The Impact of Board Diversity and Gender Composition on Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Reputation
- 8.9k Downloads
This article explores how the diversity of board resources and the number of women on boards affect firms’ corporate social responsibility (CSR) ratings, and how, in turn, CSR influences corporate reputation. In addition, this article examines whether CSR ratings mediate the relationships among board resource diversity, gender composition, and corporate reputation. The OLS regression results using lagged data for independent and control variables were statistically significant for the gender composition hypotheses, but not for the resource diversity-based hypotheses. CSR ratings had a positive impact on reputation and mediated the relationship between the number of women on the board and corporate reputation.
Keywordscorporate reputation corporate social responsibility board diversity boards of directors gender composition
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
We thank Alison Konrad for her valuable questions and suggestions to improve this manuscript; we also thank the three anonymous reviewers for their constructive feedback.
- Barnett, M.: 2007, ‘Stakeholder Influence Capacity and the Variability of Financial Returns to Corporate Social Responsibility’, Academy of Management Review 32(3), 794-816.Google Scholar
- Bilimoria, D.: 2000, ‘Building the Business Case for Women Corporate Directors’, in R. Burke and M. Mattis (eds.), Women on Corporate Boards of Directors: International Challenges and Opportunities (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht), pp. 25–40.Google Scholar
- Daily, C. M. and D. R. Dalton: 2003, ‘Women in the Boardroom: A Business Imperative’, Journal of Business Strategy 24(5), 8–9.Google Scholar
- DiTomaso, N. and C. Post: 2007, ‘Diversity’, in S. R. Clegg and J. Bailey (eds.), International Encyclopedia of Organization Studies (Sage, Thousand Oaks), pp. 397–401.Google Scholar
- Eisenhardt, K.: 1989, ‘Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review’, Academy of Management Review 14(1), 57–74.Google Scholar
- Erkut, S., Kramer, V. W. and Konrad, A. M.: 2008, ‘Critical Mass: Does the Number of Women on a Corporate Board Make a Difference?’ in S. Vinnicombe, R. J. Burke, D. Bilimoria, and M. Huse (eds.), Women On Corporate Boards of Directors: International Research and Practice (Edward Edgar, Cheltenham, UK), pp. 350-366.Google Scholar
- Fombrun, C. J. and N. A. Gardberg: 2000, ‘Opportunity Platforms Safety Nets: Corporate Citizenship and Reputational Risk’, Business & Society Review 105(1), 85–106.Google Scholar
- Gardberg, N. A. and Fombrun, C. J.: 2006, ‘Corporate Citizenship: Creating Intangible Assets Across Institutional Environments’, Academy of Management Review 31, 329-346.Google Scholar
- Harrison, D. A. and Klein, K. J.: 2007, ‘What’s the Difference? Diversity Constructs as Variety, or Disparity in Organizations’, Academy of Management Review 32, 1199-1228.Google Scholar
- Joshi, A. and Roh, H.: 2009, ‘The Role of Context in Work Team Diversity Research: A Meta-Analytic Review’, Academy of Management Journal 52(3), 599-628.Google Scholar
- Kanter, R. M.: 1997a, Men and Women of the Corporation, (Basic Books, New York, NY).Google Scholar
- Kramer, V. W., A. Konrad and S. Erkut: 2006, ‘Critical Mass on Corporate Boards: Why Three or More Women Enhance Governance’, Report No. WCW 11, Wellesley Centers for Women, Wellesley, MA.Google Scholar
- Pfeffer, J. and Salancik, G.: 1978, The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective, (Harper & Row, NY, NY).Google Scholar
- Post, C., N. Rahman and E. Rubow: 2011, ‘Diversity in the Composition of Board of Directors and Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility (ECSR)’, Business & Society 49 (forthcoming).Google Scholar
- Preacher, K. and A. Hayes: 2004, ‘SPSS and SAS Procedures for Estimating Indirect Effects in Simple Mediation Models’, Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 36(4), 717–731.Google Scholar
- Ragins, B.: 1998, ‘Gender Gap in the Executive Suite: CEOs and Female Executives Report on Breaking the Glass Ceiling’, Academy of Management Executive 12(1), 28–42.Google Scholar
- Ramirez, S. A.: 2003, ‘A Flaw in the Sarbanes-Oxley Reform: Can Diversity in the Boardroom Quell Corporate Corruption?’, St. John’s Law Review 77(4), 837-866.Google Scholar
- Sellers, P.: 2007, ‘Women on Boards (Not!)’, Fortune 156(8), 105-105.Google Scholar