Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 116, Issue 1, pp 21–48 | Cite as

Think Global, Invest Responsible: Why the Private Equity Industry Goes Green

  • Patricia Crifo
  • Vanina D. Forget
Article

Abstract

The growth of socially responsible investment (SRI) on public financial markets has drawn considerable academic attention over the last decade. Discarding from the previous literature, this article sets up to analyze the Private Equity channel, which is shown to have the potentiality to foster sustainable practices in unlisted companies. The fast integration of the environmental, social and governance issues by mainstream Private Equity investors is unveiled and appears to have benefited from the maturation of SRI on public financial markets and the impetus of large conventional actors. Hypotheses on the characteristics and drivers of this movement are proposed and tested on a unique database covering the French Private Equity industry in 2011. Empirical findings support that Private Equity socially responsible investing is characterized by investor engagement and strategically driven by a need for new value creation sources, increased risk management and differentiation. In particular, results show that independent funds, which need to attract investors, are more likely than captive funds to develop socially responsible practices. Evolution of the movement and future research paths are proposed.

Keywords

Corporate finance Corporate Social Responsibility France Multi-factorial analysis Private Equity Engagement Socially responsible investment Strategy 

Abbreviations

CSR

Corporate Social Responsibility

ESG

Environmental, social, and governance

LBO

Leveraged buyouts

SRI

Socially responsible investment

UNPRI

United Nations Principles for Responsible Investing

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Novethic (Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations, France) for granting us access to survey data. Support of the Chair for Sustainable Finance and Responsible Investment (Chair FDIR, Toulouse-IDEI and Ecole Polytechnique) is gratefully acknowledged. We are grateful to two anonymous referees as well as participants at the CSR seminar of the Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School for their insightful suggestions and very useful comments. All errors remain our own.

References

  1. Amess, K., & Wright, M. (2007). The wage and employment effects of leveraged buyouts in the UK. International Journal of the Economics of Business, Special Issue on Control Transactions: Productivity, Wage and Employment Implications, 14(2), 179–195.Google Scholar
  2. Arjaliès, D. A. (2010). A social movement perspective on finance: How socially responsible investment mattered. Journal of Business Ethics, 92(1), 57–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arora, S., & Gangopadhyay, S. (1995). Toward a theoretical model of voluntary overcompliance. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 28(3), 289–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Association Française des Investisseurs en Capital (AFIC), & Thornton, Grant. (2010). L’Activité du capital investissement Français. Paris: AFIC.Google Scholar
  5. Association Française des Investisseurs en Capital (AFIC), & Thornton, Grant. (2011). Etude premier semestre 2011. L’Activité du capital investissement Français. Paris: AFIC.Google Scholar
  6. Association for Sustainable and Responsible Investment in Asia (ASRIA). (2011). Sustainable Investment in Asian emerging markets. Washington, DC: International Finance Corporation.Google Scholar
  7. Baron, D. P., Harjoto, M. A., & Jo, H. (2011). The economics and politics of corporate social performance. Business and Politics, 13(2), 1–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bauer, R., Koedijk, K., & Otten, R. (2005). International evidence on ethical mutual fund performance and investment style. Journal of Banking & Finance, 29(7), 1751–1767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Berrone, P., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (2009). The pros and cons of rewarding social responsibility at the top. Human Resources Management, 48(6), 959–971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bocquet, A. (2007). Rapport sur la proposition de résolution (no 3491) de M. Alain Bocquet, Tendant à la Création d’une Commission d’Enquête sur la Place et le Rôle des Fonds d’Investissement dans l’Economie, sur leurs Méthodes d’Acquisition d’Entreprises par Effet de Levier appelées LBO, sur les Conséquences de Telles Pratiques pour l’Emploi, les Salaires et les Conditions de Travail ainsi que sur les Solutions Alternatives qui Pourraient Etre Mises en Œuvre à Partir de la Constitution d’un Pôle Financier Public. Paris: Assemblée Nationale.Google Scholar
  11. Bollen, N. P. B. (2007). Mutual fund attributes and investor behaviour. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 42, 689–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Boucly, Q., Sraer, D., & Thesmar, D. (2009). Job Creating LBOs’. Working Paper, Berkeley University and HEC Paris. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1354087.
  13. Bourghelle, D., Hager, J., & Louche, C. (2009). The integration of ESG information into investment processes: Toward an emerging collective belief? Working Paper, Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School. http://ideas.repec.org/p/vlg/vlgwps/2009-26.html.
  14. Brammer, S., Brooks, S., & Pavelin, S. (2006). Corporate social performance and stock returns: UK evidence from disaggregate measures. Financial Management, 35(3), 97–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Brau, J. C., & Fawcett, S. E. (2006). Initial public offerings: An analysis of theory and practice. Journal of Finance, 61(1), 399–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Brekke, K. A., & Nyborg, K. (2008). Attracting responsible employees: Green production as labor market screening. Resource and Energy Economics, 30(4), 509–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. British Venture Capital Association (BVCA), & Ipsos MORI. (2009). BVCA: Members views of sustainability issues. London: BVCA. http://admin.bvca.co.uk/library/documents/Respondent_report.pdf.
  18. British Venture Capital Association (BVCA), PriceWaterhouse Coopers, & Waterman. (2010). Responsible investment. A guide for private equity and venture capital firms. London: BVCA.Google Scholar
  19. Cespa, G., & Cestone, G. (2007). Corporate social responsibility and managerial entrenchment. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Volume Corporate Social Responsibility and Managerial Entrenchment, 16(3), 741–771.Google Scholar
  20. Climent, F., & Soriano, P. (2011). Green and good? The investment performance of US environmental mutual funds. Journal of Business Ethics, 103(2), 275–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cox, P., Brammer, S., & Millington, A. (2004). An empirical examination of institutional investor preferences for corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 52(1), 27–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cumming, D. J., Fleming, G., & Schwienbacher, A. (2008). Financial intermediaries, ownership structure and the provision of venture capital to SMEs: Evidence from Japan. Small Business Economics, 31(1), 59–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Cumming, D. J., Fleming, G., & Schwienbacher, A. (2009). Style drift in private equity. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 36(5–6), 645–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Cumming, D. J., & Johan, S. (2007). Socially responsible institutional investment in Private Equity. Journal of Business Ethics, 75(4), 395–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Cumming, D. J., Johan, S. A., Fleming, G., & Takeuchi, M. (2010). Legal protection, corruption, and Private Equity returns in Asia. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(2), 173–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Cumming, D. J., & Walz, U. (2010). Private equity returns and disclosure around the world. Journal of International Business Studies, 41, 727–754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Cumming, D. J., & Zambelli, S. (2010). Illegal buyouts. Journal of Banking & Finance, 34(2010), 441–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Cumming, D. J., & Zambelli, S. (2012). Private equity performance under extreme regulation. Journal of Banking and Finance. doi: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2012.04.002.
  29. Davis, S., Haltiwanger, J., Jarmin, R. S., Lerner, J., & Miranda, J. (2011). Private Equity and employment. NBER Working Papers No 17399, National Bureau of Economic Research. http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nbr:nberwo:17399.
  30. Derwall, J., Gunster, N., Bauer, R., & Koedijk, K. (2005). The eco-efficiency premium puzzle. Financial Analysts Journal, 61(2), 51–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Desbrières, P., & Schatt, A. (2002). The impacts of LBOs on the performance of acquired firms: The French Casc. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 29(5–6), 695–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Dunfee, T. W. (2003). A critical perspective of integrative social contracts theory: Recurring Criticisms and next generation research topics. Journal of Business Ethics, 68(3), 303–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Eccles, N. S., & Viviers, S. (2011). The origins and meanings of names describing investment practices that integrate a consideration of ESG issues in the academic literature. Journal of Business Ethics, 104(3), 389–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ethical Investment Association (EIA). (2005). Sustainable responsible investment in Australia. Sydney: EIA.Google Scholar
  35. Eurosif. (2010). European SRI Study, Revised Edition. Paris: Eurosif Studies.Google Scholar
  36. Financial Services Authority. (2006). Private Equity: A discussion of risk and regulatory engagement. http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/discussion/dp06_06.pdf.
  37. Fisman, R., Heal, G., & Nair, V. B. (2007). Corporate Social Responsibility: Doing well by doing good? Working paper, Columbia University.Google Scholar
  38. Gaspar, J. M. (2009). The performance of French LBO firms: New data and new results. Working Paper, ESSEC, France. http://www.essec-private-equity.com/us/research/pdf/LBOperformance_abstract.pdf.
  39. Gompers, P., & Lerner, J. (2000). Money chasing deals? The impact of fund inflows on Private Equity valuation. Journal of Financial Economics, 55(2), 281–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Grubbs, F. E. (1969). Procedures for detecting outlying observations in samples. Technometrics, 11(1969), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hellmann, T. (2002). A theory of strategic venture investing. Journal of Financial Economics, 64(2), 285–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hellmann, T., Lindsey, L., & Puri, M. (2008). Building relationship early: Banks in venture capital. Review of Financial Studies, 21(2), 513–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Holmstrom, B., & Tirole, J. (1997). Financial intermediation, loanable funds, and the real sector. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(3), 663–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hull, C. E., & Rothenberg, S. (2008). Firm performance: The interactions of corporate social performance with innovation and industry differentiation. Strategic Management Journal, 29(7), 781–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Jensen, M. C. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. The American Economic Review, 76(2), 323–329.Google Scholar
  46. Jensen, M. C. (1989). Eclipse of the public corporation. Harvard Business Review, 67, 60–70.Google Scholar
  47. Jensen, M. C. (1993). The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems. Journal of Finance, 48(3), 830–879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Jin, L., & Wang, F. (2002). Leveraged buyouts: Inception, evolution, and future trends. Perspectives, 3(6), 3–22.Google Scholar
  49. Johan, S., & Najar, D. (2010). The role of law, corruption and culture in investment fund manager fees. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(2), 147–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Johnson, R. A., & Greening, D. W. (1999). The effects of corporate governance and institutional ownership types on corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 564–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kanter, R. M. (1999). From spare change to real change: The social sector as beta site for business innovation. Harvard Business Review, 77(3), 122–132.Google Scholar
  52. Kaplan, S., & Schoar, A. (2005). Private equity performance: Returns, persistence and capital flows. Journal of Finance, 60(4), 1791–1823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Kaplan, S. N., & Strömberg, P. (2009). Leveraged buyouts and Private Equity. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 23(1), 121–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Kotler, P., & Lee, N. (2005). Corporate Social Responsibility: Doing the most good for your company and your cause. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  55. Kreander, N., Gray, R. H., Power, D. M., & Sinclair, C. D. (2005). Evaluating the performance of ethical and non-ethical funds: A matched pair analysis. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 32(7–8), 1465–1493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Kuckertz, A., & Wagner, M. (2009). The influence of sustainability orientation on entrepreneurial intentions—investigating the role of business experience. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(5), 524–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Le Nadant, A. L., & Perdreau, F. (2006). Financial profile of leveraged buy-out targets: Some French evidence. Review of Accounting and Finance, 5(4), 370–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Lerner, J., & Schoar, A. (2005). Does legal enforcement affect financial transactions? The contractual channel in Private Equity. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(1), 223–246.Google Scholar
  59. Lewis, A., & Mackenzie, C. (2000). Support for investor activism among U.K. ethical investors. Journal of Business Ethics, 24(3), 215–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Louche, C., & Lydenberg, S. (2006). Socially responsible investment: Differences between Europe and United States Working Paper, Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School.Google Scholar
  61. Lutz, S., Lyon, T. P., & Maxwell, J. W. (2000). Quality leadership when regulatory standards are forthcoming. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 48(3), 331–348.Google Scholar
  62. Lydenberg, S. D. (2002). Envisioning socially responsible investment: A model for 2006. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 7, 57–77.Google Scholar
  63. Mahoney, L. S., & Thorne, L. (2006). An examination of the structure of executive compensation and Corporate Social Responsibility: A Canadian investigation. Journal of Business Ethics, 69(2), 149–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Margolis, J. D., Elfenbein, H., & Walsh, A. (2009). Does it pay to be good… and does it matter? A meta-analysis and redirection of research on corporate social and financial performance. Working paper, Harvard University. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1866371.
  65. McWilliams, A., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, P. M. (2006). Corporate Social Responsibility: Strategic implications. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Moore, J. S., & Reichert, A. K. (1983). An analysis of the financial management techniques currently employed by large US corporations. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 10(4), 623–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Morrell, K., & Clark, I. (2010). Private Equity and the public good. Journal of Business Ethics, 96(2), 249–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Myers, S. C., & Majluf, N. S. (1984). Corporate financing and investment decisions: When firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics, 13(2), 187–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Neumann, W. L. (2003). Social research methods. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  70. Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 403–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2002). The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy. Harvard Business Review, 80(12), 56–68.Google Scholar
  72. Porter, M. E., & Van der Linde, C. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment–competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 97–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Portney, P. R. (2008). The (not so) new Corporate Social Responsibility: An empirical perspective. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 2(2), 261–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Post, J. E., Preston, L. E., & Sachs, S. (2002). Redefining the corporation: Stakeholder management and organizational wealth. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  75. Reinhardt, F. L., Stavins, R. N., & Vietor, R. H. K. (2008). Corporate Social Responsibility through an economic lens. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 2(2), 219–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Renneboog, L., Horst, J. T., & Zhang, C. (2008). Socially responsible investments: Institutional aspects, performance, and investor behavior. Journal of Banking & Finance, 32(9), 1723–1742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Scholtens, B. (2006). Finance as a driver of Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 68(1), 19–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Smith, M. (1996). Shareholder activism by institutional investors: Evidence from CalPERS. Journal of Finance, 51(1), 227–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Social Investment Forum (SIF). (2003). 2003 report on socially responsible investing trends in the United States. Washington, DC: Social Investment Forum.Google Scholar
  80. Social Investment Forum (SIF). (2010). US SIF 2010 Annual Report. Washington, DC: Social Investment Forum.Google Scholar
  81. Social Investment Organisation (SIO). (2005). Canadian social investment review 2004. Toronto: Social Investment Organisation.Google Scholar
  82. Sparkes, R. (1998, July). Through a glass darkly: Some thoughts on the ethics of investment. Epworth Review, 13–27.Google Scholar
  83. Sparkes, R. (2008). Socially responsible investment. In F. J. Fabozzi (Ed.), The handbook of finance. Investment management and financial management (Vol. 2). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  84. Sparkes, R., & Cowton, C. J. (2004). The maturing of socially responsible investment: A review of the developing link with corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 52(1), 45–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Turban, D. B., & Greening, D. W. (1997). Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 658–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Ueda, M. (2004). Banks versus venture capital: Project evaluation, screening, and expropriation. Journal of Finance, 59(2), 601–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. United Nations Principles for Responsible Investing (UNPRI). (2011). Five years of PRI. Report on progress 2011. UNEP-Finance Initiatives Publications.Google Scholar
  88. Vogel, D. (2005). The market for virtue: The potential and limits of Corporate Social Responsibility. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  89. Vyvyan, V., Ng, C., & Brimble, M. (2012). The influence of gender on the SRI decision making process: A study of attitudes and preferences using conjoint analysis. Journal of Accounting and Finance, 4, 17–34.Google Scholar
  90. Waddock, S. A., & Graves, S. B. (1994). Institutional owners and corporate social performance. The Academy of Management Journal, 37(4), 1034–1046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Williams, G. (2007). Some determinants of the socially responsible investment decision: A cross-country study. Journal of Behavioral Finance, 8(1), 43–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Wright, M., & Robbie, K. (1996). Venture capitalists, unquoted equity investment appraisal and the role of accounting information. Accounting and Business Research, 26(2), 153–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsEcole Polytechnique ParisTechPalaiseauFrance
  2. 2.University Paris West Nanterre La Défense, EconomixNanterreFrance
  3. 3.CIRANOMontrealCanada
  4. 4.AgroParisTech, ENGREFParisFrance

Personalised recommendations