Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 101, Issue 1, pp 111–126 | Cite as

Mission-Driven Organizations in Japan: Management Philosophy and Individual Outcomes



Previous studies imply that management philosophy has become an essential ethical foundation for a number of mission-driven organizations in Japan. This study examines how management philosophy might be influential to individuals with a sample of 1019 Japanese employees. The article develops a framework for analyzing the adoption of management philosophy and individual attitudinal and behavioral outcomes. Factor analysis shows that adoption of the management philosophy can be categorized into two dimensions, identification with management philosophy, and sensemaking of that management philosophy. Regression results indicate that while philosophy-oriented practice might affect individual adoption of management philosophy, the adoption of the management philosophy is positively related to both job involvement and organizational citizenship behavior. Furthermore, the results of structural equation analysis indicate that both dimensions of the adoption of the management philosophy might mediate the relationship between organizational practice and individual outcomes. The research not only increases our understandings into the effectiveness of the management philosophy as an essential ethical foundation, but also provides intriguing implication regarding the organizational measures required to enhance the mission-driven culture.

Key words

management philosophy mission-driven organization identification sensemaking individual outcomes job involvement organizational citizenship behavior 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Albert, S. and D. A. Whetten: 1985, ‘Organizational Identity’, Research in Organizational Behavior 7, 263-295.Google Scholar
  2. Analoui, F. and A. Karami: 2002, ‘CEOs and Development of the Meaningful Mission Statement’, Corporate Governance 2(3), 13-20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ardichvili, A., J. A. Mitchell and D. Jondle: 2009, ‘Characteristics of Ethical Business Cultures’, Journal of Business Ethics 85(4), 445-451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ashforth, B. E., S. H. Harrison and K. G. Corley: 2008, ‘Identification in Organizations: An Examination of Four Fundamental Questions’, Journal of Management 34(3), 325-374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ashforth, B. E. and F. Mael: 1989, ‘Social Identity Theory and the Organization’, Academy of Management Review 14(1), 20-39.Google Scholar
  6. Baker, T. L., T. G. Hunt and M. C. Andrews: 2006, `Promoting Ethical Behavior and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors: The Influence of Corporate Ethical Values', Journal of Business Research 59(7), 849–857Google Scholar
  7. Balogun, J. and G. Johnson: 2004, ‘Organizational Restructuring and Middle Manager Sensemaking’, Academy of Management Journal 47(4), 523-549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Baron, R. M. and D. A. Kenny: 1986, ‘The Moderator-mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51(6), 1173-1182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bart, C. K. and M. C. Baetz: 1998, ‘The Relationship between Mission Statement and Firm Performance: An Exploratory Study’, The Journal of Management Studies 35(6), 823-853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bartkus, B. R. and M. Glassman: 2008, ‘Do Firms Practice What They Preach? The Relationship Between Mission Statements and Stakeholder Management’, Journal of Business Ethics 83(2), 207-216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bolino, M. C.:1999, ‘Citizenship and Impression Management: Good Soldiers or Good Actors?’, Academy of Management Review 24(1), 82-98.Google Scholar
  12. Brickson, S. L.: 2007, ‘Organizational Identity Orientation: The Genesis of the Role of the Firm and Distinct Forms of Social Value’, Academy of Management Review 32(3), 864-888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Burke, R. J., Z. Burgess and B. Fallon: 2006, ‘Organizational Practices Supporting Women and Their Satisfaction and Well-being’, Women in Management Review 21(5), 416-425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cullen, J. C., B. A. Silverstein and M. P. Foley: 2008, ‘Linking Biomechanical Workload and Organizational Practices to Burnout and Satisfaction’, Journal of Business and Psychology 23(2), 63-71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Davis, J. H., J. A. Ruhe, M. Lee and U. Rajadhyaksha: 2007, ‘Mission Possible: Do School Mission Statements Work?’, Journal of Business Ethics 70(1), 99-110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dutton, J. E., J. M. Dukerich and C. V. Harquail: 1994, ‘Organizational Images and Member Identification’, Administrative Science Quarterly 39(2), 239-263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fenwick, T.: 2007, ‘Developing Organizational Practices of Ecological Sustainability’, Leadership and Organization 28(7), 632-645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gatewood, R. D. and C. M. Riordan: 1997, ‘The Development and Test of a Model of Total Quality: Organizational Practices, TQ Principles, Employee Attitudes and Customer Satisfaction’, Journal of Quality Management 2(1), 41-65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Germain, R. and M. B. Cooper: 1990, ‘How a Customer Mission Statement Affects Company Performance’, Industrial Marketing Management 19(2), 47-54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Grant, A. M. and J. J. Sumanth: 2009, ‘Mission Possible? The Performance of Prosocially Motivated Employees Depends on Manager Trustworthiness’, Journal of Applied Psychology 94(4), 927-944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Guthrie, J. P.: 2001, ‘High-involvement Work Practices, Turnover, and Productivity: Evidence from New Zealand’, Academy of Management Journal 44(1), 180-190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hatvany, N. and V. Pucik: 1981, ‘An Integrated Management System: Lessons from the Japanese Experience’, Academy of Management Review 6(3), 469-480.Google Scholar
  23. Hofstede, G., B. Neuijen, D. D. Ohayv and G. Sanders: 1990, ‘Measuring Organizational Cultures: A Qualitative and Quantitative Study Across Twenty Cases’, Administrative Science Quarterly 35(2), 286-316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. James, L. R., S. A. Mulaik and J. M. Brett: 2006, ‘A Tale of Two Methods’, Organizational Research Methods 9(2), 233-244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Japan Institute for Labour Policy and Training: 1999, Development of HRM Checklist for Support to the Employment Management Practices (in Japanese), Tokyo: Japan Institute for Labour Policy and Training.Google Scholar
  26. Kagan, J.:1958, ‘The Concept of Identification’, Psychological Review 65(5), 296-305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kaptein, M.: 2004, ‘Business Codes of Multinational Firms: What Do They Say?’, Journal of Business Ethics 50(1), 13-31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kirkman, B. L. and B. Rosen: 1999, ‘Beyond Self-Management: Antecedents and Consequences of Team Empowerment’, Academy of Management Journal 42(1), 58-74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kolodinsky, R. W., R. A. Giacalone and C. L. Jurkiewicz: 2008, ‘Workplace Values and Outcomes: Exploring Personal, Organizational, and Interactive Workplace Spirituality’, Journal of Business Ethics 81(2), 465-480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Konovsky, M. A. and D. W. Organ: 1996, ‘Dispositional and Contextual Determinants of Organizational Citizenship Behavior’, Journal of Organizational Behavior 17, 253-266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lodahl, T. M. and M. Kejner: 1965, ‘The Definition and Measurement of Job Involvement’, Journal of Applied Psychology 49(1), 24-33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Maitlis, S.: 2005, ‘The Social Processes of Organizational Sensemaking’, Academy of Management Journal 48(1), 21-49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. O’Connell, D.: 1998, ‘Sensemaking in Organizations’, Administrative Science Quarterly 43(1), 205-208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. O’Reilly, C. and J. Chatman: 1986, ‘Organizational Commitment and Psychological Attachment: The Effects of Compliance, Identification, and Internalization on Prosocial Behavior’, Journal of Applied Psychology 71(3), 492-499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Organ, D.W.:1988, Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Good Soldier Syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  36. Palmer, T. B. and J. C. Short: 2008, ‘Mission Statements in U.S. Colleges of Business: An Empirical Examination of Their Content With Linkages to Configurations and Performance’, Academy of Management Learning & Education 7(4), 454-470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pearce, J. and F. David: 1987, ‘Corporate Mission Statement: The Bottom Line’, Executive 1(2), 109-116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Penner, L. A., A. R. Midili and J. Kegelmeyer.: 1997, ‘Beyond Job Attitudes: A Personality and Social Psychology Perspective on the Causes of Organizational Citizenship Behavior’, Human Performance 10(2), 111-131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pfeffer, J.: 1998, ‘Understanding Organizations: Concepts and Controversies’, in: D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske and G. Lindzey (eds) The Handbook of Social Psychology, (MacGraw-Hill, Boston), pp.733-778.Google Scholar
  40. Poole, M. S.: 1985, ‘Communication and organizational climates: review, critique, and a new perspective’, in: R. D. McPhee and P. T. Tompkins (eds) Organizational Communication: Traditional Themes and New Directions (Sage, Beverly Hills), pp. 79-108.Google Scholar
  41. Ran, B. and P. R. Duimering: 2007, ‘Imaging the Organization: Language Use in Organizational Identity Claims’, Journal of Business and Technical Communication 21(2): 155-187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ring, P.S., and G. P. Rands: 1989, ‘Sensemaking, Understanding, and Committing: Emergent Interpersonal Transaction Processes in the Evolution of 3 M’s Microgravity Research Program’, in A. H. Van de Ven, H. L. Angle and M. S. Poole (eds.), Research on the Management of Innovation: The Minnesota Studies (Ballinger, New York), pp. 337-366.Google Scholar
  43. Riordan, C. M. and R. D. Gatewood: 1996, ‘Putting the E(Employee) into Quality Efforts: A Process Model of Organizational Practices, Quality Principles, and Employee Reactions’, in D. B. Fedor and S. Ghosh (eds.), Advances in the Management of Organizational Quality (JAI Press, Greenwich), pp. 299-235.Google Scholar
  44. Scott, W.E.: 1966, ‘Activation Theory and Task Design’, Organizational Behavior & Human Performance 1(1), 3-10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Singh, J., W. Verbeke and G. K. Rhoads: 1996, ‘Do Organizational Practices Matter in Role Stress Processes? A Study of Direct and Moderating Effects for Marketing-Oriented Boundary Spanners’, Journal of Marketing 60, 69-86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Staw, B. M. and L. D. Epstein: 2000, ‘What Bandwagons Brings: Effects of Popular Management Techniques on Corporate Performance, Reputation, and CEO Pay’, Administrative Science Quarterly 45(3), 523-556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tajfel, H.:1978, ‘Social Categorization, Social Identity, and Social Comparison’, in H. Tajfel (ed.), Differentiation between Social Groups (New York: Academic Press), pp.61-76.Google Scholar
  48. Tajfel, H.: 1982. ‘Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations’, Annual Review of Psychology, 33(1), 1-39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tanaka, M.: 2006, Theory and Practice of Mission Management: toward the Realization of Management Philosophy, Chuokeizai-sha, Tokyo, in Japanese.Google Scholar
  50. Thomas, J. B., S. M. Clark, and D. A. Gioia: 1993, ‘Strategic Sensemaking and Organizational Performance: Linkages among Scanning, Interpretation, Action, and Outcomes’, Academy of Management Journal 36(2), 239-270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Toyo Keizai: 2006, CSR Companies Handbook 2007 (in Japanese), Tokyo: Toyo Keizai.Google Scholar
  52. Turner, J. C., M. A. Hogg, P. J. Oakes, S. D. Reicher and M. Wetherell: 1987, Rediscovering the Social Group: A self-categorization Theory, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  53. Verbeke, W.: 2000. ‘A Revision of Hofstede et al.’s (1990) Organizational Practices Scale’, Journal of Organizational Behavior 21, 587-602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wang, Y.: 2009, ‘Examination on Philosophy-based Management of Contemporary Japanese Corporations: Philosophy, Value Orientation and performance’, Journal of Business Ethics 85(1), 1-12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Weick, K. E.: 1995, Sensemaking in Organizations, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  56. Whitbred, R. C.: 2009, ‘The Sensemaking of Organizational Mission: A Conceptual Model and Extension’, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association,

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of International StudiesHiroshima City UniversityAsaminami-Ku, HiroshimaJapan

Personalised recommendations