Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 91, Supplement 2, pp 279–289 | Cite as

Responsible Retailing: The Practice of CSR in Banana Plantations in Costa Rica

  • Pamela K. Robinson


During the last 10 years or so, a number of corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives have been introduced in global supply chains, which aim to improve the conditions of workers engaged in producing goods for export. This article discusses the observations of CSR in practice in the Costa Rican-United Kingdom (UK) banana chain. The banana chain makes for an interesting case study because there are dominant corporate actors at each end who are in a position to influence the conditions experienced by workers on banana plantations. At the top of the chain there are four major UK supermarket groups who control access to the retail market and as self- appointed guardians of consumer interest are demanding that producers adopt more socially responsible practices. At the other end, banana production is highly integrated and controlled by three large North American agri-businesses who have developed their own social and environmental certification programmes. Costa Rica also makes for an interesting country to locate the study as it has a tradition of state-led policies to protect worker rights. Yet, in spite of CSR commitments made by both supermarkets and producers that emphasise health and safety and the country’s established Labour Law, this article shows that there are problems for workers when they are forced to meet demanding production schedules. Furthermore, it suggests that whilst supermarkets continue to drive down consumer prices and put pressure on producers to reduce costs, a downward spiral of working conditions is created regardless of the CSR policies in place. However, this article also identifies that changes to supermarket behaviour is possible when consumer trust is at stake.


corporate social responsibility Costa Rica global supply chains labour codes of conduct supermarkets banana transnational producers 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. ASDA: 2007, ‘Ethical Trading’, Accessed 20 Aug 2008.
  2. Barrientos, S. and Dolan, C. 2006. ‘Transformation of Global Food: Opportunities and Challenges for Fair and Ethical Trade’, in S. Barrientos and C. Dolan (eds.), Ethical Sourcing in the Global Food Syste. (Earthscan, London), pp.1-33.Google Scholar
  3. Bemúdez Umaňa, G.: 2006, ‘Union Regional Coordinator of Coordinadora Latinoamericana de Sindicatos Bananeros (COLSIBA)’, Interview Conducted on 25 Feb 2006.Google Scholar
  4. Bevan, J. 2005. Trolley Wars: The Battle of the Supermarkets. (Profile Books, London).Google Scholar
  5. Blowfield, M. 2005. ‘Corporate Social Responsibility – the Failing Discipline and Why it Matters for International Relations’. International Relations, 19, 173-191. DOI:  10.1177/0047117805052812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bulmer-Thomas, V. 2003. The Economic History of Latin America Since Independence. 2nd edition. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).Google Scholar
  7. Chapman, P. 2007. Jungle Capitalists: A story of globalisation, greed and revolution. (Canongate, Edinburgh).Google Scholar
  8. Christopherson, S. and Lillie, N. 2005. ‘Neither global not standard: corporate strategies in the new era of labor standards’. Environment and Planning A, 37, 1919-38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. CIA (Central Intelligence Agency): 2009, ‘The World Fact Book: Costa Rica’, Accessed 10 Oct 2009.
  10. COLSIBA (Coordinadora Latinoamericana de Sindicatos Bananeros): 2005, ‘Noticias de Acción Sindical’, Accessed 3 Jan 2006.
  11. Dolan, C. and Humphrey, J. 2000. ‘Governance and Trade in Fresh Vegetables: The Impact of UK Supermarkets on the African Horticulture Industry’. Journal of Development Studies, 37, 147-76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. ETI (Ethical Trade Initiative): 2003, Key Challenges in Ethical Trade: Report on the ETI Biennial Conference 2003 (ETI, London).Google Scholar
  13. ETI: 2005, ‘The ETI Base Code’, Accessed 16 July 2008.
  14. ETI: 2007, ‘Our Members’, Accessed 15 June 2008.
  15. European Commission: 2001, ‘Promoting a European Framework for Corporate Social Responsibility’, Green Paper (Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg).Google Scholar
  16. FAO, (Food and Agriculture Organisation). 2003. The World Banana Economy: 1985-2002. (FAO, Rome).Google Scholar
  17. FAO: 2005, ‘Bananas: Is There a Tariff-Only Equivalent to the EU Tariff Rate Quota Regime? Insights from Economic Analysis’, Working Paper No. 3 (FAO, Rome).Google Scholar
  18. FAOSTAT: 2006, ‘ProdSTAT: Crops’, Accessed 14 Oct 2006.
  19. Gereffi, G.: 1994, ‘The Organisation of Buyer-Driven Global Commodity Chains: How U.S. Retailers Shape Overseas Production Networks’, in G. Gereffi and M. Korzeniewicz (eds.), Commodity Chains and Global Capitalism (Preager, Westport), pp. 1–16.Google Scholar
  20. Gereffi, G., Humphrey, J. and Sturgeon, T. 2005. ‘The Governance of Global Value Chains’. Review of International Political Economy, 12, 78- 104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Glaser, B.G. and Strauss, A.L. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. (Aldine, New York).Google Scholar
  22. Griffiths, I. and F. Lawrence: 2007, ‘Bananas to UK via the Channel Islands? It Pays for Tax Reasons’, The Guardian 6 Nov, 6–7.Google Scholar
  23. Hale, A. and Shaw, L. M. 2001. ‘Women Workers and the Promise of Ethical Trade in the Globalised Garment Industry: A Serious Beginning’. Antipode, 33, 510-30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hammersley, M. and Gomm, R. 2004. ‘Introduction’, in R. Gomm, M. Hammersley and P. Foster (eds), Case Study Method: Key Issues, Key Texts. (Sage, London).Google Scholar
  25. Harari, R.: 2005, ‘The Environmental and Health Impacts of Banana Production in Latin America’, The Second International Banana Conference, Brussels.Google Scholar
  26. Harvey, M., Quilley, S. and Beynon, H. 2002. Exploring the Tomato: Transformations of Nature, Society and Economy. (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham).Google Scholar
  27. Hertz, N. 2004. ‘Corporations on the Front Line’. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 12, 202-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hopkins, M.: 2004, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility: An Issues Paper’, Working Paper No. 27 (International Labour Office, Geneva).Google Scholar
  29. IBCII: 2005, ‘Forum Discussion at the International Banana Conference II’, held at the Flemish Parliament, Brussels 28–30 April 2005.Google Scholar
  30. IGD (Institute of Grocery Distribution): 2009, ‘TNS Figures Show 6% Final Quarter for Grocery’, Accessed 20 Jan 2009.
  31. Jenkins, R., Pearson, R. and Seyfang, G. 2002. ‘Introduction’. In: R. Jenkins, R. Pearson and G. Seyfang (eds.), Corporate Responsibility and Labour Rights: Codes of Conduct in the Global Economy. Earthscan, London, pp. 1-10.Google Scholar
  32. Klein, N. 2000. No Logo. (Flamingo, London).Google Scholar
  33. Moberg, M. and Striffler, S. 2003. ‘Introduction’, in S. Striffler and M. Moberg (eds.), Banana Wars: Power, Production, and History in the Americas (Duke University Press, London), pp.1-19.Google Scholar
  34. Morrisons: 2007, ‘Taking Good Care: Our Social Responsibility Report’, Accessed 20 June 2008.
  35. Myers, G. 2004. Banana Wars: The Price of Free Trade, a Caribbean Perspective. (Zed Books, London).Google Scholar
  36. Nichols, T. 1997. The Sociology of Industrial Injury. (Mansell, London).Google Scholar
  37. Ponte, S. and Gibbon, P. 2005. ‘Quality standards, conventions and the governance of global value chains’. Economy and Society, 34, 1-31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Preuss, L.: 2008, ‘Ethical Sourcing Codes of Large UK-Based Corporations: Prevalence, Content, Limitations’, Journal of Business Ethics. doi: 10.1007/s10551-008-9978-7.
  39. Prieto-Carrón, M. 2006. ‘Corporate Social Responsibility in Latin America: Chiquita, Women Banana Workers and Structural Inequalities’. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 21, 85-94.Google Scholar
  40. Roche, J. 1998. The International Banana Trade. (Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge).Google Scholar
  41. SAI, (Social Accountability International). 2001. Social Accountability 8000. (SAI, New York).Google Scholar
  42. SAI: 2005, ‘About Social Accountability International’, Accessed 17 Jan 2005.
  43. Sainsbury’s: 2003, ‘Ethical Trading Report’, Accessed 3 May 2004.
  44. Sandbrook, R., Edelman, M., Heller, P. and Teichman, J. 2007. Social Democracy in the Global Periphery: Origins, Challenges, Prospects. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).Google Scholar
  45. Sauma, J.: 2006, ‘Director of Corporación Bananera Nacional (National Banana Corporation)’, Interview Conducted on 7 April, 2006.Google Scholar
  46. Sayer, R. A. 1992. Method in Social Science: A Realist Approach. 2nd Edition. (Routledge, London).Google Scholar
  47. Simms, A. 2007. Tescopoly: How one shop came out on top and why it matters. (Constable, London).Google Scholar
  48. Smith, A. 2003. ‘Has the market gone bananas?’ International Union Rights, 10, 20-1.Google Scholar
  49. Soederberg, S. 2006. Global Governance in Question: Empire, Class and the New Common Sense in Managing North-South Relations. (Pluto Press, London).Google Scholar
  50. Tesco: 2007, ‘Corporate Responsibility Review 2007’, Accessed 29 June 2007.
  51. UNDP, (United Nations Development Programme). 2005. Human Development Report 2005: International Cooperation at a Crossroads. New York: UNDP.Google Scholar
  52. Urminsky, M. (ed.): 2001, ‘Self-Regulation in the Workplace: Codes of Conduct, Social Labeling and Socially Responsible Investment’, Series on Management Systems and Corporate Citizenship, MCC Working Paper No. 1 (International Labour Office, Geneva).Google Scholar
  53. Werre, M. 2003. Implementing corporate responsibility - the Chiquita case. Journal of Business Ethics, 44, 247-260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wilson, B. M. 1998. Costa Rica: Politics, Economics and Democracy. (Lynne Rienner, London).Google Scholar
  55. Wilson, J.S. and Otsuki, T. 2002. To Spray or Not to Spray? Pesticides, Banana Exports, and Food Safety. (World Bank, Washington).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wrigley, N. and Lowe, M. 2002. Reading Retail: A Geographical Perspective on Retailing and Consumption Spaces. (Arnold, London).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Birmingham Business SchoolUniversity of BirminghamEdgbaston, BirminghamU.K.

Personalised recommendations