Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 125, Issue 1, pp 87–99 | Cite as

Bags for Life: The Embedding of Ethical Consumerism

  • Pamela Yeow
  • Alison Dean
  • Danielle Tucker
Article

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to understand why some ethical behaviours fail to embed, and importantly what can be done about it. We address this by looking at an example where ethical behaviour has not become the norm, i.e. the widespread, habitual, use of ‘bags for life’. This is an interesting case because whilst a consistent message of ‘saving the environment’ has been the basis of the promotion of ‘bags for life’ in the United Kingdom for many years, their uptake has only recently become more widespread and still remains at low levels. Through an exploratory study, we unpack some of the contextual barriers which may influence ethical consumerism. We do this by examining the attitudes which influenced people to start using ‘bags for life’, and how people persuade others to use ‘bags for life’. We use a case study analysis to try and understand why ethical behaviour change has stalled and not become sustained. We find that both individuals and institutions play a significant interaction role in encouraging a sustained behavioural change towards ethical consumerism.

Keywords

Attitude–intention–behaviour gap Embedding behaviour change Environment plastic bags Ethical consumerism 

Abbreviations

BBC

British Broadcasting Corporation

BRC

British Retail Consortium, a leading trade association in the United Kingdom (UK) representing all forms of retailers

DEFRA

Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, a UK government department responsible for policy and regulations on the environment, food and rural affairs

WRAP

WRAP is funded by all four governments across the UK and the EU and run programmes in England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland to help people recycle more and waste less, both at home and at work

References

  1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behaviour. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  3. Andrew Irving Associates. (2005). Carrier bag usage and attitudes: Benchmark and target market survey. http://www.wrap.org.uk/sites/files/wrap/CarrierBagUsage.pdf.
  4. Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2001). Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 471–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Auger, P., & Devinney, T. M. (2007). Do what consumers say matter? The misalignment of preferences with unconstrained ethical intentions. Journal of Business Ethics, 76, 361–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Banerjee, A. V. (1992). A simple model of herd behaviour. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107, 797–817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. BBC News. (2008). Plastic bag bans around the world. 28th February, http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/1/hi/world/7268960.stm. Accessed 3 October 2012.
  8. Biernacki, P., & Waldorf, D. (1981). Snowball sampling: Problems and techniques of chain referral sampling. Sociological Methods and Research, 10, 141–163.Google Scholar
  9. Bikhchandani, S., Hirshleifer, D., & Welch, I. (1998). Learning from the behavior of others: Conformity, fads and informational cascades. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12, 151–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boulstridge, E., & Carrigan, M. (2000). Do consumers really care about corporate responsibility? Highlighting the attitude-behaviour gap. Journal of Communication Management, 4(4), 355–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bray, J., Johns, N., & Kilburn, D. (2011). An exploratory study into the factors impeding ethical consumption. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(4), 597–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. British Retail Consortium. (2010). http://www.brc.org.uk/. Accessed 17 June 2010.
  13. Carrigan, M., & Attalla, A. (2001). The myth of the ethical consumer—Do ethics matter in purchase behaviour? Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18(7), 560–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Carrigan, M., Moraes, C., & Leek, S. (2011). Fostering responsible communities: A community social marketing approach to sustainable living. Journal of Business Ethics, 100, 515–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Carrigan, M., Szmigin, I., & Wright, J. (2004). Shopping for a better world? An interpretive study of the potential for ethical consumption within the older market. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 21(6), 401–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Carrington, M. J., Neville, B. A., & Whitwell, G. J. (2010). Why ethical consumers don’t walk their talk: Towards a framework for understanding the gap between the ethical purchase intentions and actual buying behaviour of ethically minded consumers. Journal of Business Ethics, 97, 139–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chatzidakis, A., Hibbert, S., & Smith, A. P. (2007). Why people don’t take their concerns about fair trade to the supermarket: The role of neutralisation. Journal of Business Ethics, 74, 89–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cooper-Martin, E., & Holbrook, M. E. (1993). Ethical consumption experiences and ethical space. Advances in Consumer Research, 20(1), 113–118.Google Scholar
  19. Cowe, R., & Williams, S. (2000). Who are the ethical consumers?. London: The Cooperative Bank.Google Scholar
  20. Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24, 349–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. d’Astous, A., & Legendre, A. (2009). Understanding consumers’ ethical justifications: A scale for appraising consumers’ reasons for not behaving ethically. Journal of Business Ethics, 87, 255–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Greenhalgh, T., Robert, G., Macfarlane, F., Bate, P., & Jyriakidou, O. (2004). Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: Systematic review and recommendations. The Milbank Quarterly, 82(4), 581–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Greenwood, R., & Hinings, C. R. (2006). Radical organizational change. In S.R. Clegg, C. Hardy, T. B. Lawrence, & W.R. Nord (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organization studies (2nd Ed., pp. 814–842). Sage: London.Google Scholar
  24. Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J. M., & Van den Bergh, B. (2010). Going green to be seen: Status, reputation, and conspicuous conservation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 392–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Haddock-Fraser, J. (2010). The link between corporate brands and eco-management: The role of the news media. Kent Business School Working Paper Series, no. 224.Google Scholar
  26. Hayabuchi, Y., Enomoto, Y., Yamasue, E., Okumura, H., & Ishihara, K. N. (2005). The role of environmental education and social system on the plastic bag problem. In Proceedings of 3rd conference on the public sector, Ljubljana, Slovenia.Google Scholar
  27. James, K., & Grant, T. (2003). LCA of degradable plastic bags. www.cfd.rmit.edu.au/content/download/232/1787/.../James_and_grant.pdf.
  28. Katz, E., & Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1955). Personal Influence: The part played by people in the flow of mass communications. New York, NY: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  29. Krippendorff, K. (1980). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  30. Lewis, H., Verghese, K., & Fitzpatrick, L. (2010). Evaluating the sustainability impacts of packaging: The plastic carry bag dilemma. Packaging Technology and Science, 23, 145–160.Google Scholar
  31. Loo, R., & Loewen, P. (2004). Confirmatory factor analyses of scores from full and short versions of the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 2343–2352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Low, W., & Davenport, E. (2007). To boldly go…exploring ethical spaces to re-politicise ethical consumption and fair trade. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 6, 336–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. May, C., & Finch, T. (2009). Implementing, embedding and integrating practices: An outline of normalization process theory. Sociology, 43(3), 535–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Miles, M., & Huberman, M. A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  35. Moser, S., & Dilling, L. (2007). Towards the social tipping point: Creating a climate for change. In S. Moser & L. Dilling (Eds.), Creating a climate for change: Communicating climate change and facilitating social change (pp. 491–516). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Newholm, T., & Shaw, D. (2007). Studying the ethical consumer: A review of research. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 6, 253–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Noy, C. (2008). Sampling knowledge: The hermeneutics of snowball sampling in qualitative research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 11, 327–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Papaoikonomou, E., Valverde, M., & Ryan, G. (2012). Articulating the meaning of collective experiences of ethical consumption. Journal of Business Ethics, 110, 15–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Roach, J. (2008). Plastic bag ban gaining momentum around the world. National Geographic News, 4th April.Google Scholar
  40. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations. New York, NY: Norton.Google Scholar
  41. Sharp, A., Høj, S., & Wheeler, M. (2010). Proscription and its impact on anti-consumption behaviour and attitudes: The case of plastic bags. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 9(6), 470–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Shaw, D., Shiu, E., & Clarke, I. (2000). The contribution of ethical obligation and self-identity to the theory of planned behaviour: An exploration of ethical consumers. Journal of Marketing Management, 16(8), 879–894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Strutton, D., Vitell, S. J., & Pelton, L. E. (1994). How consumers may justify inappropriate behaviour in market settings: An application on the techniques of neutralization. Journal of Business Research, 30, 253–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. The Co-operative Bank. (2009). Ten years of ethical consumerism: 19992008. http://www.co-operativebank.co.uk/corp/pdf/Ethical_Consumerism_Report.pdf. Accessed 13 July 2011.
  45. The Co-operative Group. (2012). Ethical Consumerism Report 2011. http://www.co-operative.coop/PageFiles/416561607/Ethical-Consumerism-Report-2011.pdf. Accessed 3 October 2012.
  46. Vitell, S. J., Singhapakdi, A., & Thomas, J. (2001). Consumer ethics: An application an empirical testing of the Hunt-Vitell theory of ethics. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18(2), 153–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. WRAP. (2010). Waste and resources action programme. http://www.wrap.org.uk/retail/carrier_bags/carrier_bags_50.html. Accessed 26th August 2010.
  48. WRAP. (2012). New figures on carrier bags use released by WRAP. http://www.wrap.org.uk/content/new-figures-carrier-bages-use-released-wrap. Accessed 3rd October 2012.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kent Business SchoolUniversity of KentCanterburyUK
  2. 2.Health Management GroupImperial College Business SchoolLondonUK

Personalised recommendations