Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 103, Issue 3, pp 385–402 | Cite as

Directors’ Roles in Corporate Social Responsibility: A Stakeholder Perspective

  • Humphry Hung


We propose that corporate directors are important in helping organizations deal with two major issues of stakeholders. First, directors can help manage the interests of organizational stakeholders, and second, they assist in protecting the interests of their organizations as stakeholders in society. Their contribution can be conceptualized as the directors’ roles in corporate social responsibility (DR-CSR). We identify two types of DR-CSR, organization-centered and society-centered roles. Based on a study of 120 corporate directors, we observe that the more concern that corporate directors have for stakeholders, the more likely that they will perceive the need to perform their DR-CSR effectively.

Key words

corporate directors corporate social responsibility roles stakeholders 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aguilera, R.V. and G. Jackson: 2003, ‘The cross-national diversity of corporate governance: Dimensions and determinants’, Academy of Management Review 28 (3), 447-59.Google Scholar
  2. Atkinson, A.A., J.H. Waterhouse, and R.B. Wells: 1997, ‘A stakeholder approach to strategic performance measurement’, Sloan Management Review, 38 (3), 25-37.Google Scholar
  3. Baker, W.: 1990. ‘Market networks and corporate behavior’, American Journal of Sociology 96(3), 589-625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barney J.B. 2001. ‘Resource-based theories of competitive advantage: a ten-year retrospective on the resource-based view’. Journal of Management 27, 643-650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baysinger, B., G. Keim and C. Zeithaml: 1985, ‘An empirical evaluation of the potential for including shareholders in corporate constituency programs’, Academy of Management Journal 28: 180-200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berle. A. and G. Means. 1932. The Modern Corporation and Private Property, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  7. Boddewyn, J. J. 1988, ‘Political Aspects of MNE Theory’, Journal of International Business Studies 19(3): 341-63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bond, M. 2004. ‘Social influences on corporate political donations in Britain’, British Journal of Sociology 55 (1),56-71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bourdieu, P. and L. J. D. Wacquant,1992. An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  10. Brenner, S. N., and P. Cochran: 1991. ‘The stakeholder theory of the firm: Implications for business and society theory and research’, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Association for Business and Society, Sundance, Utah.Google Scholar
  11. Buchholz, R.A. 1992. Business environments and public policy, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  12. Buchholz, R.A. 1993. Principles of environmental management: The greening of business. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  13. Bull, C. 1987. ‘The existence of self-enforcing implicit contracts’, Quarterly Journal of Economics. 102 (1), 147-159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bulow, J, and K. Rogoff, 1989, ‘A Constant Recontracting Model of Sovereign Debt’, Journal of Political Economy, 97:155-178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Burt, R. 1983. Corporate Ties and Cooptation: Networks of Market Constraints and Directorate Ties in the American Economy. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  16. Carpenter, M.A. and J.D. Westphal: 2001. ‘The strategic context of external network ties: Examining the impact of director appointments on board involvement in strategic decision making’, Academy of Management Journal 44 (4), 639-660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Carroll, A. B., 1999. ‘Corporate social responsibility: Evolution of a definitional construct’, Business and Society, 38 (3): 268-295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Carter, R. 1990. ‘The relationship between racism and racial identity among White Americans: An exploratory investigation’. Journal of Counseling and Development 69: 46-50.Google Scholar
  19. Charkham, J.P. 1994, Keeping Good Company: A Study of Corporate Governance in Five Countrie,. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  20. Chen, S. 2011, ‘The role of ethical leadership versus institutional constraints: A simulation study of financial misreporting by CEOs’. Journal of Business Ethics 93 Suppl 1: 33-52.Google Scholar
  21. Chen, S. and P. Bouvain: 2009, ‘Is Corporate Responsibility Converging? A Comparison of Corporate Responsibility Reporting in the USA, UK, Australia, and Germany’, Journal of Business Ethics 87, 299–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Clarkson, M.B E. 1995, ‘A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporation’, Academy of Management Review, 20(1): 92-117.Google Scholar
  23. Colella, A., 2001. ‘Coworker distributive fairness judgments of the workplace accommodation of employees with disabilities’, Academy of Management Review, 26(1): 100-16.Google Scholar
  24. Coleman, J.S. 1990 Foundations of Social Theory, Cambridge Mass: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Collis, D. J., and Montgomery, C. A. 1995. ‘Competing on Resources: Strategy in the 1990 s’, Harvard Business Review, 73(4): 118-128.Google Scholar
  26. Cornell, B., A.C. Shapiro, 1987 Corporate Stakeholders and Corporate Finance. Financial Management (Spring), aa, 5-14.Google Scholar
  27. Cummings, J. L. and Doh, J. P., 2000. ‘Identifying who matters: Mapping key players in multiple environments’, California Management Review, 42(2): 83 -104.Google Scholar
  28. Cutting, B, and Kouzmin, A. 2002, ‘Evaluating corporate board cultures and decision making’, Corporate Governance, 2(2):27-45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Deegan, C. 2002. ‘Introduction – The Legitimizing Effect of Social and Environmental Disclosures – A Theoretical Foundation’, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal. 15(3): 282-311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Demb, A., and F. Neubauer, 1992. ‘The corporate board: Confronting the paradoxes’, Long Range Planning, 25(3): 9-20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Donaldson, L., 1990. ‘The ethereal hand: Organizational economics and management theory’, Academy of Management Review , 15 (3): 369-381.Google Scholar
  32. Donaldson, T. and Preston, L.E. 1995. ‘The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence’, Academy of Management Review, 20(1): 65-91.Google Scholar
  33. Egri, C.P. 1999. ‘The environmental round table role-play exercise: the dynamics of multi-stakeholder decision-making processes’, Journal of Management Education, 23(1): 95-112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. ‘Agency theory: An assessment and review’, Academy of Management Review, 14(1):57-74.Google Scholar
  35. Elkington, J., 1997, Cannibals with forks: the triple bottom line of the 21 st century business, Capstone, Oxford.Google Scholar
  36. Fama, E., and M. Jensen. 1983. ‘Separation of ownership and control’, Journal of Law and Economics, 26:301-325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Fennell, M. L., and Alexander, J. A. 1987. ‘Governing boards and profound organizational change in hospitals’, Medical Care Review, 46(2), 157-187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Forbes, D.P. and Milliken, F.J. 1999, ‘Cognition and corporate governance: understanding boards of directors as strategic decision-making groups’, Academy of Management Review, 24: 489-506.Google Scholar
  39. Freeman, R. E. 1984. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach, London: Pitman.Google Scholar
  40. Freeman, R. E., 1999. ‘Divergent stakeholder theory’, Academy of Management Review, 24(2): 233-6.Google Scholar
  41. Frooman, J. 1999. ‘Stakeholders influence strategies’, Academy of Management Review, 24(2): 191–205.Google Scholar
  42. Galbraith, J.R. and Kazanjian, R. 1986. Strategy implementation: The role of structure in process. St. Paul: West Publishing.Google Scholar
  43. Gale, J., and Buchholz, R. 1987. ‘The political pursuit of competitive advantage: What business can gain from government? ‘In A. Marcus, A. Kaufman, and D. Beam (Eds.), Business strategy and public policy,231-252. New York: Quorum.Google Scholar
  44. Getz, K.A. 1993. ‘Selecting corporate political tactics’. In B. Mitnick (Ed.), Corporate political agency: 152-170. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  45. Getz, K. A. 1997. ‘Research in corporate political action: Integration and assessment’. Business and Society, 36(1): 32-72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Gioia D. A. 1999. ‘Practicability, paradigms, and problems in stakeholder theorizing’, Academy of Management Review, 24(2): 228-232.Google Scholar
  47. Gray, R.H., Owen, D. and Adams, C. 1996. Accounting and Accountability. Hemel Hempstead: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  48. Gulati, R. and Westphal, J.D. 1999. ‘Cooperative or controlling? The effects of CEO-board relations and the content of interlocks on the formation of joint ventures’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 44: 473-506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Haas, P. M. 1992. ‘Epistemic Communities And International Policy Coordination – Introduction’. International Organization, 46(1):1-35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Halal, W. E. 1990. ‘The new management: Business and social institutions for the information age’, Business in the Contemporary World, 2: 41-54.Google Scholar
  51. Harrison, J. S. and Freeman, R. E. 1999. ‘Stakeholders, social responsibility, and performance: Empirical evidence and theoretical perspectives’, Academy of Management Review, 42 (5): 479-495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Hill, C.W.L. and Jones, T.M. 1992. ‘Stakeholder-agency theory’, Journal of Management Studies, 29(2): 131-154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Hillman A. J., Michael A. H. (1999) ‘Corporate Political Strategy Formulation: A Model of Approach, Participation, and Strategy Decisions’. Academy of Management Review 24(4): 825-42.Google Scholar
  54. Hillman A. J., Keim G. D., Luce R. A. (2001) Board Composition and Stakeholder Performance: Do Stakeholder Directors Make a Difference?’. Business and Society 40 (3): 295-314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Hillman A., Zardkoohi A., Bierman L. (1999) Corporate political strategies and firm performance: Indications of firm-specific benefits from personal service in the U.S. government’. Strategic Management Journal 20: 67-81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Hrebiniak, L. G., and William, F. J., 1985, ‘Organizational adaptation, strategic choice and environmental determinism’, Administrative Science Quarterly 30: 336-349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Hung, H. 1998, ‘A typology of the theories of the roles of governing boards’, Corporate Governance: An International Review, 6 (2): 101-111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Huse, M. 2000, ‘Boards of directors in SMEs: a review and research agenda’, Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 12 (2): 271- 290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Jawahar, I. M. and McLaughlin, G. L. 2001. ‘Toward a descriptive stakeholder theory: An organizational life cycle approach’, Academy of Management Review, 26(3): 397-415.Google Scholar
  60. Jensen, M.C., 1986. ‘Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers’, American Economic Review, 76: 323-329.Google Scholar
  61. Jones, T. M. 1995. ‘Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics’. Academy of Management Review, 20: 404-437.Google Scholar
  62. Jones, T.M. and Wicks, A.C., 1999. ‘Convergent stakeholder theory’, Academy of Management Review, 24 (2):206-22.Google Scholar
  63. Kassinis, G. and Vafeas, N. 2002. ‘Corporate boards and outside stakeholders as determinants of environmental litigation’, Strategic Management Journal, 23(5):399-415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Keim, G., and Baysinger, B. 1988. ‘The efficacy of business political activity’, Journal of Management, 14: 163-180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Keim, G., and Zeithaml, C. 1986. ‘Corporate political strategies and legislative decision making: A review and contingency approach’, Academy of Management Review, 11: 828-843.Google Scholar
  66. Korac-Kakabadse N., Kakabadse A.X., Kouzmin A. (2001) ‘Board governance and company performance: any correlations?’. Corporate Governance 1 (1): 24-30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Kosnik, R. D. 1987. ‘Greenmail: A study of board performance in corporate governance’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 32:163-185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Kotter, J., and Heskett, J. 1992. Corporate Culture and Performance, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  69. Lord, M., 2000. ‘Corporate political strategy and legislative decision making: The impact of corporate legislative influence activities’, Business and Society, 39:76-93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Lorsch, J. W. and Maclver, E. A. 1989. Pawns or Potentates: The Reality of America’s Corporate Boards, Boston: Harvard School Press.Google Scholar
  71. Maak, T. and N. Pless: 2009, ‘Business Leaders as Citizens of the World: Advancing Humanism on a Global Scale’, Journal of Business Ethics 88, 537–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Mahon, J. E., 1989. ‘Corporate Political Strategy’, Business in the Contemporary World, 2 (1): 50-62.Google Scholar
  73. Maitland, I. 1985. ‘The Limits of Business Self-Regulation’, California Management Review, 27 (3): 132 – 147.Google Scholar
  74. Mallette, P. and Fowler, K. L. 1992. ‘Effects of board composition and stock ownership on the adoption of poison pills’. Academy of Management Journal, 35:1010-1035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Marcus, G.: 1987. ‘The Structure of Emotional Appraisal: 1984 Presidential Candidates’. Paper presented at the 10th Annual Meeting of the International Society of Political Psychology, July 4–7, 1987, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
  76. Marcus, A. A. 1993. Business and society: Ethics, government and the world economy, Homewood, Il: Irwin.Google Scholar
  77. Matthews, M.R. 1993. Socially Responsible Accounting, London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
  78. Mattingly, J. E., 2004, ‘Redefining the Corporation: Stakeholder Management and Organizational Wealth’, Academy of Management Review, 29(3): 520-30.Google Scholar
  79. Middleton, M. 1987. ‘Non-profit boards of directors: Beyond the governance function’, in W. W. Powell (ed.), The Nonprofit Sector, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  80. Mileham, P. 1995. Corporate leadership: How well do non-executive influence Boards? Journal of General Management, 21(2): 1-21.Google Scholar
  81. Miller, S.: 1992. ‘Establishing an effective board of directors’, a speech given at the Seminar on Establishing an Effective Board of Directors, August 4, 1992.Google Scholar
  82. Mitchell, R.K., Agle, B. and Wood, D. 1997. ‘Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts’, Academy of Management Review, 22 (4): 853 – 886.Google Scholar
  83. Mitnick, B. 1993. Choosing agency and competition. In B. Mitnick (Ed.), Corporate political agency, 1-12. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  84. Monks R.A.G., Minow N. (1996) Corporate Governance, Blackwell Publishers, Oxford.Google Scholar
  85. Murray, J.: 2003. ‘The Global Context: Multinational Enterprises, Labor Standards, And Regulation’, in L. P. Hartman, D. G. Arnold and R. E. Wokutch (eds.), Rising above sweatshops: Innovative approaches to global labor challenges (Westport, Preager).Google Scholar
  86. Neilsen, E., Rao, H., and Hayagreeva, M. V. 1987. ‘The Strategy-Legitimacy Nexus: A Thick Description’, Academy of Management Review, 12(3): 523-533.Google Scholar
  87. Oberman, W. 1993. ‘Strategy and tactic choice in an institutional resource context’. In B. Mitnick (Ed.), Corporate political agency: 301-324. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  88. Ogden, S. and Watson, R. 1999. ‘Corporate performance and stakeholder management: Balancing shareholder and customer interests in the U. K.’, Academy of Management Journal, 42 (5): 526-538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Page, M. and Spira, L. F. 2000, ‘Who steals my purse steals trash…’: Reputation as a factor in establishing the value of non-executive directors and members of audit committees’, International Journal of Management and Decision Making, 1 (1): 1427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Parsons, 1960, Structure and process in modern societies, Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
  91. Porter, M.E., 1992. Capital Choices: Changing the Way America Invests in Industry, U.S. Council on Competitiveness, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  92. Portes, A. 1998. ‘Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology’. Annual Review of Sociology, 24:1-24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Portes, A., and Sensenbrenner, J. 1993. ‘Embeddedness and Immigration: Notes on the Social Determinants of Economic Action’. American Journal of Sociology 98:1320-1350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Preston, L.E. 1998. ‘Agents, stewards, and stakeholders’, Academy of Management Review, 23(1): 9-10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Putnam, R.: 1995. ‘Bowling Alone: America’s Declining Social Capital’, Journal of Democracy 6 (Jan), 65–78.Google Scholar
  96. Pye, A. J. and Camm, G., 2003, ‘Non-executive directors: Moving beyond the “one-size-fits-all” view’, Journal of General Management, 28 (3): 52-70.Google Scholar
  97. Pye, A. J. and Pettigrew, A. 2005, ‘Studying Board Context, Process and Dynamics: Some Challenges for the Future’, British Journal of Management, 16(1):27-38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Roberts, J., McNulty, T. and Stiles, P. 2005, ‘Beyond Agency Conceptions of the Work of the Non-Executive Director: Creating Accountability in the Boardroom’, British Journal of Management, 16 (1), 5-26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Rowley, T. J. 1997. ‘Moving beyond dyadic ties: A network theory of stakeholder influences’, Academy of Management Review, 22(4):887-910.Google Scholar
  100. Russo, M. and Fouts, P. 1997. ‘A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability’, Academy of Management Journal, 40: 534-559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Schollhammer, H. 1975. ‘Business-government relations in an international context: An assessment.’ In P. Boarman and H. Schollhammer (Eds.), Multinational corporations and governments: Business-government relations in an international context: 32-51. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  102. Scott, W. R. and J. W. Meyer: 1983, ‘The Organization of Societal Sectors: Hypothesis and Early Evidence’, in W. W. Powell and P. J. DiMaggio (eds.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), pp. 108–140.Google Scholar
  103. Scott, S.G. and Lane, V.R. 2000. ‘A stakeholder approach to organizational identity’, Academy of Management Review, 25(1):43-62.Google Scholar
  104. Sethi, P. 1982. ‘Corporate political activism’. California Management Review. 24(2): 32-42.Google Scholar
  105. Singh, H. and Harianto, F. 1989. ‘Management-board relationships, takeover risk, and the adoption of golden parachutes’, Academy of Management Journal, 32(1):7-24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Starik, M. 1995. ‘Should Trees Have Managerial Standing? Toward Stakeholder Status for Non-Human Nature’, Journal of Business Ethics 14(3): 207–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Stiles, P. 2001. ‘The Impact of the Board on Strategy: An Empirical Examination’, Journal of Management Studies, 38 (3): 627-650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Stiles, P., and Taylor, B., 1996. ‘The strategic role of the board’ Corporate Governance, An International Review, 4(1): 3-10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Taylor, E. Z. and M. B. Curtis: 2010, ‘An Examination of the Layers of Workplace Influences in Ethical Judgments: Whistleblowing Likelihood and Perseverance in Public Accounting’, Journal of Business Ethics 93, 21–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Thompson J.K., Hood J.N. (1993) ‘The Practice of Corporate social Performance in Minority- Versus Nonminoirty-Owned Small Businesses’. Journal of Business Ethics 12, 197-206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Tollison, R. D. 1982, Rent Seeking: A Survey, Kyklos, 35(3): 575-602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Trevino, L. K. and Weaver, G.R. 1999. ‘The stakeholder research tradition: Converging theorists-not convergent theory’, Academy of Management Review, 24(2): 222-227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Tricker, R. I. 1994. International Corporate Governance, Singapore: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  114. Useem, M. 1983: The inner circle: Large corporations and business politics in the U.S. and UK. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  115. Vogel, D. 1996. ‘The study of business and politics’. California Management Review, 38: 146-162.Google Scholar
  116. Walker G, Kogut B., Shan W. (1997) Social capital, structural holes and the formation of an industry network. Organization Science 8: 109-125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Wang, J. and Dewhirst, H. D.: 1992. Boards of directors and stakeholder orientation, Journal of Business Ethics, 11:115-123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Weidenbaum, M.: 1980. Public policy: No longer a spectator sport for business, Journal of Business Strategy, 3(4): 46-53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Westphal, J.D., and E. J. Zajac: 1998. ‘The symbolic management of stockholders: Corporate governance reform and shareholder reactions’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 43, 127-153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Wood, D. 1986. Strategic uses of public policy. Marshfield, MA: Pitman Publishing.Google Scholar
  121. Woodward, D.G., P. Edwards, and F. Birkin: 1996. ‘Organizational Legitimacy and Stakeholder Information Provision’, British Journal of Management 7, 329-347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Yoffie, D. 1987. ‘Corporate strategy for political action: A rational model’. In A. Marcus, A. Kaufman, and D. Beam (Eds.), Business strategy and public policy: 92-111. New York: Quorum.Google Scholar
  123. Zahra, S. A., and J. A. Pearce: 1989. ‘Boards of directors and corporate financial performance: A review and integrative model’, Journal of Management, 15(2),291-344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Management and MarketingHong Kong Polytechnic UniversityHong KongChina

Personalised recommendations