Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 101, Supplement 1, pp 83–95 | Cite as

Rethinking Responsible Agency in Corporations: Perspectives from Deleuze and Guattari

  • Mollie Painter-Morland
Article

Abstract

The notion of “responsibility” can be understood in a number of different ways, namely as being accountable for one’s actions, as a personal trait, or as a task or duty that results from one’s role. In this article we will challenge the assumptions that underpin each of these employments of the word “responsibility” and seek to redefine the concept as such. The main thrust of the argument is that we need to critically interrogate the idea of “identity” and deliberate decision-making that inform the use of all three of these notions of “responsibility”. By drawing on selected concepts emanating from the oeuvre of Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari, our understanding of agency moves away from “identity” towards “multiplicity”. In fact, it will be argued that our sense of “agency” is a side-product of our own desiring-production as it operates in and through our interactions with other human beings and organizational structures. The article therefore contends that “responsible management” requires ongoing re-articulations of moral responsiveness.

Keywords

Agency Responsibility Deleuze and Guattari 

Notes

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank the anonymous reviewers, as well as the editors of this Special issue, for their generous comments and suggestions, which allowed a much clearer argument to emerge. I would also like to thank Rene ten Bos for encouraging me to be brave enough to draw on Deleuze and Guattari’s oeuvre in my business ethics research.

References

  1. Banerjee, S. B. (2006). Corporate social responsibility: The good, the bad and the ugly. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  2. Banerjee, S. B. (2007). The problem with corporate social responsibility. In S. Clegg & C. Rhodes (Eds.), Management ethics: Contemporary contexts (pp. 55–76). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Bauman, Z. (1993). Postmodern ethics. London: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  4. Bevan, D., & Corvellec, H. (2007). The impossibility of corporate ethics: For a Levinasian approach to management ethics. Business Ethics: A European Review, 16(3), 208–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boholm, Å., & Corvellec, H. (2011). A relational theory of risk. Journal of Risk Research, 14(2), 175–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bonta, M., & Protevi, J. (2004). Deleuze and geophilosophy. A guide and glossary. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Buchanan, I. (2008). Deleuze and Guattari’s Anti-Oedipus: A reader’s guide (p. 39). New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  8. Card, R. F. (2005). Individual responsibility in corporate contexts. Journal of Business Ethics, 62, 397–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clegg, S. R., & Rhodes, C. (Eds.). (2006). Management ethics–contemporary contexts. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Crane, A., Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2004). Stakeholders as citizens? Rethinking rights, participation and democracy. Journal of Business Ethics, 53, 107–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. De Cremer, D., Mayer, M. D., & Schminke, M. (2010). Guest editors’ introduction. On understanding ethical behavior and decision making: A behavioral ethics approach. Business Ethics Quarterly, 20(1), 1–6.Google Scholar
  12. Deleuze, G. (1994). Difference and repetition (P. Patton, Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Deleuze, G. (2006/1983). Nietzsche and philosophy (H. Tomlinson, Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1992/1983). Anti-Oedipus. Capitalism and schizophrenia (R. Hurley, M. Seem, & H. R. Lane, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  15. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (2007/1987). A thousand plateaus. Capitalism and schizophrenia (B. Massumi, Trans.). London: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  16. Driscoll, D.-M., & Hoffman, W. M. (1999). Ethics matters: How to implement values-driven management. Boston: Bentley College Center for Business Ethics.Google Scholar
  17. Freeman, E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston, MA: Pitman Publishing.Google Scholar
  18. Freeman, E. R., Wicks, A., Harrison, J., Parmar, B., & de Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. French, P. A. (1984). Collective and corporate responsibility. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  20. French, P. A. (1995). Corporate ethics. Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
  21. Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine, September 13.Google Scholar
  22. Hiley, D. (1987). Power and values in corporate life. Journal of Business Ethics, 6, 343–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ibarra-Colado, E., Clegg, S. R., Rhodes, C., & Kornberger, M. (2006). The ethics of managerial subjectivity. Journal of Business Ethics, 64, 45–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jones, M. T., & Haigh, M. (2007). The transnational corporation and new corporate citizenship theory. A critical analysis. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 27, 51–69.Google Scholar
  25. Jones, C., Parker, M., & ten Bos, R. (2005). For business ethics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Message, K. (2005). The Deleuze dictionary (edited by Adrian Parr). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Moon, J., Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2005). Can corporations be citizens? Corporate citizenship as a metaphor for business participation in society. Business Ethics Quarterly, 15(3), 429–453.Google Scholar
  28. Nielsen, R. P. (1998). Can ethical character be stimulated and enabled? An action-learning approach to teaching and learning organization ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly, 8(3), 581–604. 24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Painter-Morland, M. (2008). Business ethics as practice. Ethics as the everyday business of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Painter-Morland, M. (2010). Derrida and business ethics: Ethical questioning (and)(or) questioning ethics. Business Ethics: A European Review, 9(3), 265–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Painter-Morland, M., & Dobie, K. (2009). Ethics and sustainability within SME’s: Enabling, conditioning and contaminating relationships. African Journal of Business Ethics, 4(2), 7–19.Google Scholar
  32. Painter-Morland, M., & Ten Bos, R. (2011). Business ethics and continental philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Parker, M. (1998). Business ethics and social theory: Postmodernizing the ethical. British Journal of Management, 27–36.Google Scholar
  34. Parr, A. (2005). The Deleuze dictionary. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Petry, E. (2005). Assessing corporate culture. Part 1. Ethikos 18(5). http://ethikospublication.com/html/corporateculture.html. Accessed 17 Jan 2012.
  36. Pless, N., & Schneider, R. (2006). Towards developing responsible global leaders: The PwC Ulysses experience. In T. Maak & N. Pless (Eds.), Responsible leadership (pp. 213–226). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  37. Porras, J., Emery, S., & Thompson, M. (2006). Success built to last: Creating a life that matters. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania, Wharton School Publishing.Google Scholar
  38. Power, M. (1998). The audit society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Randall, J., & Munro, I. (2010). Foucault’s care of the self: A case from mental health work. Organization Studies, 39(11), 1485–1504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Roberts, J. (2003). The manufacture of corporate social responsibility: Constructing corporate sensibility. Organization, 10(2), 249–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Takala, T., & Pallab, P. (2000). Individual, collective and social responsibility of the firm. Business Ethics: A European Review, 9(2), 109–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Trevino, L. K., & Nelson, K. A. (2010). Managing business ethics: Straight talk about how to do it right (5th ed.). Hoboken NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  43. US Federal Sentencing Commission. US Federal Sentencing Guidelines. http://www.ussc.gov/guidelin.htm.
  44. Van Oosterhout, H. (2005). Dialogue. Academy of Management Review, 30(4), 677–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Werhane, P. H. (1989). Corporate and individual moral responsibility: A reply to Jan Garrett. Journal of Business Ethics, 8(10), 821–822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Werhane, P. H., & Painter-Morland, M. J. (2008). Cutting-edge issues in business ethics: Continental challenges to theory and practice. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyDe Paul UniversityChicagoUSA
  2. 2.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of PretoriaPretoriaSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations