Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

CSR, Sustainability and the Meaning of Global Reporting for Latin American Corporations

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We seek to add to the Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Sustainable Development (SD) literature through the empirical study of Latin American firm membership in the United Nations Global Compact (GC) and Global Report Initiative (GRI). Within an institutional-based framework, we explore through three filters – commercial, state-signaling, and distinguished peers – the impact of normative and mimetic pressures associated with GC/GRI membership. Our sample includes 207 public firms from six Latin American countries (Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Mexico, and Peru). Our results suggest Latin American firms from countries with a greater European influence (normative pressure) are twice as likely to be enrolled in the GC/GRI. Additionally, we find that Latin American firms listed on the NYSE (mimetic pressure) are also twice as likely to sign up under the GC/GRI. Hence, the normative and mimetic pillars of institutional theory are found to be significant factors for Latin American firms adopting sustainability initiatives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abreu, M. de P.: 2006, `Which ``Industrial Policies'' are Meaningful for Latin America?', Intal-ITD, Working Paper-SITI 11. Buenos Aires, Argentina

  • Amis, J., Slack, T., and Hinings, C. R. 2004. The Pace, Sequence, and Linearity of Radical Change. Academy of Management Journal 47(1), 15-39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, M.L. 2004. Are Globalization and Sustainability Compatible? A Review of the Debate between the World Business Council for Sustainable Development and the International Forum on Globalization. Organization Environment book review essay 17(4), 523-532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, H. R. 1953. Social responsibilities of the businessman. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brammer, S. and Millington, A. 2008. Does It Pay to Be Different? An Analysis of the Relationship between Corporate Social and Financial Performance. Strategic Management Journal 29, 1325-1343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R.S. 1997. The contingent value of social capital. Administrative Science Quarterly 42(2), 339-365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busenitz, L.W., Gómez, C. and Spencer, J.W. 2000. Country institutional profiles: Unlocking entrepreneurial phenomena. Academy of Management Journal 43, 994–1003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B. 1991. The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons 34, 39-48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B. 1999. Corporate Social Responsibility: Evolution of a Definitional Construct. Business and Society 38, 268-295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castro, C.J. 2004. Sustainable Development: Mainstream and Critical Perspectives. Organization Environment 17, 195-225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cetindamar, D. and Husoy, K. 2007. Corporate Social Responsibility Practices and Environmentally Responsible Behavior: The Case of the United Nations Global Compact. Journal of Business Ethics 76, 163–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatterji, A. and S. Listokin: 2007, ‘Corporate Social Irresponsibility’, Democracy 3, 52–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheney, G.: 2004, ‘The Corporate Conscience and the Triple BottomLine’, Accounting Today July(12), 13–14.

  • Common, M.1995. Sustainability and Policy: Limits to Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J.L., Payne, G.T, and McMahan, G.C. 2007. A Few Bad Apples? Scandalous Behavior of Mutual Fund Managers. Journal of Business Ethics 76, 319-334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delmas, M.A. and Toffel, M.W. 2008. Organizational Responses to Environmental Demands: Opening the Black Box. Strategic Management Journal, 29, 1027-1055.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, M.: 1978, `Towards a Change in Economic Paradigm Through Experience of Developing Countries', Journal of Development Economics 5(1), 19–53

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P.J. and Powell, W.W. 1983. The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, 48: 147-60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio PJ, Powell WW. 1991. Introduction. In The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, Powell WW, DiMaggio PJ (eds). University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL; 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dornbusch, R. 1992. The Case for Trade Liberalization in Developing Countries. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 6(1), 69-85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, S.: 1995, Crisis and Reform in Latin America: From Despair to Hope (Oxford University Press, New York)

  • Eldredge, N., and Gould, S.J. 1972. Punctuated equilibria: An alternative to phyletic gradualism. In T.J.M. Schopf (Ed.), Models in paleobiology 82-115. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emery, F. E. and Trist, E. L. 1965. The causal texture of organizational environments. Human Relations 18, 21-32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fligstein N. 1987. The intraorganizational power struggle: the rise of finance presidents in large corporations, 1919–1979. American Sociological Review 52(1), 44–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox-Wolfgramm, S.J., Boal, K.B., and Hunt, J.G. 1998. Organizational adaptation to institutional change: A comparative study of first-order change in prospector and defender banks. Administrative Science Quarterly 43(1), 87-126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, T.L. 2006. The World is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century. Farrar, Straus and Giroux: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garriga, E. and Mele, D. 2004. Corporate Social Responsibility Theories: Mapping the Territory. Journal of Business Ethics 53, 51–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garz, H. and Volk, C. 2007. GRI Reporting: Aiming to Uncover True Performance. West LB Extra-Financial Research, September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gersick, C.J.G. 1991. Revolutionary change theories: A multilevel exploration of the punctuated equilibrium paradigm. Academy of Management Review 16(1), 10-36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gersick, C.J.G. 1994. Pacing strategic change: The case of a new venture. Academy of Management Journal 37(1), 9-45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S.J. 1982a. The meaning of punctuated equilibrium and its role in validating a hierarchical approach to macroevolution, in Perspectives on Evolution, R. Milkman (ed.). Sunderland, Mass.: Sinauer, 83-104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, R., and Hinings, C.R. 1988. Organizational design types, tracks and the dynamics of strategic change. Organization Studies 9(3), 293-316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, R., and Hinings, C.R. 1993. Understanding strategic change: The contribution of archetypes. Academy of Management Journal 36(5), 1052-1081.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood R, Hinings CR. 1996. Understanding radical organizational change: bringing together the old and the new institutionalism. Academy of Management Review 21(4), 1022–1054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guillen, M.F. 2000. Business groups in emerging economies: A resource-based view. Academy of Management Journal 43(3), 362-380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haggard, S.: 1990, The Politics of Growth in the Newly Industrialized Countries (Cornell University, Ithaca, NY)

  • Haslam, P. A.: 2004, ‘The Corporate Social Responsibility System in Latin America and the Caribbean’, FOCAL Policy Papers, FPP-04-1, http://www.focal.ca/pdf/csr_04.pdf.

  • Haunschild, P.R. and Miner, A.S. 1997. Modes of interorganizational imitation: the effects of outcome salience and uncertainty. Administrative Science Quarterly 42, 472-500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haveman, H.A., Russo, M.V., and Meyer, A.D. 2001. Organizational environments in flux: The impact of regulatory punctuations on organizational domains, CEO succession, and performance. Organization Science 12(3), 253-273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hess, D.: 2009, ‘The Three Pillars of Corporate Social Reporting as New Governance Regulation: Disclosure, Dialogue and Development’, Business Ethics Quarterly (forthcoming).

  • Hitt, M.A., Keats, B.W., and DeMarie, S.M. 1998. Navigating in the new competitive landscape: Building strategic flexibility and competitive advantage in the 21st century. Academy of Management Executive 12(4), 22-42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoskisson, R.E., Eden, L., Lau, C.M., and Wright, M. 2000. Strategy in emerging economies. Academy of Management Journal 43(3), 249-267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingram P, Silverman BS. 2002. The new institutionalism in strategic management. In Advances in Strategic Management 19, 1-30. Ingram P, Silverman BS (eds.) JAI Press: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, H.B. 2007. From Economic to Sustainable Development: Unfolding the Concept of Law. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 24, 505-513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jose, A., and Lee, S.M. 2007. Environmental Reporting of Global Corporations: A Content Analysis based on Website Disclosures. Journal of Business Ethics 72, 307-321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, J.: 2009, ‘Europe to U.S.: You’re a Big Polluter’, The New York Times, Green Inc. Blog, 27 Jan.

  • Kell, G. 2005. The Global Compact Selected Experiences and Reflections. Journal of Business Ethics 59(1–2), 69–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khanna, T., and Palepu, K. 1997. Why focused strategies may be wrong for emerging markets. Harvard Business Review 75(4), 41-42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knudsen, J. S.: 2005, ‘The Global Reporting Initiative in Denmark: Emperor’s New Clothes or Useful Reporting Tool?’, in M. Morsing and A. Kakabadse (eds.), Reconciling Governance Philosophies: 21st Century Challenges (UK, Palgrave).

  • Kogut, B., and Zander, U. 1996. What firms do? Coordination, identity, and learning. Organization Science 7(5), 502-518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J. 1995. Foreign entry and survival: effects of strategic choices on performance in international markets. Strategic Management Journal 16(5), 333–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long, J.S. 1997. Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables, SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopez, M.V., Garcia, A. and Rodriguez, L 2007. Sustainable Development and Corporate Performance: A Study Based on the Dow Jones Sustainability Index. Journal of Business Ethics 75, 285-300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luna Sotorrío, L. and Fernández Sánchez, J.L. 2008. Corporate Social Responsibility of the Most Highly Reputed European and North American Firms. Journal of Business Ethics 82, 379-390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maignan I, Ralston DA. 2002. Corporate social responsibility in Europe and the US: insights from businesses’ self-representations. Journal of International Business Studies 33(3), 497-514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J.W. and Rowan, B. 1977. Institutionalised organisations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. The American Journal of Sociology 83, 340-363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, W., Shaver, J.M., and Yeung, B. 1995. Foreign entrant survival and foreign market share: Canadian companies experience in United States medical sector markets. Strategic Management Journal 15(7), 555–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moon, J. 2007. The Contribution of Corporate Social Responsibility to Sustainable Development. Sustainable Development 15, 296-306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North, D.C. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagano, M., Röell, A.A., and Zechner, J. 2002. The Geography of Equity Listing: Why Do Companies List Abroad? Journal of Finance 57(6), 2654-2694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, Y. C.: 1996, `East Asian Liberalization, Bubbles, and the Challenge from China', Brooking Papers on Economic Activity 2, 357–371

  • Pava, M.L. 2008. Why Corporations Should Not Abandon Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 83(4), 805-812.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, M.W., and Heath, P.S. 1996. The growth of the firm in planned economies in transition: Institutions, organizations, and strategic choice. Academy of Management Review 21(2), 492-528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perez-Batres, L. A., L. Eden and M. A. Hitt: 2009, ‘Learning to Adapt to Radical Change in Emerging Markets: Lessons from the Mexican Banking Industry, 1991–2004’, Working Paper.

  • Perez-Batres, L.A. and Eden, L. 2008. Is there a liability of localness? How emerging market firms respond to regulatory punctuations. Journal of International Management 14, 232-251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pisani, M. J. 2003. The Negative Impact of Structural Adjustment on Sectoral Earnings in Nicaragua. Review of Radical Political Economics 35(2), 107-125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pisani, M. J. and Pagán, J.A. 2004. Self-Employment in the Era of the New Economic Model in Latin America: A Case Study from Nicaragua. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 16(4), 335-350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. and M. R. Kramer: 2006, ‘Strategy and Society’, Harvard Business Review December, 78–91.

  • Powell, W.W., and Smith-Doerr, L. 1994. Networks and economic life. In N. Smelser and R. Swedberg (Eds.), Handbook of economic sociology, 368-402. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramamurti, R. 1992. Why Are Developing Countries Privatizing? Journal of International Business Studies 23(2), 225-249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramamurti, R. 2000. A Multilevel Model of Privatization in Emerging Economies. Academy of Management Review 25(3), 525-550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rangan, S., and Drummond, A. 2004. Explaining outcomes in competition among foreign multinationals in a focal host market. Strategic Management Journal 25(3), 285-293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranis, G.: 1995, `Challenges and Opportunities Posed by Asia's Superexporters: Implications for Manufactured Exporters from Latin America', in J. L. Dietz (ed.), Latin America's Economic Development: Confronting Crisis, 2nd Edition (Lynne Rienner Publishers, Boulder, CO), pp. 37–41

  • Ranson, S., Hinings, B., and Greenwood, R. 1980. Structuring of organizational structures. Administrative Science Quarterly 25(1), 1-17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reich, R. B.: 2007, Supercapitalism: The Transformation of Business, Democracy, and Everyday Life (Alfred A. Knopf, New York)

  • Runhaar, H. and Lafferty, H. 2009. Governing Corporate Social Responsibility: An Assessment of the Contribution of the UN Global Compact to CSR Strategies in the Telecommunications Industry. Journal of Business Ethics 84(4), 479-495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabherwal, R., Hirschheim, R., and Goles, T. 2001. The dynamics of alignment: Insights from a punctuated equilibrium model. Organization Science 12(2), 179-197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W.R. 1995. Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W.R. 2001. Institutions and Organizations, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, M. 2007. Exposed: The Toxic Chemistry of Everyday Products and What’s at Stake for American Power. Chelsea Green Publishing, Vermont.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaver, J.M., Mitchell, W., Yeung, B. 1997. The effect of own-firm and other-firms experience on foreign direct investment survival in the United States, 1987–92. Strategic Management Journal 18(10), 811–824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheahan, J.: 1987, `External Trade, Industrialization, and Economic Growth in Patterns of Development in Latin America: Poverty, Repression and Economic Strategy', in J. Sheahan (ed.), Patterns of Development in Latin America: Poverty, Repression, and Economic Strategy (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), pp. 74–98

  • Simpson, W. G. and T. Kohers. 2002. The Link between Corporate Social and Financial Performance: Evidence from the Banking Industry. Journal of Business Ethics 35(2), 97–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, A.M. 2004. A New World Order. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, D. E., L. Eden, M. A. Hitt and S. R. Miller: 2007, ‘Experience of Emerging Market Firms: The Role of Cognitive Bias in Developed Market Entry and Survival’, Management International Review 47, 845–867.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton P.H, and Occasio W. 1999. Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: executive succession in the higher education publishing industry, 1958–1990. American Journal of Sociology 105(3), 801–843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tisdell, C. 2001. The Winnipeg Principles, WTO and Sustainable Development: proposed Policies for Reconciling Trade and Environment. Sustainable Development 9, 204-212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torres-Baumgarten, G. and V. Yucetepen: 2009, ‘Global Firms’ Leadership Role in Corporate Social Responsibility in Emerging Markets: The Case of Latin America’, Journal of Business Ethics (forthcoming).

  • Trevino, L.J., Thomas, D.E., and Cullen, J. 2008. The three pillars of institutional theory and FDI in Latin America: An institutionalization process. International Business Review 17(1), 118-133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trist, E. L.: 1980, ‘The Environment and System-Response Capability’, Futures April, 113–127.

  • Trist, E. L. 1983. Referent organizations and the development of inter-organizational domains. Human Relations 36, 269-284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uzzi, B. 1997. Social structure and competition in inter-firm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly 42(1), 35-67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vormedal, I.: 2005, ‘Governance Through Learning: The UN Global Compact and Corporate Responsibility’, Report No. 7/05. Center for Development and the Environment, University of Oslo, Oslo, www.prosus.uio.no/publikasjoner/Rapporter/2005-7/report_7.pdf.

  • Wan, W.P. 2005. Country resource environments, firm capabilities, and corporate diversification strategies. Journal of Management Studies, 42(1), 161-182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, F.S. 2000. Latin America in the World Economy: Mercantile Colonialism to Global Capitalism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weigelt, K. and Camerer, C. 1988.Reputation and Corporate Strategy: A Review of Recent Theory and Applications. Strategic Management Journal 9(5), 443-454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, A. 2006. Why We Need Global Standards for Corporate Disclosure. Law and Contemporary Problems 69(3), 167-186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, J. 1990. What Washington Means by Policy Reform, in John Williamson (Ed.), Latin American Adjustment: How much has happened? Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics, 7-20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wollin, A. 1999. Punctuated equilibrium: Reconciling theory of revolutionary and incremental change. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 16(4), 359-367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED): 1987, ‘Our Common Future’, The Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED). Oxford University Press, Oxford – The ‘Brundtland Report’.

  • Zucker, L.S. 1987. Institutional theories of organization. Annual Review of Sociology 13, 443-464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Management, College of Business Administration, Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, MI, 48859, U.S.A.

    Luis A. Perez-Batres, Van V. Miller & Michael J. Pisani

Authors
  1. Luis A. Perez-Batres
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Van V. Miller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Michael J. Pisani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luis A. Perez-Batres.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Perez-Batres, L.A., Miller, V.V. & Pisani, M.J. CSR, Sustainability and the Meaning of Global Reporting for Latin American Corporations. J Bus Ethics 91 (Suppl 2), 193–209 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0614-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0614-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation