Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 94, Issue 4, pp 517–531 | Cite as

Modeling Corporate Citizenship, Organizational Trust, and Work Engagement Based on Attachment Theory

  • Chieh-Peng Lin


This study proposes a research model based on attachment theory, which examines the role of corporate citizenship in the formation of organizational trust and work engagement. In the model, work engagement is directly influenced by four dimensions of perceived corporate citizenship, including economic, legal, ethical, and discretionary citizenship, while work engagement is also indirectly affected by perceived corporate citizenship through the mediation of organizational trust. Empirical testing using a survey of personnel from 12 large firms confirms most of our hypothesized effects. Finally, theoretical and managerial implications of our findings are discussed.


corporate citizenship discretionary citizenship ethical citizenship organizational trust work engagement 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Amble, B.: 2009, ‘Social Responsibility Boosts Employee Engagement’. Retrieved from
  2. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. 1988. Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Backhaus, K., Stone, B., & Heiner, K. 2002. Exploring the relationship between corporate social performance and employer attractiveness. Business and Society, 41(3), 292-318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. 2008. Towards a model of work engagement. Career Development International, 13(3), 209-223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barkhuizen, N., & Rothmann, S. 2006. Work engagement of academic staff in South African higher education institutions. Management Dynamics, 15(1), 38-46.Google Scholar
  6. Baron, D. 2001. Private politics, corporate social responsibility and integrated strategy. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 10(1), 7-45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Becker-Olsen, K. L., Cudmore, B. A., & Hill, R. P. 2006. The impact of perceived corporate social responsibility on consumer behavior. Journal of Business Research, 59(1), 46-53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Becker, T. E. 1998. Integrity in organizations: Beyond honesty and conscientiousness. Academy of Management Review, 23(1), 154-161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bowlby, J.: 1973, ‘Attachment and Loss’, in Separation: Anxiety and Anger, vol. 2 (Basic Books, New York)Google Scholar
  10. Brammer, S., & Millington, A. 2003. The effect of stakeholder preferences, organizational structure and industry type on corporate community involvement. Journal of Business Ethics, 45(3), 213-226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brammer, S., Millington, A., & Rayton, B. 2007. The contribution of corporate social responsibility to organizational commitment. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18(10), 1701-1719.Google Scholar
  12. Carroll, A. B. 1979. A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497-505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cartwright, S. & Cooper, C. L. (2009). The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Well-Being. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Chughtai, A. A. and F. Buckley: 2007, The Relationship Between Work Engagement and Foci of Trust: A conceptual analysis. Proceedings of the 13th Asia Pacific Management Conference, Melbourne, Australia, pp. 73–85Google Scholar
  15. Chughtai, A. A., & Buckley, F. 2008. Work engagement and its relationship with state and trait trust: A conceptual analysis. Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management, 10(1), 47-71.Google Scholar
  16. Chughtai, A. A. & Buckley, F. (2009). Linking trust in the principal to school outcomes: The mediating role of organizational identification and work engagement. International Journal of Educational Management, 23(7), 574-589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dawkins, J.: 2004, The Public’s Views of Corporate Responsibility 2003 (Mori, London, UK)Google Scholar
  18. De los Salmones, M. D. M. G., Crespo, A. H., & del Bosque, I. R. 2005. Influence of corporate social responsibility on loyalty and valuation of services. Journal of Business Ethics, 61(4), 369-385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dyer, J. H., & Chu, W. 2003. The role of trustworthiness in reducing transaction costs and improving performance: Empirical evidence from the United States, Japan, and Korea. Organization Science, 14(1), 57-68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fay, D., & Luhrmann, H. 2004. Current themes in organizational change. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 13(2), 113-119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fukuyama, F. 1995. Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  23. Gill, A. S. 2008. The role of trust in employee-manager relationship. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 20(1), 98-103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. González-Roma, V., Schaufeli, W.B., Bakker, A., & Lloret, S. 2006. Burnout and engagement: Independent factors or opposite poles? Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 68, 165-174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Grayson, D., & Hodges, A. (2004). Corporate Social Opportunity: Seven Steps to Make Corporate Social Responsibility Work for Your Business. Salem, WI: Sheffield Publishing.Google Scholar
  26. Hardy, G. E., & Barkham, M. 1994. The relationship between interpersonal attachment styles and work difficulties. Human Relations, 47(3), 263-281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hofstede, G. (1980). National cultures in four dimensions: a research based theory of cultural differences among nations. International Studies of Management and Organization, 13(1/2), 46-74.Google Scholar
  28. Hofstede, G., & Bond, M. H. (1988). The Confucious connection: From cultural roots to economic growth. Organizational Dynamics, 16(4), 5-21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Joyner, B. E., & Payne, D. 2002. Evolution and implementation: A study of values, business ethics and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 41(4), 297-311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Knapp, J. C. (2007). Leaders on Ethics: Real-World Perspectives on Today’s Business Challenges. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
  31. Keller, T., & Cacioppe, R. 2001. Leader-follower attachments: Understanding parental images at work. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 22(2), 70-75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lamberti, L., & Lettieri, E. 2009. CSR practices and corporate strategy: Evidence from a longitudinal case study. Journal of Business Ethics, 87(2), 153-168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Luo, X., & Bhattacharya, C. B. 2006. Corporate social responsibility, customer satisfaction, and market value. Journal of Marketing, 70, 1-18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Maerki, H. U. 2008. The globally integrated enterprise and its role in global governance. Corporate Governance, 8(4), 368-374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mahoney, L. S., & Thorn, L. 2006. An examination of the structure of executive compensation and corporate social responsibility: A Canadian investigation. Journal of Business Ethics, 69(2), 149-162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Maignan, I., & Ferrell, O. C. 2000. Measuring corporate citizenship in two countries: The case of the United States and France. Journal of Business Ethics, 23(3), 283-297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mathews, C. G. G.: 2007, ‘Thinking about leadership – leaders for tomorrow’, in The Proceedings of the 2nd National Conference on Global Competition and Competitiveness of Indian Corporates (Indian Institute of Management, Kozhikode, India)Google Scholar
  38. Maxfield, S. 2008. Reconciling corporate citizenship and competitive strategy: Insights from economic theory. Journal of Business Ethics, 80(2), 367-377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mayer, R. C., & Davis, J. H. 1999. The effect of the performance appraisal system on trust for management: A field quasi-experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(1), 123–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Morrison, E. E., Burke III, G. C., & Greene, L. 2007. Meaning in motivation: Does your organization need an inner life? Journal of Health and Human Services Administration, 30(1), 98-115.Google Scholar
  41. Nelson, D. L., & Quick, J. C. 1991. Social support and newcomer adjustment in organizations: Attachment theory at work? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 12(6), 543-554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Nelson, L. S. 1999. Contriving an unavailable significance level. Journal of Quality Technology, 31(3), 351-353.Google Scholar
  43. Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. 1986. Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12(4), 531-544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Reynolds, N., Diamantopoulos, A., & Schlegelmilch, B. B. 1993. Pretesting in questionnaire design: A review of the literature and suggestions for further research. Journal of the Market Research Society, 35(2), 171-182.Google Scholar
  45. Robinson, S. L. (1996). Trust and breach of the psychological contract. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 574-599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rothbaum, F., Weisz, J., Pott, M., Miyake, K., & Morelli, G. (2000). Attachment and culture: Security in the United States and Japan. American Psychologist, 55(10), 1093-1104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sable, P. 2008. What is adult attachment? Clinical Social Work Journal, 36(1), 21-30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Salanova, M., Agut, S., & Peiró, J.M. (2005). Linking organizational resources and Work engagement to employee performance and customer loyalty: The mediating role of service climate. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 1217-1227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. 2006. The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 701–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Schoorman, F. D., Mayer, R. C., & Davis, J. H. 2007. An integrative model of organizational trust: Past, present, and future. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 344-354.Google Scholar
  51. Shen, C. H., & Chang, Y. 2009. Ambition versus conscience, does corporate social responsibility pay off? The application of matching methods. Journal of Business Ethics, 2009, 88, 133-153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Siegel, D. S., & Vitaliano, D. F. 2007. An empirical analysis of the strategic use of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 16(3), 773-792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Simmons, J. 1990. Participatory management: Lessons from the leaders. Management Review, 79(12), 54-58.Google Scholar
  54. Singhapakdi, A., Karande, K., Rao, C. P., & Vitell, S. J. (2001). How important are ethics and social responsibility? - A multinational study of marketing professionals. European Journal of Marketing, 35(1/2), 133-153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Spreitzer, G. M., & Mishra, A. K. 2002. To stay or to go: Voluntary survivor turnover following an organizational downsizing. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 707-729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Tan, H. H., & Lim, A. K. H. 2009. Trust in coworkers and trust in organizations. Journal of Psychology, 143(1), 45-66.Google Scholar
  57. Tan, H. H., & Tan, C. S. F. 2000. Toward the differentiation of trust in supervisor and trust in organization. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 126(2), 241-260.Google Scholar
  58. Townsend, P., & Gebhardt, J. 2008. Employee engagement – completely. Human Resource Management International Digest, 16(3), 22-24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Turker, D. 2009. Measuring corporate social responsibility: A scale development study. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(4), 411-427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Waddock, S. E., & Graves, S. B. 1997. The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18(4), 303-319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Westhues, M., & Einwiller, S. 2006. Corporate foundations: Their role for corporate social responsibility. Corporate Reputation Review, 9(2), 144-153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Weyzig, F. 2009. Political and economic arguments for corporate social responsibility: Analysis and a proposition regarding the CSR agenda. Journal of Business Ethics, 86(4), 417-428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Williams, L. L. 2005. Impact of nurses’ job satisfaction on organizational trust. Health Care Management Review, 30(3), 203-211.Google Scholar
  64. Williamson, O. E. 1985. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  65. Wood, D. 1991. Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of Management Review, 16(4), 691-718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Zahra, S. A., & LaTour, M. S. 1987. Corporate social responsibility and organizational effectiveness: A multivariate approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 6(6), 459-467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Business and ManagementNational Chiao Tung UniversityTaipeiTaiwan, ROC

Personalised recommendations