Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 93, Issue 4, pp 531–551 | Cite as

The Impact of Perceived Ethical Culture of the Firm and Demographic Variables on Auditors’ Ethical Evaluation and Intention to Act Decisions

  • Breda Sweeney
  • Don Arnold
  • Bernard Pierce


This study examined the impact of perceived ethical culture of the firm and selected demographic variables on auditors’ ethical evaluation of, and intention to engage in, various time pressure-induced dysfunctional behaviours. Four audit cases and questionnaires were distributed to experienced pre-manager level auditors in Ireland and the U.S. The findings revealed that while perceived unethical pressure to engage in dysfunctional behaviours and unethical tone at the top were significant in forming an ethical evaluation, only perceived unethical pressure had an impact on intention to engage in the behaviours. Country was also found to have a significant impact, with U.S. respondents reporting higher ethical evaluations and lower intentions to engage in unethical acts than Irish respondents. Implications of the findings and areas for future research are discussed.


auditor conflict ethical culture ethical decision making underreporting of time quality threatening behaviours time pressure 



Premature sign-off


Underreporting of time


Quality threatening behaviour


Ethical culture question


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anderson-Gough, F., C. Grey, and K. Robson: 2001, ‘Tests of time: organizational time-reckoning and the making of accountants in two multi-national accounting firms’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 26 (2), 99-122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arnold, D., R. Bernardi, P. Neidermeyer, and J. Schmee: 2002, ‘Underreporting of Audit Time and Premature Sign-off in Western Europe’, Irish Accounting Review, 9 (1), 1-38.Google Scholar
  3. Arnold, D., R. Bernardi, P. Neidermeyer, and J. Schmee: 2007, ‘The effect of country and culture on elements of code of conduct: A western European perspective’, Journal of Business Ethics, 70, 327-40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barnett, T.: 2001, ‘Dimensions of moral intensity and ethical decision-making: an empirical study’. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 31, 1038-1057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barnett, T., K. Bass, and G. Brown: 1994, ‘The ethical judgments of college students regarding business issues’, Journal of Education for Business, 69, 333-338.Google Scholar
  6. Barnett, T. and S. Valentine: 2004, ‘Issue contingencies and marketers’ recognition of ethical issues, ethical judgments and behavioral intentions’, Journal of Business Research, 57, 338-46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bearden, W. O., R.G. Netemeyer, and M.F. Mobley (1993) Handbook of marketing scales: Multi-item measures for marketing and consumer behavior research. Newbury Park, CA, Sage publications.Google Scholar
  8. Bebeau, M. (1994) ‘Influencing the moral dimensions of dental practice’. In: J. Rest and D. Narvaez (eds) Moral Development in the Profession. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 121-146.Google Scholar
  9. Bernardi, R. A. and D.F. Arnold, Sr.: 1996, ‘Auditor Underreporting and Premature Sign-off: A behavioral study’, The Irish Accounting Review, 3(2), 1-22.Google Scholar
  10. Bernardi, R.A. and D.F. Arnold: 1997, ‘An examination of moral development within public accounting by gender, staff level and firm’, Contemporary Accounting Research, 14 (4), 653-668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Blanthorne, C. and S. Kaplan: 2008, ‘An egocentric model of the relations among the opportunity to underreport, social norms, ethical beliefs, and underreporting behavior’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33, 684-703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Browning, J. and N.B. Zabriskie, 1983, ‘How ethical are industrial buyers?’, Industrial Marketing Management, 12, 219-224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brugman, D. and M. Weisfelt: 2000, ‘Moral competence and professional reasoning of Dutch Accountants’, Research on Accounting Ethics, 7, 103-140.Google Scholar
  14. Buchheit, S., W.R. Pasewark Jr. and J.R. Strawser: 2003, ‘No need to compromise: evidence of public accounting’s changing culture regarding budgetary performance’, Journal of Business Ethics, 42, 151-163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Carlson, D.S., K.M. Kacmar, and L.L. Wadsworth: 2002, ‘The impact of moral intensity dimensions on ethical decision making: Assessing the relevance of orientation’, Journal of Managerial Issues 14 (1), 15-30.Google Scholar
  16. Clarke, P., N. Hill, and K. Stevens: 1996, ‘Ethical reasoning abilities: Accounting practitioners in Ireland’, Irish Business and Administrative Research, 17, 94-109.Google Scholar
  17. Cohen, J. R., L.W. Pant, and D.J. Sharp: 1995a, ‘An exploratory examination of international differences in accountants’ ethical perceptions’, Behavioral Research in Accounting, 7, 37-64.Google Scholar
  18. Cohen, J. R., L.W. Pant, and D.J. Sharp: 1995b, ‘An international comparison of moral constructs underlying auditors’ ethical judgments’, Research in Accounting Ethics, 1, 97-126.Google Scholar
  19. Cohen, J. R., L. W. Pant and D. J. Sharp: 1996, ‘Measuring the Ethical Awareness and Ethical Orientation of Canadian Auditors’, Behavioral Research in Accounting 8, 98–119.Google Scholar
  20. Cohen, J.R., L.W. Pant, & D.J. Sharp: 1998, ‘The Effect of Gender and Academic Discipline Diversity on the Ethical Evaluations, Intentions and Ethical Orientation of Potential Public Accounting Recruits’, Accounting Horizons, 12 (3), pp.250-270.Google Scholar
  21. Coram. P, A. Glavovic, J. Ng, and D.R. Woodliff, 2008, ‘The moral intensity of reduced audit quality acts’, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 27 (1), 127-149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Davis, M.A., N.B. Johnson, and D.G. Ohmer: 1998, ‘Issue-contingent effects on ethical decision making: A cross-cultural comparison’, Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 373-389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. DeZoort, F.T. and A.T. Lord: 1994, ‘An investigation of obedience pressure effects on auditors’ judgments’, Behavioral Research in Accounting, 6 (supplement), 1-30.Google Scholar
  24. DeZoort, F.T. and A.T. Lord: 1997, ‘A review and synthesis of pressure effects research in accounting’, Journal of Accounting Literature, 16, 28-85.Google Scholar
  25. Donnelly, D.P., J.J. Quirin, and D. O’Byran: 2003, ‘Auditor acceptance of dysfunctional audit behavior: An explanatory model using auditors’ personal characteristics’, Behavioral Research in Accounting, 15, 87-110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Douglas, P. C., R.A. Davidson, and B.N. Schwartz: 2001, ‘The effect of organizational culture and ethical orientation on accountants’ ethical judgments’, Journal of Business Ethics, 34, 101-121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Dubinsky, A.J. and M. Levy: 1985, ‘Ethics in retailing: Perceptions of salespeople’, Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 13 (1), 1-16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Enyon, G., N.T. Hill, K.T. Stevens, and P. Clarke: 1996, ‘An international comparison of ethical reasoning abilities: Accounting students from Ireland and the United States’, Journal of Accounting Education, 14 (4), 477-492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Finn, D.W., L.B. Chonko, and S.D. Hunt: 1988, ‘Ethical problems in public accounting: The view from the top’, Journal of Business Ethics, 7, 605-615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Fisher, R.J.: 1993, ‘Social desirability bias and the validity of indirect questioning’, Journal of Consumer Research, 20, 303-315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ford, R.C. and W.D. Richardson: 1994, ‘Ethical decision making: A review of the empirical literature’, Journal of Business Ethics, 13 (3), 205-221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Fritzsche, D.J.: 2005, Business Ethics: a global and managerial perspective. (New York: McGraw-Hill Irwin).Google Scholar
  33. Glover, S.H., M.A. Bumpus, G.F. Sharp, & G.A. Munchus, 2002, ‘Gender differences in ethical decision making’, Women in Management Review, 17 (5), 217-227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gul, F., A. Ng, and M. Tong: 2003, ‘Chinese auditors’ ethical behavior in an audit conflict situation’, Journal of Business Ethics, 42, 379-392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gurley, K., P. Wood, and I. Nijhawan: 2007, ‘The effect of punishment on ethical behavior when personal gain is involved’, Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues, 19(1), 91-105.Google Scholar
  36. Hair, J.F., R.E. Anderson, R.L. Tatham, and W.C. Black: 1995, Multivariate Date Analysis with readings 4 th edition. (New Jersey: Prentice Hall).Google Scholar
  37. Hegarty, W. H.. and H.P. Sim, Jr.: 1978, ‘Some determinants of unethical decision behavior: an experiment’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 63 (4), 451-57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Helliar, C, and J. Bebbington: 2004, Taking ethics to heart. A discussion document by the Research Committee of The Institute of Chartered Accountants in Scotland, ICAS: Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  39. Herrbach, O.: 2001, ‘Audit quality, auditor behaviour and the psychological contract’, The European Accounting Review, 10 (4), 787-802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Herrbach, O.: 2005 ‘The art of compromise? The individual and organisational legitimacy of ‘irregular auditing’, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 18, 390-409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hill, N.T., K. Stevens, and P. Clarke: 1998, ‘Factors that affect ethical reasoning abilities of U.S. and Irish small-firm accountancy practitioners’, Research on Accounting Ethics, 4, 145-65.Google Scholar
  42. Hunt, S.D., V.R. Wood, and L.B. Chonko: 1989, ‘Corporate ethical values and organizational commitment in marketing’, Journal of Marketing, 53, 79-90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Jackson, T.: 2000, ‘Making Ethic Judgments: A Cross-Cultural Management Study’, Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 17(3), 443–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Jenkins, J.G., D.R. Deis, J.C. Bedard, M.B. Curtis: 2008, ‘Accounting firm culture and governance: A research synthesis’, Behavioral Research in Accounting, 20, 45-74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Jones, T.: 1991, ‘Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue-contingent Model’, Academy of Management Review, 16, 366-395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Jones, W. and M. Kavanagh: 1996, ‘An experimental examination of the effects of individual and situational factors on unethical behavioral intentions in the workplace’, Journal of Business Ethics, 15(5), 511-23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Jones, J., D. W. Massey and L. Thorne: 2003, ‘Auditors’ Ethical Reasoning: Insights from Past Research and Implications for the Future’, Journal of Accounting Literature, 22, 45–103.Google Scholar
  48. Kelley, P.C. and D.R, Elm: 2003, ‘The effect of context on moral intensity of ethical issues: Revising Jones’s issue-contingent model’, Journal of Business Ethics, 48, 139-154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kelley, T. and L. Margheim: 1987, ‘The effect of audit billing arrangement on underreporting of time and audit quality reduction acts’, Advances in Accounting, 5, 221-233.Google Scholar
  50. Kelley, T. and L. Margheim: 1990, ‘The impact of time budget pressure, personality, and leadership variables on dysfunctional auditor behavior’, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 9(2), 21-42.Google Scholar
  51. Kelley, T., and L. Margheim: 1999, ‘Survey on the differential effects of time deadline pressure versus time budget pressure’, Journal of Applied Business Research, 15 (4), 117-128.Google Scholar
  52. Ketchand, A., R. Morris, and W. Shafer: 1999, ‘An analysis of the role of moral intensity in auditing judgments’, Research on Accounting Ethics, 5, 249-270.Google Scholar
  53. Kohlberg, L.: 1969, ‘Stage and Sequences: The Cognitive-Developmental Approach to Socialization’, in Goslin, D. A. (ed.), Handbook of Socialization Theory and Research, Chicago: Rand McNally, pp. 347–480.Google Scholar
  54. Lamberton, B., P. Mihalek, and C. Smith: 2005, ‘The tone at the top and ethical conduct connection’, Strategic Finance, March 2005, 37-9.Google Scholar
  55. Lightner, S.M., S.J. Adams, and K.M. Lightner: 1982, ‘The influence of situational, ethical and expectancy theory variables on accountants’ underreporting behavior’, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 2 (1), 1-12.Google Scholar
  56. Malone, C.F. and R.W. Roberts: 1996, ‘Factors associated with the incidence of reduced audit quality behaviors’, Auditing : A Journal of Practice and Theory, 15 (2), 49-64.Google Scholar
  57. May, D.R. and K.P. Pauli: 2002, ‘The role of moral intensity in ethical decision making: A review and investigation of moral recognition, evaluation and intention’, Business and Society, 41 (1), 84-117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. McNair, C.J. 1991: ‘Proper compromises: The management control dilemma in public accounting and its impact on auditor behaviour’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 16, 635-653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Moberg, D. J.: 2000, ‘Time pressure and ethical decision-making: The case for moral readiness’, Business and Professional Ethics Journal, 19(2), 41-67.Google Scholar
  60. Otley, D.T. and B.J. Pierce: 1996, ‘The operation of control systems in large audit firms: An empirical investigation’, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 15 (2), 65-84.Google Scholar
  61. Paolillo, J. G. P. and B.J. Vitell: 2002, ‘An empirical investigation of the influence of selected personal, organizational and moral intensity factors on ethical decision making’, Journal of Business Ethics, 35, 65-74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Pierce, B. and B. Sweeney: 2003, ‘Auditor responses to cost controls’, Irish Accounting Review, 10 (1), 45-68.Google Scholar
  63. Pierce, B. and B. Sweeney: 2004, ‘Cost quality conflict in audit firms: An empirical investigation’, European Accounting Review, 13 (3), 415-441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Pierce, B. and B. Sweeney: 2005, ‘Management Control in Audit firms: Partners’ perspectives’, Management Accounting Research, 16, 340-370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Pierce, B. and B. Sweeney: 2006, ‘Perceived adverse consequences of quality threatening behaviour in audit firms’, International Journal of Auditing, 10 (1), 19-39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Ponemon, L.A.: 1992, ‘Ethical reasoning and selection-socialization in accounting’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 17 (3/4), 239-258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Ponemon, L.: 1995, ‘The objectivity of accountant litigation support judgments’, The Accounting Review, 70, 467-488.Google Scholar
  68. Ponemon, L. A. and D. Gabhart: 1993, Ethical reasoning in accounting and auditing. (Vancouver: Canadian General Accountants’ research foundation).Google Scholar
  69. Power, M.K. 2003: ‘Auditing and the production of legitimacy’, Accounting, Organizations and Society 28, 379-394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Radtke, R.R.: 2000, ‘The effects of gender and setting on accountants’ ethically sensitive decisions’, Journal of Business Ethics, 24, 299-312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Rest, J. (1979) Development in judging moral issues. Minneapolis, MN, University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  72. Rest, J.: 1994, ‘Background Theory and Research’, in J. Rest and D. Narvaez (eds.), Moral Development in the Professions. Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 1–26.Google Scholar
  73. Rhode, J. G.: 1978, The Independent Auditor’s Work Environment: A Survey. CAR Research study No. 4. Summarized in Commission on Auditors’ Responsibilities (CAR): Report, Conclusions and Recommendations (AICPA, New York).Google Scholar
  74. Ruegger, D. and E.W. King: (1992). ‘A study of the effect of age and gender upon student business ethics’, Journal of Business Ethics, 11, 179-186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Public Law 107-204, 107th Congress of the United State of America.Google Scholar
  76. Scofield, S.B., T.J. Phillips, Jr. and C.D. Bailey: 2004, ‘An empirical reanalysis of the selection– socialization hypothesis: a research note’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29 (5-6), 543-63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Shafer, W., R. Morris, and A. Ketchand: 1999 The effects of formal sanctions on accountant Independence’, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory. 18 (2): 85-101.Google Scholar
  78. Shafer, W., R. Morris, and A. Ketchand: 2001, ‘Effects of personal values on auditors’ ethical Decisions’, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 14 (3), 254-277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Shapeero, M. P., H. Chye Koh, and L.N. Killough: 2003, ‘Underreporting and premature sign-off in public accounting’, Managerial Auditing Journal, 18 (6/7), 478-489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Sherwood, G.G.: 1981, ‘Self-serving biases in person perception: A re-examination of projection as a mechanism of defense’, Psychological Bulletin, 90, 445-459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Singer, M.S., and A. E. Singer: 1997, ‘Observer judgments about moral agents’ ethical decisions: the role of scope of justice and moral intensity’, Journal of Business Ethics 16, 473-84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Singhapakdi, A., S. H. Vitell, and K. L. Kraft: 1996, ‘Moral intensity and ethical decision- making of marketing professionals’, Journal of Business Research 36, 245-255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Smith, A. and E. Hume: 2005, ‘Linking culture and ethics: A comparison of accountants’ ethical belief systems in the individualism/collectivism and power distance contexts’, Journal of Business Ethics, 62, 209-220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Sudman, S. and N.M. Bradburn: 1974, Response effects in surveys: A review and synthesis. (Chicago: Aldine).Google Scholar
  85. Sweeney, B. and B. Pierce: 2004, ‘Management Control in Audit firms: A qualitative investigation’, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 17, 779-812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Sweeney, B. and B. Pierce: 2006, ‘Good hours and bad hours: A multi-perspective examination of the (dys)functionality of auditor underreporting of time’, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 19 (6), 858-892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Thorne, L.: 1998, ‘The role of virtue on accountants’ ethical decision making’, Research on Accounting Ethics, 4, 291-308.Google Scholar
  88. Thorne, L. and J. Hartwick: 2001, ‘The directional effects of discussion on accountants’ moral Reasoning’, Contemporary Accounting Research, 18, 337-62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Thorne, L., D. Massey, and M. Mangan: 2003, ‘Institutional context and auditors’ moral reasoning: a Canada – USA comparison’, Journal of Business Ethics, 43 (4), 305-321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Trevino, L. K. and G. Ball: 1992, ‘The social implications of punishing unethical behavior: observers cognitive and affective reactions’, Journal of Management, 18(4), 751-769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Trevino, L. K., K.D. Butterfield, and D.L. McCabe: 1998, ‘The ethical context in organizations: influences on employee attitudes and behaviors’, Business Ethics Quarterly, 8, 447-76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Willett, C. and M. Page: 1996, ‘A survey of time budget pressures and irregular auditing practices among newly qualified UK chartered accountants’, British Accounting Review, 28 (2), 101-120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Windsor, C. and N. Ashkanasy: 1995, ‘The effect of client management bargaining power, moral reasoning development and belief in a just world on accountant independence’, Accounting, Organization and Society, 20, 701-20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Windsor, C., and N. Ashkanasy: 1996, ‘Auditor independence decision making: The role of organizational culture perceptions’, Behavioral Research in Accounting, 8: 80-97.Google Scholar
  95. Zey-Ferrell, M. and O.C. Ferrell: 1982, ‘Role-Set Configuration and Opportunity as Predictors of Unethical Behavior on Organizations’, Human Relations, 35(7), 587-604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Zey-Ferrell, M., M. Weaver and O.C. Ferrell: 1979, ‘Predicting unethical behavior among marketing practitioners’, Human Relations. 32(7), 557-569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.NUI GalwayGalwayIreland
  2. 2.Union Graduate CollegeSchenectadyUSA
  3. 3.Dublin City UniversityDublinIreland

Personalised recommendations