Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 88, Supplement 4, pp 685–692 | Cite as

Creating Ties That Bind

  • R. Edward Freeman
  • Jared D. Harris
Article

Abstract

The work of Donaldson and Dunfee (Ties That Bind: A Social Contracts Approach to Business Ethics, 1999) offers an example of how normative and descriptive approaches to business ethics can be integrated. We suggest that to be truly integrative, however, the theory should explore the processes by which such integration happens. We, therefore, sketch some preliminary thoughts that extend Integrative Social Contracts Theory (ISCT) by beginning to consider the process by which microsocial contracts are connected to hypernorms.

Keywords

integrative social contracts theory hypernorms moral disagreement reflective equilibrium 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Davidson, D.: 2001, Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation, New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Dewey, J.: [1927]1954, The Public and Its Problems (Ohio University Press, Athens, Ohio).Google Scholar
  3. Donaldson, T., & T. Dunfee: 1999, Ties That Bind: A Social Contracts Approach to Business Ethics, Cambridge: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  4. Donaldson, T., & L. Preston: 1995, “The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence and Implications”, Academy of Management Review, 20 (1): 65-91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Granovetter, M.: 1985, “Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness”, The American Journal of Sociology, 91 (3): 481-510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Habermas, J.: 1990, Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action (Trans. C. Lenhardt and S. W. Nicholsen) (MIT Press, Cambridge).Google Scholar
  7. Harris, J. D., and R. E. Freeman: 2008, “The Impossibility of the Separation Thesis”, Business Ethics Quarterly, 18(4), 541–548.Google Scholar
  8. Kuhn, T. S.: 1962, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  9. Nagel, T.: 1986, The View from Nowhere, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Painter-Moreland, M.: 2008, Business Ethics as Practice: Ethics as the Everyday Business of Business, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Putnam, H.: 2002, The Collapse of the Fact/Value Dichotomy, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Quine, W. V. O.: 1951, “Two Dogmas of Empiricism”, The Philosophical Review, 60 (1): 20-43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Quine, W. V. O.: 1960, Word and Object, Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  14. Rawls, J.: 1971, A Theory of Justice, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Rorty, R.: 1981, Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Searle, J. R.: 1964, “How to Derive “Ought” From “Is”, The Philosophical Review, 73 (1): 43-58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Stansbury, J.: 2009, “Reasoned Moral Agreement: Applying Discourse Ethics within Organizations”, Business Ethics Quarterly, 19 (1): 33-56.Google Scholar
  18. Werhane, P. H.: 1999, Moral Imagination and Management Decision Making, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Wittgenstein, L.: [1952]2001, Philosophical Investigations. (Trans. G. E. M. Anscombe) (Blackwell, Oxford).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Elis and Signe Olsson Professor of Business Administration, Darden School of Business AdministrationUniversity of VirginiaCharlottesvilleU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations