Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 93, Issue 1, pp 51–71 | Cite as

Strategization of CSR



We examine the process of strategization of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) within 12 Israeli firms using a longitudinal qualitative approach. We analyzed the process of CSR strategization under Jarzabkowski’s framework. Our findings identify the differentiating characteristics of CSR strategization processes, including the requirement for informative communications rather than persuasive negotiations, and the absence of resistance within the organizational community. These unique aspects of CSR strategization may be attributed to the moral and value-centric nature of CSR activity.


Corporate Social Responsibility strategy strategization volunteerism 



The authors are grateful to Prof. Jarzabkowski for her permission to quote her work.


  1. Barnett, M.L. (2007). Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 794–816.Google Scholar
  2. Basu, K., & Palazzo, G. (2008). Corporate social responsibility: A process model of sensemaking. Academy of Management Review, 33(1), 122–136.Google Scholar
  3. Bies, R.J., Bartunek, J.M., Fort, T.L., & Zald, M.N. (2007). Corporations as social change agents: Individual, interpersonal, institutional, and environmental dynamics. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 788–793.Google Scholar
  4. Burke, L., & Logsdon, J.M. (1996). How corporate social responsibility pays off. Long Range Planning, 29(4), 495–502. doi: 10.1016/0024-6301(96)00041-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carroll, F. Hoy and J. Hall, A. (1987).The integration of corporate social policy into strategic management, In S. P. Sethi and C. M. Falbe (eds), Business and Society: Dimensions of Conflict and Cooperation, pp. 449-470, Lexington Books, Lexington, MA.Google Scholar
  6. Driver, M. (2006). Beyond the stalemate of economics versus ethics: Corporate social responsibility and the discourse of the organizational self. Journal of Business Ethics, 66, 337–356. doi: 10.1007/s10551-006-0012-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Galbreath, J. (2006). Corporate social responsibility strategy: strategic options, global considerations. Corporate Governance, 6(2), 175–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Godfrey, P.C. (2005). The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth: A risk management perspective. Academy of Management Review, 30(4), 777–798.Google Scholar
  9. Godfrey, P.C., & Hatch, N.W. (2007). Researching corporate social responsibility: An agenda for the 21st century. Journal of Business Ethics, 70(1), 87–98. doi: 10.1007/s10551-006-9080-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jarzabkowski, P. (2005). Strategy as practice - an activity based approach. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  11. Kaplan, S. (2007). Book review of strategy as practice: An activity based approach, by Paula Jazabkowski. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 986–990.Google Scholar
  12. Kaplan, S. (2008). Framing contests: Strategy making under uncertainty. Organization Science, 19(5), 729–752. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1070.0340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kleinrichert, D. (2008). Ethics, power and communities: Corporate social responsibility revisited. Journal of Business Ethics, 78(3), 475–486. doi: 10.1007/s10551-006-9339-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mackey, A., Mackey, T.B., & Barney, J.B. (2007). Corporate social responsibility and firm performance: Investor preferences and corporate strategies. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 817–835.Google Scholar
  15. Margolis, J.D., & Walsh, J.P. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 268–305. doi: 10.2307/3556659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Maxfield, S. (2008). Reconciling corporate citizenship and competitive strategy: Insights from economic theory. Journal of Business Ethics, 80, 367–377. doi: 10.1007/s10551-007-9425-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117–127. doi: 10.2307/259398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mintzberg, H. (1990). The design school: Reconsidering the basic premises of strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 11(3), 171–195. doi: 10.1002/smj.4250110302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F.L., & Rynes, S.L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 403. doi: 10.1177/0170840603024003910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pfeffer, J. (1994). Managing with power; politics and influence in organization. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  21. Porter, M.E., & Kramer, M.R. (2006). Strategy & society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78.Google Scholar
  22. Roberts, J. (2003). The manufacture of corporate social responsibility: Constructing corporate sensibility. Organization, 10(2), 249–265. doi: 10.1177/1350508403010002004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Stone, M. M., B. Bigelow and W. Crittenden: 1999, ‹Research on Strategic Management in Nonprofit Organizations Synthesis, Analysis and Future Directions’, Administration and Society 31(3), 378–423.Google Scholar
  24. Suchman, M.C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610. doi: 10.2307/258788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Varadarajan, R.P., & Menon, A. (1988). Cause-related marketing: A coalignment of marketing strategy and corporate philanthropy. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 58. doi: 10.2307/1251450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Weick, K. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations: Thousand Oaks SA: Sage.Google Scholar
  27. Whittington, R. (2006). Completing the practice turn in strategy research. Organization Studies, 27(5), 613–634. doi: 10.1177/0170840606064101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Yin, R.K. (1994). Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ben Gurion University of the NegevBeer-ShevaIsrael

Personalised recommendations