Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 120, Issue 1, pp 27–38 | Cite as

The Influence of Decision Frames and Vision Priming on Decision Outcomes in Work Groups: Motivating Stakeholder Considerations

  • Kevin D. Clark
  • Narda R. Quigley
  • Stephen A. Stumpf
Article
  • 568 Downloads

Abstract

Organizational leaders are increasingly emphasizing a stakeholder perspective in order to address concerns about business ethics. This study examined the choices of 94 groups in the context of a business decision-making simulation to determine how specific actions and communications can facilitate the consideration of different stakeholder perspectives. In particular, we examined whether generally framing the business situation as one involving diverse stakeholders versus a primarily profit-driven operation (referred to as framing), and whether specific suggestions that participants consider the concerns of stakeholders versus stockholders in maximizing the value of the firm (referred to as vision priming), would influence group choices and decision outcomes. We tested four experimental conditions against a control in a 2 × 2 experimental design to determine the effects that group choices had on decision outcomes when groups were exposed to stakeholder versus stockholder decision framing and stakeholder versus stockholder vision priming. The results revealed that the consistent conditions outperformed the control condition and that vision priming has a greater impact on decision outcomes than decision framing.

Keywords

Ethical decision making Framing Priming Work groups Stakeholders 

References

  1. Abdolmohammadi, M. J., Gabhart, D. R. L., & Reeves, M. F. (1997). Ethical cognition of business students individually and in groups. Journal of Business Ethics, 16, 1717–1725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abdolmohammadi, M. J., & Reeves, M. F. (2003). Does group reasoning improve ethical reasoning? Business and Society Review, 108, 127–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arvidsson, S. (2010). Communication of corporate social responsibility: A study of the views of management teams in large companies. Journal of Business Ethics, 96, 339–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ashforth, B. E., & Anand, V. (2003). The normalization of corruption in organizations. In R. M. Kraner & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, 25 (pp. 1–52). Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  5. Ashforth, B. E., & Kreiner, G. E. (2002). Normalizing emotions in organizations: Making the extraordinary seem ordinary. Human Resources Management Review, 12, 215–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ashkanasy, N. M., Windsor, C. A., & Trevino, L. K. (2006). Bad apples in bad barrels revisited: Cognitive moral development, just world beliefs, rewards, and ethical decision making. Business Ethics Quarterly, 16, 449–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baker, T. L., & Hunt, T. G. (2003). An exploratory investigation into the effects of team composition on moral orientation. Journal of Managerial Issues, 15, 106–119.Google Scholar
  8. Bandura, A. (1999). Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 193–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bargh, J. A. (1999). The automaticity of everyday life. In R. S. Wyer Jr (Ed.), Advances in social cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  10. Bargh, J. A., Chen, M., & Burrows, L. (1996). Automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait construct and stereotype activation on action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 230–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bazerman, M. (1997). Judgment in managerial decision making. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  12. Beams, J. D., Brown, R. M., & Killough, L. N. (2003). An experiment testing the determinants of non-compliance with insider trading laws. Journal of Business Ethics, 45, 309–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bell, B.S., Kanar, A.M., & Kozlowski, S.W.J. (2008). Current issues and future directions in simulation-based training in North America. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19(8), 1416–1434.Google Scholar
  14. Berkowitz, L. (1984). Some effects of thoughts on anti- and prosocial influences of media events: A cognitive-neoassociation analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 410–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bird, F. (1996). The muted conscience: Moral silence and the practice of ethics in business. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.Google Scholar
  16. Blau, P. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  17. Bock, J. K. (1986). Syntactic persistence in language production. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 355–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bock, J. K. (1989). Closed-class immanence in sentence production. Cognition, 31, 163–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Brief, A. P., Buttram, R. T., & Dukerich, J. M. (2001). Collective corruption in the corporate world: Toward a process model. In M. E. Turner (Ed.), Groups at work: Theory and research (pp. 471–499). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  20. Brown, M., Trevino, L. K., & Harrison, D. (2005). Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97, 117–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Carver, C. S., Ganellen, R. J., Froming, W. J., & Chambers, W. (1983). Modeling: An analysis in terms of category accessibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 403–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1981). Attention and self-regulation: A control-theory approach to human behavior. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Church, B., Gaa, J. C., Nainar, S. M. K., & Shehata, M. M. (2005). Experimental evidence relating to the person-situation interactionist model of ethical decision making. Business Ethics Quarterly, 15, 363–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Cragg, W. (2002). Business ethics and stakeholder theory. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12, 113–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreading activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93, 283–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dijksterhuis, A., & Van Knippenberg, A. V. (1998). The relation between perception and behavior, or how to win a game of trivial pursuit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 865–877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Doh, J. P., & Stumpf, S. A. (Eds.). (2005). Handbook on responsible leadership and governance in global business. Cheltenham/Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  28. Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20, 65–91.Google Scholar
  29. Dukerich, J. M., Nichols, M. L., Elm, D. R., & Vollrath, D. A. (1990). Moral reasoning in groups: Leaders make a difference. Human Relations, 43, 473–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Dutton, J. E., & Dukerich, J. M. (1991). Keeping an eye on the mirror: Image and identity in organizational adaptation. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 517–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Dutton, J. E., & Jackson, S. E. (1987). Categorizing strategic issues: Links to organizational action. Academy of Management Review, 12, 76–90.Google Scholar
  32. Fairhurst, G.T., & Sarr, R.A. (1996). The art of framing: Managing the language of leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  33. Frank, R. H., Gilovic, T., & Regan, D. T. (1993). Does studying economics inhibit cooperation? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 7(2), 159–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Frank, R. H., Gilovic, T., & Regan, D. T. (1996). Do economists make bad citizens? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10(1), 187–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.Google Scholar
  36. Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business to increase its profits. New York Times, 13, 122–126.Google Scholar
  37. Friedman, M. (2002). Capitalism and freedom (40th anniversary ed.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Keys J. B., Fulmer, R. M., & Stumpf, S. A. (1996). Microworlds and simuworlds: Practice fields for the learning organization. Organizational Dynamics, 24(4), 36–49.Google Scholar
  39. Greenberg, J. (2002). Who stole the money, and when? Individual and situational determinants of employee theft. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 89, 985–1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Harting, T. R., Harmeling, S. S., & Venkataraman, S. (2006). Innovative stakeholder relations: When “ethics pays” (and when it doesn’t). Business Ethics Quarterly, 16, 43–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hillman, A. J., & Klein, G. D. (2001). Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: What’s the bottom line? Strategic Management Journal, 22, 125–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Izraeli, D. (1988). Ethical beliefs and behaviors among managers: A cross-cultural perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 7, 263–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Jennings, D. F., Hunt, T. G., & Munn, J. R. (1996). Ethical decision making: An extension to the group level. Journal of Managerial Issues, 8, 425–439.Google Scholar
  44. Jones, G. E., & Kavanaugh, M. J. (1996). An experimental examination of the effects of individual and situational factors on unethical behavioral intentions in the workplace. Journal of Business Ethics, 15, 511–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Jones, T. M., & Ryan, L. V. (1997). The link between ethical judgment and action in organizations: A moral approbation approach. Organization Science, 8, 663–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1982). Psychology of preferences. Scientific American, 246, 161–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization. In D. A. Goslin (Ed.), The handbook of socialization theory and research (pp. 347–480). Chicago: Rand-McNally.Google Scholar
  48. Kohlberg, L. (1976). Moral stages and moralization: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization. In T. Lickona (Ed.), Moral development and behavior: Theory, research, and social issues (pp. 31–53). New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
  49. Kohlberg, L. (1981). Essays on moral development (vol. I): The philosophy of moral development. San Francisco, CA: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  50. Kozlowski, S.W.J., & Klein, K.J. (Eds.). (2000). A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 3–90). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  51. Levelt, W. J. M., & Kelter, S. (1982). Surface form and memory in question answering. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 78–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Loe, T. W., Ferrell, L., & Mansfield, P. (2000). A review of empirical studies assessing ethical decision making in business. Journal of Business Ethics, 25, 185–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Lopez, Y., Rechner, P. L., & Olson-Buchanan, J. B. (2005). Shaping ethical perceptions: An empirical assessment of the influence of business education, climate, and demographic factors. Journal of Business Ethics, 60, 341–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Luthar, H., & Karri, R. (2005). Exposure to ethics education and the perception of the linkage between organizational ethical behavior and business outcomes. Journal of Business Ethics, 61, 353–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Maak, T. (2007). Responsible leadership, stakeholder engagement, and the emergence of social capital. Journal of Business Ethics, 74, 329–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Maak, T., & Pless, N. M. (2006). Responsible leadership in a stakeholder society—a relational perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 66, 99–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Maak, T., & Pless, N. M. (2009). Business leaders as citizens of the world: Advancing humanism on a global scale. Journal of Business Ethics, 88, 537–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  59. Milgram, S. A. (1974). Obedience to authority: An experimental view. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  60. Mischel, W. (1973). Toward a cognitive social learning reconceptualization of personality. Psychological Review, 80, 252–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Neuberg, S. L. (1988). Behavioral implications of information presented outside conscious awareness: The effect of subliminal presentation of trait information on behavior in the prisoner’s dilemma game. Social Cognition, 6, 207–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Nichols, M. L., & Day, V. E. (1982). A comparison of moral reasoning of groups and individuals on the defining issues test. Academy of Management Journal, 25, 201–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Pless, N. M., & Maak, T. (2004). Building an inclusive diversity climate: Principles, processes and practice. Journal of Business Ethics, 54, 129–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Rest, J. R. (1986). Moral development: Advances in research and theory. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  65. Ritter, B. (2006). Can business ethics be trained? A study of the ethical decision making process in business students. Journal of Business Ethics, 68, 153–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Rowley, T., & Berman, S. (2000). A brand new brand of corporate social performance. Business and Society, 39, 397–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Salas, E., Wildman, J. L., & Piccolo, R. F. (2009). Using simulation-based training to enhance management education. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 8, 559–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Saville, D.J. (1990). Multiple comparison procedures: The practical solution. American Statistician, 44, 174–180.Google Scholar
  69. Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. P. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  70. Schminke, M., Wells, D., Peyrefitte, J., & Sebora, T. C. (2002). Leadership and ethics in work groups: A longitudinal investigation. Group and Organization Management, 27, 272–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Simon, H. A. (1957). Models of man. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  72. Steiner, I. D. (1972). Group processes and productivity. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  73. Tenbrunsel, A. E. (1998). Misrepresentation and expectations of misrepresentation in an ethical dilemma: The role of incentives and temptation. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 330–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Tenbrusel, A. E., Smith-Crowe, K., & Umphress, E. (2003). Building houses on rocks: The role of the ethical infrastructure in organizations. Social Justice Research, 16, 285–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Teo, H., & Caspersz, D. (2011). Dissenting discourses: Exploring alternatives to the whistleblowing/silence dichotomy. Journal of Business Ethics, 104, 237–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Thomas, K. R., Hochwater, W. A., & Mathys, N. J. (1997). Stretch targets: What makes them effective? Academy of Management Executive, 11, 48–60.Google Scholar
  77. Trapp, L. (2011). Staff attitudes to talking openly about ethical dilemmas: The role of business ethics conceptions and trust. Journal of Business Ethics, 103, 543–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Trevino, L. K., & Brown, M. E. (2004). Managing to be ethical: Debunking five business ethics myths. Academy of Management Executive, 18, 69–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Trevino, L. K., Brown, M. E., & Hartman, L. P. (2003). A qualitative investigation of perceived executive ethical leadership: Perceptions from inside and outside the executive suite. Human Relations, 56, 5–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Trevino, L. K., Butterfield, K. D., & McCabe, D. L. (1998). The ethical context in organizations: Influence on employee attitudes and behaviors. Business Ethics Quarterly, 8, 447–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Trevino, L. K., Hartman, L. P., & Brown, M. (2000). Moral person and moral manager: How executives develop a reputation for ethical leadership. California Management Review, 42, 128–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Trevino, L. K., Weaver, G. R., Gibson, D. G., & Toffler, B. L. (1999). Managing ethics and legal compliance: What hurts and what works. California Management Review, 41(2), 131–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Trevino, L. K., Weaver, G. R., & Reynolds, S. J. (2006). Behavioral ethics in organizations: A review. Journal of Management, 32, 951–990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Trevino, L. K., & Youngblood, S. A. (1990). Bad apples in bad barrels: A causal analysis of ethical decision making behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 378–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Vallacher, R. R. (1993). Mental calibration: Forging a working relationship between mind and action. In D. M. Wegner & J. W. Pennebaker (Eds.), Handbook of mental control (pp. 443–472). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  86. Victor, B., & Cullen, J. B. (1988). The organizational bases of ethical work cultures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33, 101–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Weber, J. (1990). Managers’ moral reasoning: Assessing their responses to three moral dilemmas. Human Relations, 43, 687–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Wood, R. E., Beckmann, J. F., & Birney, D. P. (2009). Simulations, learning, and real world capabilities. Education and Training, 41, 491–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Zey-Ferrell, M. K., Weaver, M., & Ferrell, O. C. (1979). Predicting unethical behavior among marketing practitioners. Human Relations, 32, 557–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kevin D. Clark
    • 1
  • Narda R. Quigley
    • 1
  • Stephen A. Stumpf
    • 1
  1. 1.Villanova School of BusinessVillanovaUSA

Personalised recommendations