Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 109, Issue 1, pp 67–82 | Cite as

Stakeholder Management Theory, Firm Strategy, and Ambidexterity

  • Mario Minoja
Article

Abstract

Stakeholder theory scholars have recently addressed two crucial calls: the first is for the integration of strategy and ethics, of stakeholder theory and strategic management, and the second call is for the development of a dynamic approach to stakeholder management. I have attempted to answer these calls by developing a theoretical framework that links together stakeholder management, stakeholder commitment to cooperate with the firm, key decision makers’ ethical commitment, and firm strategy. Starting from the basic assumption that managers cannot meet all stakeholders’ demands immediately and in a tailored manner, I contend, first, that an ambidextrous approach to stakeholder management is conducive to stakeholders’ commitment to cooperate for the sustainable well-being of the firm and, second, that firm strategy and key decision makers’ ethical commitment moderate the relationship between an ambidextrous stakeholder management and stakeholder commitment to cooperate. Furthermore, drawing on this theoretical framework, I attempt to address the call for the integration of strategy and ethics by proposing a three-level conceptual model that distinguishes the objectives, the field, and the levers of integration. Finally, I outline a set of propositions that, taken together, represent a first attempt to develop a dynamic approach to stakeholder management.

Keywords

Ambidexterity Dynamic approach Ethics Firm strategy Integration Stakeholder management 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The author expresses his gratitude to Professor Vittorio Coda (Bocconi University) for his extraordinary and relentless support and guidance, to the Editors for conceiving and managing this special issue, and to two anonymous referees for their constructive and insightful comments and suggestions.

References

  1. Argandoña, A. (2003). Fostering values in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 45(1/2), 15–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Argyris, C. (1982). Reasoning, learning, and action: Individual and organizational. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc.Google Scholar
  3. Barnett, M. L. (2007). Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 794–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bartlett, C. A., & Ghoshal, S. (1994). Changing the role of top management: Beyond strategy to purpose. Harvard Business Review, 72(6), 79–88.Google Scholar
  6. Berman, S. L., Wicks, A. C., Kotha, S., & Jones, T. M. (1999). Does stakeholder orientation matter? The relationship between stakeholder management models and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 488–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bosse, D. A., Phillips, R. A., & Harrison, J. S. (2009). Stakeholders, reciprocity, and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 30(4), 447–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Branco, M. C., & Rodrigues, L. L. (2006). Corporate social responsibility and resource-based perspectives. Journal of Business Ethics, 69(2), 111–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carroll, A. B., & Hoy, F. (1984). Integrating corporate social policy into strategic management. Journal of Business Strategy, 4(3), 48–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Christensen, C. M., Baumann, H., Ruggles, R., & Sadtler, T. M. (2006). Disruptive innovation for social change. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 94–101.Google Scholar
  11. Clarkson, M. B. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92–117.Google Scholar
  12. Coda, V. (1989). L’orientamento strategico di fondo delle imprese. Torino: UTET.Google Scholar
  13. Coda, V., & Mollona, E. (2010). The feedback structure of the strategy process and top management’s role in shaping emerging strategic behaviour. In P. Mazzola & F. W. Kellermanns (Eds.), Handbook of research on strategy process (pp. 109–141). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  14. Coombs, J. E., & Gilley, K. M. (2005). Stakeholder management as a predictor of CEO compensation: Main effects and interactions with financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 26(9), 827–840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Crilly, D., Zollo, M., & Hansen, M. (2009). The eye of the beholder: When symbolic compliance fails in the context of corporate social responsibility, working paper series, Centre for Research in Organization and Management, Bocconi University, Milano.Google Scholar
  16. De Luque, M. S., Washburn, N. T., Waldman, D. A., & House, R. J. (2008). Unrequited profit: How stakeholder and economic values relate to subordinates’ perceptions of leadership and firm performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53, 262–654.Google Scholar
  17. Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91.Google Scholar
  18. Drucker, P. F. (2004). What makes an effective executive. Harvard Business Review, 82(6), 58–63.Google Scholar
  19. Dyer, J. H., & Hatch, N. W. (2006). Relation-specific capabilities and barriers to knowledge transfers: Crating advantage through network relationships. Strategic Management Journal, 27, 701–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Elms, H., Brammer, S., Harris, J. D., & Phillips, R. A. (2010). New directions in strategic management and business ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly, 20(3), 401–425.Google Scholar
  21. Finkelstein, S. (2006). Why smart executive fail: Four case histories of how people learn the wrong lessons from history. Business History, 48(2), 153–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.Google Scholar
  23. Freeman, R. E., & Gilbert, D. R., Jr. (1988). Corporate strategy and the search for ethics. Englewoods Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  24. Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Parmar, B. L., & De Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder theory. The state of the art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Freeman, R. E., Martin, K., & Parmar, B. (2007). Stakeholder capitalism. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(4), 303–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Freeman, R. E., & Reed, D. L. (1983). Stockholders and stakeholders: A new perspective on corporate governance. California Management Review, 25(3), 88–106.Google Scholar
  27. Freeman, R. E., & Velamuri, S. R. (2006). A new approach to CSR: Company stakeholder responsibility. In A. Kakabadse & M. Morsing (Eds.), Corporate social responsibility (pp. 9–23). Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  28. Freeman, R. E., Wicks, A. C., & Parmar, B. (2004). Stakeholder theory and “The corporate objective revisited”. Organization Science, 15(3), 364–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gardberg, N. A., & Fombrun, C. J. (2006). Corporate citizenship: Creating intangible assets across institutional environments. Academy of Management Review, 31(2), 329–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Garriga, E., & Melé, D. (2004). Corporate social responsibility theories: Mapping the territory. Journal of Business Ethics, 53(1–2), 51–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ghemawat, P. (2010). Strategy and the business landscape (3rd ed.). Prentice Hall, NJ: Upper Saddle River.Google Scholar
  32. Gioia, D. A. (1999). Practicability, paradigms, and problems in stakeholder theorizing. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 228–232.Google Scholar
  33. Goodpaster, K. E. (1991). Business ethics and stakeholder analysis. Business Ethics Quarterly, 1(1), 53–73.Google Scholar
  34. Goodstein, J. D., & Wicks, A. C. (2007). Corporate and stakeholder responsibility: Making business ethics a two-way conversation. Business Ethics Quarterly, 17(3), 375–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1989). Strategic intent. Harvard Business Review, 67(3), 63–71.Google Scholar
  36. Harrison, J. S., Bosse, D., & Phillips, R. A. (2010). Managing for stakeholders, stakeholder utility functions, and competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 31(1), 58–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Harting, T. R., Harmeling, S. S., & Venkataraman, S. (2006). Innovative stakeholders relations: When ‘ethics pays’ (and when it doesn’t). Business Ethics Quarterly, 16(1), 43–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hillman, A. J., & Keim, G. D. (2001). Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: What’s the bottom line? Strategic Management Journal, 22(2), 125–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Huff, A. S. (1982). Industry influences on strategy reformulation. Strategic Management Journal, 3(2), 119–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Huff, J. O., Huff, A. S., & Thomas, H. (1992). Strategic renewal and the interaction of cumulative stress and inertia. Strategic Management Journal, 13(S1), 55–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Jamali, D. (2008). A stakeholder approach to corporate social responsibility: A fresh perspective into theory and practice. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(1), 213–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Jensen, M. C. (2002). Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(2), 235–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Jones, T. M., Felps, W., & Bigley, G. A. (2007). Ethical theory and stakeholder-related decisions: The role of stakeholder culture. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 137–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Levinthal, D. A., & March, J. G. (1993). The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14(Special issue), 95–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lockett, A., Moon, J., & Visser, W. (2006). Corporate social responsibility in management research: Focus, nature, salience and sources of influence. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 115–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lubatkin, M. H., Simsek, Z., Ling, Y., & Veiga, J. F. (2006). Ambidexterity and performance in small- to medium-sized firms: The pivotal role of top management team behavioral integration. Journal of Management, 32(5), 646–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mackey, A., Mackey, T. B., & Barney, J. B. (2007). Corporate social responsibility and firm performance: Investor preferences and corporate strategies. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 817–835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 268–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Markides, C. C., & Charitou, C. D. (2004). Competing with dual business models: A contingency approach. Academy of Management Executives, 18(3), 22–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Minoja, M., Zollo, M., & Coda, V. (2010). Stakeholder cohesion, innovation, and competitive advantage. Corporate Governance: An International Journal of Business in Society, 10(4), 395–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886.Google Scholar
  52. Newman, W. H. (1979). Commentary. In D. E. Schendel & C. W. Hofer (Eds.), Strategic management: A new view of business policy and planning (pp. 44–47). Boston: Little Brown.Google Scholar
  53. Paine, L. S. (1994). Managing for organizational integrity. Harvard Business Review, 72(2), 106–117.Google Scholar
  54. Perrini, F., & Minoja, M. (2008). Strategizing corporate social responsibility: Evidence from an Italian medium-sized, family-owned company. Business Ethics: A European Review, 17(1), 47–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Phillips, R., Freeman, R. E., & Wicks, A. (2003). What stakeholder theory is not. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13(4), 479–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy—Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  57. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  58. Porter, M. E. (1996). What is strategy? Harvard Business Review, 74(6), 61–78.Google Scholar
  59. Post, J. E., Preston, L. E., & Sachs, S. (2002). Managing the extended enterprise: The new stakeholder view. California Management Review, 45(1), 5–27.Google Scholar
  60. Prahalad, C. K., & Hammond, A. (2002). Serving the world’s poor, profitably. Harvard Business Review, 89(9), 48–57.Google Scholar
  61. Raisch, S., & Birkinshaw, J. (2008). Organizational ambidexterity: Antecedents, outcomes and moderators. Journal of Management, 34(3), 375–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Sachs, S., & Maurer, M. (2009). Toward dynamic corporate stakeholder responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(supplement 3), 535–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Saparito, P. A., Chen, C. C., & Sapienza, H. J. (2004). The role of relational trust in bank-small firm relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 47(3), 400–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Seelos, C., & Mair, J. (2007). Profitable business models and market creation in the context of deep poverty: A strategic view. Academy of Management Perspectives, 21(4), 49–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Signori, S., & Rusconi, G. (2009). Ethical thinking in traditional Italian Economia Aziendale and the stakeholder management theory: The search for possible interactions. Journal of Business Ethics, 89(supplement 3), 303–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Tushman, M. T., & O’Reilly, C. A. I. I. I. (1996). Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Review, 38(4), 8–30.Google Scholar
  67. Waddock, S. A., & Graves, S. B. (1997). The corporate social performance—Financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18(4), 303–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Weaver, G. R., Treviño, L. K., & Cochran, P. L. (1999). Integrated and decoupled corporate social performance: Management commitments, external pressures, and corporate ethics practices. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 539–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wei-Skillern, J. (2003). Sustainable development at Shell (A). Boston: Harvard Business School.Google Scholar
  70. Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5, 171–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Zadek, S. (2004). The path to corporate responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 82, 125–132.Google Scholar
  72. Zollo, M., Minoja, M., Casanova, L., Hockerts, K., Neergaard, P., Schneider, S., et al. (2009a). Towards an internal change management perspective of CSR: Evidence from project RESPONSE on the sources of cognitive alignment between managers and their stakeholders, and their implications for social performance. Corporate Governance: An International Journal of Business in Society, 9(4), 355–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Zollo, M., Minoja, M., & Coda, V. (2009b). Toward an integrated theory of strategy, working paper, Centre for Research in Organization and Management, Bocconi University, Milano.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Communication and EconomicsUniversity of Modena and Reggio EmiliaReggio EmiliaItaly
  2. 2.Department of Management and TechnologyBocconi UniversityMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations