). Business ethics and economics, Chapter 17. In R. Frederick (Ed.), A companion to business ethics. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  69. Trevino, L. K. (1986). Ethical decision making in organizations: A person–situation interactionist model. Academy of Management Review, 11(3), 601–617.Google Scholar
  70. Trevino, L. K., Weaver, G. R., & Reynolds, S. J. (2006). Behavioral ethics in organizations: A review. Journal of management, 32(6), 951–990.Google Scholar
  71. Tsalikas, J., & Nwachakwu, O. (1989). Cross-cultural marketing ethics: An investigation on the ethical beliefs’ & differences between Greeks and Americans. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 1, 45–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Valentine, S. R., & Bateman, C. R. (2011). The impact of ethical ideologies, moral intensity, and social context on sales-based ethical reasoning. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(1), 155–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Vitell, S. J., & Festervand, T. A. (1987). Business ethics: Conflicts, practices and beliefs of industrial executives. Journal of Business Ethics, 6(2), 111–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Vitell, S., Nwachukwu, S., & Barnes, J. (1993). The effects of culture on ethical-decision making: An application of Hofstede’s typology. Journal of Business Ethics, 12(10), 753–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Vitell, S. J., Singhapakdi, A., & Thomas, J. (2001). Consumer ethics: An application and empirical testing of the Hunt–Vitell theory of ethics. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18(2), 153–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Walker, A. G., Smither, J. W., & DeBode, J. (2012). The effects of religiosity on ethical judgments. Journal of Business Ethics, 106(4), 437–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Wang, L., & Calvano, L. (2013, forthcoming). Is business ethics education effective? An analysis of gender, personal ethical perspectives and moral judgement. Journal of Business Ethics. Published Online 24 November 2013.Google Scholar
  78. Waples, E. P., Antes, A. L., Murphy, S. T., Connelly, S., & Mumford, M. D. (2009). A meta-analytic investigation of business ethics instruction. Journal of Business Ethics, 87(1), 133–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Weber, J. (1990). Measuring the impact of teaching ethics to future managers: A review, assessment, and recommendations. Journal of Business Ethics, 9(3), 183–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Whipple, T. W., & Swords, D. F. (1992). Business ethics judgments: A cross-cultural comparison. Journal of Business Ethics, 11(9), 671–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Wong, D. (1991). Relativism. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  82. Wynd, W. R., & Mager, J. (1989). The business and society course: Does it change student attitudes? Journal of Business Ethics, 8(6), 487–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elizabeth Prior Jonson
    • 1
  • Linda Mary McGuire
    • 1
  • Deirdre O’Neill
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ManagementMonash UniversityMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations