Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 124, Issue 4, pp 609–621 | Cite as

In Lieu of a Sovereignty Shield, Multinational Corporations Should Be Responsible for the Harm They Cause



Some progress has been made in recent decades to articulate corporate social responsibility (CSR) and, more recently, to associate CSR with international enforcement of human rights. This progress continues to be hampered, however, by the ability of a multinational corporation (MNC) that violates human rights not only to shift liability from itself to a nation-state but even to win compensation from that nation-state for loss of profits due to restrictions on its business activities. In the process, the nation-state’s sovereignty is diminishing; and, in effect, though still attributed to nation-states, it is being transferred to the MNC. The main aim of this article is (1) to draw on normative considerations to claim that this MNC proto-sovereignty should be modified and (2) to contend that this can eventually be accomplished by adding to corporate adoption of CSR guidelines a regimen of global human rights enforcement. I base this contention on expectations about the internationalization of corporate criminal law and the globalization of civil society in general and of NGOs in particular. I consider various jurisdictions but I focus on US jurisprudence.


Sovereignty Human rights Corporate social responsibility Corporate criminal law Global civil society 



Special thanks to Anne Donchin, Ph.D., for her wise editorial and scholarly suggestions.


  1. AA Robinson (2008). “Corporate Culture” as a basis for the criminal liability of corporations. Prepared by M. Donaldson and R. Watters for the UN special representative of the Security General for Business and Human Rights (J. G. Ruggie). Online at
  2. Alston, P. (Ed.). (2005). Non-state actors and human rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Alvarez, J. E. (2011). Are corporations “subjects” of international law? Santa Clara Journal of International Law, 9(1), 1–36.Google Scholar
  4. Alvarez, J. E., Sauvant, K. P., Ahmed, K. G., & Vizcaino, G. P. (2011). The evolving international investment regime: Expectations, realities, options. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. An-Na’im, A. (1990). Toward an Islamic reformation: Civil liberties, human rights, and International law. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Arenas, D., Lozano, J. P., & Albareda, L. (2009). The role of NGOs in CSR: Mutual perceptions among stakeholders. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(1), 175–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baldwin, E., Kantor, M., & Nolan, M. (2006). Limits to enforcement of ICSID awards. Journal of International Arbitration, 23(1), 1–24.Google Scholar
  8. Barker, J. (2013). Corporate sovereignty: Law and government under capitalism. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  9. Beale, S. S. (2009). A response to the critics of corporate criminal liability. American Criminal Law Review, 46, 1481–1505.Google Scholar
  10. Bigge, D. M. (2011). Can investors use MFN [most favored nation] to dodge transparency? New York University School of Law Center for Transnational Litigation and Commercial Law, online at
  11. Blum, L. (2001). International NGOs and the Guatemalan Peace Accords. Voluntas, 12(4), 327–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brickley, P. (2013). Home court for corporations: Decision permits bylaws that restrict shareholder litigation to delaware. Wall Street Journal (July 8), p. B4.Google Scholar
  13. Byrne, E. F. (1990). Work, Inc.: A philosophical inquiry. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Byrne, E. F. (2011). Book review: Trade barriers to the public good. Techné, 15(3), 235–237.Google Scholar
  15. Campbell, T. (2006). A human rights approach to developing voluntary codes of conduct for multinational corporations. Business Ethics Quarterly, 16(2), 255–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Černič, J. L. (2008). Corporate responsibility for human rights: A critical analysis of the OECD guidelines for multinational enterprises. Hanse Law Review, 4(1), 71–100.Google Scholar
  17. Clapham, A. (2006). Human rights obligations of non-state actors. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Collins, D. (2009). The failure of a socially responsive gold mining MNC in El Salvador: Ramifications of NGO mistrust. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(Supplement 2), 245–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Davis, J. (2006). Justice without borders: Human rights cases in U.S. courts. Law and Policy, 28(1), 60–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Davis, D. R., Murdie, A., & Garnett, C. (2012). “Makers and Shapers”: Human rights INGOs and public opinion. Human Rights Quarterly, 34, 199–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. De Brabandere, E. (2009). Non-state actors, state-centrism and human rights obligations. Leiden Journal of International Law, 22, 191–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Doh, J. P., & Guay, T. R. (2004). Globalization and corporate social responsibility: How nongovernmental organizations influence labor and environmental codes of conduct. Management International Review, 44(Special Issue 2004/2), 7–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Egels-Zanden, N., & Hyllman, P. (2006). Exploring the effects of Union–NGO relationships on corporate responsibility: The case of Swedish clean clothes campaign. Journal of Business Ethics, 64(3), 303–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fauchald, O. K., & Stigen, J. (2009). Corporate responsibility before International institutions. George Washington International Law Review, 40, 1025–1100.Google Scholar
  25. Flynn, J. (2013). Reframing the intercultural dialogue on human rights. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Fraser, N. (2005). Transnationalizing the public sphere. Retrieved from
  27. Frederick, W. C. (1991). The moral authority of transnational corporate codes. Journal of Business Ethics, 10, 165–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Frederiksen, C. S. (2010). The relation between policies concerning corporate social responsibility (CSR) and philosophical moral theories—An empirical investigation. Journal of Business Ethics, 93, 357–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Garrett, A. D. (2008). The corporation as Sovereign. Maine Law Review, 60, 129–164.Google Scholar
  30. Garriga, E., & Melé, D. (2004). Corporate social responsibility theories: Mapping the territory. Journal of Business Ethics, 53(1–2), 51–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gladwell, M. (2010). Small change. New Yorker (Oct 4), retrieved from
  32. Goering, C. (2007). Amnesty international and economic, social, and cultural rights. In D. A. Bell & J.-M. Coicaud (Eds.), Ethics in action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Greenwald, G. (2011). With liberty and justice for some: How the law is used to destroy equality and protect the powerful. New York: Henry Holt and Company Metropolitan Books.Google Scholar
  34. Greenwood, D. H. (2005). The Semi-Sovereign Corporation. Legal Studies Research Paper No. 05-04, University of Utah S. J. Quinney College of Law.Google Scholar
  35. Greider, W. (2001). Sovereign Corporations. The Nation (April 30). Retrieved from
  36. Hasnas, J. (2009). The centenary of a mistake: One hundred years of corporate criminal liability. American Criminal Law Review, 46, 1329–1358.Google Scholar
  37. Howard-Hassman, R. E. (2010). Can globalization promote human rights? University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Joseph, S. (2012). Social Media, Political Change, and Human Rights. Boston College International and Comparative Law Review, 35(1), 145–188. Retrieved from
  39. Joutsenvirta, M., & Uusitalo, L. (2009). Cultural competences: An important resource in the industry-NGO dialog. Journal of Business Ethics, 91(3), 379–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kahn, I. (2009). The unheard truth: Poverty and human rights. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  41. Keane, J. (2003). Global civil society?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum, 569 U.S. ____ (2013).Google Scholar
  43. Korey, W. (1999). Human rights NGOs: The power of persuasion. Ethics and International Affairs, 13(1), 151–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Korff, D., and Brown, I. (2011). Social media and human rights. Commission for Human Rights Issue Discussion Paper. Retrieved from
  45. Ku, J. G., & Conway III, G. T. (2013). When corporate defendants go on offense. Wall Street Journal (July 5), p. A11.Google Scholar
  46. Kyl, J., Feith, D. J., & Fonte, J. (2013). The war of law: How new International law undermines democratic sovereignty. Foreign Affairs, 92(4), 115–125.Google Scholar
  47. Leaming, J. (2013). Supreme court hobbles efforts to combat corporate human rights violations overseas. American Constitution Society for Law and Policy. Retrieved April 17, 2013 from
  48. Leonhardt, D. (2013). Who will crack the code? New York Times (May 26), pp. SR 1–6.Google Scholar
  49. Linklater, A. (1998). The transformation of political community: Ethical foundations of the post-Westphalian era. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  50. Liptak, A. (2013). Friend of the corporation: The Roberts court (is) the most pro-business in decades. New York Times, May 5, pp BU 1, 5.Google Scholar
  51. Maak, T. (2009). The cosmopolitan corporation. Journal of Business Ethics, 84(Supplement 3), 361–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Maritain, J. (1951). Man and the state. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  53. Markoff, G. (2013). Arthur Andersen and the myth of the corporate death penalty: Corporate criminal convictions in the twenty-first century. University of Pennsylvania Journal of Business Law. 15(3), 797–842. Retrieved from
  54. Mauldin, W., & Kapner, S. (2013). U.S. Retailers move to spur factory safety in Bangladesh. Wall Street Journal (July 11), B3.Google Scholar
  55. Mayer, A. E. (2009). Human rights as a dimension of CSR: The blurred lines between legal and non-legal categories. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(Supplement 4), 561–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Mayer, A. E. (2012). Islam and human rights: Tradition and politics (5th ed.). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  57. McCarthy, T. (2009). Race, empire, and the idea of human development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Melé, D. (2006) Mainstream theories on normative corporate social responsibility: Analysis from catholic social theory. Retrieved from
  59. Michalos, A. (2008). Trade barriers to the public good: Free trade and environmental protection. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Murdie, A. M., & Davis, D. R. (2012). Shaming and blaming: Using events data to assess the impact of human rights INGOs. International Studies Quarterly, 56(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Neiman, P. (2013). A social contract for International business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 114(1), 75–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Norris, F. (2013). Tribune falls afoul of its own tax strategy. New York Times (June 21). pp. B1 and 6.Google Scholar
  63. Nuremberg Scholars. (2010). Brief of Amicus Curiae Nuremberg Scholars in support of Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross Appellees’ petition for rehearing and for rehearing En Banc, available online as Kiobel-rehearing-Nuremberg-amicus.pdf as one of the Amicus briefs in Kiobel v. Royal Dutch petroleum/shell, EarthRights International. Retrieved from
  64. Pellet, A. (2009). State sovereignty and the protection of fundamental human rights: An international law perspective. Pugwash Online: Conferences on Science and World Affairs, retrieved from
  65. Ratner, S. R. (2001). Corporations and human rights: A theory of legal responsibility. Yale Law Journal, 111(3), 443–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Belknap Press. Google Scholar
  67. Ruggie, J. G. (2013). Just business: Multinational corporations and human rights.  New York/London: W. W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
  68. Runzo, R., Martin, N. M., & Sharma, A. (Eds.). (2003). Human rights and responsibilities in the world religions. Vol. IV in the library of global ethics and religion. Oxford: Oneworld Publications.Google Scholar
  69. Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2007). Toward a political conception of corporate responsibility: Business and society seen from a Habermasian perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1096–1120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Secchi, D. (2007). Utilitarian, managerial and relational theories of corporate social responsibility. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(4), 347–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Seymour, M., (Ed.) (2004). The fate of the nation-state. Montreal & Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
  72. Shirky, C. (2011). The political power of social media. Foreign Affairs, 90(28), 28–29.Google Scholar
  73. Simpson, S. S. (2002). Corporate crime, law, and social control. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Smullen, A. J. (2011). Risky Business: The Criminal Prosecution of Corporations. Retrieved from
  75. Spar, D. L., & La Mure, L. T. (2003). The power of activism: Assessing the impact of NGOs on global business. California Management Review, 45(3), 78–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Stephens, P. (2013). Nations are chasing the illusion of sovereignty. Financial Times (June 7), p. 9.Google Scholar
  77. Switzer, C. (2013). Inside the human rights campaign’s social-media Success. The Chronicle of Philanthropy (July 2). Retrieved from
  78. Taylor, C. (1999). Conditions of an unforced consensus on human rights. In J. Bauer & D. A. Bell (Eds.), The East Asian challenge for human rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  79. Teegen, H., Doh, J. P., & Vachani, S. (2004). The importance of nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) in global governance and value creation: An international business research agenda. Journal of International Business Studies, 35, 463–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Tsutsui, K., & Wotipka, C. M. (2004). Global Civil Society and the International Human Rights Movement: Citizen participation in Human Rights International Nongovernmental Organizations. Social Forces, 83(2), 587–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Van den Herik, L., & Černič, J. L. (2010). Regulating corporations under International law: From human rights to International criminal law and back again. Journal of International Criminal Justice, 8(3), 725–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. von Moltke, K. (2000). An International Investment Regime? Winnipeg, CA: International Institute for Sustainable Development; Public Statement on the International Investment Regime, Osgoode Hall Law School, York University, online at
  83. Walters, G. J. (2001). Human rights in an information age: A philosophical analysis. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  84. Weissbrodt, D., & Kruger, M. (2005). Human rights responsibilities of businesses as non-state actors, In: Alston P. (Ed.) Oxford, NY: Routledge. pp. 315–350.Google Scholar
  85. Weissman, A. (2007). A new approach to corporate criminal liability. American Criminal Law Review, 44, 1319–1342.Google Scholar
  86. Welch, C. E, Jr. (Ed.). (2001). NGOs and human rights: Promise and performance. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  87. Winston, M. (2002). NGO Strategies for promoting corporate social responsibility. Ethics and International Affairs, 16(2), 71–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Wong, D. B. (2006). Natural moralities: A defense of pluralistic relativism. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Zamagni, S. (2006). The ethical anchoring of corporate social responsibility and the critique of CSR. In: L. Zsolnai (Ed.) Interdisciplinary yearbook of business ethics, vol. 1 Oxford: Peter Lang, (pp. 31–51). Republished in M. Schlag and J. A. Mercado (eds.), Free markets and the culture of common good, ethical economy. 41, 191–207.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyIndiana University-IndianapolisIndianapolisUSA
  2. 2.Hastings-on-HudsonUSA

Personalised recommendations