Skip to main content
Log in

Let the Story Go: The Role of Emotion in the Decision-Making Process of the Reluctant, Vulnerable Witness or Whistle-Blower

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper draws on cognitive psychological theory to explain the role of emotion in the decision-making process of four reluctant, vulnerable witnesses to wrongdoing, who were persuaded to blow the whistle on matters of substantial public interest. It proposes a theoretical explanation for the role of emotion on whistle-blower or witness decision-making, based on the Iterative Reprocessing Model and drawing on appraisal-based theories of cognitive psychology. It concludes that the decision to speak is preceded by an intense emotional episode, probably due to changes in the witnesses’ coping and legitimacy appraisal structures. These changes are most likely a result of interaction with journalists and others during the decision-making process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ACC. (2008). Sexual abuse and mental injury: Practice guidelines for Aotearoa-New Zealand. Wellington: ACC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allison, G., & Zelikow, P. (1971). Essence of decision: Explaining the Cuban missile crisis. Boston: Little Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R., Vohs, K., & Nathan DeWall, C. (2007). How emotion shapes behavior: Feedback, anticipation, and reflection, rather than direct causation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11(2), 167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjorkelo, B., Einarsen, S., & Matthiesen, S. B. (2010). Predicting proactive behaviour at work: Exploring the role of personality as an antecedent of whistleblowing behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(2), 371–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blenkinsopp, J., & Edwards, M. S. (2008). On not blowing the whistle: Quiescent silence as an emotion episode. In N. Ashkanasy, C. Hartel & W. Zerbe (Eds.), Research on emotion in organisations: Emotions, ethics and decision-making (Vol. 4, pp. 181–206). Bradford: Emerald.

  • Brown, A. J. (2008). Whistleblowing in the Australian public sector: Enhancing the theory and practice of internal witness management in public sector organisations. Canberra. Retrieved from http://epress.anu.edu.au/whistleblowing_citation.html. Accessed Aug 2009.

  • Clore, G., & Ortony, A. (2008). Appraisal theories: How cognition shapes affect into emotion. In M. Lewis, J. Haviland-Jones, & L. Feldman Barrett (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (pp. 628–644). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cropp, A. (1997). Digging deeper: A New Zealand guide to investigative reporting. Wellington: New Zealand Journalists Training Organisation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, W., & Zelazo, P. (2007). Attitudes and evaluations: A social cognitive neuroscience perspective. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(3), 97–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dozier, J. B., & Miceli, M. P. (1985). Potential predictors of whistle-blowing: A prosocial behavior perspective. Academy of Management Review, 10(4), 823–836.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, M. S., Ashkenasy, N., & Gardner, J. (2009). Deciding to speak up or remain silent following observed wrongdoing: The role of discrete emotions and the climate of silence. In J. Greenberg & M. Edwards (Eds.), Voice and silence in organisations (Vol. 2009, pp. 83–111). Bingley: Emerald.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellsworth, P. C., & Scherer, K. R. (2003). Appraisal processes in emotion. In R. J. Davidson, K. R. Scherer, & H. H. Goldsmith (Eds.), Handbook of affective sciences (pp. 572–594). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericson, R., Baranek, P., & Chan, J. (1989). Negotiating control: A study of news sources. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, K. (2006). Covert disclosures: Unauthorised leaking, public officials and the public sphere. Journalism Studies, 7(2), 256–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glazer, M. (1999). On the trail of courageous behavior. Sociological Inquiry, 69(2), 276–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gundlach, M. J., Douglas, S. C., & Martinko, M. J. (2003). The decision to blow the whistle: A social information processing framework. The Academy of Management Review, 28(1), 107–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henik, E. (2008). Mad as hell or scared stiff? The effects of value conflict and emotions on potential whistle-blowers. Journal of Business Ethics, 80(1), 111–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hersh, M. A. (2002). Whistleblowers—heroes or traitors? Individual and collective responsibility for ethical behaviour. Annual Reviews in Control, 26(2), 243–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollings, J. (2011a). The courage to speak: How investigative journalists persuade reluctant whistleblowers to tell their stories. PhD, Massey, Wellington.

  • Hollings, J. (2011b). The informed commitment model: Best practice for journalists engaging with reluctant, vulnerable sources and whistle-blowers. Pacific Journalism Review, 17(1), 67–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iorio, S. H. (2004). Qualitative research in journalism: Taking it to the streets. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jos, P. H., Tompkins, M. E., & Hays, S. W. (1989). In praise of difficult people: A portrait of the committed whistleblower. Public Administration Review, 49(6), 552–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jubb, P. (1999). Whistleblowing: A restrictive definition and interpretation. Journal of Business Ethics, 21(1), 77–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keil, M., Tiwana, A., Sainsbury, R., & Sneha, S. (2010). Toward a theory of whistleblowing intentions: A benefit to cost differential perspective. Decision Sciences, 41(4), 787–812.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keltner, D., & Haidt, J. (2001). Social functions of emotions. In T. Mayne & G. Bonnano (Eds.), Emotions: Current issues and future directions (pp. 192–213). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuppens, P. (2009). Anger. In D. Sanders & K. Scherer (Eds.), Oxford companion to emotion and the affective sciences (pp. 32–33). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langley, A. (1999). Strategies for theorizing from process data. The Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 691–710.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesmer-Magnus, J., & Chockalingam, V. (2005). Whistleblowing in organizations: An examination of correlates of whistleblowing intentions, actions, and retaliation. Journal of Business Ethics, 62(3), 277–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miceli, M., & Near, J. (1992). Blowing the whistle: The organizational and legal implications for companies and employees. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Northmore, D. (1996). Lifting the lid: A guide to investigative research. London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, K. (2009). Appraisal. In D. Sanders & K. Scherer (Eds.), Oxford companion to emotion and the affective sciences (pp. 45–46). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlesinger, P. (1994). Reporting crime: The media politics of criminal justice. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soanes, C., Stevenson, A., & Pearsall, J. (2004). Concise oxford English dictionary (11th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spark, D. (1999). Investigative reporting: A study in technique. Oxford: Focal Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, S. (2001). Reluctant witness. London: Institute for Public Policy Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M. M. (2007). Using emotion in risk communication: The anger activism model. Public Relations Review, 33(2), 114–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organisations. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, B. (2005). The secret man—The story of watergate’s deep throat. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2002). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J., Chiu, R., & Wei, L. (2009). Decision-making process of internal whistleblowing behavior in China: Empirical evidence and implications. Journal of Business Ethics, 88, 25–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James Hollings.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hollings, J. Let the Story Go: The Role of Emotion in the Decision-Making Process of the Reluctant, Vulnerable Witness or Whistle-Blower. J Bus Ethics 114, 501–512 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1361-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1361-z

Keywords

Navigation