Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 94, Supplement 1, pp 55–70 | Cite as

Odd Couples: Understanding the Governance of Firm–NGO Alliances

  • Miguel Rivera-Santos
  • Carlos Rufín
Article

Abstract

We leverage insights and theories from the extensive inter-firm alliance literature to explore the effect of the sector of the partners on FirmNGO (B2N) alliance governance. Our analysis suggests that the sector of the partners has an important impact on alliance governance, not only because it constrains the availability of some governance mechanisms but also because it makes alternative mechanisms available or relevant to the partners. Specifically, we predict that B2N alliances will rely on contracts, a restricted scope, and non-equity hostages, such as reputational hostages and stakeholder involvement, rather than equity, leading to limited protection against opportunism. As a consequence, B2N alliance partners will need to rely on trust-based governance mechanisms to a greater extent than B2B alliance partners, although trust will be harder to build in B2N alliances.

Keywords

alliances B2N alliances NGOs governance opportunism TCE trust 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adobor, H. and R. S. McMullen: 2002. Strategic Partnering in E-Commerce: Guidelines for Managing Alliances. Business Horizons 45(2), 67–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alchian, A. A., & Demsetz, H. (1973). The property right paradigm. Journal of Economic History, 33(1), 16-27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alexander, S., & Ruderman, M. (1987). The Role of Procedural and Distributive Justice in Organizational Behavior. Social Justice Research, 1, 177-198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Andreasen, A.: 1996, Profits for Non-Profits: Find a Corporate Partner. Harvard Business Review 74 (2), 47–59.Google Scholar
  5. Anheier, H. K., & Ben-Ner, A. (2003). The Study of the Nonprofit Enterprise. Theories and Approaches. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Argenti, P. A. (2004). Collaborating with activists: How Starbucks works with NGOs. California Management Review, 47(1), 91-116.Google Scholar
  7. Ariño, Á., De La Torre, J., & Ring, P. S. (2001). Relational quality: Managing trust in corporate alliances. California Management Review, 44(1), 109-134.Google Scholar
  8. Ariño, Á., & Reuer, J. J. (2004). Designing and renegotiating strategic alliance contracts. Academy of Management Executive, 18(3), 37-48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ariño, Á., & Reuer, J. J. (2006). Alliance Contractual Design. In O. Shenkar & J. J. Reuer (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Strategic Alliances (pp. 149–167). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
  10. Arya, B., & Salk, J. E. (2006). Cross-sector alliance learning and effectiveness of voluntary codes of corporate social responsibility. Business Ethics Quarterly, 16(2), 211-234.Google Scholar
  11. Ashman, D. (2001). Civil society collaboration with business: Bringing empowerment back in. World Development, 29(7), 1097.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Austin, J. E. (2000). Strategic collaboration between non-profits and businesses. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29(1), 69-97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Austin, J. E., Reficco, E., & SEKN Research Team. (2004). Social Partnering in Latin America: Lessons Drawn from Collaborations of Businesses and Civil Society Organizations. Cambridge, MA: David Rockefeller Center for Latin American Studies, Harvard University.Google Scholar
  14. Bacchiega, A., & Borzaga, C. (2003). The Economics of the Third Sector: Toward a More Comprehensive Approach. In A. Anheier & A. Ben-Ner (Eds.), The Study of the Nonprofit Enterprise. Theories and Approaches (pp. 27-48). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Brouthers, K. D., & Hennart, J.-F (2007). Boundaries of the Firm: Insights from International Entry Mode Research. Journal of Management, 33(3), 395-425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Stone, M. M. (2006). The Design and Implementation of Cross-Sector Collaborations: Propositions from the Literature. Public Administration Review, 66, 44-55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Carson, S. J., Madhok, A., Varman, R., & John, G. (2003). Information processing moderators of the effectiveness of trust-based governance in interfirm R&D collaboration. Organization Science, 14(1), 45-57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Child, J., & Möllering, G. (2003). Contextual confidence and active trust development in the Chinese business environment. Organization Science, 14(1), 69-81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Coase, R. (1937). The Nature of the Firm. Economica 4, 386–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dahlberg: 2007, Business Guide to Partnering with NGOs and the United Nations (Dalberg Global Development Advisors, New York).Google Scholar
  21. Das, T. K., & Rahman, N. (2002). Opportunism Dynamics in Strategic Alliances. In F. J. Contractor & P. Lorange (Eds.), Cooperative Strategies and Alliances (pp. 89-118). Oxford: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
  22. Das, T. K., & Teng, B.-S. (1998). Between trust and control: Developing confidence in partner cooperation in alliances. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 491-512.Google Scholar
  23. Das, T. K., & Teng, B.-S. (2001). Trust, control, and risk in strategic alliances: An integrated framework. Organization Studies, 22(2), 251-284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dasgupta, S., & Tao, Z. (1998). Contractual incompleteness and the optimality of equity joint ventures. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 37(4), 391-206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Davies, I. (2009). Alliances and Networks: Creating Success in the UK Fair Trade Market. Journal of Business Ethics, 86, 109-126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Deephouse, D., & Heugens, P. (2009). Linking Social Issues to Organizational Impact: The Role of Infomediaries and the Infomediary Process. Journal of Business Ethics, 86(4), 541-553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Dixit, A. (1996). The Making of Economic Policy: A Transaction Cost Politics Perspective. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  28. Dixit, A. (2003). Some lessons from transaction-cost politics for less-developed countries. Economics and Politics 15(2), 107-133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Doh, J. P. (2003). Nongovernmental Organizations, Corporate Strategy, and Public Policy: NGOs as Agents of Change. In J. P. Doh & H. Teegen (Eds.), Globalization and NGOs: Transforming Business, Government, and Society (pp. 1-18). Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
  30. Doh, J. P., Newburry, W. E., & Teegen, H. (2003). Cooperative Strategies in Environmental Nongovernmental Organizations. In J. P. Doh & H. Teegen (Eds.), Globalization and NGOs: Transforming Business, Government, and Society (pp. 65-80). Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
  31. Doh, J. P., & Teegen, H. (2003). Globalization and NGOs: Transforming Business, Government, and Society. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
  32. Enjolras, B. (2009). A Governance-Structure Approach to Voluntary Organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 38, 761-783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Evans, P. B. (1979). Dependent Development: The Alliance of Multinational, State, and Local Capital in Brazil. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Fortune: 2008, Negroponte on Intel’s $100 Laptop Pullout http://money.cnn.com/2008/01/04/technology/kirkpatrick_negroponte.fortune/index.htm. Accessed 28 May 2009.
  35. Garcia, S. M. (2002). Power and the illusion of transparency in negotiations. Journal of Business & Psychology, 17(1), 133-145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Glaister, K. W., & Buckley, P. J. (1997). Task-related and partner-related selection criteria in UK international joint ventures. British Journal of Management, 8(3), 199-223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Gray, R., Jan, B., & Collison, D. (2006). NGOs, civil society and accountability: making the people accountable to capital. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 19(3), 319-348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Guay, T., Doh, J. P., & Sinclair, G. (2004). Non-governmental Organizations, Shareholder Activism, and Socially Responsible Investments: Ethical, Strategic, and Governance Implications. Journal of Business Ethics, 52(1), 125-139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hamel, G., Doz, Y., & Prahalad, C. K. (1989). Collaborate with your competitors - and win. Harvard Business Review, 67(1), 133-140.Google Scholar
  40. Hart, O. (1995). Firms, Contracts, and Financial Structure. Oxford: Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hart, O., & Moore, J. (1999). Foundations of Incomplete Contracts. The Review of Economic Studies, 66(1), 115-138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hennart, J.-F. (1988). A transaction costs theory of equity joint ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 9(4), 361-374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hess, D. (2001). Regulating Corporate Social Performance: A New Look At Social Accounting, Auditing, And Reporting. Business Ethics Quarterly, 11(2), 307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Iyer, E. (2003). Theory of Alliances: Partnership and Partner Characteristics. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 11(1), 41-58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Jamali, D., & Keshishian, T. (2009). Uneasy Alliances: Lessons Learned from Partnerships Between Businesses and NGOs in the context of CSR. Journal of Business Ethics, 84(2), 277-295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Jeffries, F. L., & Reed, R. (2000). Trust and adaptation in relational contracting. Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 873-883.Google Scholar
  47. Johnson, E., & Prakash, A (2007a). NGO research program: a collective action perspective. Policy Sciences, 40(3), 221–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kilby, P. (2006). Accountability for empowerment: dilemmas facing non-governmental organizations. World Development, 34(6), 951-963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. A. (1993). Procedural Justice, Attitudes, and Subsidiary Top Management Compliance with Multinationals’ Corporate Strategic Decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 36(3), 502-527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. A. (1997). Fair process: Managing in the knowledge economy. Harvard Business Review, 75(4), 65-76.Google Scholar
  51. King, A (2007). Cooperation between corporations and environmental groups: a transaction cost perspective. Academy of Management. The Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Leete, L. (2000). Wage equity and employee motivation in nonprofit and for-profit organizations. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 43, 423-446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. London, T., D. A. Rondinelli and O’Neill, H.: 2003, The Uneasy Learning Alliances between Corporations and Green Organizations: A Contingent Model of Stage and Type (Mimeo, Kenan-Flagler Business School, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina).Google Scholar
  54. Low, C. (2006). A framework for the governance of social enterprise. International Journal of Social Economics, 33(5/6), 376-385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Lucea, R (2007). How And How Much Do Market And Non-Market Cognitions Differ? Implications For Non-Market Strategy, Strategic Management Society. San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
  56. Luo, Y. (2006). Opportunism in Cooperative Alliances - Conditions and Solutions. In O. Shenkar & J. J. Reuer (Eds.), Handbook of Strategic Alliances (pp. 55-80). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  57. Madhok, A. (1995). Revisiting Multinational Firms’ Tolerance for Joint Ventures: A Trust-Based Approach. Journal of International Business Studies, 26(1), 117-137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Madhok, A. (2006). How much does ownership really matter? Equity and trust relations in joint venture relationships. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(1), 4-11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Mawlawi, F. (1993). New Conflicts, New Challenges: The Evolving Role for Non-Governmental Actors. Journal of International Affairs, 46(2), 391-413.Google Scholar
  60. Messner, M. (2009). The limits of accountability. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(8), 918-938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Meyerson, D., Weick, K. E., & Kramer, M. R. (1996). Swift trust and temporary groups. In M. R. Kramer & T. R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research (pp. 166-195). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  62. O’Dwyer, B. (2005). Stakeholder democracy: challenges and contributions from social accounting. Business Ethics: A European Review, 14(1), 28-41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. O’Dwyer, B., & Unerman, J (2007). From functional to social accountability: transforming the accountability relationship between funders and non-governmental development organisations. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability, 20(3), 446-471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Oxfam America: 2002, Starbucks, Ford Foundation, Oxfam America and CEPCO Announce Innovative Collaboration to Increase the Supply of High Quality Fair Trade Coffee. Oxfam America Press Release, July 29.Google Scholar
  65. Oxfam America: 2007, Oxfam Celebrates Win–Win Outcome for Ethiopian Coffee Farmers and Starbucks. Oxfam America Press Release, June 20.Google Scholar
  66. Oxfam GB, Novib Oxfam Netherlands, Unilever and Unilever Indonesia: 2005, Exploring the Links between International Business and Poverty Reduction: A Case Study of Unilever in Indonesia (Oxfam GB, Oxford, UK), http://www.oxfam.org.uk/what_we_do/issues/livelihoods/unilever.htm. Accessed 21 Dec 2005.
  67. Oxley, J. E. (1997). Appropriability hazards and governance in strategic alliances: a transaction-cost approach. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 13(2), 387-409.Google Scholar
  68. Oxley, J. E., & Sampson, R. C. (2004). The scope and governance of international R&D alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 25(8/9), 723-750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Parker, A. R. (2003). Prospects for NGO Collaboration with Multinational Enterprises. In J. P. Doh & H. Teegen (Eds.), Globalization and NGOs: Transforming Business, Government, and Society (pp. 81-105). Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
  70. Parkhe, A. (1991). Interfirm diversity, organizational learning, and longevity in global strategic alliances. Journal of International Business Studies, 22(4), 579-601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Parkhe, A. (1993). Strategic alliance structuring: a game theoretic and transaction cost examination of interfirm cooperation. Academy of Management Journal, 36(4), 794-829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Poppo, L., & Zenger, T. R. (2002). Do Formal Contracts and Relational Governance Function as Substitutes or Complements? Strategic Management Journal, 23(8), 707-726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Porter, M. E. and M. R. Kramer: 2002, The Competitive Advantage of Corporate Philanthropy. Harvard Business Review, 80(12), 56–68.Google Scholar
  74. Preston, A. E. (1989). The nonprofit worker in a for-profit world. Journal of Labor Economics, 7(4), 438-463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Raynard, P. (1998). Coming Together. A Review of Contemporary Approaches to Social Accounting, Auditing and Reporting in Non-profit Organisations. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(13), 1471-1479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Rein, M., & Stott, L. (2009). Working Together: Critical Perspectives on Six Cross-Sector Partnerships in Southern Africa. Journal of Business Ethics, 90, 79-89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Reuer, J. J., & Ariño, A (2007). Strategic alliance contracts: dimensions and determinants of contractual complexity. Strategic Management Journal, 28(3), 313-330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Reynolds, M., & Yuthas, K (2008). Moral Discourse and Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 78(1/2), 47-64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Ring, P. S., & Van de Ven, A. H. (1994). Developmental processes of cooperative interorganizational relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 35(1), 122-160.Google Scholar
  80. Rondinelli, D. A., & London, T. (2003). How corporations and environmental groups cooperate: Assessing cross-sector alliances and collaborations. Academy of Management Executive, 17(1), 61-76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Salamon, L. (1995). Partners in Public Service: Government-Nonprofit Relations in the Modern Welfare State. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  82. Seitanidi, M., & Crane, A. (2009). Implementing CSR Through Partnerships: Understanding the Selection, Design and Institutionalisation of Nonprofit-Business Partnerships. Journal of Business Ethics, 85, 413-429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Seitanidi, M., & Ryan, A. (2007). A critical review of forms of corporate community involvement: from philanthropy to partnerships. International Journal of Nonprofit & Voluntary Sector Marketing, 12(3), 247-266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Shenkar, O., & Arikan, I. (2009). Business as International Politics: Drawing Insights from Nation-State to Inter-Firm Alliances. Business and Politics, 11(4), 1–31.Google Scholar
  85. Simanis, E., & Hart, S. L (2008). The Base of the Pyramid Protocol: Toward Next Generation BoP Strategy (Version 2.0). Ithaca NY: Center for Sustainable Global Enterprise.Google Scholar
  86. Slivinski, A. (2003). The Public Goods Theory Revisited: Comments on Kingma’s Revisitation of Weisbrod (Chapter 4). In H. K. Anheier & A. Ben-Ner (Eds.), he Study of the Nonprofit Enterprise: Theories and Approaches (pp. 67-74). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Steinberg, R. (2003). Economic theories of nonprofit organizations: an evaluation. In H. K. Anheier & A. Ben-Ner (Eds.), The Study of the Nonprofit Enterprise: Theories and Approaches (pp. 277-310). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. UN Global Compact: 2008, Note on Integrity Measures, http://www.unglobalcompact.org/AboutTheGC/integrity.html. Accessed 18 May 2008.
  89. Unerman, J., & O’Dwyer, B. (2006). On James Bond and the importance of NGO accountability. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability, 19(3), 305-318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. USAID, U. S. A. f. I. D.: 2004, Innovative Approaches to Slum Electrification (USAID, Washington DC), http://www.usaid.gov/our_work/economic_growth_and_trade/energy/pubs/slumelect_exec.pdf.
  91. Vachani, S., & Smith, N. C. (2004). Socially Responsible Pricing: Lessons from the pricing of AIDS drugs in developing countries. California Management Review, 47(1), 117-144.Google Scholar
  92. Valor Martínez, C. (2003). Social Alliances for Fundraising: How Spanish Nonprofits Are Hedging the Risks. Journal of Business Ethics, 47(3), 209-222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Van Tujil, P. (1999). NGOs and Human Rights: Sources of Justice and Democracy. Journal of International Affairs, 52(2), 493-512.Google Scholar
  94. Volery, T., & Mensik, S. (1998). The Role of Trust in Creating Effective Alliances: A Managerial Perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(9/10), 987-994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Waddock, S. A. (1988). Building Successful Social Partnerships. Sloan Management Review, 29(4), 17-23.Google Scholar
  96. Walter, A. (2003). Relationship-specific factors influencing supplier involvement in customer new product development. Journal of Business Research, 56(9), 721-733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Weidenbaum, M. (2009). Who will Guard the Guardians? The Social Responsibility of NGOs. Journal of Business Ethics, 87(Supplement 1), 147-155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Weisbrod, B. A. (1975). Toward a theory of the voluntary nonprofit sector in a three-sector economy. In E. Phelps (Ed.), Altruism, morality, and economic theory. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  99. Weisbrod, B. A. (1983). Nonprofit and proprietary sector behavior: Wage differentials among lawyers. Journal of Labor Economics, 1(3), 246-263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and Hierarchies. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  101. Williamson, O. E. (1983). Credible Commitments: Using Hostages to Support Exchange. The American Economic Review, 73(4), 519-540.Google Scholar
  102. Williamson, O. E. (1985). The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  103. Williamson, O. E. (1991). Comparative economic organization: the analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(2), 269-296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Williamson, O. E. (1993). Opportunism and Its Critics. Managerial and Decision Economics, 14(2), 97-107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Wilson, J. Q. (1989). Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do and Why They Do It. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  106. Wymer Jr, W. W., & Samu, S. (2003). Dimensions of Business and Nonprofit Collaborative Relationships. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 11(1), 3-22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Yaziji, M. (2004). Turning Gadflies into Allies. Harvard Business Review, 82(February), 110–115.Google Scholar
  108. Zaheer, A., Lofstrom, S., & George, V. P. (2002). Interpersonal and Interorganizational Trust in Alliances. In F. J. Contractor & P. Lorange (Eds.), Cooperative Strategies and Alliances (pp. 347-377). Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  109. Zaheer, A., McEvily, B., & Perrone, V. (1998). Does trust matter? Exploring the effects of interorganizational and interpersonal trust on performance. Organization Science, 9(2), 141-159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Zucker, L. G. (1986). Production of Trust: Institutional Sources of Economic Structure, 1840–1920’,. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 8, (pp. 53–111). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Babson CollegeBabson ParkU.S.A.
  2. 2.Sawyer School of BusinessSuffolk UniversityBostonU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations