Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 96, Issue 3, pp 425–434 | Cite as

Beyond Good and Evil: The Adiaphoric Company

  • Tommy Jensen
Article

Abstract

In this article, six demoralising processes in the context of the company are identified. These processes promote a realm of ‘being-with’, in which outcomes of human interaction are evaluated on rational grounds, and on whether or not a particular action accorded with stipulated ethical rules. Thereby the realm of ‘being-for’, in which individuals are supported to take increased responsibility, is marginalized. The conclusion made is that not only do the demoralizing processes systematically produce moral distance between humans, which weakens individual spontaneous outbursts of sympathy to take increased moral responsibility, they also promise to release individuals from their moral ambivalence by declaring organised action morally indifferent. Organisational action is, in other words, declared as adiaphoric – beyond good and evil.

Key words

adiaphorisation business ethics demoralising processes morality 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alvesson, M.: 1990, ‘Organization: From substance to image?’, Organization Studies 11(3), 373-394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arendt, H.: 1963/1994, Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil (Penguin books, New York).Google Scholar
  3. Arendt, H.: 1969, On Violence (Harcourt, Brace and World, New York).Google Scholar
  4. Bauman, Z.: 1989, Modernity and the Holocaust, (Polity Press, Cambridge).Google Scholar
  5. Bauman, Z.: 1993, Postmodern Ethics, (Blackwell Publishing, Malden, MA).Google Scholar
  6. Bauman, Z.: 1995, Life in Fragments. Essays in Postmodern Morality, (Basil Blackwell, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  7. Bauman, Z.: 1998, Work, Consumerism and the new Poor, (Open University Press, Celtic Court).Google Scholar
  8. Bauman, Z.: 2002, Society under Siege, (Polity Press, Cambridge).Google Scholar
  9. Bauman, Z.: 2008, Does Ethics Have a Chance in a World of Consumers?, (Harvard University Press, London).Google Scholar
  10. Benhabib, S.: 1992, Situating the Self: Gender, Community, and Postmodernism in Contemporary Ethics, (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
  11. Bevan, D. and Corvellec, H.: 2007, ‘The Impossibility of Corporate Ethics: for a Levinasian approach to managerial ethics’, Business Ethics - A European Review 16(3), 208-219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bonnedahl, K. J., T. Jensen and J. Sandström: 2007, Ekonomi och Moral: Vägar mot ökat Ansvarstagande (Economy and Morality: Routes to Increased Responsibility) (Liber, Malmö).Google Scholar
  13. Callon, M.: 1998, ‘The Embeddedness of Economic Markets in Economics’, in M. Callon (ed.), The Laws of the Markets, (Blackwell Publishers, Oxford), pp. 1-57.Google Scholar
  14. Callon, M. and Muniesa, F.: 2005, ‘Economic Markets as Calculative Collective Devices’, Organization Studies 26(8), 1229–1250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Castells, M.: 2000, ‘Materials for an Exploratory Theory of the Network Society’, British Journal of Sociology 51(1), 5-24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Clegg, S.R., D. Courpasson and N. Phillips: 2006, Power and Organizations, (Sage, London).Google Scholar
  17. Courpasson, D. and M. Reed: 2004, ‘Introduction: Bureaucracy in the Age of Enterprise’, Organization 11(1), 5-12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. du Gay, P.: 2000, In Praise of Bureaucracy. Weber, Organization, Ethics, (Sage, London).Google Scholar
  19. Ekstedt, E., R.A. Lundin, A. Söderholm and H. Wirdenius: 1999, Neo-Industrial Organising, renewal by action and knowledge formation in a project-intensive economy, (Routledge, London).Google Scholar
  20. Freeman, R. E.: 2005, ‘Stakeholder theory’, in P.H. Werhane and R.E Freeman (eds.), The Blackwell Encyclopaedia of Management: Business Ethics, (Blackwells, Oxford), pp. 496-500.Google Scholar
  21. Hamel, G. (with B. Breen): 2007, The Future of Management (Harvard Business School Press, Harvard).Google Scholar
  22. Handy, C.: 1993, ‘Balancing Corporate Power: A New Federalist Paper’, McKinsey Quarterly (3), 159–182.Google Scholar
  23. Held, D. and A. McGrew: 2007, ‘Introduction: Globalization at risk?’, in D. Held and A. McGrew (eds.), Globalization theory: Approaches and controversies, (Polity Press, Cambridge), pp. 1-11.Google Scholar
  24. Heymann, J.: 2006, Forgotten Families: Ending the Growing Crisis Confronting Children and Working Parents in the Global Economy, (Oxford University Press: Oxford).Google Scholar
  25. Hogg, M.A. and J.T. Terry: 2001, Social Identity Processes in Organizational Contexts, (Psychology Press: Philadelphia).Google Scholar
  26. Hume, D.: 1739/1978, A Treatise of Human Nature: Being an Attempt to Introduce the Experimental Method of Reasoning into Moral Subjects, book 3: “Of Morals” – A Treatment of Moral Ideas, Justice, Obligations, Benevolence, Editorial with an Analytical Index by L. A. Selby-Bigge, 2nd Edition with text revised and variant readings by P. H. Nidditch (Clarendon Press, Oxford).Google Scholar
  27. Jackall, R.: 1988, Moral Mazes: The World of Corporate Managers. Oxford University Press: Oxford.Google Scholar
  28. Jensen, T.: 2004, Översättningar av konkurrens i ekonomiska laboratorier: Om ekonomiska teoriers fÖrenkling, komplexitet och fÖrdunkling i hälso- och sjukvården (Translations of Competition in Economic Laboratories: How Economic Theories are Simplified, Complex and Blurred Within Health Care). Doctoral Dissertation, Umeå University, Sweden.Google Scholar
  29. Jensen, T.: 2006, ‘Fördunklad Organisering i en Heterogent Materiell Värld’ (Blurred Organizing in a Material Heterogeneous World), in D. Ericsson (ed.), Den Oavsedda Organisationen (The Unexpected Organisation) (Academia Adacta, Lund), pp. 46–66.Google Scholar
  30. Jensen, T.: 2007, ‘Moral Responsibility and the Business and Sustainable Development Assemblage: A Jonasian Ethics for the Technological Age’, International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development 2(1), 116-129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jensen, T.: 2008, Voluntary ghettos and mobile bureaucracy. Civic activity and acts of citizenship under threat, in Hislop, D. (ed.), Mobility and Technology in the Workplace, (Routledge, London), pp. 43-53.Google Scholar
  32. Jensen, T. and U. Nylén: 2006, ‘Striving for spontaneity: bureaucracy strikes back’, International Research Journal. Problems and Perspectives in Management 4(2):144-158.Google Scholar
  33. Jensen, T. and J. Sandström: 2009, ‘Global Trafficking Networks and Business Studies’, Tamara: Journal for Critical Organization Inquiry 7(3-4), pp. 147-159.Google Scholar
  34. Jensen, T., J. Sandström and S. Helin: 2009, ‘Corporate Codes of Ethics and the Bending of Moral Space’, Organization 16(4), pp. 529-545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jonas, H.: 1984, The Imperative of Responsibility: In Search of an Ethics for the Technological Age, (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
  36. Kallinikos, J.: 1996, Technology and Society. Interdisciplinary Studies in Formal Organisations, (Accedo Verlagsgesellschaft mbH., Munich).Google Scholar
  37. Kallinikos, J.: 2001, The Age of Flexibility, Managing Organizations and Technology, (Academia Adacta, Lund).Google Scholar
  38. Kallinikos, J.: 2004, ‘The Social Foundations of the Bureaucratic Order’. Organization 11(1): 13-36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kotter, J.P.: 1996, Leading change, (Harvard Business School Press, Harvard).Google Scholar
  40. Levinas, E.: 1969, Totality and Infinity: An Essay on Exteriority, (Duquesne University Press, Pittsburgh, PA).Google Scholar
  41. Løgstrup, K.E.: 1997, The Ethical Demand, (University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, Indiana).Google Scholar
  42. McMahon, C.: 1995, ‘The Ontological and Moral Status of Organizations’, Business Ethics Quarterly 5(3), 541–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Milgram, S.: 1974/2005, Obedience to Authority: An Experimental View (Pinter and Martin Ltd., London).Google Scholar
  44. Peters, T.: 2003, Re-imagine. Business excellence in a disruptive age, (Dorling Kindersley, London).Google Scholar
  45. Pettigrew, A.M., R. Whittington, L. Melin, C. Sánchez-Runde, F.A.J. Van Den Bosch, W. Ruigrok and T. Numagami: 2003, Innovative Forms of Organizing, (Sage: London).Google Scholar
  46. Prahalad, C.K.: 2004, The Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid: Eradicating Poverty through Profits, (Prentice Hall, London).Google Scholar
  47. Rawls, J.: 1971, A theory of Justice, (Harvard University Press, Massachusetts).Google Scholar
  48. Rorty, R.: 1989, Contingency, Irony and Solidarity, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).Google Scholar
  49. Sen, A.: 2006, Identity and violence. The illusion of destiny, (W.W. Norton and Company, New York).Google Scholar
  50. Sennett, R.: 1999, The Corrosion of Character. The Personal Consequences of Work in the New Capitalism, (W.W. Norton & Company Ltd, London).Google Scholar
  51. Sennett, R.: 2006, The Culture of the New Capitalism, (Yale University Press, New Haven).Google Scholar
  52. Singer, P.: 2002, One World: The Ethics of Globalization, (Yale University Press, New Haven).Google Scholar
  53. Stieb, J.A.: 2009, ‘Assessing Freeman’s stakeholder theory’, Journal of Business Ethics 87(3), 401–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. ten Bos, R.: 1997, ‘Essay: Business Ethics and Bauman Ethics’, Organization Studies 18(6), 997-1014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. ten Bos, R. and H. Willmott.: 2001, ‘Towards a Post-dualistic Business Ethics: Interweaving Reason and Emotion in Working Life’, Journal of Management Studies 38(6), 769-793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Tönnies, F.: 1887/2001, Community and Civil Society (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).Google Scholar
  57. Urry, J.: 2003, Global Complexity, (Polity Press, Cambridge).Google Scholar
  58. Walsh, J.P.: 2005, ‘Book review essay: Taking stock of stakeholder management’, Academy of Management Review 30(2), 426-438.Google Scholar
  59. Weber, M.: 1964, The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. Edited with an introduction by Talcott Parsons (The Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
  60. Willmott, H.: 1998, ‘Towards a New Ethics? The contributions of poststructuralism and posthumanism. In M. Parker (eds) Ethics and Organizations,. Sage: London, pp. 76-121.Google Scholar
  61. Young, I.M.: 2004, ‘Responsibility and Global Labor Justice’, The Journal of Political Philosophy 12(4), 365-388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Umeå School of BusinessUmeåSweden

Personalised recommendations