Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 103, Issue 4, pp 587–603 | Cite as

The Transparent Supply Chain: from Resistance to Implementation at Nike and Levi-Strauss

  • David J. DooreyEmail author


Information disclosure is a common regulatory tool designed to influence business behavior. A belief is that transparency can provoke learning and also positive institutional change by empowering private watchdogs to monitor and pressure business leaders to alter harmful behavior. Beginning in the late 1990s, a private movement emerged that pressured corporations to disclose the identify of their global supplier factories. These activists believed that factory disclosure would lead to greater accountability by corporations for the working conditions under which their products are made, which in time would improve labor practices. In 1995, Nike and Levi-Strauss (Levis) surprised the business community by publishing their supplier lists. This paper describes case studies of Nike and Levis, tracking the evolution from resistance to supply chain transparency through to the decision to be industry leaders in factory disclosure. The paper evaluates the contribution of factory disclosure and proposes that other companies should be urged to move toward supply chain transparency.


labor practices information disclosure transparency corporate social responsibility supply chains Nike Levi-Strauss 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Barnet, R. and J. Cavanagh: 1994, ‘Just Undo It: Nike’s Exploited Workers’, New York Times (13 February 1994), p. 11.Google Scholar
  2. Benjamin, M.: 1998, ‘A Riveting Announcement’, San Francisco Guardian (10 June 1998).Google Scholar
  3. Canadian Broadcasting Corporation: 2002, ‘Cut It Out: Campaign Focuses on Sweatshop Labour’,, Accessed May 10, 2011.
  4. Clean Clothes Campaign: 1998, ‘Levi Strauss & Company, Corporate Profile and Case Material’,
  5. Compa, L. & T. Hinchliffe-Darricarrere: 1995, “Enforcing International Labor Rights Through Corporate Codes of Conduct” Columbia Journal Transnational Law 33, 663-689Google Scholar
  6. Cushman, J.: 1998, ‘Nike Pledges to End Child Labor and Increase Safety’, New York Times (13 May 1998).Google Scholar
  7. Doorey, D.J.: 2005, “Who Made That? Influencing Foreign Labour Practices Through Reflexive Disclosure Regulation” Osgoode Hall Law Journal 43, 353-406Google Scholar
  8. Doorey, D.J.: 2011, “In Defense of Transnational Domestic Labor Regulation”, Vanderbilt Journal Transnational Law, 43, 953-1009Google Scholar
  9. Estlund, C.: 2009, ‘Just the Facts: The Case for Workplace Transparency’, NYU School of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 09-55.Google Scholar
  10. ETAG: 2003, ‘Transparency and Disclosure: New Regulatory Tools to Challenge Sweatshop Abuses’, Submission to the Public Policy Forum,, Accessed May 11, 2011.
  11. Ethical Trading Initiative: 2004, ‘Addressing Labor Rights Violations at Tarrant Ajalpan Mexico Using ETI’s Complaints Procedure’,, Accessed February 12, 2008.
  12. Featherstone, L.: 2002, Students Against Sweatshops Verso, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Gap Inc.: 2010, ‘Frequently Asked Questions – Social Responsibility, “When Will You Publish a List of Factories You Do Business with in the Developing World?”’,, Accessed September 26, 2010.
  14. Gillen, M.: 2000, “The Apparel Industry Partnership’s Free Labor Association: A Solution to the Overseas Sweatshop Problem or the Emperor’s New Clothes?” New York University Journal International Law and Policy 32, 1059-1118Google Scholar
  15. Gull, S. D. and L. Zukerman: 1993, ‘Levi Strauss, Leaving China, Passes Crowd of Firms Going the Other Way’, Wall Street Journal (5 May 1993), p. A18.Google Scholar
  16. Katz, D.: 1994, Just Do It: The Nike Spirit in the Corporate World. Random House, New York.Google Scholar
  17. Locke, R., F. Qin and R. Brause: 2006, ‘Does Monitoring Improve Labor Standards?: Lessons from Nike’, MIT Sloan Working Paper No. 4612-06,, Accessed May 11, 2011.
  18. Loss, L.: 1988, Fundamentals of Securities Regulation, 2nd Edition (Little, Brown & Co.)Google Scholar
  19. Marshall, S.: 2010, “Australia’s Textile Clothing and Footwear Supply Chain Regulation” in Human Rights at Work, C. Fenwick & T. Novitz (eds.) Hart, 555-484.Google Scholar
  20. Murphy, D. and D. Mathew: 2001, ‘Nike and Global Labour Practices’, Unpublished Case Study Prepared for the New Academy of Business Innovation Network for Socially Responsible Business.Google Scholar
  21. Nikebiz: 2011, ‘Workers and Factories: Improving Conditions in Our Contract Factories’,, Accessed May 11, 2011.
  22. O’Rourke, D.: 1997, ‘Smoke from a Hired Gun: A Critique of Nike’s Labor and Environmental Auditing in Vietnam as Performed by Ernst and Young’,, Accessed May 11, 2011.
  23. O’Rourke, D.: 2002, “Monitoring the Monitors: A Critique of Third Party Labor Monitoring” in Corporate Responsibility and Labour Rights, R. Jenkins, R. Pearson, G. Seyfang (eds.), Earthsan, 196-208.Google Scholar
  24. Preece, S., C. Fleisher and J. Toccacelli: 1995, ‘Building a Reputation Along the Value Chain at Levi Strauss’, Long Range Planning 28, 88–98.Google Scholar
  25. Rawling, M.: 2006, “Generic Model of Regulating Supply Chain Outsourcing”. In: C. Arup et al. (eds), Labour Law and Labour Market Regulation: Essays on the Construction, Constitution, and Regulation of Labour Market and Work Relationships. Federation, Sydney, pp 520-541Google Scholar
  26. Roddick, A.: 2003, ‘The Price of Dignity’, The Guardian (22 September 2003).Google Scholar
  27. Sabel, C., D. O’Rourke, A. Fung: 2001, “Realizing Labor Standards” in Can We Put an End to Sweatshops?, Sabel, C., D. O’Rourke, A. Fung (eds.), Beacon, 3-22.Google Scholar
  28. Schoenberger, K.: 2000, Levi’s Children: Coming to Terms with Human Rights in the Global Marketplace Atlantic MonthlyGoogle Scholar
  29. Stroup, K.: 1999, ‘Nike Releases Addresses of Its Duke Apparel Factories’, Duke Chronicle (12 October 1999)Google Scholar
  30. Van Yoder, S.: 2001, ‘Beware the Coming Backlash’, Industry Week (2 April 2001).Google Scholar
  31. Williams, C.:, 1999, “The Securities and Exchange Commission and Corporate Social Transparency, Harvard Law Review”, v. 110, 1197-1307CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Human Resource ManagementYork UniversityTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations