Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 114, Issue 3, pp 501–512 | Cite as

Let the Story Go: The Role of Emotion in the Decision-Making Process of the Reluctant, Vulnerable Witness or Whistle-Blower

  • James Hollings
Article

Abstract

This paper draws on cognitive psychological theory to explain the role of emotion in the decision-making process of four reluctant, vulnerable witnesses to wrongdoing, who were persuaded to blow the whistle on matters of substantial public interest. It proposes a theoretical explanation for the role of emotion on whistle-blower or witness decision-making, based on the Iterative Reprocessing Model and drawing on appraisal-based theories of cognitive psychology. It concludes that the decision to speak is preceded by an intense emotional episode, probably due to changes in the witnesses’ coping and legitimacy appraisal structures. These changes are most likely a result of interaction with journalists and others during the decision-making process.

Keywords

Appraisals Cognitive Emotion Journalists Source Whistle-blower Witness 

References

  1. ACC. (2008). Sexual abuse and mental injury: Practice guidelines for Aotearoa-New Zealand. Wellington: ACC.Google Scholar
  2. Allison, G., & Zelikow, P. (1971). Essence of decision: Explaining the Cuban missile crisis. Boston: Little Brown.Google Scholar
  3. Baumeister, R., Vohs, K., & Nathan DeWall, C. (2007). How emotion shapes behavior: Feedback, anticipation, and reflection, rather than direct causation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11(2), 167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bjorkelo, B., Einarsen, S., & Matthiesen, S. B. (2010). Predicting proactive behaviour at work: Exploring the role of personality as an antecedent of whistleblowing behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(2), 371–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blenkinsopp, J., & Edwards, M. S. (2008). On not blowing the whistle: Quiescent silence as an emotion episode. In N. Ashkanasy, C. Hartel & W. Zerbe (Eds.), Research on emotion in organisations: Emotions, ethics and decision-making (Vol. 4, pp. 181–206). Bradford: Emerald.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, A. J. (2008). Whistleblowing in the Australian public sector: Enhancing the theory and practice of internal witness management in public sector organisations. Canberra. Retrieved from http://epress.anu.edu.au/whistleblowing_citation.html. Accessed Aug 2009.
  7. Clore, G., & Ortony, A. (2008). Appraisal theories: How cognition shapes affect into emotion. In M. Lewis, J. Haviland-Jones, & L. Feldman Barrett (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (pp. 628–644). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  8. Cropp, A. (1997). Digging deeper: A New Zealand guide to investigative reporting. Wellington: New Zealand Journalists Training Organisation.Google Scholar
  9. Cunningham, W., & Zelazo, P. (2007). Attitudes and evaluations: A social cognitive neuroscience perspective. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(3), 97–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dozier, J. B., & Miceli, M. P. (1985). Potential predictors of whistle-blowing: A prosocial behavior perspective. Academy of Management Review, 10(4), 823–836.Google Scholar
  11. Edwards, M. S., Ashkenasy, N., & Gardner, J. (2009). Deciding to speak up or remain silent following observed wrongdoing: The role of discrete emotions and the climate of silence. In J. Greenberg & M. Edwards (Eds.), Voice and silence in organisations (Vol. 2009, pp. 83–111). Bingley: Emerald.Google Scholar
  12. Ellsworth, P. C., & Scherer, K. R. (2003). Appraisal processes in emotion. In R. J. Davidson, K. R. Scherer, & H. H. Goldsmith (Eds.), Handbook of affective sciences (pp. 572–594). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Ericson, R., Baranek, P., & Chan, J. (1989). Negotiating control: A study of news sources. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  14. Flynn, K. (2006). Covert disclosures: Unauthorised leaking, public officials and the public sphere. Journalism Studies, 7(2), 256–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Glazer, M. (1999). On the trail of courageous behavior. Sociological Inquiry, 69(2), 276–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gundlach, M. J., Douglas, S. C., & Martinko, M. J. (2003). The decision to blow the whistle: A social information processing framework. The Academy of Management Review, 28(1), 107–123.Google Scholar
  17. Henik, E. (2008). Mad as hell or scared stiff? The effects of value conflict and emotions on potential whistle-blowers. Journal of Business Ethics, 80(1), 111–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hersh, M. A. (2002). Whistleblowers—heroes or traitors? Individual and collective responsibility for ethical behaviour. Annual Reviews in Control, 26(2), 243–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hollings, J. (2011a). The courage to speak: How investigative journalists persuade reluctant whistleblowers to tell their stories. PhD, Massey, Wellington.Google Scholar
  20. Hollings, J. (2011b). The informed commitment model: Best practice for journalists engaging with reluctant, vulnerable sources and whistle-blowers. Pacific Journalism Review, 17(1), 67–90.Google Scholar
  21. Iorio, S. H. (2004). Qualitative research in journalism: Taking it to the streets. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  22. Jos, P. H., Tompkins, M. E., & Hays, S. W. (1989). In praise of difficult people: A portrait of the committed whistleblower. Public Administration Review, 49(6), 552–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jubb, P. (1999). Whistleblowing: A restrictive definition and interpretation. Journal of Business Ethics, 21(1), 77–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Keil, M., Tiwana, A., Sainsbury, R., & Sneha, S. (2010). Toward a theory of whistleblowing intentions: A benefit to cost differential perspective. Decision Sciences, 41(4), 787–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Keltner, D., & Haidt, J. (2001). Social functions of emotions. In T. Mayne & G. Bonnano (Eds.), Emotions: Current issues and future directions (pp. 192–213). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  26. Kuppens, P. (2009). Anger. In D. Sanders & K. Scherer (Eds.), Oxford companion to emotion and the affective sciences (pp. 32–33). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Langley, A. (1999). Strategies for theorizing from process data. The Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 691–710.Google Scholar
  28. Mesmer-Magnus, J., & Chockalingam, V. (2005). Whistleblowing in organizations: An examination of correlates of whistleblowing intentions, actions, and retaliation. Journal of Business Ethics, 62(3), 277–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Miceli, M., & Near, J. (1992). Blowing the whistle: The organizational and legal implications for companies and employees. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  30. Northmore, D. (1996). Lifting the lid: A guide to investigative research. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
  31. Scherer, K. (2009). Appraisal. In D. Sanders & K. Scherer (Eds.), Oxford companion to emotion and the affective sciences (pp. 45–46). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Schlesinger, P. (1994). Reporting crime: The media politics of criminal justice. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  33. Soanes, C., Stevenson, A., & Pearsall, J. (2004). Concise oxford English dictionary (11th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Spark, D. (1999). Investigative reporting: A study in technique. Oxford: Focal Press.Google Scholar
  35. Spencer, S. (2001). Reluctant witness. London: Institute for Public Policy Research.Google Scholar
  36. Turner, M. M. (2007). Using emotion in risk communication: The anger activism model. Public Relations Review, 33(2), 114–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organisations. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  38. Woodward, B. (2005). The secret man—The story of watergate’s deep throat. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  39. Yin, R. K. (2002). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  40. Zhang, J., Chiu, R., & Wei, L. (2009). Decision-making process of internal whistleblowing behavior in China: Empirical evidence and implications. Journal of Business Ethics, 88, 25–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Communication, Journalism and MarketingMassey UniversityWellingtonNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations