Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 106, Issue 3, pp 325–335 | Cite as

The Role of Business Ethics, Personality, Work Values and Gender in Vocational Interests from Adolescents

  • Dries Berings
  • Stef Adriaenssens


The present study investigates how business ethics are related to vocational interest. Special attention has been paid to the relationship between business ethics and the interest in ‘enterprising’ and ‘social’ oriented professions. The results show that business ethics is only significantly correlated in a negative way, to enterprising vocational preferences. Moreover, the negative contribution of business ethics to the preference for entrepreneurial and managerial professions remains after controlling for personality and work values. Some work values also predict the entrepreneurial interest: Earnings, Influence, Competition, Innovation and Creativity. The personality traits Extraversion (positive) and Agreeableness (negative) have predictive validity, but this effect disappears after controlling for work values. In the ‘Discussion’ section, we pay attention to possible consequences of the negative relationship between business ethics and Entrepreneurial interest for Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). We argue that efforts concerning realistic job previews will only be meaningful if they are completed with efforts to make people more sensitive for ethics in two other domains, namely education and business.


Business ethics Vocational interest Work values Personality Gender 


  1. Ameen, E. C., Guffey, D. M., & McMillan, J. J. (1996). Gender differences in determining the ethical sensitivity of future accounting professionals. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(5), 591–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andreoni, J., & Vesterlund, L. (2001). Which is the fair sex. Gender differences in altruism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116, 293–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arlow, P. (1991). Personal characteristics in college students’ evaluation of business ethics and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 10(1), 63–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bellizi, J., & Hasty, R. (1982). Business and non business students perceptions on questionable advertising practices. Developments in Marketing Science, 5, 241–244.Google Scholar
  5. Berings, D. (2007). The Twelve Work Value Inventory. Brussels: HUBrussel.Google Scholar
  6. Berings, D., & Adriaenssens, S. (2010). Diversiteit in waarden en religiositeit in een hogeschool. Tijdschrift voor Hoger Onderwijs, 28. Google Scholar
  7. Berings, D., Blieck, G., & Tack, T. (2004a). Manager gezocht: mag het ook een vrouw zijn? ReMeDi-eindrapport. Brussel: EHSAL-ESF.Google Scholar
  8. Berings, D., De Fruyt, F., & Bouwen, R. (2004b). Work Values and personality traits as predictors of enterprising and social vocational interests. Personality and Individual Differences, 26, 349–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Berings, D., Grieten, S., Lambrechts, F., & De Witte, H. (2008). Work values and facets of job satisfaction as predictors of employees attitude to change in higher education. Gedrag en Organisatie, 21(4), 493–517. Google Scholar
  10. Betz, M., O’Connell, L., & Shepard, J. M. (1989). Gender differences in proclivity for unethical behaviour. Journal of Business Ethics, 8(5), 321–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Blowfield, M., & Murray, A. (2008). Corporate responsibility. A critical introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Borkowski, S. C., & Ugras, Y. J. (1988). Business student and ethics: A meta-analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(11), 1117–1127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Carter, J. R., & Irons, M. D. (1991). Are economists different, and if so, why? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5, 171–177.Google Scholar
  14. Cipriani, G. P., & Zago, D. L. A. (2009). Natural born economists. Journal of Economic Psychology, 30, 455–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. De Fruyt, F., Mervielde, I., Hogerheijde, R., & Van Amstel, B. (1995). BZO–Beroepskeuze Zelf-Onderzoek. Beroepszoeker–Vlaamse Editie (BZO–Occupation Finder–Flemish Edition). Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets Test Services.Google Scholar
  16. Duska, R. (2007). Contemporary reflections on business ethics. Boston: Springer.Google Scholar
  17. Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks. Oxford: Capstone Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
  18. Emmerik, I. H., Jawahar, I. M., & Stone, T. J. (2004). The relationship between personality and discretionary helping gehaviors. Psychological Reports, 95, 355–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Feldman, D. C. (1976). A contingency theory of socialisation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 433–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Felton, E. L., & Sims, R. R. (2005). Teaching business ethics: Targeted outputs. Journal of Business Ethics, 60(4), 377–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ferrell, J., & Fraedrich, J. (1991). Business ethics: Ethical decision making and cases. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar
  22. Fouad, N. A., Harmon, L. W., & Borgen, F. H. (1997). Structure of interests in employed male and female members of U.S. racial-ethnic minority and Non-minority groups. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 44, 339–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Frank, R. H., Gilovich, T., & Regan, D. T. (1993). Does studying economics inhibit cooperation. Journal of Economic Perspective, 7, 159–171.Google Scholar
  24. Frey, B. S., & Meier, S. (2003). Are political economists selfish and indoctrinated? Evidence from a natural experiment. Economic Inquiry, 41, 448–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Frey, B. S., & Meier, S. (2005). Do business students make good citizens? Working paper. Institute for Emperical Research in Economics.Google Scholar
  26. Frey, B. S., Pommerehne, W. W., & Gygi, B. (1993). Economics indoctrination or selection? Some empirical results. Journal of Economics Education, 24, 271–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of markers of the Big-Five structure. Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 4, 26–42.Google Scholar
  28. Goldberg, L. R., Sweeney, D., Merenda, P. F., & Hughes, J. E. (1998). Demographic variables and personality: The effects of gender, age, education, and ethic/racial status on self-descriptions of personality attributes. Personality and Individual Differences, 24, 393–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Harris, A. L., & Weaver, A. B. (1994). A comparison of IS ethics among college students. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 35(2), 60–64.Google Scholar
  30. Hashwell, S., Judd, P., & Wearing, B. (1999). Acounting students and cheating: A comparative study for Australia, South Africa and the UK. Teaching Business Ethics, 3(3), 211–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hirschi, A. (2008). Personality complexes in adolescence: Traits, interests, work values, and self evalutations. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 716–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Holland, J. L. (1997). Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
  33. Jeffrey, C. (1993). Ethical development of accounting students, non-accounting business students and liberal arts students. Issues in Accounting Education, 8(1), 86–96.Google Scholar
  34. Kakabadse, N. K., Rozuel, C., & Lee-Davies, L. (2005). Corporate social responsibility and stakeholder approach: a conceptual review. International Business Governance and Ethics, 1(4), 277–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Karim, N. S. A., Zamzuri, N. H. A., & Nor, Y. M. (2009). Exploring the relationship between Internet ethics in university students and the big five model of personality. Computer and Education, 53(1), 86–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Karstedt, S. (2003). Economic morality in Europe: Market society and citizenship (pp. 10). European Social Survey Round 2 module proposal (ESS).Google Scholar
  37. Karstedt, S., & Farrall, S. (2006). The moral economy of everyday crime. Markets, consumers and citizens. British Journal of Criminology, 46, 1011–1036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lane, M. S., & Schaupp, D. (1989). Ethics in education: A comparative study. Journal of Business Ethics, 8(12), 943–949.Google Scholar
  39. Lane, M. S., Schaupp, D., & Parsons, B. (1988). Pymalion effect: An issue for business education and ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 7(3), 223–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lysonski, S., & Gaidis, W. (1991). A cross-cultural comparison of the ethics of business students. Journal of Business Ethics, 10(2), 141–150.Google Scholar
  41. McCabe, D. L., Dukerich, J. M., & Dutton, J. E. (1991). Context, values and moral dilemmas: Comparing the choices of business and law school students. Journal of Business Ethics, 10(12), 951–960. Google Scholar
  42. McCabe, D. L., Trevino, L. K., & Butterfield, K. D. (2001). Cheating in academic institutions: A decade of research. Ethics and Behaviour, 11(3), 219–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Milner, D., Mahaffey, T., Macaulay, K., & Hynes, T. (1999). The effect of business education on the ethics of studens. An empirical assessment controlling for maturation. Teaching Business Ethics, 3(3), 255–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mowen, J. C. (2000). The 3 M Model of motivation and psychology: theory and empirical applications to consumer behaviour. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
  45. Mowen, J.C., & Sujan, H. (2003). Exploring the personality trait and the intrinsic/extrinsic motive: antecedents of volunteerism. (Unpublished manuscript. College of Business Adminstration, Oklahoma State University).Google Scholar
  46. Orzeck, T., & Lung, E. (2005). Big-Five personality differences of cheaters and non-cheaters. Current Psychology, 24(4), 274–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Quinn, R. E. (1988). Beyond rational management. Mastering the paradoxes and competing demands of high performance. London: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
  48. Ros, M., Schwartz, S. H., & Surkiss, S. (1999). Basic individual values, work values, and the meaning of work. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 48, 49–71.Google Scholar
  49. Roxas, M. L. (2004). The importance of gender across cultures in ethical decision-making. Journal of Business Ethics, 50, 149–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Saucier, G. (1994). Mini-markers: A brief version of Goldberg’s unipolar big-five markers. Journal of Personality Assessment, 63, 506–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Schneider, B. (1987). The people make the workplace. Personnel Psychology, 40, 437–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Toward a universal psychological structure of human values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 550–562. Google Scholar
  53. Schwartz, S. H., & Rubel, T. (2005). Sex differences in value priorities: Cross-cultural and multi-method studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 1010–1028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Thompson, R. C., Donnay, D. A. C., Morris, M. L., & Schaubhut, N. A. (2004, July 28–August 1). Exploring age and gender differences in vocational interests. Poster presented at the annual convention of the American Psychological Association, Honolulu, HI. Google Scholar
  55. Tse, A. C. B., & Au, A. K. M. (1997). Are New Zealand business students more unethical than non-business students? Journal of Business Ethics, 16(4), 445–450. Google Scholar
  56. van Vianen, A. E. M. (2005). A review of person-environment fit research: Prospects for personnel selection. In A. Evers, N. Anderson, & O. Voskuijl (Eds.), Handbook of personal selection (pp. 419–439). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  57. Wood, W., & Glass, R. (1995). Sex as a determinant of software policy. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 36(2), 37–43. Google Scholar
  58. Wood, J. A., Longnecker, J. G., McKinney, J. A., & Moore, C. W. (1988). Ethical attitudes of students and business professionals: A study of moral reasoning. Journal of Business Ethics, 7(4), 249–357.Google Scholar
  59. Yeung, S. Y. C., Wong, S. C., & Chan, B. M. (2002). Ethical beliefs of hospitality and tourism students towards their school life. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 14(4), 183–192. Google Scholar
  60. Zopiatis, A. A., & Krambia-Kapardis, M. (2007). Ethical behaviour of tertiary education students in Cyprus. Journal of Business Ethics, 81, 647–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Human Relations Research Group (HRRG)Hogeschool-Universiteit BrusselBrusselsBelgium

Personalised recommendations