Ethical Decision Making in a Peer-to-Peer File Sharing Situation: The Role of Moral Absolutes and Social Consensus
- 2k Downloads
Individuals are downloading copyrighted materials at escalating rates (Hill 2007; Siwek 2007). Since most materials shared within these networks are copyrighted works, providing, exchanging, or downloading files is considered to be piracy and a violation of intellectual property rights (Shang et al. 2008). Previous research indicates that personal moral philosophies rooted in moral absolutism together with social context may impact decision making in ethical dilemmas; however, it is yet unclear which motivations and norms contextually impact moral awareness in a peer-to-peer (P2P) file sharing context (Shang et al. 2008). In sum, factors affecting the decision to share copyrighted material require further clarification and investigation (Shang et al. 2008). The purpose of this study was to use a consumer-based scenario and multiple ethics measures to explore how idealism, formalism, and perceived social consensus impact users’ propensity to recognize that the sharing of copyrighted media through P2P networks was an ethical issue and their subsequent ethical intentions. Results showed that high levels of idealism and formalism were associated with an increased recognition that file sharing was an ethical issue, but neither construct had a direct effect on ethical intention. Strong social consensus among respondents that other people consider file sharing to be unethical was also positively related to the recognition that file sharing was an ethical issue, and ethical recognition was a moderate predictor of intention not to engage in file sharing. Finally, a post hoc mediation analysis indicated that idealism, formalism, and social consensus operated through recognition of an ethical issue to impact ethical intention (indirect-only mediation).
KeywordsEthical issue recognition Ethical intention Moral absolutes Social consensus P2P
- Anonymous. (2003, August 30). Tipping Hollywood the black spot. The Economist 368(8339), 43–44.Google Scholar
- Anonymous. (2009, May 30). What’s mine is yours. The Economist, 80.Google Scholar
- Brady, F. N. (1985). A Janus-headed model of ethical theory: Looking two ways at business/society issues. Academy of Management Review, 10(3), 568–576.Google Scholar
- Cateora, P. R., Gilly, M. C., & Graham, J. L. (2011). International marketing (15th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Irwin.Google Scholar
- Cavanagh, G. F., Fritzsche, S. J., & Fritzsche, D. J. (1985). Using vignettes in business ethics research. Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, 7, 279–293.Google Scholar
- Chmielewski, D. C. (2008, November 4). Warner takes new tack against piracy. Los Angeles Times, C1, C6.Google Scholar
- Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2011). Intellectual property theft. http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/investigate/cyber/ipr/anti-piracy.
- Jones, T. M. (1991). Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue-contingent model. Academy of Management Review, 16(2), 366–395.Google Scholar
- Jones, W. K. (1994). A theory of social norms. University of Illinois Law Review, 1994(3), 545–596.Google Scholar
- Lam, N. M., & Graham, J. L. (2007). China now, doing business in the world’s most dynamic market. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Lewis, R. (2011, June 9). Piracy watchdog’s mild bite. Los Angeles Times.Google Scholar
- Meteus, A. M., & Peha, J. M. (2008) Dimensions of P2P and digital piracy in a university campus. In Proceedings of 2008 Telecommunications Policy Research Conference (TPRC), pp. 1–35.Google Scholar
- Moores, T. T., & Esichaikul, V. (2011). Socialization and software piracy: A study. Journal of Computer Information Systems, Spring, 1–9.Google Scholar
- Pfanner, E. (2010, January 22). Music industry counts cost of piracy. The New York Times.Google Scholar
- Rest, J. R. (1986). Moral development: Advances in research and theory. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
- Roberts, J. L. (2003, September 22). Out of tune. Newsweek, 42.Google Scholar
- Singhapakdi, A., Kraft, K. L., Vitell, S. J., & Rallapalli, K. C. (1996a). The perceived importance of ethics and social responsibility on organizational effectiveness: A Survey of marketers. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 23(1), 49–56.Google Scholar
- Siwek, S. E. (2007). The true cost of copyright industry piracy to the U.S. Economy. Institute for Policy Innovation (IPI), policy report #189, posted 10/03/2007 on http://bx.businessweek.com. Accessed 23 September, 2011, from EBSCO .
- Thong, J. Y., & Yap, C. (1998). Testing an ethical decision-making theory: The case of softlifting. Journal of Management Information Systems, 15(1), 215–237.Google Scholar
- Vitell, S. J., & Singhapakdi, A. (1993). Ethical ideology and its influence on the norms and judgments of marketing practitioners. Journal of Marketing Management, Spring/Summer, 1–11.Google Scholar