Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 91, Supplement 2, pp 193–209 | Cite as

CSR, Sustainability and the Meaning of Global Reporting for Latin American Corporations

  • Luis A. Perez-Batres
  • Van V. Miller
  • Michael J. Pisani
Article

Abstract

We seek to add to the Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Sustainable Development (SD) literature through the empirical study of Latin American firm membership in the United Nations Global Compact (GC) and Global Report Initiative (GRI). Within an institutional-based framework, we explore through three filters – commercial, state-signaling, and distinguished peers – the impact of normative and mimetic pressures associated with GC/GRI membership. Our sample includes 207 public firms from six Latin American countries (Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Mexico, and Peru). Our results suggest Latin American firms from countries with a greater European influence (normative pressure) are twice as likely to be enrolled in the GC/GRI. Additionally, we find that Latin American firms listed on the NYSE (mimetic pressure) are also twice as likely to sign up under the GC/GRI. Hence, the normative and mimetic pillars of institutional theory are found to be significant factors for Latin American firms adopting sustainability initiatives.

Keywords

Corporate Social Responsibility Sustainable Development Latin America institutional theory punctuated equilibrium United Nations Global Compact Global Report Initiative 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abreu, M. de P.: 2006, `Which ``Industrial Policies'' are Meaningful for Latin America?', Intal-ITD, Working Paper-SITI 11. Buenos Aires, ArgentinaGoogle Scholar
  2. Amis, J., Slack, T., and Hinings, C. R. 2004. The Pace, Sequence, and Linearity of Radical Change. Academy of Management Journal 47(1), 15-39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barnett, M.L. 2004. Are Globalization and Sustainability Compatible? A Review of the Debate between the World Business Council for Sustainable Development and the International Forum on Globalization. Organization Environment book review essay 17(4), 523-532.Google Scholar
  4. Bowen, H. R. 1953. Social responsibilities of the businessman. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  5. Brammer, S. and Millington, A. 2008. Does It Pay to Be Different? An Analysis of the Relationship between Corporate Social and Financial Performance. Strategic Management Journal 29, 1325-1343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burt, R.S. 1997. The contingent value of social capital. Administrative Science Quarterly 42(2), 339-365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Busenitz, L.W., Gómez, C. and Spencer, J.W. 2000. Country institutional profiles: Unlocking entrepreneurial phenomena. Academy of Management Journal 43, 994–1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carroll, A. B. 1991. The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons 34, 39-48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carroll, A. B. 1999. Corporate Social Responsibility: Evolution of a Definitional Construct. Business and Society 38, 268-295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Castro, C.J. 2004. Sustainable Development: Mainstream and Critical Perspectives. Organization Environment 17, 195-225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cetindamar, D. and Husoy, K. 2007. Corporate Social Responsibility Practices and Environmentally Responsible Behavior: The Case of the United Nations Global Compact. Journal of Business Ethics 76, 163–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chatterji, A. and S. Listokin: 2007, ‘Corporate Social Irresponsibility’, Democracy 3, 52–63.Google Scholar
  13. Cheney, G.: 2004, ‘The Corporate Conscience and the Triple BottomLine’, Accounting Today July(12), 13–14.Google Scholar
  14. Common, M.1995. Sustainability and Policy: Limits to Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Davis, J.L., Payne, G.T, and McMahan, G.C. 2007. A Few Bad Apples? Scandalous Behavior of Mutual Fund Managers. Journal of Business Ethics 76, 319-334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Delmas, M.A. and Toffel, M.W. 2008. Organizational Responses to Environmental Demands: Opening the Black Box. Strategic Management Journal, 29, 1027-1055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Diamond, M.: 1978, `Towards a Change in Economic Paradigm Through Experience of Developing Countries', Journal of Development Economics 5(1), 19–53Google Scholar
  18. DiMaggio, P.J. and Powell, W.W. 1983. The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, 48: 147-60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. DiMaggio PJ, Powell WW. 1991. Introduction. In The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, Powell WW, DiMaggio PJ (eds). University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL; 1–38.Google Scholar
  20. Dornbusch, R. 1992. The Case for Trade Liberalization in Developing Countries. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 6(1), 69-85.Google Scholar
  21. Edwards, S.: 1995, Crisis and Reform in Latin America: From Despair to Hope (Oxford University Press, New York)Google Scholar
  22. Eldredge, N., and Gould, S.J. 1972. Punctuated equilibria: An alternative to phyletic gradualism. In T.J.M. Schopf (Ed.), Models in paleobiology 82-115. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar
  23. Emery, F. E. and Trist, E. L. 1965. The causal texture of organizational environments. Human Relations 18, 21-32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fligstein N. 1987. The intraorganizational power struggle: the rise of finance presidents in large corporations, 1919–1979. American Sociological Review 52(1), 44–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fox-Wolfgramm, S.J., Boal, K.B., and Hunt, J.G. 1998. Organizational adaptation to institutional change: A comparative study of first-order change in prospector and defender banks. Administrative Science Quarterly 43(1), 87-126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Friedman, T.L. 2006. The World is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century. Farrar, Straus and Giroux: New York.Google Scholar
  27. Garriga, E. and Mele, D. 2004. Corporate Social Responsibility Theories: Mapping the Territory. Journal of Business Ethics 53, 51–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Garz, H. and Volk, C. 2007. GRI Reporting: Aiming to Uncover True Performance. West LB Extra-Financial Research, September.Google Scholar
  29. Gersick, C.J.G. 1991. Revolutionary change theories: A multilevel exploration of the punctuated equilibrium paradigm. Academy of Management Review 16(1), 10-36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gersick, C.J.G. 1994. Pacing strategic change: The case of a new venture. Academy of Management Journal 37(1), 9-45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gould, S.J. 1982a. The meaning of punctuated equilibrium and its role in validating a hierarchical approach to macroevolution, in Perspectives on Evolution, R. Milkman (ed.). Sunderland, Mass.: Sinauer, 83-104.Google Scholar
  32. Greenwood, R., and Hinings, C.R. 1988. Organizational design types, tracks and the dynamics of strategic change. Organization Studies 9(3), 293-316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Greenwood, R., and Hinings, C.R. 1993. Understanding strategic change: The contribution of archetypes. Academy of Management Journal 36(5), 1052-1081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Greenwood R, Hinings CR. 1996. Understanding radical organizational change: bringing together the old and the new institutionalism. Academy of Management Review 21(4), 1022–1054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Guillen, M.F. 2000. Business groups in emerging economies: A resource-based view. Academy of Management Journal 43(3), 362-380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Haggard, S.: 1990, The Politics of Growth in the Newly Industrialized Countries (Cornell University, Ithaca, NY)Google Scholar
  37. Haslam, P. A.: 2004, ‘The Corporate Social Responsibility System in Latin America and the Caribbean’, FOCAL Policy Papers, FPP-04-1, http://www.focal.ca/pdf/csr_04.pdf.
  38. Haunschild, P.R. and Miner, A.S. 1997. Modes of interorganizational imitation: the effects of outcome salience and uncertainty. Administrative Science Quarterly 42, 472-500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Haveman, H.A., Russo, M.V., and Meyer, A.D. 2001. Organizational environments in flux: The impact of regulatory punctuations on organizational domains, CEO succession, and performance. Organization Science 12(3), 253-273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hess, D.: 2009, ‘The Three Pillars of Corporate Social Reporting as New Governance Regulation: Disclosure, Dialogue and Development’, Business Ethics Quarterly (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  41. Hitt, M.A., Keats, B.W., and DeMarie, S.M. 1998. Navigating in the new competitive landscape: Building strategic flexibility and competitive advantage in the 21st century. Academy of Management Executive 12(4), 22-42.Google Scholar
  42. Hoskisson, R.E., Eden, L., Lau, C.M., and Wright, M. 2000. Strategy in emerging economies. Academy of Management Journal 43(3), 249-267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ingram P, Silverman BS. 2002. The new institutionalism in strategic management. In Advances in Strategic Management 19, 1-30. Ingram P, Silverman BS (eds.) JAI Press: New York.Google Scholar
  44. Jensen, H.B. 2007. From Economic to Sustainable Development: Unfolding the Concept of Law. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 24, 505-513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Jose, A., and Lee, S.M. 2007. Environmental Reporting of Global Corporations: A Content Analysis based on Website Disclosures. Journal of Business Ethics 72, 307-321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kanter, J.: 2009, ‘Europe to U.S.: You’re a Big Polluter’, The New York Times, Green Inc. Blog, 27 Jan.Google Scholar
  47. Kell, G. 2005. The Global Compact Selected Experiences and Reflections. Journal of Business Ethics 59(1–2), 69–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Khanna, T., and Palepu, K. 1997. Why focused strategies may be wrong for emerging markets. Harvard Business Review 75(4), 41-42.Google Scholar
  49. Knudsen, J. S.: 2005, ‘The Global Reporting Initiative in Denmark: Emperor’s New Clothes or Useful Reporting Tool?’, in M. Morsing and A. Kakabadse (eds.), Reconciling Governance Philosophies: 21st Century Challenges (UK, Palgrave).Google Scholar
  50. Kogut, B., and Zander, U. 1996. What firms do? Coordination, identity, and learning. Organization Science 7(5), 502-518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Li, J. 1995. Foreign entry and survival: effects of strategic choices on performance in international markets. Strategic Management Journal 16(5), 333–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Long, J.S. 1997. Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables, SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  53. Lopez, M.V., Garcia, A. and Rodriguez, L 2007. Sustainable Development and Corporate Performance: A Study Based on the Dow Jones Sustainability Index. Journal of Business Ethics 75, 285-300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Luna Sotorrío, L. and Fernández Sánchez, J.L. 2008. Corporate Social Responsibility of the Most Highly Reputed European and North American Firms. Journal of Business Ethics 82, 379-390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Maignan I, Ralston DA. 2002. Corporate social responsibility in Europe and the US: insights from businesses’ self-representations. Journal of International Business Studies 33(3), 497-514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Meyer, J.W. and Rowan, B. 1977. Institutionalised organisations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. The American Journal of Sociology 83, 340-363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Mitchell, W., Shaver, J.M., and Yeung, B. 1995. Foreign entrant survival and foreign market share: Canadian companies experience in United States medical sector markets. Strategic Management Journal 15(7), 555–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Moon, J. 2007. The Contribution of Corporate Social Responsibility to Sustainable Development. Sustainable Development 15, 296-306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. North, D.C. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Pagano, M., Röell, A.A., and Zechner, J. 2002. The Geography of Equity Listing: Why Do Companies List Abroad? Journal of Finance 57(6), 2654-2694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Park, Y. C.: 1996, `East Asian Liberalization, Bubbles, and the Challenge from China', Brooking Papers on Economic Activity 2, 357–371Google Scholar
  62. Pava, M.L. 2008. Why Corporations Should Not Abandon Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 83(4), 805-812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Peng, M.W., and Heath, P.S. 1996. The growth of the firm in planned economies in transition: Institutions, organizations, and strategic choice. Academy of Management Review 21(2), 492-528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Perez-Batres, L. A., L. Eden and M. A. Hitt: 2009, ‘Learning to Adapt to Radical Change in Emerging Markets: Lessons from the Mexican Banking Industry, 1991–2004’, Working Paper.Google Scholar
  65. Perez-Batres, L.A. and Eden, L. 2008. Is there a liability of localness? How emerging market firms respond to regulatory punctuations. Journal of International Management 14, 232-251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Pisani, M. J. 2003. The Negative Impact of Structural Adjustment on Sectoral Earnings in Nicaragua. Review of Radical Political Economics 35(2), 107-125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Pisani, M. J. and Pagán, J.A. 2004. Self-Employment in the Era of the New Economic Model in Latin America: A Case Study from Nicaragua. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 16(4), 335-350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Porter, M. E. and M. R. Kramer: 2006, ‘Strategy and Society’, Harvard Business Review December, 78–91.Google Scholar
  69. Powell, W.W., and Smith-Doerr, L. 1994. Networks and economic life. In N. Smelser and R. Swedberg (Eds.), Handbook of economic sociology, 368-402. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  70. Ramamurti, R. 1992. Why Are Developing Countries Privatizing? Journal of International Business Studies 23(2), 225-249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Ramamurti, R. 2000. A Multilevel Model of Privatization in Emerging Economies. Academy of Management Review 25(3), 525-550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Rangan, S., and Drummond, A. 2004. Explaining outcomes in competition among foreign multinationals in a focal host market. Strategic Management Journal 25(3), 285-293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Ranis, G.: 1995, `Challenges and Opportunities Posed by Asia's Superexporters: Implications for Manufactured Exporters from Latin America', in J. L. Dietz (ed.), Latin America's Economic Development: Confronting Crisis, 2nd Edition (Lynne Rienner Publishers, Boulder, CO), pp. 37–41Google Scholar
  74. Ranson, S., Hinings, B., and Greenwood, R. 1980. Structuring of organizational structures. Administrative Science Quarterly 25(1), 1-17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Reich, R. B.: 2007, Supercapitalism: The Transformation of Business, Democracy, and Everyday Life (Alfred A. Knopf, New York)Google Scholar
  76. Runhaar, H. and Lafferty, H. 2009. Governing Corporate Social Responsibility: An Assessment of the Contribution of the UN Global Compact to CSR Strategies in the Telecommunications Industry. Journal of Business Ethics 84(4), 479-495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Sabherwal, R., Hirschheim, R., and Goles, T. 2001. The dynamics of alignment: Insights from a punctuated equilibrium model. Organization Science 12(2), 179-197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Scott, W.R. 1995. Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  79. Scott, W.R. 2001. Institutions and Organizations, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  80. Shapiro, M. 2007. Exposed: The Toxic Chemistry of Everyday Products and What’s at Stake for American Power. Chelsea Green Publishing, Vermont.Google Scholar
  81. Shaver, J.M., Mitchell, W., Yeung, B. 1997. The effect of own-firm and other-firms experience on foreign direct investment survival in the United States, 1987–92. Strategic Management Journal 18(10), 811–824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Sheahan, J.: 1987, `External Trade, Industrialization, and Economic Growth in Patterns of Development in Latin America: Poverty, Repression and Economic Strategy', in J. Sheahan (ed.), Patterns of Development in Latin America: Poverty, Repression, and Economic Strategy (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), pp. 74–98Google Scholar
  83. Simpson, W. G. and T. Kohers. 2002. The Link between Corporate Social and Financial Performance: Evidence from the Banking Industry. Journal of Business Ethics 35(2), 97–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Slaughter, A.M. 2004. A New World Order. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  85. Thomas, D. E., L. Eden, M. A. Hitt and S. R. Miller: 2007, ‘Experience of Emerging Market Firms: The Role of Cognitive Bias in Developed Market Entry and Survival’, Management International Review 47, 845–867.Google Scholar
  86. Thornton P.H, and Occasio W. 1999. Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: executive succession in the higher education publishing industry, 1958–1990. American Journal of Sociology 105(3), 801–843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Tisdell, C. 2001. The Winnipeg Principles, WTO and Sustainable Development: proposed Policies for Reconciling Trade and Environment. Sustainable Development 9, 204-212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Torres-Baumgarten, G. and V. Yucetepen: 2009, ‘Global Firms’ Leadership Role in Corporate Social Responsibility in Emerging Markets: The Case of Latin America’, Journal of Business Ethics (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  89. Trevino, L.J., Thomas, D.E., and Cullen, J. 2008. The three pillars of institutional theory and FDI in Latin America: An institutionalization process. International Business Review 17(1), 118-133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Trist, E. L.: 1980, ‘The Environment and System-Response Capability’, Futures April, 113–127.Google Scholar
  91. Trist, E. L. 1983. Referent organizations and the development of inter-organizational domains. Human Relations 36, 269-284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Uzzi, B. 1997. Social structure and competition in inter-firm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly 42(1), 35-67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Vormedal, I.: 2005, ‘Governance Through Learning: The UN Global Compact and Corporate Responsibility’, Report No. 7/05. Center for Development and the Environment, University of Oslo, Oslo, www.prosus.uio.no/publikasjoner/Rapporter/2005-7/report_7.pdf.
  94. Wan, W.P. 2005. Country resource environments, firm capabilities, and corporate diversification strategies. Journal of Management Studies, 42(1), 161-182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Weaver, F.S. 2000. Latin America in the World Economy: Mercantile Colonialism to Global Capitalism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  96. Weigelt, K. and Camerer, C. 1988.Reputation and Corporate Strategy: A Review of Recent Theory and Applications. Strategic Management Journal 9(5), 443-454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. White, A. 2006. Why We Need Global Standards for Corporate Disclosure. Law and Contemporary Problems 69(3), 167-186.Google Scholar
  98. Williamson, J. 1990. What Washington Means by Policy Reform, in John Williamson (Ed.), Latin American Adjustment: How much has happened? Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics, 7-20.Google Scholar
  99. Wollin, A. 1999. Punctuated equilibrium: Reconciling theory of revolutionary and incremental change. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 16(4), 359-367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED): 1987, ‘Our Common Future’, The Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED). Oxford University Press, Oxford – The ‘Brundtland Report’.Google Scholar
  101. Zucker, L.S. 1987. Institutional theories of organization. Annual Review of Sociology 13, 443-464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Luis A. Perez-Batres
    • 1
  • Van V. Miller
    • 1
  • Michael J. Pisani
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Management, College of Business AdministrationCentral Michigan UniversityMount PleasantU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations