Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 115, Issue 2, pp 229–240 | Cite as

Ethical Decision Making in a Peer-to-Peer File Sharing Situation: The Role of Moral Absolutes and Social Consensus

  • Connie R. Bateman
  • Sean Valentine
  • Terri Rittenburg


Individuals are downloading copyrighted materials at escalating rates (Hill 2007; Siwek 2007). Since most materials shared within these networks are copyrighted works, providing, exchanging, or downloading files is considered to be piracy and a violation of intellectual property rights (Shang et al. 2008). Previous research indicates that personal moral philosophies rooted in moral absolutism together with social context may impact decision making in ethical dilemmas; however, it is yet unclear which motivations and norms contextually impact moral awareness in a peer-to-peer (P2P) file sharing context (Shang et al. 2008). In sum, factors affecting the decision to share copyrighted material require further clarification and investigation (Shang et al. 2008). The purpose of this study was to use a consumer-based scenario and multiple ethics measures to explore how idealism, formalism, and perceived social consensus impact users’ propensity to recognize that the sharing of copyrighted media through P2P networks was an ethical issue and their subsequent ethical intentions. Results showed that high levels of idealism and formalism were associated with an increased recognition that file sharing was an ethical issue, but neither construct had a direct effect on ethical intention. Strong social consensus among respondents that other people consider file sharing to be unethical was also positively related to the recognition that file sharing was an ethical issue, and ethical recognition was a moderate predictor of intention not to engage in file sharing. Finally, a post hoc mediation analysis indicated that idealism, formalism, and social consensus operated through recognition of an ethical issue to impact ethical intention (indirect-only mediation).


Ethical issue recognition Ethical intention Moral absolutes Social consensus P2P 


  1. Alexander, C. S., & Becker, H. J. (1978). The use of vignettes in survey research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 42(1), 93–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Al-Khatib, J. A., Vitell, S. J., & Rawwas, M. Y. A. (1997). Consumer ethics: A cross-cultural investigation. European Journal of Marketing, 31(11/12), 736–767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Al-Rafee, S., & Cronan, T. P. (2006). Digital piracy: Factors that influence attitude toward behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 63, 237–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Altschuller, S., & Benbunan-Fich, R. (2009). Is music downloading the new prohibition? What students reveal through an ethical dilemma. Ethics Information Technology, 11, 49–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anonymous. (2003, August 30). Tipping Hollywood the black spot. The Economist 368(8339), 43–44.Google Scholar
  6. Anonymous. (2009, May 30). What’s mine is yours. The Economist, 80.Google Scholar
  7. Barnett, T. (2001). Dimensions of moral intensity and ethical decision-making: An empirical study. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31(5), 1038–1057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barnett, T., Bass, K., Brown, G., & Hebert, F. J. (1998). Ethical ideology and the ethical judgments of marketing professionals. Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 715–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Barnett, T., & Valentine, S. (2004). Issue contingencies and marketers’ recognition of ethical issues, ethical judgments and behavioral intentions’. Journal of Business Research, 57(4), 338–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bateman, C. R., Fraedrich, J. P., & Iyer, R. (2003). The integration and testing of the Janus-headed model within marketing. Journal of Business Research, 56(8), 587–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bateman, C., & Valentine, S. (2010). Investigating the effects of gender on consumers’ moral philosophies and ethical intentions. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(3), 393–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bhattacharjee, S., Gopal, R. D., & Sanders, G. L. (2003). Digital music and online sharing: software piracy 2.0. Communications of the ACM, 46(7), 107–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brady, F. N. (1985). A Janus-headed model of ethical theory: Looking two ways at business/society issues. Academy of Management Review, 10(3), 568–576.Google Scholar
  14. Brady, F. N. (1988). Practical formalism: A new method proposed for business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 7(3), 163–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Brady, F. N., & Wheeler, G. E. (1996). An empirical study of ethical predispositions. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(9), 927–940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Butterfield, K. D., Trevino, L. K., & Weaver, G. R. (2000). Moral awareness in business organizations: influences of issue-related and social context factors. Human Relations, 53(7), 981–1018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cateora, P. R., Gilly, M. C., & Graham, J. L. (2011). International marketing (15th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Irwin.Google Scholar
  18. Cavanagh, G. F., Fritzsche, S. J., & Fritzsche, D. J. (1985). Using vignettes in business ethics research. Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, 7, 279–293.Google Scholar
  19. Chang, M. K. (1998). Predicting unethical behavior: A comparison of the theory of reasoned action and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(16), 1825–1834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Chiang, E. P., & Assane, D. (2009). Estimating the willingness to pay for digital music. Contemporary Economic Policy, 27(4), 512–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Chmielewski, D. C. (2008, November 4). Warner takes new tack against piracy. Los Angeles Times, C1, C6.Google Scholar
  22. Cronan, T. P., & Al-Rafee, S. (2008). Factors that influence the intention to pirate software and media. Journal of Business Ethics, 78, 525–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Davis, M. A., Andersen, M. G., & Curtis, M. B. (2001). Measuring ethical ideology in business ethics: A critical analysis of the ethics position questionnaire. Journal of Business Ethics, 32(1), 35–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Elango, B., Paul, K., Kundu, S. K., & Paudel, S. K. (2010). Organizational ethics, individual ethics, and ethical intentions in international decision-making. Journal of Business Ethics, 97, 543–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2011). Intellectual property theft.
  26. Ferrell, O. C., Gresham, L. G., & Fraedrich, J. (1989). A synthesis of ethical decision models for marketing. Journal of Macromarketing, 11(Fall), 55–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fleischman, G., & Valentine, S. (2003). Professionals’ tax liability assessments and ethical evaluations in an equitable relief innocent spouse case. Journal of Business Ethics, 42(1), 27–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Forsyth, D. R. (1980). A taxonomy of ethical ideologies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(1), 175–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Forsyth, D. R. (1992). Judging the morality of business practices: The influences of personal moral philosophies. Journal of Business Ethics, 11(5/6), 461–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Forsyth, D. R., & Berger, R. E. (1982). The effects of ethical ideology on moral behavior. The Journal of Social Psychology, 117, 53–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Fukukawa, K., & Ennew, C. (2010). What we believe is not always what we do: An empirical investigation into ethically questionable behavior in consumption. Journal of Business Ethics, 91, 49–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gopal, R. D., Sanders, G. L., Bhattacherjee, S., Agrawal, M., & Wagner, S. C. (2004). A behavior model of digital music piracy. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 14(2), 89–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Henle, C., Giacalone, R., & Jurkiewicz, C. (2005). The role of ethical ideology in workplace deviance. Journal of Business Ethics, 56(3), 219–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hill, C. W. L. (2007). Digital piracy: Causes, consequences, and strategic responses. Asian Pacific Journal of Management, 24, 9–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hunt, S. D., & Vitell, S. (1986). A general theory of marketing ethics. Journal of Macromarketing, 6(1), 5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Jones, T. M. (1991). Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue-contingent model. Academy of Management Review, 16(2), 366–395.Google Scholar
  37. Jones, W. K. (1994). A theory of social norms. University of Illinois Law Review, 1994(3), 545–596.Google Scholar
  38. La Rose, R., & Kim, J. (2007). Share, steal, or buy? A social cognitive perspective of music downloading. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 10(2), 267–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lam, N. M., & Graham, J. L. (2007). China now, doing business in the world’s most dynamic market. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  40. Lewis, R. (2011, June 9). Piracy watchdog’s mild bite. Los Angeles Times.Google Scholar
  41. Loo, R., & Loewen, P. (2004). Confirmatory factor analysis of scores from full and short versions of the Marlowe–Crowne social desirability scale. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(11), 2343–2352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lu, L., & Lu, C. (2010). Moral philosophy, materialism, and consumer ethics: An exploratory study in Indonesia. Journal of Business Ethics, 94, 193–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lysonski, S., & Durvasula, S. (2008). Digital piracy of MPs: Consumer and ethical predispositions. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 25(3), 167–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. May, D. R., & Pauli, K. P. (2002). The role of moral intensity in ethical decision making: A review and investigation of moral recognition, evaluation, and intentions. Business and Society, 41(1), 84–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Meteus, A. M., & Peha, J. M. (2008) Dimensions of P2P and digital piracy in a university campus. In Proceedings of 2008 Telecommunications Policy Research Conference (TPRC), pp. 1–35.Google Scholar
  46. Moores, T. T., & Esichaikul, V. (2011). Socialization and software piracy: A study. Journal of Computer Information Systems, Spring, 1–9.Google Scholar
  47. Narvaez, D., Getz, I., Rest, J. R., & Thoma, S. J. (1999). Individual moral judgment and cultural ideologies. Developmental Psychology, 35(2), 478–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Nguyen, N. T., & Biderman, M. D. (2008). Studying ethical judgments and behavioral intentions using structural equations: Evidence from the multidimensional ethics scale. Journal of Business Ethics, 83, 627–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. O’Fallon, M. J., & Butterfield, K. D. (2005). A review of the empirical ethical decision-making literature: 1996–2003. Journal of Business Ethics, 59, 375–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Peterson, R. A., Albaum, G., Merunka, D., Munuera, J. L., & Smith, S. M. (2010). Effects of nationality, gender, and religiosity on business-related ethicality. Journal of Business Ethics, 96, 573–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Pfanner, E. (2010, January 22). Music industry counts cost of piracy. The New York Times.Google Scholar
  52. Power, S. J., & Lundsten, L. L. (2005). Managerial and other white-collar employees’ perceptions of ethical issues in their workplaces. Journal of Business Ethics, 60(2), 185–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Randall, D. M., & Fernandes, M. (1991). The social desirability response bias in ethics research. Journal of Business Ethics, 10(11), 805–817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Reidenbach, R. E., & Robin, D. P. (1988). Some initial steps toward improving the measurement of ethics evaluations in marketing activities. Journal of Business Ethics, 7, 871–879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Reidenbach, R. E., & Robin, D. P. (1990). Toward the development of a multidimensional scale for improving evaluations of business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 9(8), 639–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Reidenbach, R. E., Robin, D. P., & Dawson, L. (1991). An application and extension of a multidimensional ethics scale to selected marketing practices and marketing groups. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 19, 83–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Rest, J. R. (1986). Moral development: Advances in research and theory. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  59. Reynolds, S. J. (2006). Moral awareness and ethical predispositions: Investigating the role of individual differences in the recognition of moral issues. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(1), 233–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Roberts, J. L. (2003, September 22). Out of tune. Newsweek, 42.Google Scholar
  61. Shang, R., Chen, Y., & Chen, P. (2008). Ethical decisions about sharing music files in the P2P environment. Journal of Business Ethics, 80, 349–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Sheth, J. N., & Frazier, G. L. (1982). A model of strategy mix choice for planned social change. Journal of Marketing, 46(Winter), 15–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Singhapakdi, A., Kraft, K. L., Vitell, S. J., & Rallapalli, K. C. (1996a). The perceived importance of ethics and social responsibility on organizational effectiveness: A Survey of marketers. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 23(1), 49–56.Google Scholar
  64. Singhapakdi, A., Salyachivin, S., Virakul, B., & Veerayangkur, V. (2000). Some important factors underlying ethical decision making of managers in Thailand. Journal of Business Ethics, 27(3), 271–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Singhapakdi, A., Vitell, S. J., & Franke, G. R. (1999). Antecedents, consequences, and mediating effects of perceived moral intensity and personal moral philosophies. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27(1), 19–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Singhapakdi, A., Vitell, S. J., & Kraft, K. L. (1996b). Moral intensity and ethical decision-making of marketing professionals. Journal of Business Research, 36(3), 245–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Sinha, R. K., & Mandel, N. (2008). Preventing digital music piracy: The carrot or the stick. Journal of Marketing, 72(January), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Siwek, S. E. (2007). The true cost of copyright industry piracy to the U.S. Economy. Institute for Policy Innovation (IPI), policy report #189, posted 10/03/2007 on Accessed 23 September, 2011, from EBSCO .
  69. Swaidan, Z., Rawwas, M. Y. A., & Al-Khatib, J. A. (2004). Consumer eEthics: Moral ideologies and ethical beliefs of a micro-culture in the U.S. International Business Review, 13(6), 749–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Thong, J. Y., & Yap, C. (1998). Testing an ethical decision-making theory: The case of softlifting. Journal of Management Information Systems, 15(1), 215–237.Google Scholar
  71. Valentine, S., & Barnett, T. (2007). Perceived organizational ethics and the ethical decisions of sales and marketing personnel. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 27(4), 373–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Valentine, S., & Bateman, C. (2011). The impact of ethical idealogies, moral intensity, and social context on sales-based ethical reasoning. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(1), 155–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Ventimiglia, M., & MacDonald, D. A. (2012). An examination of the factorial dimensionality of the Marlowe Crowne social desirability scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(4), 487–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Vitell, S. J., & Patwardham, A. (2008). The role of moral intensity and moral philosophy in ethical decision making: A cross-cultural comparison of China and the European Union. Business Ethics: A European View, 17(2), 196–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Vitell, S. J., Rallapalli, K., & Singhapakdi, A. (1993). Marketing norms: The influences of personal moral philosophies and organizational ethical culture. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 21(Fall), 331–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Vitell, S. J., & Singhapakdi, A. (1993). Ethical ideology and its influence on the norms and judgments of marketing practitioners. Journal of Marketing Management, Spring/Summer, 1–11.Google Scholar
  77. Waterman, D., Ji, S. W., & Rochet, L. R. (2007). Enforcement and control of piracy, copying, and sharing in the movie industry. Review of Industrial Organization, 30, 255–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Weber, J. (1990). Scenarios in business ethics research: Review, critical assessment, and recommendations. Business Ethics Quarterly, 2, 137–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Zhao, X., Lynch, J. G., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37, 197–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Connie R. Bateman
    • 1
  • Sean Valentine
    • 2
  • Terri Rittenburg
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of MarketingUniversity of North DakotaGrand ForksUSA
  2. 2.Department of ManagementUniversity of North DakotaGrand ForksUSA
  3. 3.Department of Management and Marketing, College of Business, Dept. 3275University of WyomingLaramieUSA

Personalised recommendations