Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 96, Issue 2, pp 249–263 | Cite as

Private Equity and the Public Good

  • Kevin Morrell
  • Ian Clark


The dominance of agency theory can reduce our collective scope to analyse private equity in all its diversity and depth. We contribute to theorisation of private equity by developing a contrasting perspective that draws on a rich tradition of virtue ethics. In doing so, we juxtapose ‘private equity’ with ‘public good’ to develop points of rhetorical and analytical contrast. We develop a typology differentiating various forms of private equity, and focus on the ‘take private’ form. These takeovers are where private equity funds are used to buy all a firm’s publicly listed shares. Take private deals reduce reporting requirements and lessen the amount of public scrutiny a firm comes under. They allow greater control of a firm’s assets and resources but also have effects in terms of the wider social fabric. The ‘public good’ and virtue ethics offer an alternative basis for theorisation of these deals. This provides a needed contrast to accounts of private equity based on agency theory.


common good equity public interest public good private virtue 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alvesson, M. and Willmott, H.: 1992, ‘On The Idea Of Emancipation In Management And Organization Studies’, Academy of Management Review, 17(3): 432-464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aristotle: 1980, The Nichomachean Ethics (D. Ross, Trans.). Hazell Books, Aylesbury.Google Scholar
  3. Ashforth, B. E., Gioia, D., Robinson S. L. and Trevino, L.: 2008, ‘Reviewing Organizational Corruption’, Academy of Management Review, 33(3), 670-684.Google Scholar
  4. Barnett, M. L.: 2007. ‘Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility’, Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 794–816.Google Scholar
  5. Barney, J. B.: 2002, Gaining and Sustaining Competitive Advantage (Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
  6. Barry, D. and Elmes, M.: 1997, ‘Strategy retold: Toward a narrative view of strategic discourse’, Academy of Management Review, 22 (2), 429-52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bearle, A. and Means, G.: 1932, The Modern Corporation and Private Property (Macmillan, New York).Google Scholar
  8. Benjamin, G. and Margulis, J.: 2005, Angel Capital: How to Raise Early-Stage Private Equity Financing (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
  9. Berman, S. L., Wicks, A. C., Kotha, S., and Jones, T. M.: 1999, ‘Does stakeholder orientation matter? The relationship between stakeholder management models and firm financial performance’, Academy of Management Journal, 42 (5), 488–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Buckley, M.: 2008, ‘Two Principles of Broadcast Media Ownership for a Democratic Society’, Journal of Business Ethics, 82, 821–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. BVCA: 2008, ‘BVCA Private Equity and Venture Capital Performance Measurement Survey 2008’, Available on Accessed 9th March 2010
  12. Calás, M. B., and Smircich, L.: 1999, ‘Past postmodernism? Reflections and tentative directions’, Academy of Management Review, 24, 649–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cannella, A. A. and R. L. Paetzold.: 1994, ‘Pfeffer’s Barriers to the Advance of Organization Science: A Rejoinder’, Academy of Management Review, 19(2): 331–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Carcello, J. V.: 2009, ‘Governance and the Common Good’, Journal of Business Ethics, 89(1): 11–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chandler, A.: 1977, The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business (CUP, Cambridge).Google Scholar
  16. Chaterjee, S.: 2008, ‘Does Increased Equity Ownership Lead to More Strategically Involved Boards?’, Journal of Business Ethics, 87, 267–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Clark, I.: 2007, ‘Private Equity and HRM in the British Business System’, Human Resource Management Journal 17(3), 218–226Google Scholar
  18. Cole, S.: 1983, ‘The hierarchy of the sciences?’. American Journal of Sociology 89(1), 111–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cumming, D. and Johan, S.: 2007, ‘Socially Responsible Institutional Investment in Private Equity’, Journal of Business Ethics, 75(4), 395-416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Daily, C. M., Dalton, D. R. and Cannella, A. A. (2003). ‘Introduction To Special Topic Forum Corporate Governance: Decades of Dialogue and Data’, Academy of Management Review, 28, 3, 371–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. De Clercq, D. and Dimov, D.: 2008, ‘Internal Knowledge Development and External Knowledge Access in Venture Capital Investment Performance’, Journal of Management Studies, 45(3), 585-612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Deakin, S. and Konzelmann, S. J.: 2003, ‘After Enron: an age of enlightenment?’, Organization, 10(3), 583-587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Delbridge, R. and Ezzamel, M.: 2005, ‘The strength of difference: contemporary conceptions of control’, Organization, 12(5), 603-618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Donaldson, L.: 2005, ‘For positive management theories while retaining science: reply to Ghoshal’, Academy of Management Learning and Education, 4(1), 109-113.Google Scholar
  25. Donaldson, I. and Davis, J.: 1991, ‘Stewardship or Agency Theory: CEO Governance and Shareholder Returns’, Australian Journal of Management, 16(1), 49-64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ferraro, F., Pfeffer, J. and Sutton, R. I.: 2005, ‘Economics language & assumptions: how theories can become self-fulfilling’, Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 8–24.Google Scholar
  27. Ferraro, F., Pfeffer, J. and Sutton, R. I.: 2009, ‘How and Why Theories Matter: A Comment on Felin and Foss (2009)’, Organization Science, 20(3), 669–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Filatotchev, I. and Toms, S.: 2006, ‘Corporate Governance and Financial Constraints on Strategic Turnarounds’, Journal of Management Studies, 43(3), 407-433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Folkman, P., J. Froud, J. Sukhdev and K. Williams: 2006, ‘Working for Themselves? Capital Market Intermediaries and Present Day Capitalism’, Working Paper Series No. 25 (University of Manchester, Manchester).Google Scholar
  30. Fraser-Sampson, G.: 2007, Private Equity As An Asset Class, (Wiley, London).Google Scholar
  31. Freeman, R. E.: 1984, Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach (Pitman, Boston, MA)Google Scholar
  32. Frenkel, M., and Shenhav, Y. A.: 2006, ‘From binarism back to hybridity: A postcolonial reading of management and organization studies’, Organization Studies, 27, 855–876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Froud, J. and K. Williams: 2007, ‘Private Equity and the Culture of Value Extraction’, Working Papers Series No. 31 (Centre for Research on Socio-Cultural Change, University of Manchester).Google Scholar
  34. Galbraith, J. K.: 1952, American Capitalism: The Concept of Countervailing Power (Penguin, London).Google Scholar
  35. Galbraith J. K.: 1967, The New Industrial State (Penguin, London).Google Scholar
  36. Gaudin, J.: 1998, ‘Modern Governance, Yesterday and Today: Some Clarifications to be Gained from French Government Policies’, International Social Science Journal, 50(1), 47–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ghoshal, S.: 2005, ‘Bad management theories are destroying good management practices’, Academy of Management Learning and Education, 4(1), 75-91.Google Scholar
  38. Gilligan, J. and Wright, M.: 2008, Private Equity DeMystified: An Exploratory Guide (Corporate Finance Faculty, ICAEW, London).Google Scholar
  39. GMB/TSC: 2007, Report and Evidence submitted to the Treasury Select Committee on Private Equity as part of the GMB union submission, (GMB, London).Google Scholar
  40. Gopalakrishnan, S., Scillitoe, J. and Santoro, M. D.: 2008, ‘Tapping Deep Pockets: The Role of Resources and Social Capital on Financial Capital Acquisition by Biotechnology Firms in Biotechpharma Alliances’, Journal of Management Studies, 45(8), 1354-1376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Graafland, J.: 2009, ‘Do Markets Crowd Out Virtues? An Aristotelian Framework’ Journal of Business Ethics, 91(1), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Grint, K.: 2007, ‘Learning to Lead: Can Aristotle Help Us Find the Road to Wisdom?’, Leadership, 3(2), 231-46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Harris, R., Siegel, D. and Wright, M.: 2005, ‘Assessing the Impact of Management Buyouts on Economic Efficiency: Plant-Level Evidence from the United Kingdom’, Review of Economic and Statistics, 87, 148-153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hassard, J. and Kelemen, M.: 2002, ‘Production and Consumption in Organizational Knowledge: The Case of the ‘Paradigms Debate’, Organization, 9(2), 331–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ireland, P.: 2005, ‘Shareholder Primacy and the Distribution of Wealth’, Modern Law Review, 68(1), 49-81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Jack, G., and Westwood, R.: 2006, ‘Postcolonialism and the politics of qualitative research in international business’, Management International Review, 46, 481–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Jensen, M. and Meckling, W.: 1976, ‘Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behaviour, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure’, Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305-60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Jones, T. M. and Goldberg, L. D.: 1982, ‘Governing the large corporation: More arguments for public directors’, Academy of Management Review, 7, 603-611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kaplan, S. and Schoar, A.: 2005, ‘Private Equity Performance Returns, Persistence and Capital Flows’, Journal of Finance, 60(4), 1791-1824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Keil, T., Autio, E. and George, G.: 2008, ‘Corporate Venture Capital, Disembodied Experimentation and Capability Development’, Journal of Management Studies, 45(8), 1475-1505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Knights, D. and McCabe, D.: 1999, ‘Are there no limits to authority: TQM and organizational power’, Organization Studies, 20, 197–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Kraut, R.: 2002 Aristotle: Political Philosophy, (Oxford University Press, Oxford).Google Scholar
  53. Lado, A. A., Boyd, N. G., Wright, P. and Kroll, M.: 2006, ‘Paradox And Theorizing Within The Resource-Based View’, Academy of Management Review, 31(1): 115-131.Google Scholar
  54. Lau, V. P, Wong, Y. Y..: 2009, ‘Direct and Multiplicative Effects of Ethical Dispositions and Ethical Climates on Personal Justice Norms: A Virtue Ethics Perspective’ Journal of Business Ethics, 90(2), 279-294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Lewis, C. S.: 1943, ‘The Abolition of Man’, Accessed 15 July 2009.
  56. Lewis, J. D.: 2009, ‘Solon of Athens and the Ethics of Good Business’ Journal of Business Ethics, 89(1), 123-138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Lyotard, J-F.: 1984, The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge (Manchester University Press, Manchester).Google Scholar
  58. MacIntyre, A.: 1984, After Virtue. Duckworth, London.Google Scholar
  59. Marris, R.: 1964, The Economic Theory of Managerial Capitalism. (Macmillan, London).Google Scholar
  60. Martin, R., Casson, P., Nisar, T.: 2007, Investor Engagement- Investors and Management Practice Under Shareholder Value. (Oxford University Press, Oxford).Google Scholar
  61. Mayers, D., Shivdasani, A. and Smith, C. W.: 1997, ‘Board Composition in the Life Insurance Industry’, Journal of Business, 70(1), 33–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. McKinley, W., Mone, W. A. and Moon, G.: 1999, ‘Determinants and development of schools in organization theory’, Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 634–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Means, G.: 1930, ‘The Diffusion of Stock Ownership in the United States’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 44(4), 561-600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Michalos, A. C.: 2001, ‘Ethics Counselors as a New Priesthood’, Journal of Business Ethics, 29: 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Michalos, A. C.: 2008, ‘Ancient Observations on Business Ethics: Middle East Meets West’, Journal of Business Ethics, 79, 9-19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Mok, K.: 2002, ‘Policy of decentralization and changing governance of higher education in post-Mao China.’ Public Administration and Development, 22(3), 261-273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Morrell, K.: 2004, ‘Decision Making and Business Ethics: The Implications of Using Image Theory in Preference to Rational Choice’, Journal of Business Ethics 50, 239–252Google Scholar
  68. Morrell, K.: 2006, ‘Policy as Narrative: New Labour’s Reform of the National Health Service’, Public Administration 84(2), 367–385Google Scholar
  69. Morrell, K.: 2008, ‘The Narrative of ‘Evidence Based’ Management: A Polemic’, Journal of Management Studies 45(3), 613–635Google Scholar
  70. Morrell, K.: 2009, ‘Governance and the Public Good’, Public Administration 87(3), 538–556Google Scholar
  71. Neubert, M. J., Carlson, D. S., Kacmar, K. M., Roberts, J. A. and Chonko, L. B.: 2009, ‘The Virtuous Influence of Ethical Leadership Behavior: Evidence from the Field’ Journal of Business Ethics, 90(1), 157-170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Nozick, R., 1974, Anarchy, State, and Utopia. (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
  73. Nussbaum, M. C.: 2001, The Fragility of Goodness, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).Google Scholar
  74. O’Brien, T. W.: 2009, ‘Reconsidering the Common Good in a Business Context’, Journal of Business Ethics, 85(1), 25-37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. O’Sullivan, M.: 2000, Contests for Corporate Control: Corporate Governance and Economic Performance in the United States and Germany. (Oxford University Press, Oxford).Google Scholar
  76. Orts, E. W. and Strudler, A.: 2009, ‘Putting a Stake in Stakeholder Theory’, Journal of Business Ethics, 88(4), 605–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Patashnik, E.: 2003, ‘After the Public Interest Prevails: The Political Sustainability of Policy Reform’, Governance, 16(2), 203–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Perry, J. L. and Rainey, H. G.: 1988, ‘The public-private distinction in organization theory: a critique and research strategy’, Academy of Management Review, 13(2), 182-201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Pfeffer, J.: 1993, ‘Barriers to the advance of organizational science: paradigm development as a dependent variable’, Academy of Management Review, 18(4), 599–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Pickhardt, M. 2005, ‘Some Remarks on Self-Interest, the Historical Schools and the Evolution of the Theory of Public Goods’, Journal of Economic Studies, 32(3), 275–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Poppo, L. and Zenger, T.: 2002 ‘Do formal contracts and relational governance function as substitutes or complements?’, Strategic Management Journal, 23(8), 707-725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Rawls, J.: 1971, A Theory of Justice. (Harvard University Press, Cambridge).Google Scholar
  83. Russo, A. and Perrini, F.: 2010, ‘Investigating Stakeholder Theory and Social Capital: CSR in Large Firms and SMEs’ Journal of Business Ethics, 91(2), 207-221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Samuelson, P. A.: 1954, ‘The pure theory of public expenditure’, Review of Economics and Statistics, 36, 387–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Scholtens, B.: 2006, ‘Finance as a Driver of Corporate Social Responsibility’, Journal of Business Ethics, 68(1), 19-33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Shapiro, D. L. and Rynes, S.L.: 2005, ‘The role of management scholarship in the public sector’, Academy of Management Journal, 48(6), 989–997.Google Scholar
  87. Shergold, P.: 1997, ‘The colour purple: perceptions of accountability across the Tasman’, Public Administration and Development, 17(3), 293-306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Starkey, K.: 1995, ‘Opening up Corporate Governance’, Human Relations, 48(8), 837-844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Sundaramurthy, C. and Lewis, M.: 2003, ‘Control and collaboration: paradoxes of governance’, Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 397–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Tullock, G.: 1984, ‘A (partial) rehabilitation of the public interest theory’, Public Choice, 42, 89-99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Van Maanen, J.: 1995, ‘Style as theory’, Organization Science, 6(1), 133–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Walker, D.: 2007, ‘Guidelines for Disclosure and Transparency in Private Equity’, Accessed 19 July 2008.
  93. Webb, T., A. Stratton and I. Griffiths: 2009, ‘MG Rover: How the Phoenix Four Hit the Jackpot’, 11 September, Accessed 27 September 2009.
  94. Williamson, O.: 1964, The Economics of Discretionary Behaviour: Managerial Objectives in a Theory of the Firm. (Prentice Hall, New Jersey)Google Scholar
  95. Williamson, O.: 1967, ‘Hierarchical Control and Optimum Firm Size’, Journal of Political Economy, 75, 123-38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Wright, M. and Lockett, A.: 2003, ‘The structure and management of alliances: syndication in the venture capital industry’, Journal of Management Studies 40, 2073-2102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Wright, M. and Robbie, K.: 1998, ‘Venture capital and private equity: a review and synthesis’, Journal of Business and Accounting, 25(5/6), 521-70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Zald, M. N. (1996). ‘More fragmentation? Unfinished business in linking the social sciences and the humanities’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(2), 251–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Birmingham Business SchoolUniversity of BirminghamBirminghamU.K.

Personalised recommendations