Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 111, Issue 1, pp 13–24 | Cite as

The Employee as ‘Dish of the Day’: The Ethics of the Consuming/Consumed Self in Human Resource Management



This article examines the ethical implications of the growing integration of consumption into the heart of the employment relationship. Human resource management (HRM) practices increasingly draw upon the values and practices of consumption, constructing employees as the ‘consumers’ of ‘cafeteria-style’ benefits and development opportunities. However, at the same time employees are expected to market themselves as items to be consumed on a corporate menu. In relation to this simultaneous position of consumer/consumed, the employee is expected to actively engage in the commodification of themselves, performing an appropriate organizational identity as a necessary part of being a successful employee. This article argues that the relationship between HRM and the simultaneously consuming/consumed employee affects the conditions of possibility for ethical relations within organizational life. It is argued that the underlying ‘ethos’ for the integration of consumption values into HRM practices encourages a self-reflecting, self-absorbed subject, drawing upon a narrow view of individualised autonomy and choice. Referring to Levinas’ perspective that the primary ethical relation is that of responsibility and openness to the Other, it is concluded that these HRM practices affect the possibility for ethical being.


Autonomy Choice Consumption Ethics Human resource management (HRM) Identity Performance Levinas 



I would like to thank those who have commented on this article: the participants at the Workshop on ‘Ethics and HRM: Theoretical and Conceptual Analyses’ sponsored by EABIS and Monash University in April 2011, especially Carl Rhodes; the organisers of the workshop, Gavin Jack, Jan Schapper and Michelle Greenwood for their encouragement; the three anonymous reviewers for their perceptive suggestions; and Martin Brigham and Nestor Delgado for help with the Aviva case. The responsibility for the article is of course entirely my own.


  1. Baudrillard, J. (1998). The consumer society. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Bauman, Z. (1995). Life in fragments. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  3. Bauman, Z. (1998). Work, consumerism and the new poor. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bauman, Z. (2000a). Liquid modernity. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  5. Bauman, Z. (2000b). Tourists and vagabonds. In J. Davis (Ed.), Identity and social change. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  6. Bevir, M. (1999). Foucault and critique: Deploying agency against autonomy. Political Theory, 27(1), 65–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brueggemann, W. (1999). The covenanted self. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.Google Scholar
  8. Burawoy, M. (1979). Manufacturing consent. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  9. Byers, D., & Rhodes, C. (2007). Ethics, alterity and organisational justice. Business Ethics: A European Review, 16(3), 239–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Campbell, C. (1987). The Romantic ethic and the spirit of consumption. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  11. Clegg, S., Kornberger, M., & Rhodes, C. (2007). Business ethics as practice. British Journal of Management, 18(2), 107–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Coates, G. (1994). Performance appraisal as icon: Oscar-winning performance or dressing to impress? International Journal of Human Resource Management, 5(1), 167–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Collinson, D. (1991). “Poachers turned gamekeepers”: Are personnel managers one of the barriers to equal opportunities. Human Resource Management Journal, 1(3), 58–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Costea, B., Crump, N., & Amiridis, K. (2008). Managerialism, the therapeutic habitus and the self in contemporary organizing. Human Relations, 61(5), 661–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Costea, B., & Introna, L. (2004). Self and other in everyday existence. Lancaster University Management School Working Paper 2004/020,
  16. Critchley, S. (2007). Infinitely demanding: Ethics of commitment, politics of resistance. London: VersoGoogle Scholar
  17. Dale, K. (2005). Building a social materiality: Spatial and embodied politics in organizational control. Organization, 12(5), 649–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dale, K., & Burrell, G. (2008). The spaces of organization and the organization of space. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  19. Diprose, R. (1993). The bodies of women. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. du Gay, P. (1996). Consumption and identity at work. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  21. Falk, P., & Campbell, C. (1997). Introduction. In P. Falk & C. Campbell (Eds.), The shopping experience (pp. 1–14). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fleetwood, S. (2008). Workers and their alter-egos as consumers. Capital and Class, 32, 31–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fleming, P., & Sturdy, A. (2009). “Just be yourself!”: Towards neo-normative control in organisations? Employee Relations, 31(6), 569–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fombrun, C., Tichy, N., & Devanna, M. (Eds.). (1984). Strategic human resource management. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  25. Foucault, M. (1992). History of sexuality, Vol. 2: The uses of pleasure. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  26. Foucault, M. (1984). On the genealogy of ethics: An overview of work in progress. In R. Rabinow (Ed.), The foucault reader 340–372. London: Penguin. Google Scholar
  27. Fox, A. (1985). Man mismanagement (2nd ed.). London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
  28. From the screenplay for The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy, episode 5. Accessed December 3, 2010, from, from the books by Douglas Adams.
  29. Gabriel, Y., & Lang, T. (1995). The unmanageable consumer. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  30. Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  31. Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  32. Gorz, A. (1967). Strategy for labour. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  33. Greenwood, M. (2002). Ethics and HRM: A review and conceptual analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 36(3), 261–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Grey, C. (1994). Career as a project of self. Sociology, 28(2), 479–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Guest, D. (1990). HRM and the American dream. Journal of Management Studies, 27(4), 377–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hancock, P., & Tyler, M. (2000). The look of love. In J. Hassard, R. Holliday, & H. Willmott (Eds.), Body and organization (pp. 108–129). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  37. Heelas, P. (2002). Work ethics, soft capitalism and the “turn to life”. In P. du Gay & M. Pryke (Eds.), Cultural economy: Cultural analysis and commercial life (pp. 78–96). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hochschild, A. (1983). The managed heart. London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  39. Korczynski, M. (2007). HRM and the menu society. In S. Bolton & M. Houlihan (Eds.), Searching for the human in human resource management (pp. 103–114). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  40. Lasch, C. (1980). The culture of narcissism. London: Abacus.Google Scholar
  41. Legge, K. (2005). HRM: Rhetorics and realities (2nd ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  42. Lehtonen, T.-K., & Mäenpää, P. (1997). Shopping in east centre mall. In P. Falk & C. Campbell (Eds.), The shopping experience (pp. 136–165). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Levinas, E. (1998). Otherwise than being, or beyond essence. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Levinas, E. (1999). Alterity and transcendence (M. Smith, Trans.). London: Athalone Press.Google Scholar
  45. Lodziak, C. (2002). The myth of consumerism. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  46. McMurray, R., Pullen, A., & Rhodes, C. (2011). Ethical subjectivity and politics in organizations. Organization, 18(4), 541–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Myerson, J. (2004). The contemporary office. In S. McKellar & P. Sparke (Eds.), Interior design and identity (pp. 191–209). Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Pinnington, A., Macklin, R., & Campbell, T. (2007). Human resource management: Ethics and employment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Rhodes, C., Pullen, A., & Clegg, S. (2010). ‘“If I should fall from grace…”: Stories of change and organizational ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 91, 535–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Roberts, J. (2001). Corporate governance and the ethics of narcissus. Business Ethics Quarterly, 11(1), 109–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rose, N. (1996). Inventing ourselves. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tagg, J. (1993). The burden of representation. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  53. Townley, B. (1994). Reframing HRM. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  54. Ulrich, D., & Brockbank, W. (2005). The HR value proposition. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  55. Van Buren, I. I. I. H., Greenwood, M., & Sheehan, C. (2011). Strategic HRM and the decline of employee focus. Human Resource Management Review, 21(3), 209–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Walton, R. (1985). Towards a strategy of eliciting employee commitment based upon policies of mutuality. In R. Walton & P. Lawrence (Eds.), HRM: Trends & challenges (pp. 35–65). Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  57. Watson, T. (2007). HRM, ethical irrationality and the limits of ethical action. In A. Pinnington, R. Macklin, & T. Campbell (Eds.), Human resource management: Ethics and employment (pp. 223–236). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Williams, R. (1976). Keywords. London: Fontana.Google Scholar
  59. Willmott, H. (1993). “Strength is ignorance, freedom is slavery”: Managing culture in modern organization. Journal of Management Studies, 30, 515–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Winstanley, D., & Woodall, J. (2000). The ethical dimension of human resource management. Human Resource Management Journal, 10(2), 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wright, C. (2005). Reinventing HRM: Business partners, internal consultants and the limits to professionalization. Human Relations, 61(8), 1063–1086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Organisation, Work and TechnologyLancaster University Management School, Lancaster UniversityLancasterUK

Personalised recommendations