Catalyzing Corporate Commitment to Combating Corruption
- 505 Downloads
This article considers what policy reforms may help catalyze corporate commitment to combating corruption. The starting point for this discussion is a voluntary, corporate principles approach to self-regulation. Such an approach should seek to encourage corporations to implement effective compliance and ethics programs and to disclose information related to their anti-corruption activities to relevant stakeholders. Although a corporate principles approach is a private initiative, there is a significant role for the public sector. This article discusses some of the ways that the public sector can support and further the goals of a corporate principles approach to combating corruption. The reforms discussed in this article include amnesty programs for corporations that self-disclose corrupt payments, the use of corporate monitors in the enforcement of anti-corruption laws, expanding the definition of corruption in criminal laws, sustainability reporting indicators related to bribery, and the implementation of multi-stakeholder initiatives to support a corporate principles approach.
Keywordsbribery corporate monitors corruption facilitation payments multi-stakeholder initiatives private-to-private corruption sustainability reporting
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Berenbeim, R. E. and S. Muirhead: 2002, Business Conduct Codes: Why Corporations Hesitate (Conference Board, New York).Google Scholar
- Bray J 2006 ‘Agents, Consultants and Joint-Venture Partners in International Business Transactions’. In: B. Errath (Ed.), Business Against Corruption: Case Stories and Examples. United Nations Global Compact Office: New York.Google Scholar
- Brew, P. and J. Moberg: 2006 ‘The Power of Joining Forces – The Case for Collective Action in Fighting Corruption’. In: B. Errath (Ed.), Business Against Corruption: Case Stories and Examples. United Nations Global Compact Office, New York.Google Scholar
- Control Risks Group Limited: 2006, ‘International Business Attitudes to Corruption – Survey 2006’, www.crg.com/PDF/corruption_survey_2006_V3.pdf.
- Dunfee, T.W. and D. Hess: 2001, ‘Getting From Salbu to the ‘Tipping Point’: The Role of Corporate Action within a Portfolio of Anti-Corruption Strategies’, Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business, 21 (2), 471-490.Google Scholar
- Eigen, P.: 2007, ‘Fighting Corruption in a Global Economy: Transparency Initiatives in the Oil and Gas Industry’, Houston Journal of International Law, 29 (2): 328-354.Google Scholar
- Ford, C. and D. Hess: 2009, ‘Can Corporate Monitorships Improve Corporate Compliance?’ Journal of Corporation Law 34(3), 679–737.Google Scholar
- Freedman, M.: 2006, ‘Trust Us’, Forbes, Dec. 25, 2006, 132–133.Google Scholar
- Global Reporting Initiative, 2006: ‘Sustainability Report- ing Guidelines’, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, http://www.globalreporting.org/ReportingFramework/G3Guidelines.
- Heimann, F. and G. Dell: 2007, ‘Transparency Int’l, Progress Report 07: Enforcement of the OECD Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials’, Transparency International, Berlin, Germany, http://www.transparency.org/news_room/in_focus/2007/oecd.
- Heine, G: 2003, ‘Comparative Analysis’. In: G. Heine, B. Huber, and T. Rose (Eds.), Private Commercial Bribery: A Comparison of National and Supranational Legal Structures. International Chamber of Commerce, Paris.Google Scholar
- Heine, G., B. Huber, and T. Rose, (eds.): 2003, Private Commercial Bribery: A Comparison of National and Supranational Legal Structures (International Chamber of Commerce, Paris).Google Scholar
- Hess, D.: 2008, ‘The Three Pillars of Corporate Social Reporting as New Governance Regulation: Disclosure, Dialogue, and Development’, Business Ethics Quarterly 18(4): 447-482.Google Scholar
- Hess, D. and T. W. Dunfee: 2000, ‘Fighting Corruption: A Principled Approach’, Cornell International Law Journal, 33 (3), 593-626.Google Scholar
- Hess, D. and T. W. Dunfee: 2003, ‘Taking Responsibility for Bribery: The Multinational Corporation’s Role in Combating Corruption’, in R. Sullivan (ed.), Business and Human Rights: Dilemmas and Solutions (Greanleaf Publishing, Sheffield, UK), pp. 260–271.Google Scholar
- Hess, D. and C. Ford: 2008, ‘Corporate Corruption and Reform Undertakings: A New Approach to an Old Problem,’ Cornell International Law Journal, 41 (2): 307-346.Google Scholar
- International Chamber of Commerce: 2006, ‘Memorandum to the OECD Working Group on Bribery in International Business Transactions’, International Chamber of Commerce, Paris, France, http://www.iccwbo.org/uploadedFiles/ICC/policy/anticorruption/pages/Memorandum%20to%20OECD%20working%20group.pdf.
- KPMG: 2008, ‘2008 Anti-Bribery and Anti-Corruption Survey’, http://us.kpmg.com/RutUS_prod/Documents/8/2008_FCPA_AntiBriberySurvey.pdf.
- Laufer, W. S.: 1999, ‘Corporate Liability, Risk Shifting, and the Paradox of Compliance’, Vanderbilt Law Review, 54 (5): 1343-1420.Google Scholar
- Lobel, O.: 2004, ‘The Renew Deal: The Fall of Regulation and the Rise of Governance in Contemporary Legal Thought’, Minnesota Law Review, 89 (2), pp. 342-470.Google Scholar
- Masters, B.: 2007, ‘US Steps Up Overseas Bribery Crackdown’, Financial Times 30: 5.Google Scholar
- Price, M 2006 ‘Case Story: Integrity Due Diligence’. In: B. Errath (Ed.), Business Against Corruption: Case Stories and Examples. United Nations Global Compact Office: New York.Google Scholar
- PricewaterhouseCoopers: 2008, ‘Confronting Corruption: The Business Case for an Effective Anti-Corruption Programme’, PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited, http://www.pwc.com/extweb/pwcpublications.nsf/docid/1F2DCA23DC8E7E1F852573CB00578048/$FILE/PwC-Confronting-Corruption.pdf.
- Reisinger, S.: 2007, ‘On Bended Knee’, Corporate Counsel, July 2007, 72–77.Google Scholar
- Roner, L.: 2008, ‘Voluntary Disclosure’s Banana Skin’, Ethical Corporation, July/August 2008, 11.Google Scholar
- Rose, T. O 2003 ‘Introduction’. In: G. Heine, B. Huber, and T. Rose (Eds.), Private Commercial Bribery: A Comparison of National and Supranational Legal Structures. International Chamber of Commerce, Paris.Google Scholar
- Segal, P.: 2006, ‘Coming Clean on Dirty Dealing: Time for a Fact-Based Evaluation of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act’, Florida International Law Journal, 18 (1): 169-210.Google Scholar
- Wilkinson P 2006 ‘Reporting on Countering Corruption’. In: B. Errath (Ed.), Business Against Corruption: Case Stories and Examples. United Nations Global Compact Office, New York.Google Scholar
- Wood, S.: 2002–2003, ‘Environmental Management Systems and Public Authority in Canada: Rethinking Environmental Governance’, Buffalo Environmental Law Journal 10(1), 129–210.Google Scholar
- Wrage, A. and K. Mandernach: 2006 ‘Facilitation Payments’. In: B. Errath (Ed.), Business Against Corruption: Case Stories and Examples. United Nations Global Compact Office, New York.Google Scholar
- Zervos, A.: 2006, ‘Amending the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act: Repealing the Exemption for “Routine Government Action” Payments’, Penn State International Law Review, 25 (1), pp. 251-294.Google Scholar