Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 122, Issue 4, pp 709–723 | Cite as

Does Board Gender Diversity Have a Financial Impact? Evidence Using Stock Portfolio Performance

  • Larelle Chapple
  • Jacquelyn E. Humphrey


There is growing regulatory pressure on firms worldwide to address the under-representation of women in senior positions. Regulators have taken a variety of approaches to the issue. We investigate a jurisdiction that has issued recommendations and disclosure requirements, rather than implementing quotas. Much of the rhetoric surrounding gender diversity centres on whether diversity has a financial impact. In this paper we take an aggregate (market-level) approach and compare the performance of portfolios of firms with gender diverse boards to those without. We also investigate whether having multiple women on the board is linked to performance, and if there is a within-industry effect. Overall, we do not find evidence of an association between diversity and performance. We find some weak evidence of a negative correlation between having multiple women on the board and performance, but that in some industries diversity is positively correlated with performance.


Gender diversity Corporate governance Financial performance 



The authors thank John Nowland, Emma Schultz, Tom Smith, Garry Twite and workshop participants at the Australian National University for helpful comments. We also thank Chen Cheng and Theingi Oo for research assistance. We thank Susan McCreery for proofreading the manuscript. We acknowledge the Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand for financial support.


  1. Adams, R., & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(2), 291–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams, R., Gray, S., & Nowland, J. (2011). Does gender matter in the boardroom? Evidence from the market reaction to mandatory new director announcements. Working Paper, University of Queensland.Google Scholar
  3. Ahern, K., & Dittmar, A. (2012). The changing of the boards: The impact on firm valuation of mandated female board representation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 127(1), 137–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Australian Institute of Company Directors. (2012). Appointments to ASX200 Boards.Google Scholar
  6. Bilimoria, D. (2000). Building the business case for women corporate directors. In R. J. Burke & M. C. Mattis (Eds.), Women on corporate boards of directors: International challenges and opportunities (pp. 25–40). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bonn, I. (2004). Board structure and firm performance: Evidence from Australia. Journal of the Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management, 10(1), 14–24.Google Scholar
  8. Brammer, S., Millington, A., & Pavelin, S. (2007). Gender and ethnic diversity among UK corporate boards. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(2), 393–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Broome, L. L., Conley, J. M., & Krawiec, K. D. (2011). Does critical mass matter? Views from the boardroom. Working Paper, University of North Carolina.Google Scholar
  10. Broome, L. L., & Krawiec, K. D. (2008). Signaling through board diversity: Is anyone listening? University of Cincinnati Law Review, 77(1), 446–447.Google Scholar
  11. Burke, R. (1997). Women on corporate boards of directors: A needed resource. Journal of Business Ethics, 16(9), 909–915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Campbell, K., & Mınguez-Vera, A. (2008). Gender diversity in the boardroom and firm financial performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(3), 435–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Carhart, M. M. (1997). On persistence in mutual fund performance. Journal of Finance, 52(1), 57–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Carter, D., D’Souza, F., Simkins, B., & Simpson, W. (2010). The gender and ethnic diversity of US boards and board committees and firm financial performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 18(5), 396–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Carter, D., Simkins, B., & Simpson, W. G. (2003). Corporate governance, board diversity, and firm value. Financial Review, 38(1), 33–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fairfax, L. (2011). Board diversity revisited: New rationale, same old story? North Carolina Law Review, 89(1), 855–886.Google Scholar
  17. Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1993). Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. Journal of Financial Economics, 33(1), 3–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Farrell, K. A., & Hersch, P. L. (2005). Additions to corporate boards: The effect of gender. Journal of Corporate Finance, 11(1–2), 85–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gharghori, P., Lee, R., & Veeraraghavan, M. (2009). Anomalies and stock returns: Australian evidence. Accounting and Finance, 49(3), 555–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gul, F. A., Chung-ki, M., & Srinidhi, B. (2009). Gender diversity on U.S. corporate boards and cost of capital. Working Paper, Hong Kong Polytechnic University.Google Scholar
  21. Gul, F. A., Hutchinson, M., & Lai, K. (2011). Gender diversity and properties of analyst earnings forecasts. Working Paper, Monash University.Google Scholar
  22. Hafsi, T., & Turgut, G. (2013). Boardroom diversity and its effect on social performance: Conceptualization and empirical evidence. Journal of Business Ethics, 112(2), 463–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hart, O. (1995). Corporate governance: Some theory and implications. The Economic Journal, 105, 678–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hermalin, B. E., & Weisbach, M. S. (2003). Boards of directors as an endogenously determined institution: A survey of the economic literature. FRBNY Economic Policy Review, 9(1), 7–26.Google Scholar
  25. Hillman, A. J., Nicholson, G. J., & Shropshire, C. (2008). Directors’ multiple identities, identification, and board monitoring and resource provision. Organization Science, 19(3), 441–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Konrad, A. M., Kramer, V. W., & Erkut, S. (2008). Critical mass: The impact of three or more women on corporate boards. Organizational Dynamics, 37(2), 145–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Krishnan, G. V., & Parsons, L. M. (2008). Getting to the bottom line: An exploration of gender and earnings quality. Journal of Business Ethics, 78(1–2), 65–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nguyen, H., & Faff, R. (2007). Impact of board size and board diversity on firm value: Australian evidence. Corporate Ownership and Control, 4(2), 24–32.Google Scholar
  29. Nielsen, S., & Huse, M. (2010). The contribution of women on boards of directors: Going beyond the surface. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 18(2), 136–148.Google Scholar
  30. Ryan, M., & Haslam, S. A. (2005). The glass cliff: Evidence that women are over-represented in precarious leadership positions. British Journal of Management, 16(2), 81–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Srinidhi, B., Gul, F. A., & Tsui, J. (2011). Female directors and earnings quality. Contemporary Accounting Research, 28(5), 1610–1644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Terjesen, S., Sealy, R., & Singh, V. (2009). Women directors and corporate boards: A review and research agenda. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(3), 320–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Torchia, M., Calabro, A., & Huse, M. (2011). Women directors on corporate boards: From tokenism to critical mass. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(2), 299–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wang, Y., & Clift, B. (2009). Is there a “business case” for board diversity. Pacific Accounting Review, 21(2), 88–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.QUT Business SchoolQueensland University of TechnologyBrisbaneAustralia
  2. 2.Research School of Finance, Actuarial Studies and Applied StatisticsAustralian National UniversityCanberraAustralia

Personalised recommendations