Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Odd Couples: Understanding the Governance of Firm–NGO Alliances

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We leverage insights and theories from the extensive inter-firm alliance literature to explore the effect of the sector of the partners on FirmNGO (B2N) alliance governance. Our analysis suggests that the sector of the partners has an important impact on alliance governance, not only because it constrains the availability of some governance mechanisms but also because it makes alternative mechanisms available or relevant to the partners. Specifically, we predict that B2N alliances will rely on contracts, a restricted scope, and non-equity hostages, such as reputational hostages and stakeholder involvement, rather than equity, leading to limited protection against opportunism. As a consequence, B2N alliance partners will need to rely on trust-based governance mechanisms to a greater extent than B2B alliance partners, although trust will be harder to build in B2N alliances.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adobor, H. and R. S. McMullen: 2002. Strategic Partnering in E-Commerce: Guidelines for Managing Alliances. Business Horizons 45(2), 67–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alchian, A. A., & Demsetz, H. (1973). The property right paradigm. Journal of Economic History, 33(1), 16-27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, S., & Ruderman, M. (1987). The Role of Procedural and Distributive Justice in Organizational Behavior. Social Justice Research, 1, 177-198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andreasen, A.: 1996, Profits for Non-Profits: Find a Corporate Partner. Harvard Business Review 74 (2), 47–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anheier, H. K., & Ben-Ner, A. (2003). The Study of the Nonprofit Enterprise. Theories and Approaches. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Argenti, P. A. (2004). Collaborating with activists: How Starbucks works with NGOs. California Management Review, 47(1), 91-116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ariño, Á., De La Torre, J., & Ring, P. S. (2001). Relational quality: Managing trust in corporate alliances. California Management Review, 44(1), 109-134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ariño, Á., & Reuer, J. J. (2004). Designing and renegotiating strategic alliance contracts. Academy of Management Executive, 18(3), 37-48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ariño, Á., & Reuer, J. J. (2006). Alliance Contractual Design. In O. Shenkar & J. J. Reuer (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Strategic Alliances (pp. 149–167). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arya, B., & Salk, J. E. (2006). Cross-sector alliance learning and effectiveness of voluntary codes of corporate social responsibility. Business Ethics Quarterly, 16(2), 211-234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashman, D. (2001). Civil society collaboration with business: Bringing empowerment back in. World Development, 29(7), 1097.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austin, J. E. (2000). Strategic collaboration between non-profits and businesses. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29(1), 69-97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austin, J. E., Reficco, E., & SEKN Research Team. (2004). Social Partnering in Latin America: Lessons Drawn from Collaborations of Businesses and Civil Society Organizations. Cambridge, MA: David Rockefeller Center for Latin American Studies, Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacchiega, A., & Borzaga, C. (2003). The Economics of the Third Sector: Toward a More Comprehensive Approach. In A. Anheier & A. Ben-Ner (Eds.), The Study of the Nonprofit Enterprise. Theories and Approaches (pp. 27-48). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Brouthers, K. D., & Hennart, J.-F (2007). Boundaries of the Firm: Insights from International Entry Mode Research. Journal of Management, 33(3), 395-425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Stone, M. M. (2006). The Design and Implementation of Cross-Sector Collaborations: Propositions from the Literature. Public Administration Review, 66, 44-55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carson, S. J., Madhok, A., Varman, R., & John, G. (2003). Information processing moderators of the effectiveness of trust-based governance in interfirm R&D collaboration. Organization Science, 14(1), 45-57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Child, J., & Möllering, G. (2003). Contextual confidence and active trust development in the Chinese business environment. Organization Science, 14(1), 69-81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R. (1937). The Nature of the Firm. Economica 4, 386–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlberg: 2007, Business Guide to Partnering with NGOs and the United Nations (Dalberg Global Development Advisors, New York).

  • Das, T. K., & Rahman, N. (2002). Opportunism Dynamics in Strategic Alliances. In F. J. Contractor & P. Lorange (Eds.), Cooperative Strategies and Alliances (pp. 89-118). Oxford: Elsevier Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das, T. K., & Teng, B.-S. (1998). Between trust and control: Developing confidence in partner cooperation in alliances. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 491-512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das, T. K., & Teng, B.-S. (2001). Trust, control, and risk in strategic alliances: An integrated framework. Organization Studies, 22(2), 251-284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, S., & Tao, Z. (1998). Contractual incompleteness and the optimality of equity joint ventures. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 37(4), 391-206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, I. (2009). Alliances and Networks: Creating Success in the UK Fair Trade Market. Journal of Business Ethics, 86, 109-126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deephouse, D., & Heugens, P. (2009). Linking Social Issues to Organizational Impact: The Role of Infomediaries and the Infomediary Process. Journal of Business Ethics, 86(4), 541-553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, A. (1996). The Making of Economic Policy: A Transaction Cost Politics Perspective. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, A. (2003). Some lessons from transaction-cost politics for less-developed countries. Economics and Politics 15(2), 107-133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doh, J. P. (2003). Nongovernmental Organizations, Corporate Strategy, and Public Policy: NGOs as Agents of Change. In J. P. Doh & H. Teegen (Eds.), Globalization and NGOs: Transforming Business, Government, and Society (pp. 1-18). Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doh, J. P., Newburry, W. E., & Teegen, H. (2003). Cooperative Strategies in Environmental Nongovernmental Organizations. In J. P. Doh & H. Teegen (Eds.), Globalization and NGOs: Transforming Business, Government, and Society (pp. 65-80). Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doh, J. P., & Teegen, H. (2003). Globalization and NGOs: Transforming Business, Government, and Society. Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enjolras, B. (2009). A Governance-Structure Approach to Voluntary Organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 38, 761-783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, P. B. (1979). Dependent Development: The Alliance of Multinational, State, and Local Capital in Brazil. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortune: 2008, Negroponte on Intel’s $100 Laptop Pullout http://money.cnn.com/2008/01/04/technology/kirkpatrick_negroponte.fortune/index.htm. Accessed 28 May 2009.

  • Garcia, S. M. (2002). Power and the illusion of transparency in negotiations. Journal of Business & Psychology, 17(1), 133-145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaister, K. W., & Buckley, P. J. (1997). Task-related and partner-related selection criteria in UK international joint ventures. British Journal of Management, 8(3), 199-223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, R., Jan, B., & Collison, D. (2006). NGOs, civil society and accountability: making the people accountable to capital. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 19(3), 319-348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guay, T., Doh, J. P., & Sinclair, G. (2004). Non-governmental Organizations, Shareholder Activism, and Socially Responsible Investments: Ethical, Strategic, and Governance Implications. Journal of Business Ethics, 52(1), 125-139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamel, G., Doz, Y., & Prahalad, C. K. (1989). Collaborate with your competitors - and win. Harvard Business Review, 67(1), 133-140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, O. (1995). Firms, Contracts, and Financial Structure. Oxford: Oxford.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, O., & Moore, J. (1999). Foundations of Incomplete Contracts. The Review of Economic Studies, 66(1), 115-138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennart, J.-F. (1988). A transaction costs theory of equity joint ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 9(4), 361-374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hess, D. (2001). Regulating Corporate Social Performance: A New Look At Social Accounting, Auditing, And Reporting. Business Ethics Quarterly, 11(2), 307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iyer, E. (2003). Theory of Alliances: Partnership and Partner Characteristics. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 11(1), 41-58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamali, D., & Keshishian, T. (2009). Uneasy Alliances: Lessons Learned from Partnerships Between Businesses and NGOs in the context of CSR. Journal of Business Ethics, 84(2), 277-295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeffries, F. L., & Reed, R. (2000). Trust and adaptation in relational contracting. Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 873-883.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, E., & Prakash, A (2007a). NGO research program: a collective action perspective. Policy Sciences, 40(3), 221–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilby, P. (2006). Accountability for empowerment: dilemmas facing non-governmental organizations. World Development, 34(6), 951-963.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. A. (1993). Procedural Justice, Attitudes, and Subsidiary Top Management Compliance with Multinationals’ Corporate Strategic Decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 36(3), 502-527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. A. (1997). Fair process: Managing in the knowledge economy. Harvard Business Review, 75(4), 65-76.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, A (2007). Cooperation between corporations and environmental groups: a transaction cost perspective. Academy of Management. The Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 889.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leete, L. (2000). Wage equity and employee motivation in nonprofit and for-profit organizations. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 43, 423-446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • London, T., D. A. Rondinelli and O’Neill, H.: 2003, The Uneasy Learning Alliances between Corporations and Green Organizations: A Contingent Model of Stage and Type (Mimeo, Kenan-Flagler Business School, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina).

  • Low, C. (2006). A framework for the governance of social enterprise. International Journal of Social Economics, 33(5/6), 376-385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucea, R (2007). How And How Much Do Market And Non-Market Cognitions Differ? Implications For Non-Market Strategy, Strategic Management Society. San Diego, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo, Y. (2006). Opportunism in Cooperative Alliances - Conditions and Solutions. In O. Shenkar & J. J. Reuer (Eds.), Handbook of Strategic Alliances (pp. 55-80). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madhok, A. (1995). Revisiting Multinational Firms’ Tolerance for Joint Ventures: A Trust-Based Approach. Journal of International Business Studies, 26(1), 117-137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madhok, A. (2006). How much does ownership really matter? Equity and trust relations in joint venture relationships. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(1), 4-11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mawlawi, F. (1993). New Conflicts, New Challenges: The Evolving Role for Non-Governmental Actors. Journal of International Affairs, 46(2), 391-413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messner, M. (2009). The limits of accountability. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(8), 918-938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyerson, D., Weick, K. E., & Kramer, M. R. (1996). Swift trust and temporary groups. In M. R. Kramer & T. R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research (pp. 166-195). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Dwyer, B. (2005). Stakeholder democracy: challenges and contributions from social accounting. Business Ethics: A European Review, 14(1), 28-41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Dwyer, B., & Unerman, J (2007). From functional to social accountability: transforming the accountability relationship between funders and non-governmental development organisations. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability, 20(3), 446-471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oxfam America: 2002, Starbucks, Ford Foundation, Oxfam America and CEPCO Announce Innovative Collaboration to Increase the Supply of High Quality Fair Trade Coffee. Oxfam America Press Release, July 29.

  • Oxfam America: 2007, Oxfam Celebrates Win–Win Outcome for Ethiopian Coffee Farmers and Starbucks. Oxfam America Press Release, June 20.

  • Oxfam GB, Novib Oxfam Netherlands, Unilever and Unilever Indonesia: 2005, Exploring the Links between International Business and Poverty Reduction: A Case Study of Unilever in Indonesia (Oxfam GB, Oxford, UK), http://www.oxfam.org.uk/what_we_do/issues/livelihoods/unilever.htm. Accessed 21 Dec 2005.

  • Oxley, J. E. (1997). Appropriability hazards and governance in strategic alliances: a transaction-cost approach. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 13(2), 387-409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxley, J. E., & Sampson, R. C. (2004). The scope and governance of international R&D alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 25(8/9), 723-750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, A. R. (2003). Prospects for NGO Collaboration with Multinational Enterprises. In J. P. Doh & H. Teegen (Eds.), Globalization and NGOs: Transforming Business, Government, and Society (pp. 81-105). Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkhe, A. (1991). Interfirm diversity, organizational learning, and longevity in global strategic alliances. Journal of International Business Studies, 22(4), 579-601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parkhe, A. (1993). Strategic alliance structuring: a game theoretic and transaction cost examination of interfirm cooperation. Academy of Management Journal, 36(4), 794-829.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poppo, L., & Zenger, T. R. (2002). Do Formal Contracts and Relational Governance Function as Substitutes or Complements? Strategic Management Journal, 23(8), 707-726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. and M. R. Kramer: 2002, The Competitive Advantage of Corporate Philanthropy. Harvard Business Review, 80(12), 56–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preston, A. E. (1989). The nonprofit worker in a for-profit world. Journal of Labor Economics, 7(4), 438-463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raynard, P. (1998). Coming Together. A Review of Contemporary Approaches to Social Accounting, Auditing and Reporting in Non-profit Organisations. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(13), 1471-1479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rein, M., & Stott, L. (2009). Working Together: Critical Perspectives on Six Cross-Sector Partnerships in Southern Africa. Journal of Business Ethics, 90, 79-89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reuer, J. J., & Ariño, A (2007). Strategic alliance contracts: dimensions and determinants of contractual complexity. Strategic Management Journal, 28(3), 313-330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, M., & Yuthas, K (2008). Moral Discourse and Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 78(1/2), 47-64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ring, P. S., & Van de Ven, A. H. (1994). Developmental processes of cooperative interorganizational relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 35(1), 122-160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rondinelli, D. A., & London, T. (2003). How corporations and environmental groups cooperate: Assessing cross-sector alliances and collaborations. Academy of Management Executive, 17(1), 61-76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salamon, L. (1995). Partners in Public Service: Government-Nonprofit Relations in the Modern Welfare State. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seitanidi, M., & Crane, A. (2009). Implementing CSR Through Partnerships: Understanding the Selection, Design and Institutionalisation of Nonprofit-Business Partnerships. Journal of Business Ethics, 85, 413-429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seitanidi, M., & Ryan, A. (2007). A critical review of forms of corporate community involvement: from philanthropy to partnerships. International Journal of Nonprofit & Voluntary Sector Marketing, 12(3), 247-266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shenkar, O., & Arikan, I. (2009). Business as International Politics: Drawing Insights from Nation-State to Inter-Firm Alliances. Business and Politics, 11(4), 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simanis, E., & Hart, S. L (2008). The Base of the Pyramid Protocol: Toward Next Generation BoP Strategy (Version 2.0). Ithaca NY: Center for Sustainable Global Enterprise.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slivinski, A. (2003). The Public Goods Theory Revisited: Comments on Kingma’s Revisitation of Weisbrod (Chapter 4). In H. K. Anheier & A. Ben-Ner (Eds.), he Study of the Nonprofit Enterprise: Theories and Approaches (pp. 67-74). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, R. (2003). Economic theories of nonprofit organizations: an evaluation. In H. K. Anheier & A. Ben-Ner (Eds.), The Study of the Nonprofit Enterprise: Theories and Approaches (pp. 277-310). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • UN Global Compact: 2008, Note on Integrity Measures, http://www.unglobalcompact.org/AboutTheGC/integrity.html. Accessed 18 May 2008.

  • Unerman, J., & O’Dwyer, B. (2006). On James Bond and the importance of NGO accountability. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability, 19(3), 305-318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USAID, U. S. A. f. I. D.: 2004, Innovative Approaches to Slum Electrification (USAID, Washington DC), http://www.usaid.gov/our_work/economic_growth_and_trade/energy/pubs/slumelect_exec.pdf.

  • Vachani, S., & Smith, N. C. (2004). Socially Responsible Pricing: Lessons from the pricing of AIDS drugs in developing countries. California Management Review, 47(1), 117-144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valor Martínez, C. (2003). Social Alliances for Fundraising: How Spanish Nonprofits Are Hedging the Risks. Journal of Business Ethics, 47(3), 209-222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Tujil, P. (1999). NGOs and Human Rights: Sources of Justice and Democracy. Journal of International Affairs, 52(2), 493-512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volery, T., & Mensik, S. (1998). The Role of Trust in Creating Effective Alliances: A Managerial Perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(9/10), 987-994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waddock, S. A. (1988). Building Successful Social Partnerships. Sloan Management Review, 29(4), 17-23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter, A. (2003). Relationship-specific factors influencing supplier involvement in customer new product development. Journal of Business Research, 56(9), 721-733.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weidenbaum, M. (2009). Who will Guard the Guardians? The Social Responsibility of NGOs. Journal of Business Ethics, 87(Supplement 1), 147-155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weisbrod, B. A. (1975). Toward a theory of the voluntary nonprofit sector in a three-sector economy. In E. Phelps (Ed.), Altruism, morality, and economic theory. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisbrod, B. A. (1983). Nonprofit and proprietary sector behavior: Wage differentials among lawyers. Journal of Labor Economics, 1(3), 246-263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and Hierarchies. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1983). Credible Commitments: Using Hostages to Support Exchange. The American Economic Review, 73(4), 519-540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1985). The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1991). Comparative economic organization: the analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(2), 269-296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1993). Opportunism and Its Critics. Managerial and Decision Economics, 14(2), 97-107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. Q. (1989). Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do and Why They Do It. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wymer Jr, W. W., & Samu, S. (2003). Dimensions of Business and Nonprofit Collaborative Relationships. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 11(1), 3-22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yaziji, M. (2004). Turning Gadflies into Allies. Harvard Business Review, 82(February), 110–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaheer, A., Lofstrom, S., & George, V. P. (2002). Interpersonal and Interorganizational Trust in Alliances. In F. J. Contractor & P. Lorange (Eds.), Cooperative Strategies and Alliances (pp. 347-377). Oxford: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaheer, A., McEvily, B., & Perrone, V. (1998). Does trust matter? Exploring the effects of interorganizational and interpersonal trust on performance. Organization Science, 9(2), 141-159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zucker, L. G. (1986). Production of Trust: Institutional Sources of Economic Structure, 1840–1920’,. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 8, (pp. 53–111). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miguel Rivera-Santos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rivera-Santos, M., Rufín, C. Odd Couples: Understanding the Governance of Firm–NGO Alliances. J Bus Ethics 94 (Suppl 1), 55–70 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0779-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0779-z

Keywords

Navigation